
ME/CFS patient estimates have doubled – but the disease is still ignored
Tens of thousands of New Zealanders are thought to have myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), formerly known as 'chronic fatigue syndrome'. Yet the disease remains largely neglected in medicine and politics alike.
The number of ME patients, those suffering from chronic fatigue and other symptoms, living in Aotearoa may have doubled in recent years, according to ME Society (ANZMES) estimates. The group has updated its earlier appraisal, drawing on an international prevalence rate based on pooled data. Applying this to our population and adding anticipated new cases triggered by Covid infection, the group's estimate has risen from roughly 25,000 to 65,000.
If this estimate is correct, that would be more than the number of New Zealanders with rheumatoid arthritis, lupus and multiple sclerosis combined. Compared to most chronic illnesses, there's only patchy medical and public awareness, little tailored health care, and very little research investment.
Aotearoa lacks an official, data-confirmed prevalence rate for ME, but the appraisal from ANZMES appears broadly consistent with estimates from other countries.
Emerging studies point to a trend where a large subset of people with persisting Long Covid may be developing ME. Overseas estimates suggest a sky-rocketing of new ME cases since the pandemic began, but the picture in Aotearoa is not yet clear and may differ in light of our initially low Covid spread. It's crucial to remember that Covid hasn't gone away. New Zealanders are still getting infected each week – wastewater testing last week showed the highest Covid levels all year – and every new infection carries a risk of Long Covid.
Viruses are a common cause of ME, alongside genetic and other factors, so it makes sense that the Covid virus may also initiate the illness in some people. The pandemic's long tail is likely driving the suspected jump in numbers with ME here. Other contributors include an expected rise in number over time if many aren't recovering, and the effect of a potential undercount in earlier years.
ME is a serious, long-lasting illness that stops people from being able to do their usual activities. The disease makes physical and mental exertion difficult, and can dramatically slash how much activity a person can handle.
It's way more of a threat than 'chronic fatigue syndrome' suggests. Most patients – up to 75% – need to stop or reduce their work. An estimated one in four are fully housebound or bedbound. With ME, your body's energy battery recharges extremely slowly, and has a much smaller capacity overall. People severely affected may only get a total of 5% (or less) of the energy they had before getting ill, and it can take weeks, months or longer to recharge.
Far beyond tiredness, the hallmark feature of ME is 'Post-Exertional Malaise' (PEM) – an extreme worsening of symptoms after even minor physical or mental exertion. This can trigger a 'crash' lasting for days, weeks or longer.
Attempting to push through can greatly worsen symptoms and may lead to long-term deterioration. Those with severe ME become extremely disabled, needing fulltime care.
Many Long Covid patients have symptoms that match ME: are they the same thing? Not fully, but they seem closely related. Post-Covid ME is a subset of a bigger Long Covid umbrella, which covers various conditions including post-intensive care syndrome and autonomic disorders. Some people have both diagnoses; in future this may change as more is understood.
Affecting all ages including kids, ME disrupts the brain, immune system, and metabolism. It's recognised as a physical disease by the World Health Organization (since 1969). Science supports this: multiple studies show many distinct biological abnormalities in people with ME.
But ANZMES President Fiona Charlton says she still hears of health professionals here claiming that ME is psychological in nature, based in the mind. In an interview for World ME Awareness, Charlton put the claim to Jaime Seltzer, US patient advocate, Stanford researcher and one of Time Magazine's 100 most influential health leaders. Her response:
'This was never acceptable. But we know so much more than we did in the late 80s, early 90s when these diseases were first beginning to be known, that there's genuinely no excuse for that anymore.'
Why is it vital for the public and doctors to understand these illnesses? If people truly realised the serious consequences when patients push too hard, forcing themselves back to work or exercise — they could be helped to avoid getting worse.
Bizarrely though, there's been barely any political leadership on either illness in Aotearoa. There was one Health Select Committee inquiry into ME care back in 2012 (with no change or follow-up), little-to-no media advocacy from MPs, and no work programme or policy in the Health Ministry.
Our public health system has no dedicated services for ME patients, and no ME specialist doctor. There's one clinic for Taranaki health staff with Long Covid, with no dedicated funding. Other Long Covid pilot clinics were discontinued.
Australia is funding biomedical research far more generously than us (though a lot more investment is still needed). Australia's parliament has long completed an inquiry into Long Covid, including investigation of ME.
In contrast, the first report of New Zealand's Royal Commission into the Covid response contains a fleeting mention of Long Covid, and made clear – after having sought input from affected (unwell) patients – that Long Covid was seen as outside the scope.
In many other countries (e.g. UK, US, Canada, Germany, Austria), at least some MPs or ministers are calling for change. Some sizeable investments in research are under way. And other nations have at least provided a number of specialist services for people with ME and Long Covid, for example the US and UK.
ANZMES has been urging political leaders to reclass ME as a disability for more than a decade, and has recently released an urgent call to action for MPs. The condition meets official disability definitions, for both New Zealand and the UN, yet ME patients can't access sufficient disability support services. Some of the most severely sick patients in Aotearoa can only access three hours of caregiver support per day, when they require 24/7 care.
Immediate reform is required, the group says, to save the billions of dollars that ME costs the country. Australia's price tag is cited – ME costs Australia's economy about $14.5 billion AUD each year. This figure includes direct health care system costs, out-of-pocket expenses, the cost of accessing health care, and the indirect cost of lost income.
The pandemic could only compound the price tag. Researchers here think Long Covid might cost us about $2 billion annually – 0.5% of GDP – in lost productivity. Recent modelling from Germany put the combined cost, for both Long Covid and ME, at 1.5% of GDP in 2024.
The cost of doing nothing is high, for our people and our purse. The government must act to prevent further ballooning of these illnesses.
ANZMES says solutions are available that can help to improve individual outcomes and reduce healthcare strain. Among other policy actions, they suggest bringing in a new nationwide tracking system – to code, track and report on ME and Long Covid across health services – and to include both diseases in national health research with more sustained funding.
The ongoing toll of ME and Long Covid could be minimised by stronger measures to lower the spread of Covid and other infectious diseases, since it's possible to lower or even prevent new cases of chronic illness triggered by pathogens including the Covid virus. This will require action, such as wider eligibility for vaccines and anti-viral treatments, masking measures, and cleaning the air in places like schools and childcare.
It's time for our political and health leaders to stop the denial and act – a rising tide of affected New Zealanders can't be ignored.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

1News
7 hours ago
- 1News
Patterson says foraged mushrooms may have been in fatal lunch
Triple murder accused Erin Patterson has told a Morwell court she looked up information about death cap mushrooms but believed they didn't grow in her area as she continued testifying in her own defence for a third day. She also became emotional while admitting she misled her former in-laws about having medical tests, including claiming she had a biopsy and was booked for an MRI, despite none of those appointments taking place. Patterson, 50, has pleaded not guilty to three counts of murder and one count of attempted murder. She is accused of deliberately poisoning her former in-laws with a beef Wellington laced with death cap mushrooms in July 2022. Three people died. A fourth, Pastor Ian Wilkinson, survived after weeks in hospital. 'I became aware of death cap mushrooms quite early' Under questioning from her defence lawyer, Colin Mandy SC, Patterson said she began researching mushrooms during Covid lockdowns after developing an interest in foraging. ADVERTISEMENT Erin Patterson. (Source: 1News) 'I became aware of death cap mushrooms quite early through this period,' she said. 'I looked up to see if they grew in South Gippsland and I remember finding out that they didn't, essentially.' She also told the jury she knew of another toxic species — inocybe mushrooms — growing on her property, which she had learned were dangerous to dogs. May have searched death cap sites Three white Amanita phalloides (deathcap), which are one of the most poisonous of all known mushrooms. (Source: The jury was reminded of earlier prosecution evidence that Patterson's computer had accessed webpages discussing mushroom foraging and known locations of death caps. "I don't specifically remember doing it that day," she told the court, "but it's possible it was me… and possible that's part of the process I went through to see if they grew in South Gippsland." ADVERTISEMENT Patterson also denied ever foraging in nearby locations such as Lock or Outtrim where mushroom experts previously testified they had logged death cap sightings on citizen science platforms. She told the court she was unaware of those posts. Breaks down over misleading Don and Gail In one of the day's more emotional moments, Patterson was shown messages she'd exchanged with her former in-laws — Don and Gail Patterson — about a suspected health issue. She told them she had a lump on her arm and claimed she'd undergone a needle biopsy and was scheduled for an MRI. But on the stand, she admitted none of that was true. "Some weeks prior, I had been having an issue with my elbow with pain and I thought there was a lump there," she explained. "They had shown quite a lot of care about that, which felt really nice." ADVERTISEMENT She said the pain resolved itself and she felt embarrassed for raising the alarm. "I didn't want their care of me to stop, so I just kept it going," she said, sniffing and speaking with a halting voice. "I shouldn't have done it." Why Patterson arranged the lunch Woman accused of killing three people with poisonous mushrooms in beef Wellington testifies in her defence. (Source: 1News) Patterson also gave evidence about why she organised the fatal family lunch in July, 2022. She said it was motivated by a desire to spend more time with her former in-laws and their extended family. "Primarily, the kids and I had such a good time seeing nanna and papa… that I wanted to do it again," she said. ADVERTISEMENT She told the court that during a previous visit, Gail had commented on how nice the garden looked and Patterson believed Heather Wilkinson would like to see it too. Patterson then said she put considerable thought into what to serve for the lunch. While shepherd's pie had worked in the past, she said it didn't feel "special enough". Instead, she decided to attempt beef Wellington — a dish her mother used to make on important occasions — using a recipe from her RecipeTin Eats cookbook. It was her first time making it. She told the court she bought most of the ingredients from Woolworths, including mushrooms, puff pastry and filo pastry, which were already common staples in her household. "I bought mushrooms very regularly. At least weekly, sometimes twice weekly," she said. How Patterson says she prepared the beef Wellington Erin Patterson says she used this receipe to make beef Wellington (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT Patterson walked the court through how she planned and prepared the beef Wellington at the centre of the case. She said the recipe came from Dinner by food blogger Nagi Maehashi (known for RecipeTin Eats), but with several changes. The original called for a whole beef tenderloin wrapped in mustard, prosciutto, mushroom duxelles and a thin crepe, all encased in puff pastry. But Patterson said she had to adapt. She didn't use mustard, omitted the prosciutto because her father-in-law didn't eat pork, and replaced the crepe with filo pastry because it seemed "a little bit complicated". She also couldn't find a full beef fillet, so decided to make individual portions using a twin pack of eye fillet steaks. She told the jury she began prepping the day before, salting the steaks on Friday to draw out moisture and reading the recipe carefully, even Googling tips so she wouldn't "stuff it up". On the Saturday morning, she started early by cooking the mushroom duxelles. She chopped Woolworths-bought mushrooms in her Thermomix, added garlic and shallots, and cooked it down "for a very long time" to prevent the pastry from going soggy. Patterson said she asked her Facebook friends for advice on the beef cut and mushroom quantity, sharing a photo of the eye fillet pack with the group. She said individual portions required more mushrooms and pastry than a traditional log-style Wellington. ADVERTISEMENT "You've got the mushroom and pastry on the top and bottom sides rather than the circumference," she explained. "I used a lot more." When asked why she bought more filo pastry in the days following the lunch, Patterson said she couldn't remember. "I'd only bought some a day before, but it looks like I must have forgotten I did that," she told the court. "But I made things with pastry all the time, so it wouldn't have mattered." Patterson says dried mushrooms may have included foraged ones Detective who led the investigation reveals stark new details about Patterson's actions and behaviour following the fatal lunch. (Source: 1News) Patterson said there was a chance the dried mushrooms she added to the dish may have included foraged varieties. She told the jury she initially used Woolworths mushrooms for the duxelles, a mushroom paste base for the beef Wellington, but said the mixture "tasted bland" while cooking. ADVERTISEMENT To enhance the flavour, she decided to mix in dried mushrooms she had stored in her pantry. At the time, she believed they were store-bought. "I thought they were the dried ones I'd bought from Melbourne," she said. "Now I think there's a possibility that some foraged ones were in there as well." Patterson described briefly rinsing the mushrooms to soften them, then chopping and mixing them into the dish. She did not say whether she tasted the filling again after adding the dried mushrooms. Lunch served on mismatched dinner plates, court hears Patterson also detailed the moments leading up to the meal being served. ADVERTISEMENT She said her former in-laws were inside the home and chatting while she prepared the mashed potatoes and plated the food. Gail and Heather, she said, took a look inside her pantry which she recalled feeling "proud" of, even though it was slightly messy. Patterson said she used her regular dinnerware to serve the meal: A mix of black, white and coloured plates, including one hand-painted by her daughter. "I don't have grey dinner plates," she told the court. That detail appeared to contradict testimony from Pastor Ian Wilkinson, the only surviving guest, who recalled the meal being served on four grey plates and one tan-orange one. Erin Patterson's testimony continues.


Scoop
8 hours ago
- Scoop
NZNO Backs People's Pay Equity Select Committee
Press Release – NZNO NZNO Primary Health Care Nurses College chair Tracey Morgan says it was devastating to the 5000 primary health care members that their claim was scuppered without warning or legitimate reason. Representing a third of the pay equity claims scrapped by the Coalition Government, NZNO is throwing its full support behind the People's Select Committee on Pay Equity. Members of the New Zealand Nurses Organisation Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa (NZNO) had 12 pay equity claims being progressed across the health sector including aged care, primary health care, hospices, Plunket, community health and laboratories when the scheme was gutted on 6 May. These claims covered almost 10,000 nurses, health care assistants, allied health workers and administration staff. A further 35,000 NZNO Te Whatu Ora members had their pay equity review halted by the changes, meaning their pay would again fall behind. NZNO Primary Health Care Nurses College chair Tracey Morgan says it was devastating to the 5000 primary health care members that their claim was scuppered without warning or legitimate reason. 'It was antidemocratic and an attack on women for the Government not to have consulted the workers whose lives they were changing. Primary and community health care nurses, like their hospice, Plunket and aged care counterparts, accepted lower wage increases in their collective agreements on the understanding they were likely to receive pay equity settlements. 'Now they can have their say through the People's Select Committee on Pay Equity. 'The committee of 10 former women MPs from across the political spectrum are strong wahine who helped establishment the previous system to address the gender discrimination which has kept down their wages their whole working lives.' Most New Zealanders – 68 percent – believe the Government should have consulted on the changes, a new poll released today found. Tracey Morgan says NZNO urges all its members to submit their views to the Select Committee so they can be heard when it meets in August.


Scoop
10 hours ago
- Scoop
NZNO Backs People's Pay Equity Select Committee
Press Release – NZNO NZNO Primary Health Care Nurses College chair Tracey Morgan says it was devastating to the 5000 primary health care members that their claim was scuppered without warning or legitimate reason. Representing a third of the pay equity claims scrapped by the Coalition Government, NZNO is throwing its full support behind the People's Select Committee on Pay Equity. Members of the New Zealand Nurses Organisation Tōpūtanga Tapuhi Kaitiaki o Aotearoa (NZNO) had 12 pay equity claims being progressed across the health sector including aged care, primary health care, hospices, Plunket, community health and laboratories when the scheme was gutted on 6 May. These claims covered almost 10,000 nurses, health care assistants, allied health workers and administration staff. A further 35,000 NZNO Te Whatu Ora members had their pay equity review halted by the changes, meaning their pay would again fall behind. NZNO Primary Health Care Nurses College chair Tracey Morgan says it was devastating to the 5000 primary health care members that their claim was scuppered without warning or legitimate reason. 'It was antidemocratic and an attack on women for the Government not to have consulted the workers whose lives they were changing. Primary and community health care nurses, like their hospice, Plunket and aged care counterparts, accepted lower wage increases in their collective agreements on the understanding they were likely to receive pay equity settlements. 'Now they can have their say through the People's Select Committee on Pay Equity. 'The committee of 10 former women MPs from across the political spectrum are strong wahine who helped establishment the previous system to address the gender discrimination which has kept down their wages their whole working lives.' Most New Zealanders – 68 percent – believe the Government should have consulted on the changes, a new poll released today found. Tracey Morgan says NZNO urges all its members to submit their views to the Select Committee so they can be heard when it meets in August.