Food waste collections coming to Brighton and Hove
Brighton & Hove City Council has approved food waste collections in the city. The new scheme, funded by the government and £1.2m from the local authority's budget, is set to be rolled out in stages from September. BHCC said the scheme would help boost recycling rates – which are "historically low" in the city - by getting food waste out of general refuse. Some residents raised concerns that food waste collections could lead to additional smells and traffic.
Councillor Tim Rowkins, cabinet member for net zero and environmental services, said at a council meeting on Thursday the waste would be stored in sealed containers and removed in 24 hours. He added it would mean less smell and fewer vehicles.About a third of household rubbish in Brighton and Hove is food and drink waste, approximately 2.8kg per household each week, according to the council.BHCC said the food waste would be turned into compost for use in and around the city. Food waste collections are set to be extended to all households by March 2026. Kerbside collections will be made weekly, while communal food waste would be collected every day under the proposals.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
39 minutes ago
- BBC News
Woodeaton Manor School to move despite £1.6m spend on improvements
A school for pupils with special educational needs that a council has spent £1.6m improving is still operating on a "dilapidated" site and will eventually need to Manor School, near Oxford, was rated inadequate and found to be "chaotic" by Ofsted inspectors who visited in October 2023 and its governing body later resigned.A new head teacher and governors were appointed but - while inspectors found it had improved on a visit in March - it remains in special County Council said it had suffered "significant financial implications" after the school's former governing body did not "appropriately invest" in its Grade II* listed building and wider site. It also said the school previously lacked "robust financial management and other leadership", which had left its budget "significant overspent" to the tune of about £1.5m in a report to councillors that will be discussed at a meeting next Friday, the council's director of children's services Lisa Lyons said the school's site was "not fit for purpose".She added: "Despite significant investment from the county council, this site and building cannot be improved to deliver quality education and the long-term plan is to relocate the school into more appropriate premises."The school has about 80 pupils, all of whom have Education, Health and Care Plans (EHCPs). It previously offered residential placements but they were paused following Ofsted's inspection in 2023 and they have since been year, the council agreed to spend £900,000 on replacing fire doors as well as making other "fire safety improvements to meet the legislative standards".It said that money was also going to be spent on "suitable perimeter fencing" and new entrance gates. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Win a Westland plant food bundle worth £100
Its around this time of year that your garden could do with a good feed. And happily our friends at Westland are offering up two fantastic bundles of plant feed for pretty much every occasion. 2 2 The bundle includes tomato, hydrangea and rose feed. As well as a lawn liquid and bug feed. To enter fill in the form below. Or write to Sun Westland Boost competition, PO Box 3190, Colchester, Essex, CO2 8GP.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Why baby boomers are the backbone of middle-class Britain
Why do so many younger people feel they are disadvantaged relative to older generations? The narrative of intergenerational 'unfairness' – recently explored in a Telegraph piece on whether boomers are the 'victim generation' – pervades social discourse, and I find it really troubling. Pitting one section of society against another, on the basis of perceived 'fairness', damages the fabric of our country. In truth, there are vast differences in income and wealth throughout the population, both across and within age groups. Many young people are well-paid, and they certainly enjoy far more leisure time and holidays than previous generations, along with flexible working and much better employment protections than the baby-boomers could ever have imagined – which we have fought hard to achieve. Indeed, the post-war baby-boomers are the backbone of middle-class Britain, and have been the bastion of trying to safeguard British values while championing progress. Of course, there are vast differences among people in their 60s and early 70s, but in general, they tend to have a strong work ethic – want to support themselves and their families, avoid living on benefits – and will work even when feeling unwell, because they are loyal to their employer or their business. This is the generation that built the country we know and love today – they are disciplined, self-reliant and resourceful, unafraid of competition, and strive to improve themselves and help their families as much as they can. As Anthony New, a Telegraph reader, puts it: ''When we were growing up, many of us were very poor but we worked hard and balanced our budgets carefully.' The baby-boomers are also the heart of many of our charities and volunteering networks. They take responsibility for others, not just themselves, and want to 'give back' to society. They tend to be very community-minded and want to 'do the right thing' – which sometimes requires self-sacrifice, but baby-boomers have been brought up to believe this is how society works well. Their parents, who went through the war years, had real deprivations, while baby-boomers had very little when young but nevertheless worked hard to rebuild the country, taking advantage of post-war industrial and technological improvements. Despite all of this, too many commentators blame baby-boomers for selfishly gathering more than their 'fair share' of national resources, depriving them of their rightful dues. They accuse them of being 'lucky' to afford their own homes, enjoy free university education, and get big pensions. These accusations are much more perception than reality. Of course those at the end of their career will be better off than those just starting their working life. As Deborah Skinner, another Telegraph reader, puts it: 'We worked bloody hard throughout our life. Never had savings or a rich family to fall back on.' The baby-boomers scrimped and saved to afford sky-high mortgage interest. No holidays, spending cut to the bone, and working for years before they could buy a property. Less than ten per cent of baby-boomers went to university. The vast majority started work at 15, 16 or 18 – with many going into apprenticeships, bringing home an income straight from school. So by the time they reached their late twenties, they had already been earning money and saving for ten to fifteen years. Today's younger people, many of whom have higher education, do not reach this point until their early or mid-thirties. And as for pensions. Well, less than half of baby-boomers – and particularly women – were offered an employer pension. There was no auto-enrolment, no automatic right to a pension or any other workplace benefit. Women could be barred from pensions and generous maternity rights. Even basic employment protections against harassment and unfair dismissal were not the norm – we had to fight for women's working conditions to improve. So, it's time to stop this 'oldie bashing' and start to appreciate that each generation contributes to society, and the intergenerational envy that has crept into conventional thinking for too many younger people does not reflect reality. In fact it builds dangerous resentment. There are inequalities everywhere. Rather than trying to take money away from baby-boomers, who did so much to improve our country, let's work together as a society. It is the turn of younger generations now to carry us forward and build an even better future. Will they rise to the challenge?
