logo
Warning Ryanair could cut even more flights to popular holiday destination

Warning Ryanair could cut even more flights to popular holiday destination

Independent14-04-2025

Ryanair is considering cutting more flights from medium and small Spanish airports next winter and in 2026 if operator Aena AENA.MC does not lower its fees, newspaper El Economista reported on Monday citing the Irish airline's CEO Eddie Wilson.
Regional airports "need low fees to stimulate growth", Wilson told El Economista in an interview, "otherwise the formula will not work", he said, adding that the company would not invest in loss-making operations.
In January Ryanair announced that it is scaling back its flight services in Spain by around 800,000 seats this summer citing 'excessive fees' from airports.
The budget carrier said it planned to reduce its traffic in the country by 18 per cent, which equates to around 12 routes after complaining of Spain 's airport operator Aena's charges and lack of incentives for growth.
While the Spanish government decided to freeze airport charges for five years during the Covid-19 pandemic in 2021, Ryanair claims that Aena has attempted to increase charges every year despite this, especially at Spanish regional airports.
Due to this, the airline said it would cease operations at Jerez airport in southern Spain and Valladolid airport further north and remove one aircraft based in Santiago.
Ryanair CEO Eddie Wilson said at the time that the airline increased its capacity in Spain to boost tourism and employment following the government's commitment to recovery post-Covid.
'However, Aena persists with unjustified rate increases and refuses to implement effective incentive systems to support Spain's regional growth, prioritising foreign investment in airports in the Caribbean, the UK and America', he said.
The largest European airline in terms of passenger numbers said in January that it would reduce flights at seven regional airports in Spain this summer and cancel some 800,000 passenger seats compared to the previous year.
Madrid, Malaga and Alicante, according to El Economista.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Little-known spot in the Canary Islands named 'cheapest' for summer holidays
Little-known spot in the Canary Islands named 'cheapest' for summer holidays

Daily Mirror

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mirror

Little-known spot in the Canary Islands named 'cheapest' for summer holidays

A lesser-known resort in the Canary Islands has been named Spain's best value destination for summer holidays this year - and it's right by some popular hotspots Brits heading to the Canary Islands this summer may want to consider a trip to Tenerife - but not necessarily to famous resorts such as Costa Adeje. If you're looking for Spain holidays on a budget, then the island's Costa del Silencio needs to be on your radar, as it's recently been revealed as the Canaries' best value destination for summer. According to research from TravelSupermarket, a week's holiday in Costa del Silencio comes in at an average of £424pp between May and September, making it the cheapest in rankings out of all the Spanish hotspots compared. "Costa del Silencio offers exceptional value for those seeking summer sun in the Canaries," explained Steph Marinkovic, Head of Editorial at TravelSupermarket. "What's great about this spot is that it's much quieter than Tenerife's busy southern resorts, but it's super affordable. "You've got the amazing golden Montaña Amarilla volcanic formation right on your doorstep - one of Tenerife's most Instagram-worthy natural landmarks – without paying the premium prices you'd expect for such spectacular scenery. The destination is known for excellent snorkelling and diving opportunities in its crystalline waters, as well as easy access to nearby Golf del Sur for affordable golfing." It's worth noting that if you're after Tenerife's iconic nightlife, then this may not be the destination for you, as the name aptly suggests! However if you're looking to make the most of the island's gorgeous beaches, or want to enjoy some of the sunshine without having to brave the crowds, then there's plenty of appeal. That's not to say there's no atmosphere at all; you'll still find plenty of restaurants and bars, but there tends to be more of a laidback vibe to the area. Oh, and if you do want the odd night out or two, it's just a 20-minute drive to popular areas such as Los Cristianos and Playa de las Americas. Costa del Silencio was the top best value destination in the Canaries, but for all Spanish destinations overall it was the charming town of Manilva which took the top spot in the rankings. The tiny seaside town boasts beautiful beaches and vineyards, and sits right by Costa del Sol so you can easily access all of the resort's iconic beaches and party towns. Meanwhile if you're after more Spanish getaway inspiration, you can check out Spain's top 10 best value destinations in the list below: Manilva, Costa del Sol (£371) Costa del Silencio, Tenerife (£424) S'illot, Majorca (£449) Calpe, Costa Blanca (£470) Cala Ratjada, Majorca (£488) Callao Salvaje, Tenerife (£498) Tossa de Mar, Costa Brava (£508) Puerto de la Cruz, Tenerife (£512) Lloret de Mar, Costa Brava (£522) El Arenal, Majorca (£535) Steph added: "Across the top ten, we see a mix of established resort towns and lesser-known gems, giving budget-conscious travellers plenty of options for their summer getaway. No matter your beach holiday style – whether you prefer authentic villages, vibrant resorts, or family-friendly beaches – there's a bargain destination in Spain to match."

Company boss pocketed £150,000 in fraudulent Covid business loans
Company boss pocketed £150,000 in fraudulent Covid business loans

Wales Online

timean hour ago

  • Wales Online

Company boss pocketed £150,000 in fraudulent Covid business loans

Company boss pocketed £150,000 in fraudulent Covid business loans A judge told Zahid Afzal that at a time of national emergency the government had set up a system to help businesses which he had abused A company boss fraudulently obtained £150,000 in loans designed to help businesses hit by the Covid pandemic, a court has heard. Zahid Afzal made two legitimate applications for "Bounce Bank" loans but then used his knowledge of the application process to acquire three more loans he was not entitled to. A judge at Swansea Crown Court told the defendant that at a time of national emergency the government had set up a system to help businesses which he had abused to obtain loans he was not entitled to. ‌ Harry Dickens, prosecuting, told the court that the UK government established "Bounce Back" loans to help small and medium businesses during the coronavirus pandemic, and that the scheme allowed companies to borrow between £2,000 and £50,000 at a low interest rate. ‌ He said the defendant made two legitimate applications for his companies Phones Onn and Phone Bits Ltd to HSBC and NatWest respectively, and the applications were successful. However, he said Afzal subsequently made three more applications to Lloyds, Starling, and Metro Bank during 2020 for the same phone companies and in each case falsely declared there had been no previous applications for those firms. The court heard the defendant also inflated the turnover figures of the firms in order to access the maximum £50,000 loan amounts. Article continues below The prosecutor said the three loan applications were successful and a total of £150,000 was paid into the companies' accounts, much of which was subsequently transferred out into personal accounts. Zahid Afzal, aged 37, of Albert Street, Haverfordwest, Pembrokeshire, had previously pleaded guilty to three counts of fraud by false representation when he appeared in the dock for sentencing. He has no previous convictions. Jon Tarrant, for Afzal, said the defendant employed eight people, and said six of those needed the employment to maintain their UK visas. He said the father-of-three was a successful businessman who had established himself in a positive light to many people but that position "has now been reversed". ‌ He said the defendant's remorse for his "unwise decisions" had been "palpable" during their conferences. For the latest court reports sign up to our crime newsletter Judge Catherine Richards said at a time of nation emergency the UK government had established a system to help businesses that was paid for by society and which "relied on the trust and confidence that each gives the other as a member of this society". She told Afzal he had deliberately abused that by applying for loans he knew he was not entitled to and which, ultimately, were not for business use. ‌ The judge said while she had no doubt the offending justified immediate custody she was concerned that "the public finances are not further prejudiced" by Afzal's actions. She also said she was mindful of the impact of immediate custody on others. With one-quarter discounts for his guilty pleas Afzal was sentenced to two years in prison suspended for two years and was ordered to complete 300 hours of unpaid work. A proceeds of crime investigation will now be launched into the defendant's finances. Article continues below The prosecution barrister said he wanted to out the court on notice that a written application would be made for a restraint order to be made in respect of the defendant's personal Santander bank account which currently contains some £74,000.

Ireland has a US border — it could help travellers nervous about Trump's America
Ireland has a US border — it could help travellers nervous about Trump's America

Metro

time2 hours ago

  • Metro

Ireland has a US border — it could help travellers nervous about Trump's America

Bleary eyes, hours-long lines, and a deep-rooted rumbling of irrational anxiety. The US has a reputation for intimidating border control. There's something about passing through immigration when you land at JFK that makes you wonder if you've accidentally smuggled 30 kilos of coke into your hand luggage. But international travellers arriving from a select group of airports, including Ireland's Dublin and Shannon, breeze through customs — without an American passport. That's because the Irish airports are two of 15 in the world that offer US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Preclearance, which allows travellers to clear US immigration – and the headache that comes with it – before they board. Unless you make a habit of flying from an airport that offers it, preclearance is unlikely to be on your radar. But travelling via Dublin could ease stress for anyone nervous about flying to the US right now. Fuel your wanderlust with our curated newsletter of travel deals, guides and inspiration. Sign up here. So, now you know there has been a US border in Dublin Airport for more than 30 years. Preclearance as a concept, though, has been around much longer. It was first introduced in 1903 for ferry passengers arriving in the US from Victoria, Canada, before being extended to air travel in the 1950s. It's arranged via legal treaty, and in practice, that means that when you arrive on US soil, you do so as a domestic passenger — free to bypass the usual border inspections and skip straight to baggage reclaim. Queues tend to be shorter at preclearance, because there are generally less people passing through. Experts say it can save you hours. Another advantage is that, if the worst occurs and you are refused boarding, you won't be deported — if you live in Ireland, you're already at home. If you're coming from the UK or Europe, at least you're still on the right side of the Atlantic. Preclearance also exists at airports in Aruba, Bermuda, Abu Dhabi and the Bahamas, as well as nine airports in Canada. But Dublin was the first outside of North America — a decision based on the long history of diplomatic relations between Ireland and the USA. Travellers have no choice in the matter — essentially, if you're flying to the USA from Dublin, you have to go through preclearance in the Irish capital. It's worth noting that the workers who process your documents are US border control agents, not Irish airport staff. Some CPB agents are dual-nationals. However it's important to remember they are all American citizens, working for the US government – now the Trump administration – overseas. The main difference is that CBP officers working in Ireland are unarmed, in accordance with Irish law. Metro's Lifestyle Editor, Kristina Beanland, travelled to the Windy City via Dublin in 2023 and shared this account of her trip. 'My friends and I, who had travelled from London, arrived at a small corner of Dublin airport, where there was no one else apart from us and a few customs officers. 'But the strangest part was that you suddenly felt like you were in the USA. There were American accents and uniforms with the stars and stripes on the arm, and signs signalling that you were approaching a US border. 'It was weird, and felt like a slightly annoying stop on the journey – that is, until we arrived at O'Hare and were rewarded with a breezy stroll off the flight, straight to pick up our suitcases and into the waiting cab. In total, it probably took less than an hour to get from the plane to Michigan Avenue. 'That said, on the way home, stopping in Dublin was annoying. We'd already gone through American border control in Chicago, and the stopover was a result of having to take the same inbound route back. 'Fast-forward two years though, and we're living in a world where Donald Trump is President. The idea of passing through a US border that's only a 50-minute flight from home, somehow feels a lot less stressful than doing so on actual American soil.' Rolling out preclearance on foreign soil is not a decision for the US alone. Host nations must see the benefit. Niall Kearns, airport director at Ireland's Shannon Airport, told CNN last year that it's good for business. Fifteen airports outside the US have a US preclearance border: Dublin (Ireland) Shannon (Ireland) Aruba Hamilton (Bermuda) Abu Dhabi (UAE) Nassau (Bahamas) Calgary (Canada) Edmonton (Canada) Halifax (Canada) Montreal (Canada) Ottawa (Canada) Vancouver (Canada) Winnipeg (Canada) Toronoto (Canada) Prince Rupert (Canada) Since Donald Trump returned to the White House, scrutiny has ramped up at the US border, with travellers detained and deported due to visa mix-ups and even content saved on their phones. In February, British graphic artist Rebecca Burke, 28, was detained for 19 days after TSA agents said she had been working in the US illegally (she was doing odd jobs for a host family in return for free accommodation, and no money had exchanged hands). In April, two German tourists were deported after their trip to Hawaii was deemed 'suspicious' because they hadn't booked a hotel. A Lebanese man who is a US citizen (with an American wife) was also detained when he tried to return home after a weekend trip to Canada. In March, an unnamed French scientist was denied entry to the States after airport immigration officers searched his phone and found messages critical of the Trump administration. Last month, Turkish-American streamer Hasan Piker claimed he was detained and questioned for two hours by US Customs and Border Protection agents at Chicago's O'Hare Airport after returning from France. He said agents interrogated him about his political views, including his stance on Trump and Gaza. Piker said the questioning felt 'deliberate'. On Wednesday, the US president resurrected a controversial travel ban from his first term in the White House: a proclamation that bans citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States. Tariffs, travel bans, mass firings – if there's one thing you can be sure about with Donald Trump, it's that he'll make news. Constantly . That's even the case here in the UK, where most of his decisions have no direct impact. But is all that coverage stopping Brits from hopping across the pond for a vacation? If you look at the dry numbers from the US National Travel and Tourism Office, you might think the answer is no. In January, the month of Trump's second inauguration, the number of UK visitors to the US was 5% higher than the previous January. More Trending February and April saw more Brits going to the US than in the same months in 2024, suggesting that far from putting people off, we may even be more keen to visit the country when it's run by Trump. ABTA, the British trade association for the travel industry, tells a similar tale. They 'haven't seen any significant changes in terms of UK-US travel post-Trump administration', a spokesperson told Metro, with 'no noticeable shifts away' from the States. But that may not be the full story. You can read our political reporter Craig Munro's analysis here. MORE: Zelensky refutes Trump's take on war and calls Putin 'murderer who came to kill the kids' MORE: Donald Trump calls Elon Musk 'the man who has lost his mind' and won't talk to him MORE: Teenager dies after inhaling cleaning product in social media 'dusting' challenge

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store