Regulatory gaps in Vietnam supplements market
Suspected counterfeit goods seized by police in Hà Nội. — VNA/VNS Photo
HANOI: Vietnam's dietary supplement market has expanded rapidly over the past decade, reaching a scale of approximately US$2.4bil in 2022, according to Euromonitor.
The sector is expected to grow at a compound annual rate of around 7% from 2023 to 2028.
This growth reflects rising interest in preventative health solutions, influenced by concerns about food safety, environmental quality and the capacity of the healthcare system.
The market also faces increasing scrutiny over product authenticity, advertising practices and regulatory oversight.
A recent case involving a pharmacist, who was arrested for operating a large-scale counterfeit production network, has drawn attention to these issues as authorities seized over 100 tonnes of goods, including unlicensed supplements and medical devices.
Confiscated items included tens of thousands of boxes, bottles, blister packs, labels and packaging materials used to imitate more than 100 different product types.
Initial findings from the Public Security's Institute of Criminal Science Ministry confirmed that two Herbitech products, Medi Kid Calcium K2 and Baby Shark food, were counterfeits. Both were marketed as children's health supplements.
Police are continuing to investigate 115 other Herbitech products suspected of being fake. Retail pharmacies reportedly discovered several of these fake products.
Unlike pharmaceuticals, dietary supplements in Vietnam are not required to undergo clinical trials or centralised safety evaluations.
The current regulatory framework allows products to be introduced to the market through a self-declaration process.
This involves submitting a compliance dossier, a test report from a private laboratory and a public notice, without mandatory assessment by authorities before sale.
Products often include disclaimers stating they are not medicines and are not intended to replace treatment.
However, such statements are sometimes accompanied by unverified claims, including benefits such as enhanced immunity, weight reduction, detoxification or improved cardiovascular health.
Regulatory agencies typically do not assess these claims before market entry.
In cases where violations are found, penalties are often limited, and products may re-enter the market under different branding with the same formula.
Social media platforms have become a significant channel for product promotion, often using influencers and live streaming.
These campaigns frequently feature non-experts presenting products with professional packaging and scripted messaging.
In some cases, pharmacies and clinics have participated in sales and distribution activities, raising questions about professional standards and commercial incentives.
The commercial appeal of dietary supplements, particularly in comparison to prescription medicines, has led to increased participation by a range of sellers, including retired medical professionals and retail pharmacies.
This trend has made it more difficult for consumers to distinguish between evidence-based advice and commercial promotion.
The current system's limited oversight raises concerns about product quality, safety and consumer protection.
Given the market's size and continued growth, several experts and policymakers have called for a review of existing regulations, including stronger scientific evaluation, stricter controls on advertising, and improved enforcement to ensure public health and safety. — Viet Nam News/ANN
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
Singapore property tycoon Ong Beng Seng to plead guilty on July 3 in case involving former transport minister
The 79-year-old was previously scheduled to plead guilty on April 2. - Photo: ST file SINGAPORE: Billionaire Ong Beng Seng, who is facing two charges in a case linked to former transport minister S. Iswaran, will be pleading guilty on July 3. The date was set after his pre-trial conference on Tuesday (June 10). The 79-year-old was previously scheduled to plead guilty on April 2, but the case was adjourned after his lawyers asked for more time to obtain his medical reports. The property tycoon was charged on Oct 4, 2024, with abetting a public servant in obtaining gifts and with abetting the obstruction of justice. Under Section 165, it is an offence for a public servant to accept anything of value from any person with whom he is involved in an official capacity without payment or with inadequate payment. According to court documents, the businessman had in December 2022 allegedly arranged for Iswaran fo fly on Ong's private plane from Singapore to Doha. The flight was valued at US$7,700 (S$10,400). Ong is also said to have arranged for Iswaran a one-night stay at Four Seasons Hotel Doha, valued at $4,737.63, and a business class flight from Doha to Singapore, valued at $5,700. Court documents showed that it was allegedly Ong who alerted Iswaran that the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau had seized the flight manifest for the December 2022 trip. It prompted Iswaran to ask the tycoon to bill him for the flight to avoid investigations. For this alleged offence, Ong was charged with the abetment of obstruction of justice. The businessman is known as the man who brought Formula One (F1) to Singapore in 2008 – the first night race in the sport's history. Iswaran was chairman of the F1 steering committee and the Government's chief negotiator with Singapore GP on business matters related to the race. The two men had worked in the mid-2000s to convince then Formula One Group chief executive Bernie Ecclestone to make Singapore the venue for the sport's first night race. On Oct 3, 2024, Iswaran was handed a 12-month jail term after he pleaded guilty to five charges, including obtaining valuable items as a public servant from Ong and David Lum Kok Seng, managing director of construction company Lum Chang Holdings. Iswaran was placed on the Home Detention Scheme on Feb 7, 2025. On June 6, the Singapore Prison Service said he completed his emplacement on the Home Detention Scheme and that he is no longer under prison custody. - The Straits Times/ANN
The Star
11 hours ago
- The Star
This app is trying to change how people eat
Cheez-Its used to be one of Marissa Gradei's go-to snacks, in part because she thought of them as 'healthier' alternatives to other savory nibbles such as potato chips. That changed three months ago, when Gradei, 27, a social media manager in Fairfax, Virginia, started using a smartphone app called Yuka. The app prompts users to scan the bar codes of food and personal care items – in grocery stores and at home – and then offers a score out of 100 to indicate how 'healthy' it thinks the item is for you or the environment. Gradei's trusty snacks scored a 2 out of 100 – 'bad' for health, according to the app. She hasn't purchased any since. After the Yuka app launched in the United States in 2022, more than 20 million people have downloaded it – a figure that has more than doubled since January 2024. In a recent interview with CNN, Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. said he and his wife 'consider it invaluable'. 'You can go into any grocery store, flash it at any product, and you can get a 'go' or a 'no',' he said. But can the Yuka app accurately portray how good a given food is for your health? And should you rely on an app to guide your food choices in the first place? We asked four nutrition experts. How does it work? The Yuka app originally launched in France in 2017 as a tool to help people quickly understand the healthfulness of certain food and personal care products. It expanded to the United States in 2022. After scanning a product's bar code, the app assigns the product a health value out of 100 – with 100 being the best – and a corresponding colour score of excellent (dark green), good (light green), poor (orange) or bad (red). To generate these scores for certain foods, the app uses an algorithm based on three criteria: the food's nutritional quality (60% of the score), the presence of additives and whether the app deems the additives risky (30%) and whether the food is organic (10%). Yuka uses a European labeling system called Nutri-Score to assess a food's nutritional quality. High protein and high fiber are good, for example; high amounts of sugar, sodium, saturated fats and calories are bad. The company has two full-time employees – one with a toxicology background and one with a food engineering and human nutrition background – who sort through the scientific research on about 600 food dyes, preservatives, thickening agents, artificial sweeteners and other food additives. They classify them as 'high risk', 'moderate risk', 'limited risk' or 'risk-free' based on their potential links to health conditions such as cancer, heart disease, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and infertility. The app is free, although it offers a premium version for between US$10 (RM42) and US$50 (RM211) per year, said Julie Chapon, one of Yuka's co-founders. The premium version includes extra features such as the ability to use the app when your phone is offline. The company does not promote the app through paid advertisements, or take money from food and cosmetics industries, said Chapon, who has a marketing and consulting background. Kennedy's endorsement has most likely helped with awareness, she said, but the app isn't affiliated with the Make America Healthy Again, or MAHA, movement. What do nutrition experts think of Yuka? The app has hit on a real hunger for more clear-cut nutrition information, said Dr Dariush Mozaffarian, director of the Food Is Medicine Institute at Tufts University. 'The public is really confused about what defines a healthy food,' he said. And it can be valuable for people to use their smartphones to help them make better food choices, said Lisa Harnack, a professor of public health nutrition at the University of Minnesota. Anyone can flip over a product and read its nutrition label, she said, but for the average person, it can be burdensome to try to parse the healthfulness of dozens of foods at a time. Scanning a product and glancing at its ranking and color score is much simpler. That said, some experts worry that labelling food as either 'good' or 'bad' can lead to disordered eating. 'I don't like that,' Elaine Siu, a dietitian at the City of Hope cancer center in Duarte, California, said of the labeling system. Instead, she said, people should focus on following a balanced diet overall. This typically involves eating plenty of fruits, vegetables, whole grains, lean sources of protein and healthy fats. And keep in mind that your nutritional needs will vary depending on your health and activity levels, she said, which the Yuka app can't account for. Siu, for instance, advises cancer patients on how to eat. Many are undernourished and could benefit from consuming more calories. But the Yuka app deducts points for high-calorie foods. Several of Siu's patients have refused to drink the nutrition shakes or eat the protein bars she has recommended, she said, because the Yuka app has scored them poorly. Is its rating system trustworthy? The Nutri-Score system that Yuka uses to assess a food's nutritional quality is an 'OK' system, Mozaffarian said. He said he doesn't agree with the idea of penalising foods for calories, since many high-calorie foods can be nutritious. The app labels many nuts and nut butters, for instance, as 'too caloric'. And, Mozaffarian said, it's problematic that Yuka doesn't distinguish between natural sugars and added sugars – the latter of which are most concerning for health. Because there's still a lot we don't know about how food additives affect us, Mozaffarian said, it's 'a little excessive' to devote 30% of the score to their presence. Much of the research Yuka uses to assess the risk level of additives are either observational studies – which can't demonstrate cause and effect – or animal studies that use much higher doses of those additives than what you'd find in food. Animal study results also don't always translate to humans. Siu said she was surprised to see monosodium glutamate, or MSG, categorised as 'high risk'. Although some limited studies have linked the ingredient to conditions such as heart disease and Type 2 diabetes, the amount we normally consume in food has not been shown to cause harm, she said. Siu said she recently used the app on a package of seaweed sheets that contained just 10 calories per serving, and it ranked the product as 'too high' in calories. 'The scoring system is very questionable,' she said. Of the four experts we consulted, none agreed with Yuka's decision to include a food's organic classification in its scoring system. There's no proof of any nutritional benefit from eating organic foods relative to conventionally grown foods, said Melanie Hingle, a professor of nutritional sciences at the University of Arizona. What's the bottom line? The experts largely agreed that it could be beneficial to limit highly processed foods, to which the Yuka app typically gives low scores. Eating unprocessed, whole foods – such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, legumes and whole grains – is associated with reduced risks of various chronic conditions such as Type 2 diabetes, heart disease and some cancers. But you don't necessarily need an app to help you do that. And whole foods typically don't have bar codes you can scan anyway. 'Ideally, the app would include foods that don't come in packages,' Harnack said. 'If these types of foods are missing, it might be easy to overlook some of the best choices in the supermarket.' – ©2025 The New York Times Company This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
New Straits Times
14 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Australia's corporate regulator secures guilty pleas in stock manipulation case
SYDNEY: Four people have pleaded guilty to criminal charges in a local Australian court for their roles in a coordinated scheme to pump up stock prices before dumping them, the country's corporate regulator said on Tuesday. The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) had charged Larissa Quinlan, Kurt Stuart, Emma Summer and Syed Yusuf in July last year for their involvement in a conspiracy to commit market rigging. The four individuals planned which low-value or penny stocks they would promote in public groups called the "ASX Pump and Dump Group" and the "ASX Pump and Dump Channel" on the messaging app Telegram, ASIC said. Over three weeks in September 2021, the group made nine such posts. Before posting, they bought the chosen stocks, hoping the publicity would push their prices up and then sold those shares for a profit once the stock price rose. "ASIC takes breaches of the market manipulation rules very seriously and as demonstrated in this matter, we will not hesitate to take enforcement action where appropriate," ASIC Chair Joe Longo said in a statement, welcoming the guilty verdict. The individuals face a maximum penalty of 15 years' imprisonment and a fine of more than A$1 million (US$651,300) for the conspiracy offence. The matters will be heard in the Sydney District Court in July to obtain a date for a sentence hearing, the ASIC said.
