
Changes to law would give police ‘licence to kill', UK rights groups warn
Police want changes to the law giving them 'a licence to kill', leading rights groups have warned as the government prepares to give officers new protections from prosecution.
A government-ordered review into police accountability is expected to report within weeks. It followed fears of a walkout by angry armed officers in London after a police marksman, Martyn Blake, was tried for murder over the shooting of Chris Kaba. Blake was acquitted in October by a jury in three hours.
Police say they want the system to be fairer and protect officers who use force as part of their duties. Rights groups believe the system holding police to account is already too weak, and diluting it would 'undermine public trust'.
In a letter seen by the Guardian, groups including Inquest, the Centre for Women's Justice, Liberty and Black Lives Matter warn the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, against weakening police accountability.
'This review is less a kneejerk reaction but rather a dangerous and calculated attempt to use a high-profile case to push for less scrutiny and accountability of police actions,' they said.
'The number of cases where police officers are prosecuted for a death is vanishingly small (since 1990 there has only been one successful prosecution of an officer for manslaughter and none for murder).
'2023-24 saw a 10% increase in police use of force and the highest figure of police-related deaths for nearly a decade.
'Our work has exposed disturbing levels of neglect, violence and excessive use of force by police officers, particularly in cases involving Black and racialised people. The institutional impunity afforded the police at an individual and corporate level indicates in most cases that police officers remain above the law.'
Inquest says since 1990 there have been 1,915 deaths following police custody or contact.
Later this year new laws will be introduced giving anonymity to firearms officers who shoot someone, unless they are convicted.
Within weeks, a review conducted by a former judge and former senior Scotland Yard chief will report.
It is looking at whether it should be made harder for inquests to find police unlawfully killed someone. It is also examining whether to make it harder to disprove an officer's claim of self-defence in misconduct inquiries, by changing the standard of proof to the higher criminal test of beyond reasonable doubt, rather than the current civil test which is on the balance of probabilities.
Sign up to Headlines UK
Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning
after newsletter promotion
Susan Alexander, whose son Azelle Rodney was shot dead by police in 2005 while on the way to rob a rival drug gang, said: 'Seeing the police and their representatives now once again invest their energy to try and weaken the ways in which we can hold them accountable is an insult.
'Instead, imagine how many lives could be saved and families spared if they focused on implementing change and listening to us families rather than continuing to shut us out.'
Deborah Coles, the director of Inquest, said: 'This review is a cynical attempt to shield the police from accountability and protect them from the rule of law. Police should not have a licence to kill. The changes they want would, in effect, give them one.'
The government believes it faces a balancing act of ensuring officers have the confidence to use their powers, while also reassuring the public that police are not above the law.
The Home Office was asked to comment.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
5 hours ago
- NBC News
A juror in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex-trafficking trial is expected to be dismissed
A juror in the Sean 'Diddy' Combs sex trafficking trial is expected to be dismissed from the case on Monday over inconsistencies about where he lives. The issue came up this week, five weeks into the trial, during a conversation Juror No. 6 had with the jury department, indicating he had moved to New Jersey a few weeks ago to live with his girlfriend. That conversation sparked another discussion among legal counsels, who pressed for more information. Jurors in the case must live in New York state and district courts have broad discretion to replace a juror for any violation. The juror, a 41-year-old Black male who works in communications at a correctional facility, told court officials he was living in a New York apartment during the work week. His story later changed to him living with his daughter and fiancée in the Bronx. At some point, he told court officials he lived with his aunt in the Bronx. Earlier Friday, U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian said he was leaning against dismissing the juror, saying there was likely an innocent explanation for the conflicting answers. But as more details emerged, Subramanian said there were serious concerns about his candor and it appeared the juror either could not follow simple instructions or there was an effort to be deceptive. Subramanian warned that removal of the juror may be required. Defense attorney Xavier Donaldson said the juror answered the question about where he resides as truthfully as possible and suggested bringing him back to court because he wanted to remain on the jury. Prosecutors argued that the juror's removal is necessary to protect the integrity of the court proceedings. The juror said during jury selection that he enjoyed listening to reggaeton and '90s hip-hop, and his hobbies included sports and fantasy football. Combs faces five criminal counts: one count of racketeering conspiracy; two counts of sex trafficking by force, fraud or coercion; and two counts of transportation to engage in prostitution. Combs has vociferously denied the allegations against him.


Powys County Times
a day ago
- Powys County Times
Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts
The Work and Pensions Secretary will add 'non-negotiable' protections to the Welfare Reform Bill, amid a backlash against planned cuts to benefits. The package of measures is aimed at reducing the number of working-age people on sickness benefits, and the Government hopes they can save £5 billion a year by the end of the decade. The proposals include tightening of the eligibility criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit in England, and cutting the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). Dozens of Labour MPs last month urged the Prime Minister to pause and reassess planned cuts, saying the proposals are 'impossible to support'. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told the Guardian there will be extra protections added to the Bill when it is published next week. She said: 'When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. 'I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. 'That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. 'These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable.' A Government impact assessment published alongside the reforms warned some 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, across England, Scotland and Wales, could fall into relative poverty after housing costs as a result of the changes.


The Herald Scotland
a day ago
- The Herald Scotland
Kendall to add protections to welfare Bill amid backlash to cuts
The proposals include tightening of the eligibility criteria for personal independence payment (Pip), the main disability benefit in England, and cutting the sickness-related element of universal credit (UC). Dozens of Labour MPs last month urged the Prime Minister to pause and reassess planned cuts, saying the proposals are 'impossible to support'. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall told the Guardian there will be extra protections added to the Bill when it is published next week. She said: 'When we set out our reforms we promised to protect those most in need, particularly those who can never work. 'I know from my 15 years as a constituency MP how important this is. It is something I take seriously and will never compromise on. 'That is why we are putting additional protections on the face of the Bill to support the most vulnerable and help people affected by the changes. 'These protections will be written into law, a clear sign they are non-negotiable.' A Government impact assessment published alongside the reforms warned some 250,000 people, including 50,000 children, across England, Scotland and Wales, could fall into relative poverty after housing costs as a result of the changes.