Study Shows How Plastic Particles In Food, Beverages Can Harm Your Liver
New Delhi:
Microscopic plastic particles found in food and beverages may affect glucose metabolism and harm organs such as the liver, according to a new animal study.
The findings raise concerns about potential health risks in people who consume microplastics (less than 5 millimetre) and nanoplastics (less than 100 nanometre), which can enter the food chain and end up in seafood and other foods people eat.
Previous estimates show that a person may ingest around 40,000 to 50,000 microplastic particles a year through food and beverages, with some estimating exposure to be as high as 10 million particles per year.
"Our observations that oral ingestion of polystyrene nanoplastics contributes to glucose intolerance and signs of liver injury, confirm and extend what has been recently reported on the effects of nanoplastics in animal models," said Amy Parkhurst, a doctoral candidate at the University of California, Davis, US.
For the study, the researchers focused on exposure via oral consumption to mimic nanoparticles found in food and drink.
They gave 12-week-old male mice a standard rodent diet with a daily oral dose of polystyrene nanoparticles. Polystyrene is a widely used plastic commonly found in food packaging and products.
The researchers chose a daily nanoparticle dose of 60 mg per kilogram of body weight, based on human exposure levels and earlier mouse studies that showed health effects at similar amounts.
"We can't control for all the plastics the mice are exposed to," said Parkhurst. "However, our study design allowed us to see dose-correlated changes since the nanoplastics-dosed group would have a higher exposure."
Compared to the control group receiving no polystyrene, the mice consuming nanoplastics exhibited systemic glucose intolerance and elevated alanine aminotransferase, which indicates liver injury.
In the mice consuming polystyrene, the researchers also observed an increase in gut permeability and elevated levels of endotoxin, which contribute to liver dysfunction.
"Our findings warrant further studies to help inform policy around micro and nanoplastics," said Parkhurst.
"Robust scientific evidence plays a key role in shaping monitoring efforts and guiding regulations."
The findings will be presented at the ongoing NUTRITION 2025, the flagship annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition in Orlando.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
18 hours ago
- Hans India
Obesity may lead to anxiety, impair brain functioning
New Delhi: Among the global rise in obesity rates, a study showed that being overweight can lead to mental health issues like anxiety and also impair brain functioning. The animal study suggested that the two conditions may be connected through interactions between the gut and the brain. Conducted in mice, the research linked diet-induced obesity with anxiety-like symptoms, alterations in brain signaling, and differences in gut microbes that may contribute to impaired brain functioning. 'Our findings suggest that obesity can lead to anxiety-like behaviour, possibly due to changes in both brain function and gut health,' said Desiree Wanders, Associate Professor and chair of nutrition at Georgia State University, US. In addition to other risks of obesity such as type 2 diabetes and heart disease, the study focussed on its potential impacts on brain health using a mouse model that develops many of the same obesity-related issues seen in humans. The team subjected six-week mice to a low-fat diet (16) and a high-fat diet (16) for 21 weeks. As predicted, the mice on a high-fat diet weighed significantly more and had significantly more body fat than those fed a low-fat diet. In behavioural tests, the researchers found that the obese mice displayed more anxiety-like behaviours, such as freezing (defensive behaviour mice exhibit in response to a perceived threat), compared with lean mice. These mice also showed different signalling patterns in the hypothalamus -- a region of the brain involved in regulating metabolism, which could contribute to cognitive impairments. In addition, the researchers observed distinct differences in the makeup of gut bacteria in obese mice compared with lean mice. 'These findings could have important implications for both public health and personal decisions,' said Wanders. 'The study highlights the potential impact of obesity on mental health, particularly in terms of anxiety. By understanding the connections between diet, brain health, and gut microbiota, this research may help guide public health initiatives that focus on obesity prevention and early intervention, particularly in children and adolescents.' The findings will be presented at the ongoing NUTRITION 2025, the flagship annual meeting of the American Society for Nutrition in Orlando, Florida.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
a day ago
- Business Standard
US scientists warn that trump's cuts will set off a brain drain
Ardem Patapoutian's story is not just the American dream, it is the dream of American science. He arrived in Los Angeles in 1986 at age 18 after fleeing war-torn Lebanon. He spent a year writing for an Armenian newspaper and delivering Domino's at night to become eligible for the University of California, where he earned his undergraduate degree and a postdoctoral fellowship in neuroscience. He started a lab at Scripps Research in San Diego with a grant from the National Institutes of Health, discovered the way humans sense touch, and in 2021 won the Nobel Prize. But with the Trump administration slashing spending on science, Dr. Patapoutian's federal grant to develop new approaches to treating pain has been frozen. In late February, he posted on Bluesky that such cuts would damage biomedical research and prompt an exodus of talent from the United States. Within hours, he had an email from China, offering to move his lab to 'any city, any university I want,' he said, with a guarantee of funding for the next 20 years. Dr. Patapoutian declined, because he loves his adopted country. Many scientists just setting out on their careers, however, fear there is no other option but to leave. Scientific leaders say that's risking the way American science has been done for years, and the pre-eminence of the United States in their fields. China and Europe are on hiring sprees. An analysis by the journal Nature captured the reversal: Applications from China and Europe for graduate student or postdoctoral positions in the United States have dropped sharply or dried up entirely since President Trump took office. The number of postdocs and graduate students in the United States applying for jobs abroad has spiked. A university in France that created new positions for scientists with canceled federal grants capped applications after overwhelming interest. A scientific institute in Portugal said job inquiries from junior faculty members in the United States are up tenfold over the last two months. 'We are embarking on a major experiment in restructuring the innovative engine in America, and China is the control,' said Marcia McNutt, a geophysicist and the president of the National Academy of Sciences, which was established by President Abraham Lincoln to advise the government on science policy. 'China is not going to cut its research budget in half.' Since the 1950s, when the federal government expanded the National Institutes of Health and created the National Science Foundation as public-private research partnerships, the United States has become the international mecca for science. It was the uniquely American system that President Franklin D. Roosevelt's science adviser, Vannevar Bush, envisioned in his landmark report, 'Science, The Endless Frontier': Federal money enabled scientific discoveries that made American research institutions the envy of the world, and they in turn fueled the rise of the United States as the leader in technology and biotechnology. As that system attracted international talent, it came to depend on the aspiring scientists who come to the United States to work in university labs at low wages for the privilege of proximity to the world's best researchers. They often stay: In the American defense industry and fields like engineering and computer and life sciences, at least half the workers with doctorates are foreign-born. Now, American science finds itself fighting on several fronts as the Trump administration seeks to cut budgets and seal borders, to punish universities for their liberalism and federal health agencies for their responses to Covid. Federal science budgets have been slashed. Stricter immigration policies have spread fear among international scientists working in the United States, and those who had hoped to. Graduate and postdoctoral students have had their visas canceled, or worry they will. The administration cut off funding for international students at Harvard — a judge blocked the move, but other universities worry about being next. Secretary of State Marco Rubio pledged to 'aggressively revoke' the visas of Chinese students in what he called 'critical fields,' which almost certainly includes science, where labs often have more Chinese than American-born graduate students and postdocs. President Trump has worried about the nation losing its scientific edge to 'rivals abroad,' as he wrote in a letter in March to his science adviser, Michael Kratsios. He urged Mr. Kratsios to continue Vannevar Bush's vision, 'recapturing the urgency which propelled us so far in the last century.' Yet Mr. Kratsios argues that philanthropies and industry should pick up more of the cost, and that too much federal science spending goes to bureaucracy. 'Spending more money on the wrong things is far worse than spending less money on the right things,' he said in a speech at the National Academy in May. But even at Johns Hopkins, which has benefited from the philanthropy of former New York Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, those dollars can't make up the shortfall. Industry doesn't typically fund basic research, and it costs more to do research in industry in part because companies, unlike university labs, have to pay competitive wages. 'It's not just the international students, the whole system is on hold because the uncertainty does not allow you to plan,' Dr. Patapoutian said. 'With all these grants frozen or cut, it creates this massive chaos.' Just under half of the graduate students and postdocs in his lab hail from other countries. Now he is seeing less interest from abroad, but like many other lab heads he is not hiring new postdocs anyway: 'Everybody's kind of bolted down making sure we have the funds to keep the people we have.' In the first half of the 20th century, American scientists joined European universities to make fundamental discoveries: the structure of molecules (J. Robert Oppenheimer), the structure of DNA (James Watson). The rise of fascism in Europe drove many Jewish scientists to the United States. After World War II, 'we brought the rocket scientists here,' said Dr. McNutt. 'That's what got us to the moon.' While the logistics and expense of moving entire labs is likely to daunt more established researchers from moving, for postdocs and others just starting their labs, other countries offer the promise of greater stability. 'They are going to be able to recruit the best and brightest, proven people,' Dr. McNutt said. 'They are going to give them labs. They're going to give them equipment and funds, no questions asked.' At Johns Hopkins, which has long received more N.I.H. funding than any other university, Richard Huganir, the chairman of neuroscience, said he is 'terrified' of being unable to enroll international students. His department has 36 labs with 100 graduate students and postdocs, about 30 percent are international. 'For us, it would be losing 30 percent of our work force,' he said. 'They are integral to the whole fabric of American science, and losing that population would be devastating.' Graduate students and postdocs are going home to China and Korea for jobs, he said. Beyond losing talent, Dr. Huganir worries about the increasing isolation of American science. He canceled plans to host an international meeting at Hopkins because foreign scientists did not want to come to the United States; organizers considered moving it to Oxford, in England, but realized international students in the United States would not go because they fear not being allowed back in. Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the nation's top federal health official, this week said he wanted to bar scientists at the N.I.H. and other federal agencies from publishing in leading scientific journals, which he called 'corrupt.' Mathias Unberath, a computer scientist who studies computer-assisted medicine, came to Hopkins from Germany eight years ago. He has 13 doctoral students and two postdocs, all but five from abroad. 'My whole team, including those who were eager to apply for more permanent positions in the U.S., have no more interest,' he said. Those looking for jobs are applying in Europe, 'including some of my superstars,' he said. One American citizen, the recipient of a prestigious Siebel scholarship and an award for best paper, has taken a postdoc in Germany. Dr. Unberath himself was in the hospital with his wife, who had just given birth to their second son, when the first Trump administration suspended H-1B visas — Dr. Unberath had one. Now, he said, even if his students can get visas, they see the cuts to the N.S.F. and N.I.H. and worry they will not be able to get the early career grants they need to earn tenure. 'And if you don't make tenure,' he said, 'well, then what?' Daphne Koller came from Israel to do her Ph.D. in computer science at Stanford, became a professor there and was awarded a MacArthur Fellowship before founding two tech companies, Coursera, which puts university courses online, and Insitro, which uses artificial intelligence to drive drug discovery. Most of the first employees at both companies, she said, were hired right out of universities, and most were foreign-born. 'I would like nothing better than for the U.S. education system to really have the same emphasis on rigor and science and STEM so that we can train great scientists and engineers here,' Dr. Koller said. 'That would be incredible, but it doesn't happen magically. Even if that were ultimately the case, it's wonderful for a country to be in the unique position where it is the beacon, the magnet for the best and brightest from all over the world.' No institution has been more affected than Harvard, as the administration has made it an example of what it sees as the woke excesses of higher education. Rudolf Pisa, in a cell biology lab there, lost the N.I.H. grant that helps postdoctoral researchers transition to running their own labs. He came from the Czech Republic to do his Ph.D. at Rockefeller University in New York because he believed the American approach to science was 'brave.' His wife, a neuroscientist at Boston University, is American, but fears it is only a matter of time before her grant is canceled, too. They are looking for jobs in Europe. 'Two months ago I would not have thought of any of this,' Dr. Pisa said. He had considered himself a good investment for the United States. His work at Rockefeller helped lead to a patent and then a company to design cancer drugs that would be less likely to develop resistance over time. 'We created jobs,' he said. 'There's more out of it than just the papers.' The head of Dr. Pisa's lab, Tom Rapoport, said five of his students had their visas revoked before a judge temporarily restored them. He also lost the federal grant that funds his lab — despite a perfect score from N.I.H reviewers. He may have to reduce his lab from 14 people to eight, only one of them is American. Dr. Rapoport knows well how political turbulence affects science. His parents fled Nazism in Germany and Austria to train and work in the United States: His mother was a pediatrician, his father a biochemist who discovered how to prolong the shelf life of blood, which the U.S. military used to save countless service members. They left after being blacklisted as members of the Communist Party, ending up in East Germany. Dr. Rapoport was a professor there until the fall of the Berlin Wall; after, he had trouble getting a position, he said, because universities were suspicious of those from the East. He joined Harvard in 1995 because he admired the innovation and rigor of American science. 'This is scientific heaven,' he said. 'Or it used to be.' He worries that Americans don't appreciate how the system has worked for so long. 'Many people look at us as just parasites,' he said. 'All the medicines that people take, they were all developed in the U.S. There's essentially nothing developed by anyone else. We are on the top of the whole thing, and we're really risking it all.'
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
Could your morning coffee be the secret for longer life? Harvard study reveals new benefits
For millions of women who begin their mornings with a cup of coffee, new research suggests that this daily habit may offer more than just a caffeine boost. A 30-year study tracking nearly 50,000 women found that moderate consumption of caffeinated coffee in midlife is associated with healthier aging—physically, mentally, and emotionally. Presented at the annual Nutrition 2025 meeting of the American Society for Nutrition in Orlando, the study analyzed data from participants of the long-running Nurses' Health Study. Women between ages 45 and 60 provided dietary and health information starting in 1984, including details about their caffeine intake from sources like coffee, tea, cola, and decaf coffee. Caffeinated Coffee Stands Out Among Beverages The research showed that women who aged well—defined as reaching at least 70 without major chronic diseases, cognitive decline, memory complaints, or physical disabilities—tended to consume an average of 315 milligrams of caffeine per day. That's roughly equal to three small cups of regular coffee. More than 80% of the caffeine came from coffee, and each additional cup per day was linked to a 2% to 5% greater likelihood of healthy aging . However, other caffeinated beverages like tea, soda, and decaf coffee did not show the same benefit. According to Dr. Sara Mahdavi, the study's lead researcher and a postdoctoral fellow at Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, coffee's unique mix of bioactive compounds may be responsible for its impact on aging. Lifestyle Matters, But Coffee Plays a Role Dr. Mahdavi emphasized that while moderate coffee intake might offer some protection, it should be viewed within the context of a broader healthy lifestyle. She noted that women who consumed one to three cups daily in their 50s were more likely to maintain good cognitive, physical, and mental health into older age, even after adjusting for diet, exercise, and smoking. 'These results, while preliminary, suggest that small, consistent habits can shape long-term health,' Mahdavi said. She added that people who already consume coffee moderately—typically two to four cups per day—may include it as part of a healthy routine, though it's not recommended to start drinking coffee just for these benefits. Not Everyone Benefits Equally The findings also pointed to a genetic component. In related research, Mahdavi and her team examined how caffeine metabolism affects health outcomes. Individuals who metabolize caffeine slowly—due to specific genetic traits—might face increased risks of kidney issues if they consume large quantities of coffee. In this group, heavy coffee consumption was linked to a higher likelihood of hypertension, albuminuria, and kidney hyperfiltration. This suggests that for slow metabolizers, more coffee isn't necessarily better. For most, however, up to two cups a day appears safe and could be beneficial. Future research by Mahdavi's team will investigate how bioactive coffee compounds interact with metabolic and genetic markers of aging. The goal is to create more personalized dietary guidance that considers individual health profiles and genetic traits. While past studies have linked coffee to reduced risks of death and chronic diseases, this new research is among the first to explore coffee's influence across multiple dimensions of aging over several decades. The results add to the growing body of evidence that a moderate, consistent coffee habit—especially when paired with healthy lifestyle choices—may play a role in supporting a longer, healthier life.
