logo
Fact Check: This letter by a school principal about ICE detaining her students is real

Fact Check: This letter by a school principal about ICE detaining her students is real

Yahoo08-04-2025

Claim:
An image authentically shows a letter by a school principal in Sackets Harbor, New York, calling for the release of three students and their mother from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody.
Rating:
In early April 2025, a letter purportedly showing a school principal's appeal for the return of her students from U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody spread widely online. Social media users posted the alleged letter on platforms like Bluesky, Facebook and X.
The letter was allegedly written by Jaime Cook, principal of New York's Sackets Harbor Central School that teaches preschool through high school students. It described a situation where ICE officials detained three unnamed students from the same family, even though they allegedly followed "the legal [immigration] process." According to the letter, agents supposedly went "door to door" and "handcuffed" the students before putting them in a van with an "alleged criminal" and taking them to a detention center. Officials also detained their mother, according to the letter.
Per the letter, at least one of the students is a third grader. "We are in shock—and it is that shared shock that has unified our community in the call for our students' release," Cook allegedly wrote.
While Snopes has not independently corroborated every claim in the letter (it's true ICE agents detained the family), we have confirmed it is real. The principal posted the letter on Facebook on April 5, 2025, and Cook confirmed the document's authenticity via email. The school also confirmed the document's authenticity via a phone call. Therefore, we have rated this claim true.
ICE did not immediately respond to a request for comment. As of this writing, the family has not been identified.
The case gained national media attention in part because it happened in the hometown of U.S. President Donald Trump's "border czar," Tom Homan. He told New York television station 7News he first heard about the situation from a childhood friend, New York Assemblyman Scott Gray of Watertown. Gray said via an emailed statement on April 7 he was "pleased to share that the family at the center of this recent federal immigration matter is being returned home."
Sackets Harbor Central School District Superintendent Jennifer Gaffney also confirmed in an emailed statement that the students and their mother "are returning home."
"At this time, we respectfully ask both the media and the community to honor the family's privacy," the statement read, noting that the district did not plan to respond to further media inquiries.
While the letter did not state the day ICE detained the family, news reports said the arrests happened in an early morning raid on March 27, 2025, that was initially focused on arresting a South African man who is accused of distributing images of child sexual abuse. In addition to the woman and her three kids, three other people were detained in the sweep, per The Associated Press.
The case sparked outrage among the local community, which organized protests calling for the students' return. In a 7News interview about the situation on April 2, Homan said, "ICE is doing everything by the book" and the family was "found in the country illegally" (see 2:15). Here is an excerpt from the conversation (see 2:54):
First of all, the family is not in a jail. They're in a family residential center; it's an open-air campus. So the investigators are doing their due diligence. The victim witness specialists are reviewing the safety and security of the children, medical evaluations — it's usually a part of the investigation, so the investigation continues. It's a criminal investigation.
The full interview is available on 7News' YouTube page.
In Cook's letter, she challenged Homan's description of the family's circumstances:
We are in direct communication with our students. Let me be clear: they are not "being medically evaluated." They are not being "questioned as potential victims." Calling a detention center by another name does not change what it is.
We deserve better than spin and misinformation. My teachers and my students are already hurting.
Family residential centers are detention centers according to ICE's own website.
In her email, Cook said she posted the letter to Facebook "in response to misinformation," claiming the family had no association with the "alleged criminal" ICE initially targeted. "I lent my voice as a person and I do not represent my school district or the teacher's union," she continued.
Homan's interview with 7News did not address Cook's allegations that the students were handcuffed. However, page 10 of the 2015 ICE arrest procedures handbook reads: "Age, size, and gender are not valid reasons for failing to handcuff an individual. Juveniles may be handcuffed for officer safety." There does not appear to be a more recent handbook publicly available at the time of publication.
Gray, the New York assemblyman, said via email he did not know whether the children were handcuffed and could not verify details in Cook's letter. "My focus was on the family first, I will attempt to work on the [other details] next," he said.
7News | WWNY | Watertown. "7News Extra FULL INTERVIEW: Border Czar Tom Homan Talks about ICE Sweep near Sackets Harbor." YouTube, 2 Apr. 2025, www.youtube.com/watch?v=DDGeLrbhfJM. Accessed 7 Apr. 2025.
"Arrest Procedures Handbook." U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 21 July 2015, p. 10, www.ice.gov/doclib/foia/policy/handbookHSI_15-03_ArrestProcedures_Jul21_2015.pdf. Accessed 7 Apr. 2025.
"Detention Management." Www.ice.gov, www.ice.gov/detain/detention-management.
Harbor, Sackets. "Sackets Harbor Central School." Sacketspatriots.org, www.sacketspatriots.org/. Accessed 7 Apr. 2025.
Jaime Montana Cook. "Message from Sackets Harbor Principal." Facebook.com, 5 Apr. 2025, www.facebook.com/jaime.cook.712/posts/pfbid0pTCWysCrkCJmqa9AxEGfoPXjPJFpnaPXMtFVPgTNQhC2pSUGwWmLkAoNFrTDKFNYl?rdid=BlH4dr3FXEIWW8Pd#. Accessed 7 Apr. 2025.
Ormsbee, Molly. "Three Students Detained by ICE Agents near Watertown." WPTZ, 1 Apr. 2025, www.mynbc5.com/article/students-detained-by-ice-upstate-new-york/64349643. Accessed 7 Apr. 2025.
"South African Man Living in Jefferson County Charged with Distribution of Child Pornography." Justice.gov, 28 Mar. 2025, www.justice.gov/usao-ndny/pr/south-african-man-living-jefferson-county-charged-distribution-child-pornography. Accessed 7 Apr. 2025.
Thompson, Carolyn. "Family Swept up by US Immigration Agents Looking for Someone Else Is Released from Custody." AP News, 7 Apr. 2025, apnews.com/article/homan-ice-sackets-harbor-children-detained-acdf67107330d5548cc8fefb80b47da9. Accessed 7 Apr. 2025.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

California City Terminates 'Divisive' ICE Contract Amid L.A. Protests
California City Terminates 'Divisive' ICE Contract Amid L.A. Protests

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

California City Terminates 'Divisive' ICE Contract Amid L.A. Protests

Glendale, California, which is located just minutes from Los Angeles where anti-ICE protests erupted this weekend, has decided to end a contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement to hold detainees in its jail. In a press release Sunday, city officials said that 'public perception of the ICE contract—no matter how limited or carefully managed, no matter the good—has become divisive.' 'And while opinions on this issue may vary—the decision to terminate this contract is not politically driven. It is rooted in what this City stands for—public safety, local accountability, and trust,' the statement said. Ahead of the unrest in Los Angeles, Glendale had come under some scrutiny over a 2007 contract to house ICE detainees despite a 2018 sanctuary state law ensuring that no local law enforcement resources are used for the purpose of immigration enforcement. In one year, the city collected $6,000 to house ICE detainees, and The Los Angeles Times reported that the city receives $85 per detainee per day. In the last week, two ICE detainees were held in Glendale's detention center, leading to an outcry over the city's potentially unlawful compliance, as the Trump administration has moved to increase the number of daily ICE arrests. But it seems that Glendale will no longer be complicit in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown. The statement continued, emphasizing that local law enforcement was not responsible for enforcing immigration law, and that the city would remain in compliance with the law. 'The Glendale Police Department has not engaged in immigration enforcement, nor will it do so moving forward,' the statement said. Just a few miles away in downtown Los Angeles, massive anti-ICE protests are still ongoing after immigration authorities arrested at least 44 immigrants Friday. In response to the protests, Donald Trump bypassed California Governor Gavin Newsom to deploy the National Guard, which has used tear gas, flash grenades, and rubber bullets against the protesters and journalists. The decision on behalf of Glendale is a victory for the protestors, and a clear response to the ongoing direct action in Los Angeles, as well as the Trump administration's escalating efforts to conduct mass deportations of undocumented immigrants.

Trump Continues Inflaming L.A. Protests: ‘BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!'
Trump Continues Inflaming L.A. Protests: ‘BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!'

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump Continues Inflaming L.A. Protests: ‘BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!'

President Donald Trump called for the military to be deployed against anti-Immigrations and Customs Enforcements (ICE) protests in Los Angeles, California. The protests, which began in response to ICE raids at various workplaces on Friday, escalated over the weekend after Trump ordered the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops into the city over the objections of Mayor Karen Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom, both Democrats. 'Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!' Trump wrote early Monday morning on Truth Social. In another post, the president called for law enforcement to 'ARREST THE PEOPLE IN FACE MASKS, NOW!' U.S. Northern Command issued a statement on Sunday indicating that 'approximately 500 Marines from 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines at Twentynine Palms, California, are in a prepared to deploy status should they be necessary to augment and support the DoD's protection of federal property and personnel efforts.' The call from the president to deploy the military against U.S. citizens — a power that hasn't been invoked by a president since the 1992 Rodney King riots in Los Angeles — would be a serious escalation of federal involvement in what local authorities say remains a manageable, if in sporadic instances violent, outbreak of public protest. Some Republican lawmakers and Trump administration officials have indicated their support for the deployment of military personnel to California. On Sunday night, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) shared a screenshot of a controversial opinion piece he wrote in 2020 calling for the military to be deployed against Black Lives Matter protests. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth wrote on social media Sunday night that 'if violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert.' The president and his administration have targeted Los Angeles and several other so-called 'sanctuary cities' — cities and other state or local jurisdictions that limit its cooperation with federal immigration enforcement — as sites to conduct highly publicized ICE raids on immigrant communities. While the administration claims that they are focusing enforcement actions on criminals, Acting ICE Director Tom Homan admitted on Monday that ICE has been sweeping up migrants who just so happened to be at the location of one of their targets, including mothers, high school students, and migrants arriving to immigration court for scheduled hearings. As the administration's enforcement actions grow in intensity, and stray from the bounds of legality, Trump and his allies have claimed protests against their increasingly authoritarian tactics are effectively an illegal impediment to federal operations. 'A once great American City, Los Angeles, has been invaded and occupied by Illegal Aliens and Criminals. Now violent, insurrectionist mobs are swarming and attacking our Federal Agents to try and stop our deportation operations,' Trump wrote on Sunday in a post that bears little resemblance to what is actually happening in the city. 'Order will be restored, the Illegals will be expelled, and Los Angeles will be set free.' In a Sunday press conference, Mayor Bass said that 'what we're seeing in Los Angeles is chaos that has been provoked by the administration.' 'When you're at Home Depot and workplaces, when you tear parents and children apart, and when you run armored caravans to our streets you cause fear and you cause panic and deploying federalized troops is a dangerous escalation,' Bass said. 'We need to be real about this, this is about another agenda, it's not about public safety.' Bass added that the city remained committed to protecting the First Amendment rights of protesters, but that those legal protections 'do not give you the right to be violent to create chaos are to be violent to create chaos are to vandalize property.' Governor Newsom formally requested on Sunday that Trump revoke his federalization of the National Guard and withdraw them from the city. 'In dynamic and fluid situations such as the one in Los Angeles, State and local authorities are the most appropriate ones to evaluate the need for resources to safeguard life and property. Indeed, the decision to deploy the National Guard, without appropriate training or orders, risks seriously escalating the situation,' he wrote. 'There is currently no need for the National Guard to be deployed in Los Angeles, and to do so in this unlawful manner and for such a lengthy period is a serious breach of state sovereignty that seems intentionally designed to inflame the situation,' Newsom added. More from Rolling Stone Finneas Says He Was Tear-Gassed During 'Very Peaceful' ICE Protest in L.A. ABC News Suspends Journalist for Calling Stephen Miller and Trump 'World-Class Haters' Republicans Say They're Cool With Trump Deploying Troops Against Protesters Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence

California Lawsuit Will Challenge Trump's Order Sending National Guard to L.A., Newsom Says
California Lawsuit Will Challenge Trump's Order Sending National Guard to L.A., Newsom Says

New York Times

time31 minutes ago

  • New York Times

California Lawsuit Will Challenge Trump's Order Sending National Guard to L.A., Newsom Says

The state of California will file suit against the Trump administration over its move to take control of the state's National Guard and deploy its troops to Los Angeles to protect immigration enforcement agents, Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a social media post Monday. The governor has argued that local law enforcement agencies were effectively managing the response to protests over recent immigration raids, and that there was no need for President Trump to call up the National Guard. Before the lawsuit was filed, Mr. Newsom's office appeared to foreshadow the litigation in a letter to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Sunday. 'In dynamic and fluid situations such as the one in Los Angeles, state and local authorities are the most appropriate ones to evaluate the need for resources to safeguard life and property,' Mr. Newsom's legal affairs secretary, David Sapp, wrote in the letter. 'Indeed the decision to deploy the National Guard, without appropriate training or orders, risks seriously escalating the situation.' Mr. Trump said on Saturday that he was imposing federal control over at least 2,000 National Guard troops for at least 60 days in order to quell the protests, and directed Mr. Hegseth to determine which ones to use. The order did not specify that the troops needed to come from California, but so far the California National Guard has been used, according to the U.S. Northern Command. Mr. Trump's order suggested that protests against Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids and detention facilities were interfering with federal functions, and that they constituted a rebellion against the federal government's authority and its ability to enforce federal law. That is the standard for invoking the Insurrection Act to use the military for domestic policing. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store