logo
US stands by Indo-Pacific allies against China 'threat'

US stands by Indo-Pacific allies against China 'threat'

Perth Now2 days ago

US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth has reassured allies in the Indo-Pacific they will not be left alone to face increasing military and economic pressure from China, while insisting that they also contribute more to their own defence.
He said Washington will bolster its defences overseas to counter what the Pentagon sees as rapidly developing threats by Beijing, particularly in its aggressive stance toward Taiwan.
China has conducted numerous exercises to test what a blockade would look like of the self-governing island, which Beijing claims as its own and the US has pledged to defend.
China's army "is rehearsing for the real deal," Hegseth said on Saturday in a keynote speech at a security conference in Singapore.
"We are not going to sugarcoat it — the threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent."
Hegseth says China is training to invade Taiwan.
China has a stated goal of having its military have the capability to take Taiwan by force if necessary by 2027, a deadline that is seen by experts as more of an aspirational goal than a hard war deadline.
But China also has built sophisticated man-made islands in the South China Sea to support new military outposts and developed highly advanced hypersonic and space capabilities, which are driving the US to create its own space-based "Golden Dome" missile defences.
Speaking at the Shangri-La Dialogue, a global security conference hosted by the International Institute for Security Studies, Hegseth said China is no longer just building up its military forces to take Taiwan, it's "actively training for it, every day".
Hegseth also called out China for its ambitions in Latin America, particularly its efforts to increase its influence over the Panama Canal.
He urged countries in the region to increase defence spending to levels similar to the five per cent of their gross domestic product European nations are now pressed to contribute.
"We must all do our part," Hegseth said.
In the last few months the Trump administration has taken a Patriot missile defence battalion out of the Indo-Pacific in order to send it to the Middle East, a massive logistical operation that required 73 military cargo aircraft flights, and sent Coast Guard ships back to the US to help defend the US-Mexico border.
Hegseth was asked why the US pulled those resources if the Indo-Pacific is the priority theatre for the United States. He did not directly answer but said the shift of resources was necessary to defend against Houthi missile attacks launched from Yemen, and to bolster protections against illegal immigration into the US
At the same time, he stressed the need for American allies and partners to step up their own defence spending and preparations, saying the US was not interested in going it alone.
"Ultimately a strong, resolute and capable network of allies and partners is our key strategic advantage," he said.
"China envies what we have together, and it sees what we can collectively bring to bear on defence, but it's up to all of us to ensure that we live up to that potential by investing."
The Indo-Pacific nations caught in between have tried to balance relations with both the US and China over the years. Beijing is the primary trading partner for many, but is also feared as a regional bully, in part due to its increasingly aggressive claims on natural resources such as critical fisheries.
Hegseth said committing US support for Indo-Pacific nations would not require local governments to align with the West on cultural or climate issues.
It is not clear if the US can or wants to supplant China as the region's primary economic driver. But Hegseth's push follows Trump's visit to the Middle East, which resulted in billions of dollars in new defence agreements.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'We will determine our defence budget': PM defies US calls to increase defence spending
'We will determine our defence budget': PM defies US calls to increase defence spending

SBS Australia

time2 hours ago

  • SBS Australia

'We will determine our defence budget': PM defies US calls to increase defence spending

'We will determine our defence budget': PM defies US calls to increase defence spending Published 2 June 2025, 3:25 am Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has resisted calls made by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in Singapore to boost Australia's defence spending, ahead of his highly anticipated first face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump later this month. It comes amid backlash against the US doubling tariffs on steel and aluminium imports.

Australia won't set defence spending target figure: PM
Australia won't set defence spending target figure: PM

The Advertiser

time2 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Australia won't set defence spending target figure: PM

Australia will fund the defence capability it needs, Anthony Albanese says, as the US pushes for spending to increase by tens of billions of dollars. The request was made directly by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. "On defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible," a Pentagon statement said. This would require the federal government to pour tens of billions of extra dollars into the defence budget. Defence spending, currently 2.0 per cent of gross domestic product, is on track to rise to about 2.3 per cent by 2033/34. The 3.5 per cent figure is more than what was previously nominated by the principal advisor to the US defence secretary. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said while the US had asked for a "range of things", the government would determine defence spending. "What you should do in defence is decide what you need, your capability, and then provide for it," he told reporters in South Australia on Monday. "What we need is things that defend us in real terms, and that's what we'll provide." The US has been pushing its allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defence spending to help share the burden of deterrence. After meeting with Mr Hegseth, Mr Marles admitted his US counterpart had relayed Australia should increase its defence spending, but did not say by exactly how much. The defence minister on Friday said Australia was willing to have that conversation. But on Sunday, Mr Albanese said his government would decide the nation's defence policy. Mr Hegseth told the Asian security summit at the weekend that the threat posed by China was real and could be imminent. Australia will fund the defence capability it needs, Anthony Albanese says, as the US pushes for spending to increase by tens of billions of dollars. The request was made directly by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. "On defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible," a Pentagon statement said. This would require the federal government to pour tens of billions of extra dollars into the defence budget. Defence spending, currently 2.0 per cent of gross domestic product, is on track to rise to about 2.3 per cent by 2033/34. The 3.5 per cent figure is more than what was previously nominated by the principal advisor to the US defence secretary. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said while the US had asked for a "range of things", the government would determine defence spending. "What you should do in defence is decide what you need, your capability, and then provide for it," he told reporters in South Australia on Monday. "What we need is things that defend us in real terms, and that's what we'll provide." The US has been pushing its allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defence spending to help share the burden of deterrence. After meeting with Mr Hegseth, Mr Marles admitted his US counterpart had relayed Australia should increase its defence spending, but did not say by exactly how much. The defence minister on Friday said Australia was willing to have that conversation. But on Sunday, Mr Albanese said his government would decide the nation's defence policy. Mr Hegseth told the Asian security summit at the weekend that the threat posed by China was real and could be imminent. Australia will fund the defence capability it needs, Anthony Albanese says, as the US pushes for spending to increase by tens of billions of dollars. The request was made directly by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. "On defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible," a Pentagon statement said. This would require the federal government to pour tens of billions of extra dollars into the defence budget. Defence spending, currently 2.0 per cent of gross domestic product, is on track to rise to about 2.3 per cent by 2033/34. The 3.5 per cent figure is more than what was previously nominated by the principal advisor to the US defence secretary. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said while the US had asked for a "range of things", the government would determine defence spending. "What you should do in defence is decide what you need, your capability, and then provide for it," he told reporters in South Australia on Monday. "What we need is things that defend us in real terms, and that's what we'll provide." The US has been pushing its allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defence spending to help share the burden of deterrence. After meeting with Mr Hegseth, Mr Marles admitted his US counterpart had relayed Australia should increase its defence spending, but did not say by exactly how much. The defence minister on Friday said Australia was willing to have that conversation. But on Sunday, Mr Albanese said his government would decide the nation's defence policy. Mr Hegseth told the Asian security summit at the weekend that the threat posed by China was real and could be imminent. Australia will fund the defence capability it needs, Anthony Albanese says, as the US pushes for spending to increase by tens of billions of dollars. The request was made directly by US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth to Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles on the sidelines of the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. "On defence spending, Secretary Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5 per cent of its GDP as soon as possible," a Pentagon statement said. This would require the federal government to pour tens of billions of extra dollars into the defence budget. Defence spending, currently 2.0 per cent of gross domestic product, is on track to rise to about 2.3 per cent by 2033/34. The 3.5 per cent figure is more than what was previously nominated by the principal advisor to the US defence secretary. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said while the US had asked for a "range of things", the government would determine defence spending. "What you should do in defence is decide what you need, your capability, and then provide for it," he told reporters in South Australia on Monday. "What we need is things that defend us in real terms, and that's what we'll provide." The US has been pushing its allies in the Indo-Pacific to increase their defence spending to help share the burden of deterrence. After meeting with Mr Hegseth, Mr Marles admitted his US counterpart had relayed Australia should increase its defence spending, but did not say by exactly how much. The defence minister on Friday said Australia was willing to have that conversation. But on Sunday, Mr Albanese said his government would decide the nation's defence policy. Mr Hegseth told the Asian security summit at the weekend that the threat posed by China was real and could be imminent.

Poland chooses Pro-Trump conservative for president
Poland chooses Pro-Trump conservative for president

The Advertiser

time2 hours ago

  • The Advertiser

Poland chooses Pro-Trump conservative for president

Conservative pro-Trump candidate Karol Nawrocki has won Poland's presidential runoff election. Nawrocki secured just under 51 per cent of the vote in a very tight race against liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, who received just over 49 per cent. The close race had the country on edge since a first round two weeks earlier and through the night into Monday, revealing deep divisions in the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union. The vote was seen as a test of the nation's support for a pro-European course versus US President Donald Trump-style nationalism. Nawrocki, 42, a eurosceptic historian and amateur boxer who ran a national remembrance institute, campaigned on a promise to ensure economic and social policies favour Poles over other nationalities, including refugees from neighbouring Ukraine. An early exit poll released on Sunday evening suggested Trzaskowski was headed to victory before updated polling reversed the picture hours later. The outcome indicates that Poland can be expected to take a more nationalist path under its new leader, who was backed by Trump who granted him an audience in the White House in early May during the Polish presidential campaign. In Poland, the president holds a five-year term and has broad powers, including representing the country abroad, shaping foreign policy, appointing the prime minister and the cabinet, and serving as commander-in-chief of the armed forces in the event of war. with dpa and Reuters Conservative pro-Trump candidate Karol Nawrocki has won Poland's presidential runoff election. Nawrocki secured just under 51 per cent of the vote in a very tight race against liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, who received just over 49 per cent. The close race had the country on edge since a first round two weeks earlier and through the night into Monday, revealing deep divisions in the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union. The vote was seen as a test of the nation's support for a pro-European course versus US President Donald Trump-style nationalism. Nawrocki, 42, a eurosceptic historian and amateur boxer who ran a national remembrance institute, campaigned on a promise to ensure economic and social policies favour Poles over other nationalities, including refugees from neighbouring Ukraine. An early exit poll released on Sunday evening suggested Trzaskowski was headed to victory before updated polling reversed the picture hours later. The outcome indicates that Poland can be expected to take a more nationalist path under its new leader, who was backed by Trump who granted him an audience in the White House in early May during the Polish presidential campaign. In Poland, the president holds a five-year term and has broad powers, including representing the country abroad, shaping foreign policy, appointing the prime minister and the cabinet, and serving as commander-in-chief of the armed forces in the event of war. with dpa and Reuters Conservative pro-Trump candidate Karol Nawrocki has won Poland's presidential runoff election. Nawrocki secured just under 51 per cent of the vote in a very tight race against liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, who received just over 49 per cent. The close race had the country on edge since a first round two weeks earlier and through the night into Monday, revealing deep divisions in the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union. The vote was seen as a test of the nation's support for a pro-European course versus US President Donald Trump-style nationalism. Nawrocki, 42, a eurosceptic historian and amateur boxer who ran a national remembrance institute, campaigned on a promise to ensure economic and social policies favour Poles over other nationalities, including refugees from neighbouring Ukraine. An early exit poll released on Sunday evening suggested Trzaskowski was headed to victory before updated polling reversed the picture hours later. The outcome indicates that Poland can be expected to take a more nationalist path under its new leader, who was backed by Trump who granted him an audience in the White House in early May during the Polish presidential campaign. In Poland, the president holds a five-year term and has broad powers, including representing the country abroad, shaping foreign policy, appointing the prime minister and the cabinet, and serving as commander-in-chief of the armed forces in the event of war. with dpa and Reuters Conservative pro-Trump candidate Karol Nawrocki has won Poland's presidential runoff election. Nawrocki secured just under 51 per cent of the vote in a very tight race against liberal Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, who received just over 49 per cent. The close race had the country on edge since a first round two weeks earlier and through the night into Monday, revealing deep divisions in the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union. The vote was seen as a test of the nation's support for a pro-European course versus US President Donald Trump-style nationalism. Nawrocki, 42, a eurosceptic historian and amateur boxer who ran a national remembrance institute, campaigned on a promise to ensure economic and social policies favour Poles over other nationalities, including refugees from neighbouring Ukraine. An early exit poll released on Sunday evening suggested Trzaskowski was headed to victory before updated polling reversed the picture hours later. The outcome indicates that Poland can be expected to take a more nationalist path under its new leader, who was backed by Trump who granted him an audience in the White House in early May during the Polish presidential campaign. In Poland, the president holds a five-year term and has broad powers, including representing the country abroad, shaping foreign policy, appointing the prime minister and the cabinet, and serving as commander-in-chief of the armed forces in the event of war. with dpa and Reuters

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store