Do You Have Your Cootie Shot?
A sudden and mysterious outbreak of communicable disease began recently in my apartment building in Manhattan. Three 7-year-olds, a boy and two girls, were sharing the elevator one day with a caretaker and a random adult (me). The boy was leaning against the back of the elevator, between the two girls. 'Help! I'm in a girl sandwich,' he said. 'If I'm not careful, I'm going to get cooties!'
'Kids still play Cooties?' I asked, surprised that cooties were not a relic of my Boomer childhood but had endured into the 21st century, still sparking alarm, feigned or real, among the young. 'Yeah-huh,' the boy said. One of the girls piped up: 'I know how to give a cootie shot.' She demonstrated on her own shoulder, her technique a bit of a blur.
The kids and their caretaker got off on their floor, leaving me to ponder the cootie phenomenon for the first time in many decades. Beyond being amused, I was struck by the morbid salience of a children's game that mimics infection at a time when vaccine skepticism is on the rise and an outbreak of a non-pretend disease, measles, is threatening the lives of children in the Southwest. I learned that there is a vibrant if slender slice of academic literature on 'preadolescent cootie lore,' as one scholar puts it, and that this goofy grade-school fixation is more closely tied to real public-health concerns than you might think if your cootie expertise derives only from the playground.
What exactly are cooties? Since at least the 1960s, field researchers have collected definitions of varying specificity from grammar-school respondents: 'boys' germs,' 'girls' germs,' 'something that kills you,' 'like germs, it has germs on it,' 'where somebody licks the bottom of the chair or eats paper.' Other experts speak of cooties in more anthropological terms. The University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee folklorist Simon J. Bronner has characterized cooties as a 'ritualized affliction.' In their seminal 1976 book, One Potato, Two Potato: The Folklore of American Children, Herbert and Mary Knapp described cooties as a kind of sport. 'There are no supervised Cootie leagues, but more people in the United States have played Cooties than have played baseball, basketball, and football combined,' they wrote. 'It's our unofficial national game.'
Cooties certainly have something to do with hygiene. According to a (somewhat gross) analysis by Lawrence A. Hirschfeld, an anthropologist at the New School for Social Research, cooties are 'a social contaminant that pass from one child to another,' made up of 'the invisible particulates associated with germs, farts, or 'boogers.'' They seem to draw upon children's anxieties about illness and doctors but also gender, reflecting the confusing mix of flirtation and social opprobrium attached to boy-girl relations (and not entirely absent from adult life). Beyond that, Hirschfeld concludes, 'Cootie lore is not conceptually orderly.'
Cootie history is clearer. The word itself began life as a British colonial term, probably a corruption of kutu, a Malay word for lice and other biting insects. American soldiers picked it up, as it were, from their allies during World War I. A New York Times report from 1918, headlined 'Doughboys Lose Cooties,' described soldiers who 'scratch with a vengeance' lining up at a 'Disinfecting Plant' run by the American Red Cross. One 'lanky New England lad' exclaims, 'I've got all the cooties in France.' In the 1920s, games referencing cooties became popular at bridal showers, in honor of grooms who had served in Europe (and also provoked, perhaps, by sublimated anxiety about other communicable diseases they might have brought home). One version involved drawing separate parts of a bug, based on rolls of a dice, until a winner had a completed louse. This practice evolved into Cootie, the game in which kids assemble plastic insects with fiddlehead-fern-like proboscises, which was introduced nationwide in 1949 and is still manufactured today.
The invisible-particulate form of cooties appears to have hit American playgrounds sometime in the 1930s, but surveys suggest that it didn't become ubiquitous until the early '50s, at the height of the polio epidemic. Before the polio vaccine was introduced in 1955, tens of thousands of children were catching the disease every year; thousands of them died, and more were left paralyzed. In his book Explaining Traditions: Folk Behavior in Modern Culture, Bronner writes that cooties and cootie shots—'circle circle, dot dot' being one classic formulation—were a way for children 'to dramatize the dread of the disease.' Cooties was also popular during the '80s, when kids were hearing a lot about AIDS.
This kind of imitative play—not just Cooties but also House or Cops and Robbers—helps children make sense of the world. Like nursery rhymes, it can also be commentary, even a kind of satiric outsider art. As Iona Opie, a pioneering British children's folklorist, once observed: 'Step into the playground; a kind of defiant lightheartedness envelops you. The children are … making fun of life.' This was apparently very much the case during the early days of the coronavirus pandemic. Bronner told me that while schools were shut down and kids were isolated at home, they began sending one another memes in which cooties tended to represent a kind of generalized pandemic funk. Moreover, the senders often depicted themselves as babies—in Bronner's interpretation, a humorous expression of their frustration at not being able to do normal kid things.
I suppose it is comforting that, five years after COVID-19 was first declared a pandemic, my elevator acquaintances had returned to an in-person style of cootie play, acting out their venerable parody of infection and protecting themselves with shots in the arm. But the epidemiological satire takes on an especially dark cast when it expresses more faith in the power of vaccination than does the current secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Kennedy has dismissed the scientifically proven efficacy of the polio vaccine as 'mythology,' despite polio having been considered eradicated in the U.S. since 1979. (Before he was confirmed, a spokesperson noted: 'Mr. Kennedy believes the polio vaccine should be available to the public and thoroughly and properly studied.' Not quite a full-throated endorsement.) He has also sown doubt about vaccines at a time when vaccine hesitancy is fueling a historic and frightening measles outbreak in the Southwest, which has now infected more than 600 people in the U.S. and killed two unvaccinated children in Texas—the first measles deaths in America in a decade. An adult who died in New Mexico was also found to be infected with measles. (Outside the U.S., the health secretary of Chihuahua, Mexico, announced that an unvaccinated man had died of measles in connection with the Texas outbreak.)
Kennedy has spoken about the benefits of the MMR vaccine but also continues to undermine its safety and efficacy. He has repeatedly emphasized parental choice in vaccination and, as The Atlantic reported, told the grieving father of one Texas child, 'You don't know what's in the vaccine anymore.' He insists on promoting unproven alternative treatments such as cod-liver oil (a source of vitamin A), antibiotics, and steroids; in a Fox News interview, he claimed that these can lead to 'an almost miraculous and instantaneous recovery.' According to actual virologists, this is a prodigious exaggeration of vitamin A's efficacy, and in the case of the other supposed miracle cures, it's pure invention.
A cootie shot might be an even more fanciful treatment, but, unlike with vitamin A, overdoing it won't lead to liver damage, which Texas pediatricians told The New York Times they are now seeing in unvaccinated young patients, whose parents were presumably paying Kennedy heed. When so many adults seem intent on returning to the Dark Ages, we must cherish medical wisdom wherever we find it. In 2025, the cootie shot stands as an inadvertent rebuke to the nation's top health official, in that it emphasizes vaccines' very real efficacy against disease. I wonder if the HHS secretary has ever heard this anecdote from his own family history. On February 25, 1923, his grandmother Rose Kennedy recorded the following in her journal: 'Joe Jr. and Jack have a new song about the Bedbugs and the Cooties. Also a club where they initiate new members by sticking pins into them.' Did RFK Jr.'s uncles (who had likely received smallpox vaccinations) invent cootie shots? A topic for further research.
Article originally published at The Atlantic
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


UPI
14 hours ago
- UPI
Childhood trauma linked to higher risk of endometriosis in adult women
1 of 2 | Endometriosis affects one in 10 women in the United States and can cause chronic and frequently severe pelvic pain. A new study has found that women who experienced childhood traumas are at heightened risk to develop the condition as adults. Photo by cottonbro studio/ Pexels ST. PAUL, Minn., June 11 (UPI) -- A suspected link between childhood trauma and the risk of developing endometriosis in later life was strengthened Wednesday with the publication of study that showed a greater chance of the condition among women with histories of difficult childhoods. The study of hundreds of thousands of women in Sweden found those who as children experienced substance abuse, had a teenage or mentally ill parent, financial problems or a death in the family were linked to a 20% increased risk of an endometriosis diagnosis compared to women who had not been exposed. However, the risk was much greater for girls exposed more than one of those factors, rising to 60%, while those who witnessed or were subjected to violence saw more than twice the risk of developing endometriosis later in life compared to women who had not been exposed, the Swedish authors reported. The study published in the British medical journal Human Reproduction builds on earlier findings that women who experienced physical and sexual abuse as children had a 79% higher risk of developing the painful condition, which affects one in 10 reproductive-age women in the United States. Lead author Dr. Marika Rostvall, a physician and doctoral student in the Department of Global Public Health at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm, told UPI the findings provide more evidence of the strong connection between mental and physical health. The findings "support previous studies in other areas of medicine suggesting that the mind and body are intimately connected and that psychologically taxing events can have biological consequences," she said in emailed comments. Endometriosis usually affects women in their 20s and 30s, and while there are a handful known risk factors such as starting menstruation early and having a lean body type, the cause remains unknown. The problems stem from the behavior of tissues known as endometrium, which under normal circumstances are found only in the inner lining of a woman's uterus. Those tissues grow to a thick, blood vessel-rich layer during the menstrual cycle to prepare for possible implantation of an embryo, and then shed the blood at the end of the cycle if there is no embryo present. But in some cases, endometrium behave abnormally and start growing outside of the uterus. When they do so, they can attach themselves to the ovaries, fallopian tubes, bowel, bladder or other parts of the body, triggering frequently severe pelvic pain as they carry out their monthly thickening function. As a result, endometriosis can cause excessive bleeding and even infertility -- which is the case for up to half of women with the condition -- as well as cysts, scar tissue and adhesions. Those in turn can trigger chronic pain, including during with sexual intercourse as well as during urination or bowel movements. The Swedish researchers began by looking at the health records of more 1.3 million women born in in the country between 1974 and 2001, eventually narrowing it down to 24,000 who were diagnosed with endometriosis. They then tapped several national registers to track their childhood experiences, looking for evidence of trauma or difficulties, including crimes such as violence and sexual abuse. The results, they said, demonstrate the importance of considering "the whole person" not just the symptoms of endometriosis. The negative physical consequences of psychological trauma can perhaps be traced to a compromised ability of the immune system to protect against the condition, or even in how the body perceives pain, Rostvall said. "I think the immune system is an interesting part of the puzzle when it comes to trying to understand why some women develop endometriosis," she said. "Chronic inflammation is a big part of the disease, and it has also been shown that women with endometriosis have a higher incidence of autoimmune disorders compared to healthy women. "There is a lot of interesting research being done in the area, and a deeper understanding of exactly how the immune system functions in relation to endometriosis could potentially help bring forward new kinds of treatment." Like some other women's health issues, the pain of endometriosis is often dismissed and sufferers have reported negative experiences with healthcare professionals, often in the form of providers "trivializing" symptoms, which can cause feelings of loneliness and alienation. This, in turn, can make obtaining a diagnosis difficult and prompt some to choose to avoid engaging with doctors altogether. A British psychological-based study from last year showed some women who suffered symptoms felt they had experienced a form of "medical gaslighting" in which they were made to doubt their own perceptions of pain. Rostvall said these kinds of experiences are especially relevant when the patients are women who come from socially and psychologically traumatic backgrounds. "A lot of women presenting with pain, especially socioeconomically disadvantaged women and women with psychiatric comorbidities, who are more likely to have experienced childhood adversity, have their pain dismissed. They then have to wait for a long time to receive a diagnosis and treatment, potentially allowing the condition to worsen," she said. "I think physicians should be aware of the complex linkage between the mind and body in general and be more open to listening to their patients' stories, take their pain seriously, and offer a thorough physical examination."


Boston Globe
a day ago
- Boston Globe
Jillian Sackler, philanthropist who defended husband's legacy, dies at 84
Arthur Sackler died in 1987 — nine years before the opioid OxyContin was marketed by the company as a powerful painkiller. Shortly after his death, his estate sold his share of the company to his billionaire brothers, Raymond and Mortimer, for $22.4 million. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up The company's misleading advertising claim that OxyContin was nonaddictive prompted doctors to overprescribe it beginning in the 1990s. The proliferation of the medication ruined countless lives of people who became dependent on it. Advertisement In 2021, the company proposed a bankruptcy settlement in which members of the Sackler family agreed to pay $4.2 billion over nine years to resolve civil claims related to the opioid crisis. In return, they sought immunity from future lawsuits. In 2024, the US Supreme Court struck down that deal. A revised settlement was reached in 2025, with the Sacklers and Purdue agreeing to pay $7.4 billion without receiving immunity. The first payment, within three years, included $1.5 billion from the Sacklers and nearly $900 million from Purdue. Advertisement But the backlash from the crisis prompted universities and cultural institutions — including the Louvre and the Metropolitan Museum of Art — to obliterate the Sackler name from programs, buildings, and galleries, and to declare that they would no longer accept any philanthropy from the family. Jillian Sackler — a British native who was made a dame by Queen Elizabeth II in 2005 for her philanthropic work — mounted a concerted publicity campaign to absolve her husband of any complicity or culpability, repeatedly reminding the public that he had died long before the scandal erupted. While she stopped short of saying that the drug was the 'root cause' of the opioid crisis, she accused the company of misleading advertising. She told The Guardian that the other members of the family 'have a moral duty to help make this right and to atone for any mistakes made.' As for Arthur, she added: 'I think he would not have approved of the widespread sale of OxyContin.' The couple were avid art collectors and patrons. One art scholar described Arthur Sackler as 'a modern Medici.' The couple was associated with major cultural and academic institutions like the Arthur M. Sackler Gallery at the Smithsonian Institution; the Sackler Wing at the Metropolitan Museum; the Arthur M. Sackler Museum at Harvard University (now part of the Harvard Art Museums); the Arthur M. Sackler Sciences Center at Clark University; and the Arthur M. Sackler Center for Health Communications and the Sackler School of Graduate Biomedical Sciences, both at Tufts University. After Arthur Sackler died, his wife continued his philanthropic agenda. Donations from his estate and insurance benefits helped finance the Jillian and Arthur M. Sackler Wing of Galleries at the Royal Academy of Arts in London, the Arthur M. Sackler Museum of Art and Archaeology at Peking University, the Arthur M. Sackler Colloquia at the National Academy of Sciences, and Studio International, an art magazine. Their name was removed from some, but not all, of those institutions. Advertisement Gillian Lesley Tully was born on Nov. 17, 1940, in Stoke-on-Trent, in central England south of Manchester. She changed the spelling of her first name when she moved to the United States to be with Arthur Sackler, whom she met in 1967 when he was visiting London; they married in 1980. Her father, Kenneth Tully, worked at Midland Bank (now HSBC UK). He married a colleague, Doris Queenie-Gillman Smith. Ms. Sackler had a younger brother, Brian Tully, who died in 2019, leaving her no immediate survivors except for Arthur Sackler's children from an earlier marriage. Among them is Elizabeth Sackler, a philanthropist who has described the estimated $13 billion amassed by her aunts and cousins during the opioid crisis as 'morally abhorrent.' Jillian Sackler attended New York University. The couple moved into a home on Park Avenue in Manhattan, where she continued to live after her husband's death. In her role as president and CEO of the Dame Jillian and Dr. Arthur M. Sackler Foundation for the Arts, Sciences and Humanities, Sackler referred to the other branches of her husband's family as the 'OxySacklers.' In an opinion piece in The Washington Post in 2019, she wrote that her husband had been smeared through 'guilt by association.' Advertisement 'Neither Arthur nor his heirs had anything to do with the manufacture or marketing of OxyContin,' she asserted. 'Suggestions that his philanthropy is now somehow tainted are simply false.' She added: 'Arthur is not here to answer back, but I can tell you that blaming him for OxyContin's marketing, or for any other wrongdoing by the pharmaceutical industry, is as ludicrous as blaming the inventor of the mimeograph for email spam.' This article originally appeared in
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
L'Oréal to acquire majority stake in British skincare brand Medik8
L'Oréal Group has signed an agreement to acquire a majority stake in UK-based skincare brand Medik8. Inflexion, a European mid-market private equity company, will retain a minority share post-transaction. The acquisition is a strategic move by L'Oréal to bolster its Luxe division with a brand that has a strong foundation in scientific research and innovation. Medik8's performance and potential for international expansion make it a valuable addition to L'Oréal's portfolio. L'Oréal will begin to consolidate Medik8's sales following the transaction's closure. The agreement grants L'Oréal rights to eventually acquire the remaining shares held by minority shareholders. L'Oréal LUXE president Cyril Chapuy stated: 'We are delighted to welcome Medik8 to the L'Oréal family. As a premium skincare range, with high levels of proven efficacy at an accessible price point, Medik8 perfectly complements our existing skincare portfolio. 'We share a strong belief in Medik8's global potential and are excited to embark on this journey together, to build a powerful and impactful brand presence worldwide.' Completion of the transaction is anticipated in the summer or early autumn of 2025, pending regulatory approvals. Founded by scientist Elliot Isaacs, Medik8 is known for its CSA Philosophy: Vitamin C plus Sunscreen by day, Vitamin A by night. Medik8's has expanded its omni-channel sales strategy to include major online and offline retailers in Europe and the US. Medik8 CEO Simon Coble stated: 'I am delighted to be joining forces with a company which shares our vision for the brand's future growth and whose core values align with our deep commitment to science, innovation and above all, results without compromise. I look forward to the next stage in Medik8's journey, as we work together to bring our innovative products to a wider audience.' "L'Oréal to acquire majority stake in British skincare brand Medik8" was originally created and published by Retail Insight Network, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data