Dodgy boxes: Could I get in trouble for owning one after recent court cases?
Dodgy boxes are back in the news are they?
They are, for a couple of reasons. A
man appeared before Trim District Court
on Wednesday charged with selling the boxes and other technical equipment that had the potential to deprive
Sky Television
of almost €750,000 in revenue, the court was told. He was jailed for 3½ years.
Separately, and almost simultaneously, the same broadcaster alleged during a High Court hearing that
another man may have earned up to €450,000
a year from operating a different dodgy service.
So these dodgy boxes are definitely illegal are they?
They are and they aren't. The dodgy boxes – or Android boxes, which is what they are properly called – are not at all illegal.
What do you mean?
Android is an entirely legitimate operating system that runs on multiple technologies including phones, tablets and Fire Sticks.
READ MORE
But if Android boxes are legit, why are all these people coming before the courts?
The boxes are fine, but they can allow people to do illegal things. Apps can be easily installed that allow people to stream copyrighted content from the internet on to their televisions, tablets or phones. The people who are ending up in court are the ones selling the boxes preloaded with the dodgy apps and selling codes that give access to the platforms where copyrighted content can be found.
Could a humble dodgy box owner get into trouble? I am asking for a friend.
Well, Sky Ireland chief executive JD Buckley said this week that the company 'continuously evolves our investigative strategies to crack down on illegal streaming and protect consumers from risks including malware, fraud and identity theft. Further action will follow with consequences for those identified as operating illegal services and for those who watch them.'
Consequence? Those who watch them? Sounds worrying.
It does seem to suggest Sky would target end users of the boxes, but that may be a stretch. Knowingly circumventing restrictions and accessing copyrighted content could leave people exposed to prosecution for sure, but there are hundreds of thousands of dodgy box owners out there. Ireland's courts service, already groaning under the strain of its caseload, would probably not be delighted by moves against all of those watching copyrighted content for free.
Garda sources have even expressed doubt the force would have jurisdiction when it comes to the use of such boxes, suggesting it would be a civil, rather than criminal, matter.
[
Dodgy boxes and suspect streaming: can Irish viewers be persuaded away from illegal services?
Opens in new window
]
And this is all a Sky thing is it?
No, not at all. Sky is a key player in Irish broadcast and is the pre-eminent broadcaster of many hugely popular sports, including the English Premier League. Many, many people unwilling to pay the monthly subscription costs or pay-per-view charges use the dodgy boxes to access the content for free, which is why Sky is often found front and centre in the war on illegal streamers. But there is a broader umbrella group also fighting against the tide of streamers.
And who are they?
They are called the Federation Against Copyright Theft (
Fact
) and they have taken multiple actions against dodgy box operators in recent years. It says many consumers are unaware that piracy networks are often linked to organised crime, with their profits potentially funding other illegal activities.
The
London
-based group, has said they have been successful in shutting down thousands of prohibited streams, and have brought about the demise of services for those using the illegal operations. Social media profiles selling dodgy boxes have also disappeared while subscriptions have been terminated and paid settlements agreed.
So that is the end of streamers is it?
Hmm, it seems unlikely that the thousands of Irish homes that access movies, TV programmes and sport are just going to stop. The war on pirated content appears to be a long way from over.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
5 hours ago
- Irish Times
Homeowners can ‘save more than €3,500 a year' with energy-efficient technology
Homeowners using energy-efficient technologies such as solar panels, heat pumps and electric-vehicle home chargers can save more than €3,500 a year, a report says. As well as reporting big savings, people who have taken the most energy-efficient approach to their homes say they get additional benefits including enhanced levels of comfort, according to Electric Ireland's sustainability index. Despite the benefits, however, a significant portion of the population feel unable to invest in such technologies due to the upfront costs and a lack of clear guidance. A total of 13 per cent of those who took part in the survey said they had solar panels installed; 11 per cent owned heat pumps and 7 per cent had EV chargers. READ MORE Respondents said there were clear cost benefits to these new technologies. Householders generating energy through solar panels reported perceived savings averaging €91 a month on energy bills. Those with heat pumps said they saved an average of €77 monthly. EV owners reported average savings of €128 a month on fuel costs. The cumulative monthly savings for people with all three technologies comes in at €296 monthly or €3,552 over a year. While financial savings were listed as the leading benefits, some respondents also spoke of additional benefits: 60 per cent of heat pump owners said their homes were more comfortable as a result and 46 per cent said convenience was another benefit. Despite benefits of such technology, the Electric Ireland sustainability index shows that willingness to make the switch to more energy-efficient technologies remains low beyond the early adopters. For those who have yet to make any home energy-efficiency upgrades, few have active plans to do so. Just 22 per cent are considering solar panels with only 12 per cent considering heat pumps or EV chargers. The most commonly cited barrier is cost, with nearly 60 per cent saying the upfront cost was a key deterrent. 'What Electric Ireland's new sustainability index reveals is that the long-term benefits of more energy-efficient technologies are clear – but the upfront costs can be challenging' Electric Ireland's Noeline Gibbons said. She said the average cost of a solar PV system was €8,000 to €10,000 and when SEAI grants were included most households saw a return on investment within four to six years. 'We are acutely aware that many families and individuals want to start the energy transition, but struggle with upfront costs and a lack of information,' she said. Beyond cost concerns, others reported that the process of accessing grants felt like too much hassle or said they were unsure if the investment would pay off in the long term. Ms Gibbons said a lack of information and the ease of sticking to current habits were also noted by some as factors holding people back. Awareness of available grants was limited with less than 40 per cent familiar with government support schemes. 'Our sustainability index show that many consumers who are considering switching to more sustainable energy lifestyles simply don't know where to begin – and the range of options can feel complex and daunting so there is a clear need for simple accessible information,' Ms Gibbons said. The sustainability index was conducted by Red C Research between April 2nd and April 10th, with a nationally representative survey of 1,026 adults.
Irish Times
6 hours ago
- Irish Times
Men arrested in Greystones after home burglary interrupted by gardaí
Two men were arrested in Greystones after gardaí were called to the scene of a burglary at a home in the Wicklow town on Thursday afternoon. Gardaí from the Wicklow North Community Engagement area arrested the men in their 40s under Operation Thor, which was initially set up to tackle rural burglaries across the country. The arrests were made at around 2:30pm after gardaí responded to a report of an incident at a home. When they arrived at the property they conducted a search and discovered the men attempting to flee the scene. READ MORE They were found to be in possession of a bag with items that were identified as belonging to the homeowners. The items were subsequently returned to the owners. The two men were brought to Bray Garda station where they were being detained under Section 4 of the Criminal Justice Act, 1984. Investigations are ongoing.
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
House search in Annie McCarrick murder investigation continues
The search for the remains of murdered Annie McCarrick , who disappeared in south Dublin in 1993, has continued into a second week. Gardaí are determined to definitively rule out a Dublin property as a possible burial site. The dig operation is taking place on the grounds of a house in Clondalkin that was previously linked to the suspect. It has involved significant excavation work to the rear of the property. The house has been renovated and extended since it was purchased about 15 years ago by its current owners, who have no connection to the case. Gardaí have used mini diggers, Kango hammers and other machinery to excavate a section that has been built on in the period since Ms McCarrick disappeared. READ MORE Gardaí are acting on a tip-off that something related to the case - either Ms McCarrick's remains or other evidence - may have been buried there in the 1990s. Ms McCarrick, who was from New York, was 26 when she went missing and had been living in Sandymount, south Dublin. A cadaver dog, believed to be the same animal that found Tina Satchwell's remains buried under her home in Youghal, Co Cork, in 2023, has been used to check the site in the event Ms McCarrick's body was there. The people who currently own the home have moved out pending the completion of the search. The Irish Times has made efforts to contact the chief suspect for Ms McCarrick's murder since his release, without charge , from Garda custody last Friday. However, nobody appeared to be at his home in the east of the country on Thursday and calls also went unanswered. A wealthy businessman in his 60s, he was arrested last Thursday morning on suspicion of Ms McCarrick's murder and his home was searched. It was the first arrest in the inquiry, which has continued for more than 32 years. The man was interviewed for the maximum 24 hours allowed under law and was then released from Irishtown Garda station in Dublin's south inner city, pending further investigations. The suspect denies any wrongdoing and, as he faces no charges, there are no restrictions on his movements and no requirement for him to surrender his passport. The man knew Ms McCarrick well from her time studying and working in Dublin and Kildare from the late 1980s into the 1990s. They were close at one point and he was spoken to, along with many others who knew Ms McCarrick, around the time she disappeared. She was seen by her flatmates in her rented accommodation at St Cathryn's Court, Sandymount, on the morning of March 26th, 1993. When she failed to show up for work over the following two days and did not keep a dinner date with friends the evening after her last confirmed sighting, they became concerned and reported her missing on March 28th. There were reported sightings of her on the day she disappeared. These were in Enniskerry, Co Wicklow and in Glencullen, Co Dublin. They have since been discounted. Gardaí believe Ms McCarrick was killed in south Dublin, or at least met her killer close to her home, and that she was murdered and her body disposed of by the time the alarm was raised. She was said to have told US-based friends that the man arrested last week was harassing her just before she disappeared and that he had struck her when he was drinking. Those concerns were passed on to gardaí in 1993, though Ms McCarrick's friends do not believe they were acted on.
