Scientists make concerning discovery while analyzing samples taken at remote Antarctic stations: 'We need to do more research'
Scientists have discovered microplastics are showing up in Antarctic snow and at some of the most remote research stations. If microplastics are evident in one of the most isolated places on Earth, surely they're already making their way into the water we drink, the air we breathe, and the food we eat.
A study published in the journal Science of the Total Environment revealed that researchers have detected microplastics as small as 11 micrometers — or about the size of a red blood cell — at Union Glacier, Schanz Glacier, and the South Pole.
With a new detection method, scientists found anywhere from 73 to 3,099 plastic particles in just one liter of snow, according to a summary from the British Antarctic Survey on Phys.org. That's up to 100 times more than past studies reported.
The most common plastic found was polyamide, which is used in textiles, ropes, and outdoor gear. Some particles may have traveled long distances, but researchers think much of it comes from nearby sources, like equipment and protective clothing.
In the summary, ocean ecologist Dr. Clara Manno said, "We need to do more research to fully understand the sources of microplastic pollution in Antarctica — how much of it is local, and how much is transported over long distances so we can explore how best to reduce this plastic pollution in one of the most pristine places on Earth."
Scientists also don't yet know the long-term effects of microplastics in Antarctic snow. But they warn these tiny particles could speed up ice melt by changing how snow reflects sunlight.
Microplastics are ending up in the food chain, which means fish, seals, and penguins are likely swallowing them. This could impact the health and survival of these animals, but scientists are still figuring out just how much harm it's causing.
A study from the British Antarctic Survey found that krill, a key part of the ocean's food web, might be carrying microplastics to the seafloor. This could interfere with carbon storage, the process by which the ocean traps and holds carbon instead of letting it build up in the air. If that balance gets thrown off, ocean health could decline and contribute to climate problems.
Microplastics aren't just in the environment: They're in our bodies too. Scientists have even found them in human placentas and linked them to inflammation, hormone imbalances, and breathing problems.
Do you worry about air pollution in and around your home?
Yes — always
Yes — often
Yes — sometimes
No — never
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
A study from Environment International found microplastics in 80% of human blood samples, meaning they are circulating through our bodies in ways scientists are still working to understand.
The United Nations is working on a Global Plastics Treaty to push countries toward stricter plastic pollution policies. Scientists are also developing filtration systems to catch microplastics before they reach rivers and oceans. Some of these filters can capture even the tiniest plastic particles, stopping pollution at the source.
Individuals can also help by choosing natural fabrics over synthetics, using reusable containers instead of plastic, and supporting policies that limit single-use plastics. Small changes — like adding a filter to your washing machine or checking clothing labels for plastic fibers — can also cut down pollution.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Researchers make critical breakthrough after using powerful satellite to track dangerous pollution: 'Large-scale missions'
Research published this March in the journal Environmental Research Letters has demonstrated an impressive new way to zero in on heavy polluters and monitor evolving pollution problems, according to a release via Researchers at the Max Planck Institute and Heidelberg University have established a method for using a German satellite, the Environmental Mapping and Analysis Program, or EnMAP, to determine the amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) present in the same area "with an unprecedented spatial resolution." These common air pollutants are generally released from the same source, so measuring one or the other independently has been challenging to date. This team leveraged the new technique to assess emissions from power plants. The technology used for such measurements has typically "only [achieved] a spatial resolution of 3 to 5 kilometers" (about 1.9 to 3.1 miles), according to the release. But the EnMAP can achieve an "exceptionally high level of spatial detail" of a 30-meter (98-foot) square, producing more precise and usable data. NO2 isn't technically a greenhouse gas like CO2, methane (CH4), or nitrous oxide (N2O), though it is harmful when in the home. Meanwhile, because NO2 is so often emitted alongside CO2, it is often used to measure CO2 based on an assumed ratio. With independent measuring made possible with the EnMAP, readings can now provide more accurate and insightful information. The EnMAP has been in the sky for three years as of April and has been key to numerous climate-related studies. The paper's co-authors are hopeful about the future applications of the method they have developed using the satellite. "Our study shows how satellites with high spatial resolution can contribute to the targeted monitoring of industrial emissions in the future—in addition to large-scale missions such as the European CO2M satellite," said research leader Thomas Wagner in a statement. With accurate data being key to catching polluters as well as tracking potential improvements, there's the possibility for innovative measurement techniques to play a role in not only penalties for offenders but also in setting more pro-environment policies down the line. Do you worry about air pollution in your town? All the time Often Only sometimes Never Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.


Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Iran Escalates IAEA Feud After ‘Slanderous' Espionage Assertion
Iran is escalating its fight with the United Nations nuclear watchdog by accusing its inspectors of slander and presenting sloppy evidence, according to a legal brief circulated among diplomats days before a key meeting in Vienna. The note shows tension is rising between Tehran and the International Atomic Energy Agency ahead of a gathering at the body on June 9 when Western nations could refer Iran to the UN Security Council for failing to comply with its international nuclear-safeguards obligations.

Business Insider
8 hours ago
- Business Insider
Top 10 African countries with the lowest life expectancy
Despite being one of Africa's largest economies, Nigeria struggles with systemic challenges that shorten lifespans, including widespread infectious diseases, high poverty rates, insecurity, and a lack of adequate healthcare and infrastructure. Business Insider Africa presents the top 10 African countries with the lowest life expectancy. The list is courtesy of the UN's World Population Prospect. For instance, Nigeria's average life expectancy of 54.6 years is a stark contrast to Monaco, where people live the longest. Most of us don't sit around wondering how long we'll live. But the average life expectancy in your country says a lot more than just how many birthdays people might celebrate. It's a powerful indicator of how well a society is doing when it comes to healthcare, living conditions, education, nutrition, and even political stability. Globally, life expectancy can vary depending on where you're born. According to the latest World Population Prospects report by the United Nations, there's a stark divide between high-income and low-income nations. Wealthier countries, equipped with advanced healthcare systems, cleaner environments, and better infrastructure, tend to have significantly higher life expectancies than poorer nations that grapple with disease, malnutrition, conflict, and poor access to healthcare. Unfortunately, Africa dominates at the bottom of the global life expectancy chart. Of the 25 countries with the lowest life expectancy in the world, 24 are on the African continent. This isn't just a coincidence, it reflects deep-seated challenges like underfunded healthcare systems, limited access to clean water and sanitation, high rates of infectious diseases like malaria and HIV/AIDS, and ongoing political or economic instability in many regions. For instance, Nigeria's average life expectancy of 54.6 years is a stark contrast to Monaco, where people live the longest, with an average of nearly 87 years, a gap of more than 32 years. Despite being one of Africa's largest economies, Nigeria struggles with systemic challenges that shorten lifespans, including widespread infectious diseases, high poverty rates, insecurity, and a lack of adequate healthcare and infrastructure. Below are the top 10 African countries with the lowest life expectancy: Rank Country Life Expectancy (Both Sexes) Life Expectancy (Male) Life Expectancy (Female) 1 Nigeria 🇳🇬 54.6 54.3 54.9 2 Chad 🇹🇩 55.2 53.4 57.2 3 South Sudan 🇸🇸 57.7 54.8 60.8 4 Central African Republic 🇨🇫 57.7 55.5 59.6 5 Lesotho 🇱🇸 57.8 55.0 60.4 6 Somalia 🇸🇴 59.0 56.5 61.5 7 Mali 🇲🇱 60.7 59.3 62.1 8 Guinea 🇬🇳 60.9 59.7 59.7 9 Benin 🇧🇯 61.0 59.5 62.4 10 Burkina Faso 🇧🇫 61.3 59.1 63.4