UK watchdog fines 23andMe over 2023 data breach
In Brief
The U.K. data protection watchdog has fined 23andMe £2.31 million ($3.1m) for failing to protect U.K. residents' personal and genetic data prior to its 2023 data breach.
The Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) said on Tuesday it has fined the genetic testing company as it 'did not have additional verification steps for users to access and download their raw genetic data' at the time of its cyberattack.
In 2023, hackers stole private data on more than 6.9 million users' over a months-long campaign by accessing thousands of accounts using stolen credentials. 23andMe did not require its users to use multi-factor authentication, which the ICO said broke U.K. data protection law.
The ICO said over 155,000 U.K. residents had their data stolen in the breach.
In response to the fine, 23andMe told TechCrunch that it had rolled out mandatory multi-factor authentication for all accounts.
The ICO said it is in contact with 23andMe's trustee following the company's filing for bankruptcy protection. A hearing on 23andMe's sale is expected later on Tuesday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
26 minutes ago
- Forbes
The Wiretap: A Horrific Grooming Of A 10-Year-Old That Began On Roblox
The Wiretap is your weekly digest of cybersecurity, internet privacy and surveillance news. To get it in your inbox, subscribe here. Roblox has been criticized for its child safety issues, but argues it's investing in minor protection. (Photo Illustration by Pavlo Gonchar/SOPA Images/LightRocket via Getty Images) In 2023, a mother called the FBI's National Threat Operations Center with concerns about her 10-year-old daughter, who she said had been groomed by a man on the popular games platform Roblox. According to a recently-unsealed search warrant reviewed by Forbes, the man had fostered a relationship with the girl on the site, then turned the conversation sexual, asking for pictures of the minor that she provided over text message. The mother said the man had later hacked into the girl's online schooling accounts, locking her out of all of her classes because she only attended virtually. Her mother told investigators she feared the man may have obtained administrator level access to those virtual schools. She told FBI agents her daughter had tried to take her own life more than once. The daughter later told the FBI that her other friends on Roblox had been stalked and harassed by the same man. He has not been charged with a crime. The Department of Justice declined to comment on the case. Roblox has been under fire in recent months over allegations it has failed to protect its minor users. In April, Florida's Attorney General James Uthmeier said he was issuing a subpoena to Roblox 'to uncover how this platform is marketing to children and to see what policies they are implementing—if any—to avoid interactions with predators." Uthmeier said in an online statement there had been 'concerning reports about children being exposed to graphic or harmful material on the gaming platform, as well as predatory adults being able to message minors on the app freely.' Roblox said it was continuing to improve its safety procedures and systems. 'As a policy, we cannot comment on pending litigation. With that being said, Roblox is deeply committed to the safety and well-being of our community and helping protect children is a top priority,' spokesperson Kadia Koroma said. 'We invest significant resources in advanced technology like robust filters as well as maintaining human moderation teams, to help detect and address inappropriate content and behavior and do not allow user-to-user image sharing on our platform.' She said Roblox constantly monitors the platform for inappropriate content and regularly works with law enforcement to protect children. The mounting criticism hasn't stopped Roblox's growth. In its first quarter results released earlier this year, Roblox reported that average daily active users hit 97.8 million, up 26% year-over-year. Got a tip on surveillance or cybercrime? Get me on Signal at +1 929-512-7964. OpenAI is starting to work with the Pentagon. (Photo by) OpenAI has announced OpenAI for Government, a new initiative to provide its AI tools to all manner of government agencies, including the military. The new entity has secured a contract worth up to $200 million with the Department of Defense's Chief Digital and Artificial Intelligence Office to 'help the Defense Department identify and prototype how frontier AI can transform its administrative operations, from improving how service members and their families get healthcare, to streamlining how they look at program and acquisition data, to supporting proactive cyber defense,' the company wrote in a post announcing the deal. The Minnesota man accused of killing a lawmaker, her husband and attempting to murder another local politician and their allegedly used data broker sites to locate his victims, according to court documents. Police found a notebook listing 11 registered data brokers, alongside the names and addresses of other lawmakers, investigators said. Meta AI users had no idea their prompts would be made public when they asked the chatbot things like for help on school tests and 'anthropomorphic animal characters wearing very little clothing.' But according to numerous user complaints, their queries were open on the web for anyone to view. While Meta says that users are given fair warning about prompts being public, and it's easy to make them private, many users appear to have misunderstood that their searches would be available on the "Discover" feed on the Meta AI app and website. One expert said it was a 'huge user experience and security problem.' The Washington Post is investigating a cyberattack on a small number of unnamed reporters, whose emails appear to have been hacked. The paper forced a reset of login credentials for all staff late last week, according to the Wall Street Journal. Food distribution giant United Natural Foods said it's recovering from a hack that disrupted operations, leading to some food shortages across American grocery stores. Electronic ordering systems are now coming back online, two weeks after the initial breach, TechCrunch reports. which offers tools to cybersecurity teams to help them find vulnerabilities in their networks, announced a $100 million Series D funding round led by venture capital firm New Enterprise Associates. 'We've proven that using AI to hack companies isn't science fiction—it's real, and it's delivering measurable results at scale,' said CEO and cofounder Snehal Antani. The company's customers use its AI not as an offensive weapon but as a virtual 'pentester,' probing companies' IT systems to show them where real hackers could get in. The longest-standing dark web drug market, Archetyp Market, is no more. A 30-year-old alleged administrator was arrested in Barcelona, Spain, while the site's infrastructure was taken down, as part of a European-led police operation. Archetyp had more than 600,000 users worldwide, with as much as $250 million in sales for narcotics, including fentanyl.
Fox News
37 minutes ago
- Fox News
EU chief agrees with Trump on China trade issues, declares ‘Donald is right'
Print Close By Emma Colton Published June 17, 2025 European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen found some mutual understanding with President Donald Trump during the G7 conference, declaring "Donald is right" about China's certain trade policies. "When we focus our attention on tariffs between partners, it diverts our energy from the real challenge — one that threatens us all," von der Leyen said during a meeting at the G7, which included Trump's attendance before his abrupt departure back to Washington, D.C., on Monday, Politico reported. "On this point, Donald is right — there is a serious problem," she added, referring to China ignoring global trade rules. Von der Leyen was referring to China's restrictions on raw material exports needed for cars, batteries and wind turbines, with the European Commission chief accusing China of "weaponizing" its ability to produce critical raw materials while icing out competitors. Specifically, China restricted its exports of permanent magnets globally back in April, when Trump rolled out his reciprocal tariff plan that aimed to bring parity to the U.S.' chronic trade deficit. G7 SUMMIT OPENS IN CANADA, WITH LEADERS TO ADDRESS TRADE, WARS WHILE HOPING TO AVOID CLASH WITH TRUMP China has focused on "undercutting intellectual property protections, massive subsidies with the aim to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains. This is not market competition — it is distortion with intent," von der Leyen said, while also warning against "a new China shock" as the country floods the global market with inexpensive subsidized products, Politico reported. GERMANY'S MERZ TO 'ADAPT' TO TRUMP DURING HIGH-STAKES MEETING ON TARIFFS, DEFENSE Von der Leyen has previously traded barbs with Trump, including over trade in April, when she warned "global markets are shaken by the unpredictable tariff policy of the U.S. administration." Ahead of the June summit in Canada, the EU leader reported on X that she had an overarching and "good call" with Trump. "Good call with President Trump ahead of the G7 Summit," she posted on X Saturday. "We discussed the tense geopolitical situation in the Middle East as well as the need for close coordination on the impact on energy markets. We also discussed the situation in Ukraine, the imperative for a ceasefire and the need to keep up pressure on Russia. Finally, we took stock of the ongoing trade talks. I reiterated our commitment to reach a good deal before July 9." The EU leader's remarks were made before Trump abruptly departed the summit Monday, following a day of meetings. The G7 summit, Trump's first under his second administration, kicked off Monday morning and will run through Tuesday in a remote ski town in Alberta, Canada. Upon his trip back to the capital, Trump told the media that the EU had not offered a fair trade deal, adding that, "They're either going to make a good deal, or they'll just pay whatever we say they have to pay." Trump has previously threatened imposing tariffs up to 50% on all EU imports if a trade deal is not reached by July. The summit was expected to focus on trade, the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, and tensions in the Middle East. However, emphasized focus was placed specifically on Israel and Iran after Israel launched preemptive strikes on Iran Thursday evening after months of attempted and stalled nuclear negotiations and subsequent heightened concern that Iran was advancing its nuclear program. The two nations have continued trading deadly strikes since, with Trump abruptly ending his trip to Canada and heading back to Washington, D.C., while warning on Truth Social, "IRAN CAN NOT HAVE A NUCLEAR WEAPON. I said it over and over again! Everyone should immediately evacuate Tehran!" TRUMP, RUBIO CUTTING G7 TRIP SHORT, RETURNING TO DC AS CHATTER INDICATES IRANIANS FLEEING TEHRAN When asked why Trump abruptly left the G7, he told the media on Tuesday, "I don't believe in telephones," adding that "being on the scene is much better." "And we did everything I had to do at the G7. We had a good G7," Trump added. Trump is expected to report to the Situation Room at the White House as tensions flare between Israel and Iran. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Fox News Digital reached out to the European Commission for any additional comment on von der Leyen's remarks Monday but did not immediately receive a reply. Print Close URL
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Coal power plants were paid to close. Is it time to do the same for slaughterhouses?
The food industry will go to great lengths (and spend a fortune) to lobby policymakers, confuse the public and politicise scientific findings. You can see the results in the UK's delay of a ban on junk food advertisers targeting children, or the orchestrated backlash to a report that recommended cutting red meat consumption and embracing more plant-based diets. It's a well-worn playbook. When scientific evidence indicates the need to phase down environmentally harmful or unhealthy products, the responsible industry pushes back. Motivating this resistance, my colleagues and I believe, is something rarely discussed in the context of food systems: stranded assets. These are investments that lose value or stop generating revenue earlier than their owners and investors anticipated, due to changes in market conditions, technology or – of particular interest here – policy and regulation. This concept has been central to debates in the energy transition. For example, studies have shown that keeping global warming below 2 °C will require leaving fossil fuels in the ground and shutting down power plants before they've generated a return on investment, wiping off about US$1 trillion (£736 billion) in value for companies, financial institutions and investors. The same dynamic applies to the task of feeding everyone well and without substantial environmental harm. What we produce must change, as well as how we produce it. Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences. Producing animal-sourced protein, especially beef and dairy, has environmental impacts that dwarf those of plant-based protein. Some new technologies may reduce these impacts, particularly feed additives to reduce methane emissions from cattle. But the negative impacts go far beyond cow burps to include deforestation, biodiversity loss, water scarcity and pollution. Beef in particular, even when produced using intensive systems like feedlots in the US, requires substantially more land to make 100 grams of protein than any other source (excluding lamb, which is produced in much lower quantities). As the global population increases and constraints on land use intensify, as much nourishing food as possible will need to be produced on as little land as possible. This will entail slashing the amount of land used for animal-sourced foods. However, companies consistently invest in the assets that produce, process, transport and store the foods we consume. These range from slaughterhouses to the grain silos and transport equipment for single-crop supply chains, to manufacturing plants and the research and development of ultra-processed foods. In order to curtail certain foods, as part of a global shift towards sustainable and healthy diets, these assets cannot generate the revenue they do now. This means writing off some of the capital that has been sunk into them, and any anticipated revenue. Our research identified £217 billion that has been invested in meatpacking plants, for example. A portion of this will be lost in service of a shift to more plant-based sustenance. Whether or not policymakers and researchers are aware of the stranded assets problem, food companies certainly are. We outline three things that need to happen. First, while it is laudable that companies set targets to cut emissions or deforestation, how they invest their money is not always consistent with these goals. Companies need to disclose to investors and the public which of their assets are incompatible with a sustainable future, and how they plan to phase them out. Second, lenders (typically banks) and investors (asset managers and their clients) must work with the companies they fund to manage these transitions rather than simply revoke financing or divest. Shutting down a meatpacking plant and building up a plant-based protein business is costly, and firms will need support. Divestment can play an important role symbolically, signalling an ethical and moral stance against certain activities. But unless it is done by all investors at once, assets like shares go to other buyers with little or no interest in sustainability. Third, and perhaps the thorniest problem, who pays for stranded assets? The money has already been spent. The investments have been made, the meatpacking plants and infrastructure already built, the anticipated revenue and maximised profit margins already embedded in the value of these companies. There is the cost of shutting down assets early as well as the opportunity cost of not making money that was expected from capital that has already been sunk. Who bears those costs? Many assume the answer is straightforward: the polluter should pay. This is certainly possible to achieve. Take the recent ruling in Germany, which determined that private companies can be held liable for their share in causing climate damages. But implementing this principle requires unusually strong political leadership and sustained public support. Both of these things are difficult to secure, particularly in food systems where industry lobbying is intense, livelihoods are at stake, public attention is fragmented and diets are highly personal and easily politicised. Even when policies designed to improve public health or sustainability are passed, they can be easily rolled back. Which brings us to an uncomfortable alternative: paying the polluter. This approach already exists in other sectors. Since 2020, Germany has paid coal plants to retire early. The same has been done in the Netherlands, parts of the US and several other countries. In the Netherlands, the government paid farmers to reduce dairy herds in certain areas in order to hit pollution targets. Paying off food companies to phase out harmful assets sounds like a bailout and feels unfair, since a clean and thriving environment is a human right. Such an approach could only work if it allowed stronger regulation that ensured such pollution wouldn't occur in the future. This is how abolitionists contributed to ending slavery in the UK. If we're stuck between endless policy whiplash and slow-motion climate and health crises, paying the polluter may be worth considering. It's politically fraught and emotionally frustrating, but when it comes to stopping pollution sooner rather than later, it is perhaps more tractable than waiting for political will, corporate courage and public consensus to converge. Get a weekly roundup in your inbox instead. Every Wednesday, The Conversation's environment editor writes Imagine, a short email that goes a little deeper into just one climate issue. Join the 45,000+ readers who've subscribed so far. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article. Stephanie Walton does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
