
Iqra Aziz believes there is no excuse to hit a child
Actor Iqra Aziz has spoken out strongly against a viral incident showing a father slapping his child in public. The incident, which was captured on video and widely circulated on social media, showed a man striking his son across the face, allegedly in response to the child being too loud while skating. The footage sparked outrage, and Iqra was among the first celebrities to publicly call out the behaviour.
Sharing the video on her Instagram Story, Iqra penned a powerful message addressing the deep-rooted culture of corporal punishment in Pakistani households. "No action is big enough for you to slap or hit your child in public, in front of family or even (alone) in a room," she wrote. As a desi parent herself, Iqra acknowledged how difficult it can be to break free from generational cycles of violence, especially when many parents today were once children punished for being "too naughty, too loud," or simply not obedient enough.
Iqra emphasised that children are not miniature adults; they are vulnerable and still learning how to behave. "Please understand your child is new to this world at every stage of his/her life," she wrote. "He's younger than you, vulnerable and experiencing things differently. Someone has to break the cycle."
Iqra's words resonated widely, with social media users applauding her for shedding light on a normalised but harmful parenting practice. One user commented, "Islam does not allow slapping across the face. The child should have been disciplined at home." Another added, "Violence has become a part of our DNA. This is not acceptable." As per another netizen, practices like these are behind people complaining "their kids don't care for them in old age."
Pakistan has no federal law explicitly banning corporal punishment at home, though efforts like the Islamabad Capital Territory Prohibition of Corporal Punishment Act (2021) exist. Advocacy groups have long pushed for stronger child protection laws nationwide.
With big hits such as Suno Chanda and Mannat Murad in her portfolio, Iqra's long credited her success to her love for the craft. "I like to express myself. Maybe during that journey, I made such good friends with the camera that the moment it comes in front of me, I become a different person," she said, appearing as a guest on The Pick & Drop Show last year.
While celebrities typically find themselves socialising a lot in showbiz, Iqra maintained that contrary to her usual on-screen persona, she is a very private person. "Off-screen, it's not very often that I am able to make friends with people."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Our grief is not justice
Another woman gone – and we are still playing the same old song and dance. Photo: File They say history is a great teacher. Unless, of course, we are talking about the treatment of women in Pakistan. In that case, the lessons rarely seem to stick. It is not that we forget what happened. In fact, on May 20 when the Supreme Court upheld Zahir Jaffer's death sentence, we proudly reposted '#JusticeForNoor'. We like the same photo of Zainab Ansari that makes the rounds on social media on her death anniversary, as many still comment that her killer should have been publicly hanged. We even speak of Qandeel Baloch's name with bated breath, recounting how unfortunate it was every time we see her picture make it back to our timeline. And now, we chant for 17-year-old Sana Yousaf. We demand the harshest punishment for her killer, calling for his swift execution, insisting that he be made an example of. We post her pictures with teary captions, share videos of her smiling, and ask: how a girl so young could be taken so violently. Outrage, by now, is a choreography we have learned by heart. And we really do mean it. And still, there is always another girl. And then another. And then another. And make no mistake, there always will be. Because ours is not a history of lessons learned – it is rot that keeps returning, like a cancer that festers in any corner it can find. 'Jaisi karni, waisi bharni' Allow us to demonstrate. On June 3, just hours after it was confirmed that Sana's murder was an act of hatred by Umar Hayat for rejecting his "friendship" proposal, social media was flooded with supportive comments. However, as the story goes, the sceptics eventually began to creep. One comment appeared. Then another. Then a third. But why was she on TikTok to begin with? Where are her parents? She must have had some involvement in this. What started as a clear case of rage on femicide by any definition of the word, swiftly flattened into a PR-friendly lecture on how girls should behave. Inevitably, rolling the red carpet for everyone's favorite pseudo-moralists, who, true to form, reach for their most iron-clad, tight-fisted defence: the Islam card. This ranged from throwaway one-liners about the necessity of modesty, casually dropped into comment sections, to full-blown fanatics spewing the most vile vitriol, calling for the swift "erasure" (being generous here) of all such women, because they are the ones spreading "fahaashi", leading society astray and betraying the word of God. Ironically, they consistently fail to acknowledge what Islam actually teaches: that there is no compulsion in religion, that justice is sacred, and that the burden of wrongdoing lies not on the victim, but the oppressor. But nuance, of course, rarely trends. Neither does picking a side, because celebrities with mammothian platforms, sweeped in at just the right time to provide half-baked statements of condemnation while simultaneously preaching the dangers of social media, the importance of privacy, and how young girls should be careful. Only a few and far between had the courage to call a spade a spade: a man felt entitled to a girl's life and he took it. It is not just the social media echo chamber that is pushing this narrative, too. Just last week, Justice Ali Baqir Najafi stood in the Supreme Court, following Jaffer's sentencing and described Noor's case as a warning against live-in relationships. Unfortunate and disgusting sure, but a cautionary tale, nevertheless. And so, the case of a woman who was tortured, killed, and beheaded became, somehow, a parable about lifestyle choices inviting danger. And the cancer does not stop at the courtroom. We saw this unfold in real time with the Dua Zehra case, where large media outlets and mainstream journalists after expressing their concerns, speculated on her character, questioned her sanity, painted her as rebellious, and amplified every salacious detail they could find. Our silent complicity Perhaps the most devastating betrayal comes when these words are repeated by our own. At the dinner table, the cancer lives in our mothers, who mourn the news as it plays on the television and then reinforce this is why girls should stay home. It grows in our grandmothers, who agree with them, sighing "in my day girls stayed quiet." It breathes in our cousin commenting, "this happens when girls don't stay within their limits". It thrives in phrases like, "apni izzat apne haath" (you are the guardian of your own honour). While there is some truth to the notion that we have a degree of control over the respect we receive from those around us, more often than not, this phrase is used in a deceptive way to teach young girls something far more insidious. It becomes a subtle, almost palatable way of implying: "What happened to you is sad but if you hadn't done this or that, you wouldn't have invited this trouble; maybe you could have saved yourself." So the point we arrive at is this: despite what we like to tell ourselves, these are not bad apples, or an "uneducated" few. This is the symptom of a society suspended in a coma, where shock is expected, but action is absent. Each time a woman's name becomes a headline, we jolt awake, shaken by our anger; we post tributes, we write captions, until slowly slipping back into a familiar sleep. The truth is, we live in a state of denial, of the unique willful kind, where we have learned to perform our grief. Public mourning has become our substitute for justice and expressions of solidarity have become our excuse to avoid confronting the systems and this has allowed this violence to happen again and again. Perhaps, at this point, this has paralysingly become our only choice. But at the very least, let us not pretend to be surprised. Let us not mourn Sana as if her death was unprecedented or unthinkable. The cancer that led us here is not new and it is not hiding. It has baked into our institutions, families, conversations and media. And it is now convincing us that our grief is enough. Which, for the record, it never was, and it never will be.


Express Tribune
7 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Israeli strikes kill 42 in Gaza on first day of Eid, say Palestinian officials
Displaced Palestinians mourn and carry injured and killed Palestinians who lost their lives after Israeli airstrike and artillery shelling on Eid al-Adha morning in Khan Yunis, Gaza on June 06, 2025. PHOTO: ANADOLU AGENCY Listen to article As Palestinians in Gaza mark the first day of Eid al-Adha, Israeli attacks have killed at least 42 people across the enclave since dawn this morning. Shelling, airstrikes reported in Khan Younis, Gaza City, Jabalia amid ongoing humanitarian catastrophe Israeli forces continued with their brutality and did not spare Palestinians on the first day of Eid al-Adha, one of Islam's holiest festivals, by carrying out a series of airstrikes and artillery attacks across the Gaza Strip on Friday morning, killing 42 people and injuring several others, according to eyewitnesses and medical sources. Despite the festive occasion, many Palestinians performed Eid prayers amid the rubble of their destroyed homes, as Israel's genocidal war continues to devastate the besieged enclave. In southern Gaza, Israeli warplanes carried out multiple raids in Khan Younis, while heavy artillery targeted residential neighborhoods in the central, northern, and eastern parts of the city, witnesses said. Plumes of smoke rose across southern Khan Younis as shelling and air raids intensified. According to medical sources, a child was shot dead by Israeli forces near the Al-Saraya detention area in Khan Younis. Another civilian succumbed to injuries sustained in a previous Israeli strike on the city. Four Palestinians were killed and several others were injured when an Israeli drone struck a mobile phone charging station set up between tents sheltering displaced families west of Khan Younis. In Rafah, four more Palestinians were killed by Israeli forces near an aid distribution center, the same locations that have been the target of deadly Israeli attacks since their establishment late last month. Following an Israeli airstrike on the town of Abasan al-Kabira, east of Khan Younis, rescue crews found one body under the rubble. Eyewitnesses also reported that Israeli troops carried out demolitions of buildings in northern Khan Younis. In northern Gaza Strip, medical sources reported that nine Palestinians were killed and several others injured after Israeli forces bombed residential homes in Jabalia with the casualties transported to Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital. Heavy shelling hit the Al-Tuffah neighborhood of Gaza City, while air raids struck Jabalia town, residents said. This marks the fourth Eid al-Adha observed under the shadow of war in Gaza, which has been reeling from a deliberate and systematic campaign of extermination since Oct. 7, 2023. Israel, rejecting international calls for a ceasefire, has pursued a genocidal offensive in Gaza since October 2023, killing nearly 54,700 Palestinians, most of them women and children. Aid agencies have warned about the risk of famine among the enclave's more than 2 million inhabitants. Last November, the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza. Israel also faces a genocide case at the International Court of Justice for its war crimes against civilians in the enclave.


Express Tribune
14 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Khalilur Rehman Qamar claims talk show clash on 'Taghoot' was staged
Listen to article Pakistani screenwriter and poet Khalilur-Rehman Qamar has made a startling claim regarding last year's viral 'Taghoot scandal,' stating that the controversial talk show confrontation was 'pre-planned' and not spontaneous. Speaking on a podcast this week, Qamar alleged that the televised clash between Islamic scholar Saahil Adeem and a female guest was orchestrated for dramatic effect. The episode, aired in June 2024, had sparked nationwide debate over gender roles, religious authority, and freedom of expression. Qamar claimed that the show's producers intentionally staged the conflict to provoke public outrage and media attention. 'It wasn't an accident. The narrative was scripted to reach a certain climax,' he said. According to Qamar, as soon as Saahil Adeem referred to women as ignorant, he was about to intervene to clarify that ignorance is not exclusive to women — he considers anyone who hasn't read the Holy Quran with translation, whether male or female, to be ignorant. However, before he could speak, a female participant interrupted, and the direction of the discussion took a sharp turn. Khalilur-Rehman Qamar also expressed his astonishment at the woman's demand for an apology from a scholar like Saahil Adeem. In his view, everyone makes mistakes, but what triggered his anger was the perceived disrespect. He stated that the entire incident clearly shows the producers' intention was to create provocation and extract a specific type of reaction — and that they succeeded in doing so. The programme, aired in June last year, featured Saahil Adeem making harsh remarks about women. He claimed that if 100 women were surveyed, he would find 95% to be ignorant, obsessed only with makeup and TikTok, and unaware of fundamental Islamic concepts such as 'Taghoot'. In response, a participant named Azbah Abdullah protested against his statements and demanded an apology. The situation quickly escalated into a heated exchange. Adeem questioned whether the young woman even knew the meaning of 'Taghoot'. When she admitted she didn't, he declared that this was precisely what ignorance was — and that she should accept it. The argument didn't stop there. The woman countered that the reason many women are deprived of knowledge is due to a patriarchal society, but Saahil Adeem disagreed, insisting that calling out ignorance is a religious obligation. During the heated discussion, Qamar also lost his composure. He expressed anger at the young woman, stating that if listening to Arabic verses was painful for her, it was unacceptable. He then asked the host to cut her microphone — a moment that intensified the controversy. The episode quickly went viral on social media. Now, nearly a year later, Qamar's revelation that the entire incident was 'scripted.'