
Waspi women epitomise the excesses of single-issue activism
When historians come to look back on this period of British history, one of the things that will leap out is how, even as the state teetered towards fiscal apocalypse, there were more and more demands for greater spending on fewer justifiable causes.
Of all these, there can be few less sympathetic than the crusade by the Women Against State Pension Inequality, known as the Waspi campaign, for over ten billion pounds in compensation from the Government which was ultimately rejected.
As a legal challenge against that decision begins at the High Court on Monday, it might superficially appear that the campaigners have a solid case for compensation.
After all, didn't the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PSHO) recommend last March that the Government pay out billions to compensate women who were not adequately informed about changes to the state pension age?
Indeed such is the sense of grievance that over 9,000 women coughed up £150,000 for the cost of going to court to challenge the decision – and plenty of Labour MPs, attracted by an easy photo opportunity, made rash promises in opposition that they must now regret.
But this impression collapses once you actually look at the detail of what the PSHO has said.
The ombudsman did not say that all 3.5 million women in the relevant cohort, or even a particularly significant fraction of them, have been wronged by the state and deserve compensation.
Rather, that given the 'administrative burden' required to manually review all three and a half million cases and then calculate compensation on an individual basis, the Government should consider splitting the difference – giving a blanket compensation to everyone who could possibly have been affected.
That would mean spending up to £10.5 billion in paying thousands of pounds to possibly millions of people who do not deserve it, in order to get some compensation to those who would.
Even if Britain were a rich country, rolling in tax revenue and with big budget surpluses, that would be an extremely decadent way to spend taxpayers' money.
In our current circumstances, where ministers are contemplating large cuts, critical services are skinned to the bone and there is an emerging consensus on higher defence spending, it would be madness.
That's why Liz Kendall, the Work and Pensions Secretary, was right to reject the PSHO's recommendation: the ombudsman only considers a single problem, in the abstract and according to a narrow set of criteria; but it is up to the Government to take a holistic view.
If this thinking stopped with the Waspi women it would be a mercy. But goes much further.
Single-issue campaign groups are endemic to British politics. Disability campaigners defend the absurd explosion of Motability claims, whilst environmental bodies demand developers spend vast sums on bat tunnels with no regard to whether this represents value for money.
If such campaigns continue to be indulged, the public would understandably think we have much more cash to throw around that we really do – and the demands will just keep coming.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


North Wales Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Lammy holding talks on post-Brexit deal for Gibraltar
Mr Lammy held talks with Gibraltar's leaders, members of the opposition and the business community before leaving the British overseas territory to head to Brussels on Wednesday morning. Talks on rules governing the border of Spain and Gibraltar have been ongoing since Britain left the European Union in 2020, but an agreement has not yet been reached. The PA news agency understands that a deal has not yet been reached and there are still a number of sticking points. A Foreign Office source said: 'We're working to secure an agreement that works for the people and businesses in Gibraltar. 'An agreement that will protect British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the future.' Ministers have insisted no deal will be done without the full support of Gibraltar's government. Mr Lammy held talks with chief minister Fabian Picardo in Gibraltar along with the UK's overseas territories minister Stephen Doughty. Today, with @DavidLammy and @SDoughtyMP we held a Cabinet meeting in No6 Convent Place to agree final parameters for negotiation. We will now travel to Brussels to meet @MarosSefcovic and @jmalbares. It's time to try to finalise arrangements for lasting, stable relationship… — Fabian Picardo (@FabianPicardo) June 11, 2025 The ministers and Mr Picardo then travelled to Brussels for talks with the EU and Spanish representatives. In a post on X on Wednesday morning, Mr Picardo said it is 'time to try to finalise arrangements for lasting, stable relationship between Gibraltar and the EU/Spain which is safe, secure and beneficial'. But officials close to the talks said there were still 'hard negotiations ahead'. Gibraltar was ceded to the UK by Spain in 1713 and the population is heavily in favour of remaining a British overseas territory. The last time it voted on a proposal to share sovereignty with Spain, in 2002, almost 99% of Gibraltarians rejected the move. Gibraltar also hosts an RAF base at its airport and an important naval facility. The Government, in line with its Conservative predecessors, has said it will not sign up to a deal that gives sovereignty over Gibraltar to another country, or that the Gibraltarian government is not content with. The strategic defence review, released earlier this month, said the UK would maintain a military presence in Gibraltar, 'upholding the sovereignty of British Gibraltar territorial waters'.


Powys County Times
22 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Lammy holding talks on post-Brexit deal for Gibraltar
Foreign Secretary David Lammy will have talks with the European Union and Spain in Brussels as a post-Brexit deal on Gibraltar appears close. Mr Lammy held talks with Gibraltar's leaders, members of the opposition and the business community before leaving the British overseas territory to head to Brussels on Wednesday morning. Talks on rules governing the border of Spain and Gibraltar have been ongoing since Britain left the European Union in 2020, but an agreement has not yet been reached. The PA news agency understands that a deal has not yet been reached and there are still a number of sticking points. A Foreign Office source said: 'We're working to secure an agreement that works for the people and businesses in Gibraltar. 'An agreement that will protect British sovereignty, supports Gibraltar's economy and allows businesses to plan for the future.' Ministers have insisted no deal will be done without the full support of Gibraltar's government. Mr Lammy held talks with chief minister Fabian Picardo in Gibraltar along with the UK's overseas territories minister Stephen Doughty. Today, with @DavidLammy and @SDoughtyMP we held a Cabinet meeting in No6 Convent Place to agree final parameters for negotiation. We will now travel to Brussels to meet @MarosSefcovic and @jmalbares. It's time to try to finalise arrangements for lasting, stable relationship… — Fabian Picardo (@FabianPicardo) June 11, 2025 The ministers and Mr Picardo then travelled to Brussels for talks with the EU and Spanish representatives. In a post on X on Wednesday morning, Mr Picardo said it is 'time to try to finalise arrangements for lasting, stable relationship between Gibraltar and the EU/Spain which is safe, secure and beneficial'. But officials close to the talks said there were still 'hard negotiations ahead'. Gibraltar was ceded to the UK by Spain in 1713 and the population is heavily in favour of remaining a British overseas territory. The last time it voted on a proposal to share sovereignty with Spain, in 2002, almost 99% of Gibraltarians rejected the move. Gibraltar also hosts an RAF base at its airport and an important naval facility. The Government, in line with its Conservative predecessors, has said it will not sign up to a deal that gives sovereignty over Gibraltar to another country, or that the Gibraltarian government is not content with.


Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Householders who racially abuse police at home to face prosecution
People who racially abuse police making house calls will be prosecuted under plans to close a legal loophole. Offenders will face up to two years in jail if they are found guilty of directing religious or racial abuse at emergency service workers who enter their homes. The Public Order Act of 1986 made it illegal to racially or religiously abuse anyone in public but did not cover behaviour within a private home. The legislation was designed to let police keep public spaces free from abuse but not overstep into conversations held in private. But the Home Office said this left police and other emergency workers vulnerable and unprotected from racial and religious harassment during house calls, and meant they could not bring perpetrators to account. Home Office officials said ministers had decided to close the loophole because of an increase in reports of emergency workers being abused for their race or religion while in private homes. 'They should not have to tolerate abuse' A Home Office spokesman said: 'By closing the loophole in the Public Order Act 1986, the Government is making clear that racially or religiously motivated abuse and threats towards our emergency workers will never be tolerated, regardless of where it takes place.' Dame Diana Johnson, the policing minister, said: 'Our emergency workers put themselves in harm's way every day to keep us safe and they should never have to tolerate abuse due to their race or religion while simply doing their job. 'By closing this loophole, we're sending a clear message that racial and religious abuse directed towards those who serve our communities will not be tolerated.' The changes will be introduced through amendments to Labour's Crime and Policing Bill, which will also extend police powers to enter homes to seize knives and mobile phones. At present, the law only allows officers to seize blades that are on the banned list, such as 'zombie' knives and machetes, and ministers said police were hamstrung when they raided suspects' homes. They are not allowed to take weapons such as kitchen knives, which are not on the list, even if they suspect they will be used in crimes. Police will also be able to enter homes and search for stolen mobile phones without a warrant, if the devices have been electronically tracked to that location. Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, said the law change would enable emergency workers to save lives free from violence or intimidation. 'Anyone who violates this core principle brings shame on themselves and will feel the full force of the law, wherever they are,' he said. 'I will not stand any health worker being subjected to abuse and take a zero-tolerance approach, and these new measures will crack down on perpetrators.'