British lawmakers vote to decriminalize abortion for pregnant women while America cracks down
British lawmakers voted Tuesday to decriminalize abortion for the pregnant woman – in striking contrast to the crackdown on reproductive rights in the United States.
Lawmakers voted by an overwhelming majority to invalidate Victorian-era legislation that makes it possible to prosecute a woman for ending her pregnancy in England and Wales, though medical professionals who help terminate a pregnancy beyond certain limits will still be breaking the law.
Currently, abortion beyond the first 24 weeks of pregnancy is illegal in those two parts of the United Kingdom. Beyond that time limit, it is permitted in certain circumstances, such as when the mother's life is at risk. While abortions are common in England and Wales, women who terminate their pregnancy outside of existing restrictions face the threat of criminal investigation, arrest, prosecution and even imprisonment.
Tuesday's vote – which amends a draft policing and crime law – seeks to remove those threats. The amended bill needs to pass through both chambers of the UK parliament before it can become law.
The vast majority of Britons believe women should have the right to an abortion, according to YouGov surveys stretching back to 2019. The latest poll, conducted in April, showed that 88% of respondents supported that right.
Britain's vote comes as its ally across the Atlantic has dramatically restricted abortion rights. Since the US Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022 – which had enshrined abortion as a constitutional right – many US states have introduced severe restrictions or outright bans on the practice. The changes have completely upended the landscape of reproductive health and choice in America.
Louise McCudden, UK head of external affairs at MSI Reproductive Choices, a charity providing abortions, thinks there is a connection between Tuesday's vote and a 'hostile climate' toward abortion rights in the UK driven by the changes in the US.
McCudden told CNN there had been an 'increase in activity from anti-choice groups outside (MSI) clinics' that feel 'emboldened' by the crackdown on abortion rights across the pond.
'On the rare occasions when you do see women who are suspected of ending a pregnancy over 24 weeks, they are invariably in extremely vulnerable situations,' she also said, noting that the women who had been investigated in the UK included domestic abuse survivors, potential trafficking survivors and women who'd had miscarriages and stillbirths.
However, the UK's Society for the Protection of Unborn Children strongly condemned Tuesday's vote.
'If this clause becomes law, a woman who aborts her baby at any point in pregnancy, even moments before birth, would not be committing a criminal offense,' Alithea Williams, the society's public policy manager, said in a statement Tuesday.
'Now, even the very limited protection afforded by the law is being stripped away,' she added.
CNN's Kara Fox contributed reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Midland dad diagnosed with rare cancer after one routine from pharmacist
A routine question from a pharmacist during a repeat prescription order led to a father being diagnosed with an extremely rare form of cancer. Dave Paxton, 38, was getting his anxiety medication sorted out and just before the end of the call, the pharmacist inquired - "Any other concerns?". Dave, who works as an engineering manager, mentioned that he'd observed his stools were of a darker shade – something he wouldn't normally have taken to a doctor. Read more: Watch chaos on Jet2 flight This led to him securing a GP appointment four days on, where an endoscopy disclosed he was suffering from cancer of the duodenum – the initial segment of the small intestine. A subsequent CT scan indicated Dave is dealing with a grade four squamous cell carcinoma – a condition so rare there are only 22 confirmed instances worldwide. The cancer has metastasised to his liver, exerting pressure on his pancreas, causing bleeding, which necessitates a blood transfusion every four days for Dave. While doctors haven't offered a prognosis, he's undergoing half a year's course of chemotherapy aiming to shrink the tumour, along with radiotherapy aimed at ceasing the bleeding. Dave's treatment expenses are covered by private health insurance obtained via his job. However, due to the extreme scarcity of duodenal squamous-cell tumours and lack of trials regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy, Dave cannot access this treatment either through his insurance or the NHS. To afford the £180,000 required for his 24-session treatment, Dave has launched a fundraising effort. Hailing from Burton-on-Trent, Staffordshire, Dave expressed: "This is terrifying and the treatment side effects are horrendous, but I'm very grateful to the pharmacist for checking in with me. "I had noticed but wasn't thinking much of it. "The diagnosis was such a shock. All I could think about was my son, I just burst into tears. "But I also knew I had to get on with it. "The cancer is so rare they just can't say how long I have, only that they are treating me to prolong my life. "One of the nurses was so helpful, he just said 'you can beat this' go home and put on music, do the things you enjoy, don't lie down and give up." Following his conversation with the pharmacist on February 7, he underwent an endoscopy on March 6. Even simple activities like playing with his nine year old son Stanley and walking the dog leave Dave feeling exhausted, he shared. "It all feels very scary, and it's a constant and exhausting battle every day," he expressed. Dave has already undergone two months of chemotherapy and has recently started radiotherapy and immunotherapy. Having a squamous-cell tumour in your duodenum is extremely rare, and it's even more unusual for Dave who is young compared to most patients with this condition. He revealed: "They don't know how I got it so young, they just said it's 'bad luck'." He believes that immunotherapy has shown promising results for tackling squamous-cell tumours. He optimistically stated: "After six months hopefully I'll be in remission and looking towards Christmas and a new start. "Unless you've been through something like this, you really don't understand how precious life is. "I just want as much time as I can get with my family."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
How much water should I drink in hot weather?
Let's face it: not many of us drink enough water. We've all experienced feeling faint and dehydrated after opting for fizzy drinks or sugary teas instead. Staying hydrated is essential for your body to function properly, especially in the UK's summer heatwave, as the rising temperatures mean we're more likely to feel groggy. It's also important to drink plenty of water in the winter months, when cold and flu symptoms are more common. Water can help to clear out toxins, clear up skin and boost energy levels, according to studies. But how much do you actually need to drink to feel the benefits? Here's what the experts say. The NHS recommends drinking six to eight glasses of fluid per day – or about 1.2 litres – to stay hydrated on an average day. As well as water, this includes: Sugar-free tea and coffee Lower-fat milk Fruit juice and smoothies (no more than 150ml a day) On a warm day, however, you'll need to drink more water to replace the liquid you'll lose through sweat. Dehydration is one of the biggest health issues caused by a heatwave, as well as overheating, heat exhaustion and heatstrokes. Every person's body is different, so the exact amount you need may depend on factors such as your health, age, size and weight. It's equally important to stay hydrated during winter, as water can help boost your immune system during flu and cold season, helping you to fight off these viruses, and also give you a much-needed energy boost if you're feeling run-down. It seems like a lot to drink in a day, but a slight change in diet can reduce the amount you need to consume. Try eating foods with a high water content, such as watermelon, cucumber and courgette, to contribute to your fluid intake. Cut back on salty foods such as bacon and cheese, as they will cause your body to use up fluids to dilute the sodium consumed. It's possible – but rare – to over-hydrate if you drink too much water in a short period of time. This can lead to a condition called hyponatremia – sometimes known as 'water intoxication' – if your blood's sodium content becomes diluted. The symptoms include disorientation, nausea and vomiting, and cases are most common among endurance athletes. As a rule of thumb, you should only drink water when you are thirsty, and not drink so much that you feel bloated or put on weight.
Miami Herald
2 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Are Americans confident in Trump to handle international crisis? What poll found
As tensions boil over in the Middle East, a new poll finds most Americans doubt President Donald Trump's ability to steer the nation through a global crisis. The YouGov/Economist survey, conducted June 13 to 16, asked respondents 'are you confident in Donald Trump's ability to deal wisely with an international crisis, or are you uneasy about his approach?' A slim majority, 52%, said they are uneasy with the president's approach, while 38% said they have confidence in his capabilities. An additional 10% said they were not sure. On this question, a massive partisan divide emerged. Most Democrats and independents — 89% and 56%, respectively — said they are uneasy, while most Republicans, 79%, said they have faith in the president. This divide was even more stark among Trump voters and those who voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris, with 83% of Trump voters expressing confidence and 90% of Harris voters telegraphing unease. The poll — which sampled 1,512 U.S. adults with a margin of error of 3.3 percentage points — comes a few days after war broke out between Israel and Iran. On June 13, Israel launched a preemptive missile strike on Iran, hitting military and nuclear sites across the country. Iran quickly retaliated by firing a barrage of missiles into Israel. Israeli officials have said their goal is to cripple Iran's nuclear program, claiming it poses an imminent threat to Israel. Multiple Middle East experts, though, believe Iran was not on the verge of developing a nuclear bomb, according to previous reporting from McClatchy News. Trump has said he was fully aware of Israel's plan for a preemptive strike, and suggested he may move to involve the U.S. military in the conflict. When asked about the possibility of striking Iran's nuclear facilities on June 18, he said, 'I may do it, I may not do it,' according to The Hill. 'I mean, nobody knows what I'm going to do.' He has also called for Iran's 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER' and threatened to kill Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Meanwhile, a bipartisan group of lawmakers has put forward a resolution that would strip Trump of the ability to unilaterally go to war with Iran. 'This is not our war,' Rep. Thomas Massie, a Kentucky Republican who introduced the measure, wrote on X June 17. 'Even if it were, Congress must decide such matters according to our Constitution.' Most Americans appear to agree. In a YouGov poll released on June 17, 60% of respondents said they don't think 'the U.S. military should get involved in the conflict between Israel and Iran.' Just 16% said they believe U.S. forces should get involved, and 24% said they were not sure.
