CDC purges career officials from oversight of vaccine committee
Career officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention responsible for overseeing the agency's committee of outside vaccine experts have been removed from their role in the process, multiple CDC officials tell CBS News.
News of their removal comes the same week Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. fired all the members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, known as ACIP, and replaced them with eight new picks that include close allies and COVID vaccine critics. The next meeting of the committee is coming up at the end of June.
The vaccine recommendations from the committee are closely watched by state and local authorities, health care providers and others because they are tied to several federal policies that enable access to the shots, including requirements for insurance coverage and programs for uninsured children.
Multiple federal health officials said the staffers removed from overseeing the panel included Dr. Melinda Wharton, the associate director for vaccine policy, and her team at the agency's National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases.
A CDC spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Wharton had served as the committee's executive secretary before she was pulled from her role.
Among other things, she and her team had been responsible for vetting nominees for ACIP membership, which would usually include extensive screening for potential conflicts of interest before someone would be named to the committee.
Multiple CDC officials said that Kennedy circumvented the CDC's process to pick his new members of the committee.
HHS said in an "ACIP FAQ" document shared with members of Congress and stakeholders that Kennedy's new picks for the committee were being selected "through a rigorous examination of their scientific credentials and a comprehensive ethics review for potential conflicts of interest."
Wharton and her team had also overseen the panel's operations, including prioritizing its agenda and planning meetings for work groups that huddle to discuss technical details between the committee's public discussions and votes.
ACIP work group planning meetings have since been postponed due to the lack of voting committee members to attend them, multiple people familiar with the matter told CBS News.
Those people said the CDC's chief of staff, Matt Buzzelli, an appointee of the Trump administration, was now effectively in charge of the committee's planning.
Buzzelli is seen by many within the agency as the CDC's de facto head, in the absence of a Senate confirmed director or acting director appointed by Kennedy.
One former CDC official said the move amounted to "putting RFK like-minded people and removing all potential internal CDC opposition" in the committee, calling it far from normal.
Dr. Lakshmi Panagiotakopoulos, one of the CDC officials overseeing the work group on COVID-19 vaccines, resigned last week after Kennedy ordered edits to the CDC's recommendations to exclude children and pregnant women.
Several medical groups criticized Kennedy's move at the time to bypass the committee and its COVID-19 vaccines work group. The American Pharmacists Association is among those now withholding endorsement of the CDC's new adult immunization schedule.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Senate G.O.P. Includes Expanded Fund for Radiation Victims in Policy Bill
Senate Republicans on Thursday included in their version of President Trump's domestic policy bill a provision that would revive and significantly expand a law for compensating victims of government-caused nuclear contamination who developed cancer and other serious illnesses. The measure, long championed by Senator Josh Hawley, Republican of Missouri, would overhaul a law passed more than three decades ago with a narrow scope. It was meant to compensate civilians sickened by the legacy of the nation's aboveground nuclear testing program, a hallmark of the Manhattan Project in the 1940s, and uranium miners who worked between 1942 and 1971. It paid out more than $2.6 billion in benefits to more than 55,000 claimants since its creation in 1990. The Senate passed bipartisan legislation last year to substantially broaden the scope of that law — called the Radiation Exposure Compensation Act, or RECA — beyond Cold War-era victims to cover others who have been harmed by the aftereffects in the decades since. But after Republican leaders refused to allow it to come to a vote on the House floor, the law expired, dashing hopes of compensation for sickened civilians. Senate Republican leaders are now, at the behest of Mr. Hawley, giving the measure another shot at passage, including it in the Senate version of the domestic policy bill that they are hoping to pass in weeks. He is considered a key vote on the bill because he opposes several provisions floated by his party for cutting Medicaid. 'I think about, in the St. Louis area alone, how many folks I've talked to whose grandfathers or grandmothers were involved with the radiation project and whose families have subsequently had cancer in the family for generations,' Mr. Hawley said in an interview. 'And they're very proud of their service to the nation, but they would like to be thanked for that and be treated appropriately and not lied to anymore by their government.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
RFK Jr. Is Barely Even Pretending Anymore
The Atlantic Daily, a newsletter that guides you through the biggest stories of the day, helps you discover new ideas, and recommends the best in culture. Sign up for it here. When Robert F. Kennedy Jr. accepted his new position as health secretary, he made a big show of distancing himself from his past life. 'News reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry,' Kennedy, who has for decades promoted the debunked notion that vaccines cause autism and has baselessly sown doubt over the ability of the U.S. government to vet shots, said at his confirmation hearing in January. 'I am neither. I am pro-safety.' But for all Kennedy's talk, this week, he did exactly what a person would do if they were trying to undermine the scientific consensus on vaccination in the United States. He abruptly dismissed the entire expert committee that advises the CDC on its nationwide vaccine recommendations—and began to fill the roster with like-minded people ready to cast doubt on the benefits of vaccination. Like Kennedy, few of these new appointees to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice, or ACIP, have openly embraced the notion that they are anti-vaccine. But among them are individuals who have spoken out against COVID vaccines and policies, claimed vaccine injuries for their own children, and falsely linked COVID shots to deaths—or even baselessly accused those vaccines of 'causing a form of acquired immunity deficiency syndrome.' In January, I wrote that remaking the committee in exactly this way would be an especially harmful blow to Americans' health: Perhaps more than any other body of experts in the U.S., ACIP guides the nation's future preparedness against infectious disease. By appointing a committee that is poised to legitimize more of his own radical views, Kennedy is giving his skewed version of scientific reality the government's imprimatur. Whether he will admit to it or not, he is serving the most core goal of the anti-vaccine movement—eroding access to, and trust in, immunization. In an emailed statement, Health and Human Services Press Secretary Emily G. Hilliard reiterated that 'Secretary Kennedy is not anti-vaccine—he is pro-safety, pro-transparency, and pro-accountability,' and added that his 'evidence-based approach puts accountability and radical transparency first, which will restore trust in our public health system.' (Kennedy, notably, promised Senator Bill Cassidy during his confirmation process that he would maintain ACIP, as Cassidy put it, 'without changes.') Since the 1960s, ACIP has lent government policy on vaccines the clout of scientific evidence. Its mandate is to convene experts across fields such as infectious disease, immunology, pediatrics, vaccinology, and public health to carefully vet the data on immunizations, weigh their risks and benefits, and vote on recommendations that guide the public on how to use them—who should get vaccines, and when. Those guidelines are then passed to the CDC director, who—with only the rarest of exceptions—accepts that advice wholesale. 'These recommendations are what states look to, what providers look to,' Rupali Limaye, an expert in vaccine behavior at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told me. Medicare, for instance, is required to fully cover the vaccines that ACIP recommends; ACIP also determines which vaccines are covered by the Vaccines for Children Program, which provides free vaccines for children whose families cannot afford them. The experts who serve on ACIP have the opportunity, more than just about any of their scientific peers, to translate their vaccine rhetoric into reality. So far, Kennedy has dismissed the 17 people who were serving on ACIP, and filled eight of the newly open slots. Most of the new nominees have an obvious bone to pick with at least some vaccines, especially COVID shots, and have publicly advocated for limiting their use. Among the new members, for instance, is Robert Malone, a controversial physician who has spoken at anti-vaccine events, where he has denounced COVID vaccines and, without evidence, suggested that they can worsen coronavirus infections. Another appointee is Vicky Pebsworth, who serves on the board of the National Vaccine Information Center, an anti-vaccine nonprofit previously known as Dissatisfied Parents Together. A third, Retsef Levi, a health-care-management expert, called for the administration of COVID vaccines to be halted in 2023, and has questioned the shots' safety, despite a large body of evidence from clinical trials supporting their continued use. Overall, 'this is not a list that would increase confidence in vaccine decisions,' Dorit Reiss, a vaccine-policy expert at UC San Francisco, told me. (None of these new ACIP members returned a request for comment.) The next ACIP meeting is scheduled for the end of this month—and the agenda includes discussion about anthrax vaccines, chikungunya vaccines, COVID-19 vaccines, cytomegalovirus vaccine, the human-papillomavirus vaccine, influenza vaccines, the Lyme-disease vaccine, meningococcal vaccines, pneumococcal vaccines, and RSV vaccines. That's a big slate of topics for a brand-new panel of members, Paul Offit, a pediatrician and a vaccine expert who has previously served on ACIP, told me: Depending on how the meeting is structured, and on the input from CDC scientists, these new committee members could substantially alter the guidelines on several immunizations—perhaps so much so that certain shots could stop being recommended to certain groups of Americans. Based on the composition of the committee so far, Offit predicts that the new ACIP will eventually push the CDC away from full-throated endorsement of many of these vaccines. Even subtle changes in the wording of CDC recommendations—a should swapped for a may—can have big ripple effects, Limaye told me. Insurers, for instance, may be more reluctant to cover vaccines that are not actively endorsed by the CDC; some states—especially those in which vaccines have become a political battleground—may stop mandating those types of shots. If the CDC softens its recommendations, 'we will likely see more partisan divides' in who opts for protection nationwide, Jason Schwartz, a vaccine-policy expert at Yale, told me. Pharmaceutical companies may, in turn, cut down production of vaccines that don't have full CDC backing, perpetuating a cycle of reduced availability and reduced enthusiasm. And primary-care physicians, who look to the CDC's vaccination schedule as an essential reference, may shift the language they use to describe childhood shots, nudging more parents to simply opt out. Historically, medical and public-health associations, such as the American Academy of Pediatrics, have aligned their vaccine recommendations with ACIP's—because those recommendations were all driven by scientific evidence. Now, though, scientific consensus and government position are beginning to diverge: Multiple groups of physicians, scientists, and public-health scholars have issued statements condemning the vaccine decisions of Kennedy and his allies; a number of prominent scientists have now banded together to form a kind of alt-ACIP, dubbing themselves the Vaccine Integrity Project. As the views of fringe vaccine groups become the government's stance, Americans may soon have to choose between following the science and following what their nation's leaders say. Identifying as 'anti-vaccine' has historically been taboo: In a nation where most people remain largely in favor of shots, the term is pejorative, an open acknowledgment that one's views lie outside of the norm. But the more vaccine resistance infiltrates HHS and its advisers, the more what's considered normal may shift toward Kennedy's own views on vaccines; ACIP's reputation for evidence-backed thinking could even gild those views with scientific legitimacy. Assembling one's own team of friendly experts is an especially effective way to sanewash extremism, Reiss told me, and to overturn the system through what appear to be normal channels. If the nation's most prominent group of vaccine advisers bends toward anti-vaccine, the term loses its extremist edge—and the scientists who argue, based on sound data, that vaccines are safe and effective risk being labeled anti-government. Article originally published at The Atlantic
WebMD
2 hours ago
- WebMD
This Is What Psychosis Is Really Like
At the age of 48 – with no previous history of mental health symptoms – I was diagnosed with bipolar I with psychotic features. It was a life-altering moment. Bipolar disorder is a mental illness that involves significant changes in mood, energy, and behavior. Bipolar I is characterized by manic episodes, which involve abnormally elevated mood, risky behaviors, and impulsive behavior. These "high" mood episodes often (but not always) alternate with depressive episodes, which are periods of low mood, lack of motivation, and difficulty concentrating. Bipolar disorder may also involve psychosis. This is most common during manic episodes but can happen during depressive episodes, too. More than half of people diagnosed with bipolar disorder also experience psychosis at some point. What is Psychosis? Psychosis occurs when a person loses touch with reality. Common symptoms include delusions (unusual beliefs), hallucinations (seeing or hearing things that are not real), paranoia (believing others are out to get you), and disorganized thoughts or behaviors. For me, psychosis showed up powerfully and suddenly. Here's what it was like. Delusions: I Was Convinced I Was Comatose Delusions are fixed, false beliefs that are not based on reality. Even when there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary, the delusion remains. One of my delusions was that I was in a coma. I went to the emergency room looking for answers. While in the ER, doctors conducted several neurological tests, including the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and a CT scan. They wanted to rule out other brain issues for what I was experiencing, as psychiatric disorders usually appear earlier in life. The doctors told me that I was not in a coma, but I would not accept this answer. I refused to believe them. They went over all of the neurological tests that they had conducted. Despite the results of these tests, I continued to believe that I was in a coma. Because I was so disconnected from reality, the doctors admitted me to inpatient psych. Paranoia: I Thought They Were Spying on Me Along with delusions, I frequently had paranoia during mood episodes. I believed that I was the subject of a secret research study and that my doctors were in on it. I thought that they were spying on me at my home. So I would call my doctors, accusing them of installing hidden cameras in my house. Disorganized Thoughts and Behavior During psychotic episodes, my thoughts were very disorganized and didn't make any sense. I also had disorganized behavior, and I would make decisions based on delusions. For example, when I thought my doctors were spying on me, I bought numerous cameras to catch them in the act. The cameras sit – unopened – in my garage to this day! Anxiety Though anxiety isn't listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) as a symptom of psychosis, it was a part of my experience. Delusions, in particular, can be extremely disorientating and frightening. You're terrified and confused, especially when reality does not match up with your internal beliefs and thoughts. For me, this resulted in panic. People often portray psychosis as something that can't get better. That's not true. For me, the right treatment – medication and therapy – has made a huge difference.
