logo
‘She lived without fear': daughter of Chechen activist publishes book she vowed to pen after mother's murder

‘She lived without fear': daughter of Chechen activist publishes book she vowed to pen after mother's murder

The Guardian6 days ago

Lana Estemirova was 15 in 2009, when her mother, the renowned Chechen human rights activist Natalia Estemirova, was kidnapped and murdered. Bundled into a car as she walked to the bus stop on her way to work, she was driven out of town and then shot five times in the chest and head.
The killing was widely seen as retribution for Estemirova's fearless investigations of extrajudicial murders, kidnappings and human rights abuses in Chechnya, first by Russian soldiers and then by forces loyal to the Kremlin-appointed warlord, Ramzan Kadyrov. Nobody was ever prosecuted for the crime.
Three years later, Lana, Natalia's only child stood at her mother's grave and made two promises: firstly, that she would never take needless risks and would ensure her own future children led boring, stable lives; and secondly, that she would write a book about her mother, to ensure that 'she will be remembered and her killers will fade like ghosts'.
After nearly a decade of work, that book will be published later this month. Its title, Please Live, refers to one of the many text messages Lana sent her mother after she went missing, before the news came that she had been killed. Lana also appears in a documentary film about her mother, entitled Natasha, that is released this month.
'I made that promise on my mother's grave when I was 18 years old, the idea that I need to tell her story. More than a decade later, I am able to say: 'Yes, I fulfilled this promise and fulfilled this duty as a daughter to my mother,'' said Lana, in an interview from Portugal, where she now lives.
The powerful book is a guide to Chechnya's recent, bloody history, and a coming-of-age memoir with a twist, detailing the suffocating constraints and the warm generosity of growing up in traditional Chechen culture, with the backdrop of war and terror regularly making itself felt.
It also gives an account of the relationship between Lana and her mother, who was absolutely devoted to her work. Natalia Estemirova had been a history teacher, with no connections to the human rights or dissident world, but had become transfixed by the need to help people. 'She couldn't walk past a situation and pretend it's not happening. There was this gap that nobody wanted to step into, and she decided to fill that gap,' said Lana.
She writes how on one occasion her mother sliced open one of her favourite cuddly toys and sewed it back up with tiny videotapes inside – that held footage from the aftermath of atrocities – to be able to get them through checkpoints.
Lana examines the sacrifices that her mother made in her home life in order to continue working on sensitive cases, even after friends and associates were threatened or killed. These included the journalist Anna Politkovskaya, who was shot dead in the entrance to her apartment building two years earlier.
Although Estemirova was a devoted and loving mother, she was unwilling to leave the dangerous work, and Lana writes of the anger she felt as a teenager and the sense of injustice as to why it was her mother, and not other people, who had to make all the sacrifices.
'What devastated me was this sense that we just never had our chance, and that she gave away so much of herself to other people, to the victims of all these terrible crimes, that there was not enough left for us,' said Lana.
Natasha, a new documentary film about Estemirova which will premiere this weekend, also explores this question. 'Once you have a direct threat against you and you know you can be killed, I was interested in what drives you, why don't you stop,' said Mark Franchetti, the co-producer and co-director of Natasha.
Franchetti met Natalia Estemirova when he covered the Chechen wars as a journalist for the Sunday Times. At the time, she was a regular port of call for journalists covering the aftermath of the two brutal wars in the country, working from the Grozny offices of the organisation Memorial, and one of the few people still working on sensitive cases as Kadyrov unleashed violence and terror to bring society into line.
After a career covering terrible atrocities in war, Franchetti said he decided to make the film because he wanted to cover the story of someone who refused to look the other way. 'Every conflict, amid all the evil, brings people to the surface who are the best of humanity. She was just an ordinary schoolteacher and she becomes this remarkable figure,' he added.
After her mother's murder, Natalia's former colleagues helped Lana to move to Britain, where she studied. She married, and last year had a daughter of her own, whom she has called Natasha – the affectionate form of her mother's name.
Kadyrov is still in charge of Chechnya, and has dispatched his forces to aid Russia's war in Ukraine. Lana said she saw 'many parallels' between the fate of Mariupol and Grozny, and also said that Chechnya's broken society should serve as a cautionary tale.
'Putin and Kadyrov completely crushed the spirit of ordinary Chechens. I think that's the lesson of what will happen to many Ukrainian regions if they are allowed to be retained by Putin. It's important to learn not just from Chechnya's past but also Chechnya's present,' she said.
Over the years, as the voices standing up to Kadyrov's crimes have become fewer and quieter, Lana has come to view her mother's life choices with acceptance and pride. 'I needed this time to understand that I fully accept all of my mother's choices. They really made her the person she was. She was a free person in an unfree world. She lived without fear, even if she felt it deep inside, and that's why it was possible for her to stand up to all those thugs. She didn't want to live in fear or compromise with her conscience,' she said.
It was hard growing up with the feeling that her mother was so devoted to her work that there was not as much space to spend time together as Lana would have liked, but that is something she has also come to terms with. 'I've had a lot of time to think about it, that if everyone who fights for freedom were to pick their family first I guess there would never be any progress,' she said.
Please Live: The Chechen Wars, My Mother and Me by Lana Estemirova, is published by John Murray on 19 June
Natasha, a film by Andrew Meier and Mark Franchetti, will premiere at the Tribeca film festival on 8 June

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Eradicating India's jungle insurgency – can it be done and at what human cost?
Eradicating India's jungle insurgency – can it be done and at what human cost?

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Eradicating India's jungle insurgency – can it be done and at what human cost?

For decades, guerrilla communist warfare has raged deep in India's jungles. What began as an uprising in the 1960s, fuelled by inequality and discontent among the poorest, is now a fully fledged Maoist armed struggle vowing to overthrow the Indian state. But after decades of insurgency and a corresponding state-led crackdown that has left almost 12,000 civilians, militants and security personnel dead, India's home minister Amit Shah gave a clear-cut deadline earlier this year; the Maoist insurgency would be 'completely eradicated' by March 2026. Yet activists, lawyers and former officials have alleged that the operation has come at the cost of human rights abuses and loss of civilian life. They have also questioned the government's motives as well as whether it can truly erase the ideologically driven movement. Widely known as the Naxalites, a name taken from the West Bengal village where the first peasant rebellion took place, the movement follows the Marxist-Leninist ideology of class struggle and agrarian revolution and the philosophy, taken from the Chinese communist leader Chairman Mao, of achieving this through guerrilla armed struggle. The Naxalite cadre has largely been drawn from two of the most marginalised and oppressed groups in India: adivasis, the tribal Indigenous people who largely live in the forests and jungles, and Dalits, the lowest caste previously referred to as untouchables. The militant insurgency has surged at various intervals over the past half century. At its peak in the early 2000s it controlled large swathes of the country, known as the 'red corridor' which stretched from the Telangana-Andhra Pradesh border in southern India, right across the central states of Chhattisgarh, Odisha, Maharashtra, Jharkhand and up to West Bengal, and had more than 30,000 foot soldiers. Now, however, the number of active Naxalite fighters is estimated to be just 500, operating in limited districts, who pitch their fight as a David and Goliath struggle. It was in early 2024 that the government announced Operation Kagar, intended as the endgame for the Naxalite movement. Focusing on the vast forest areas of the Chhattisgarh, the remaining Maoist heartland, upwards of 60,000 security personnel were deployed as well as advanced drone and surveillance technology. As a result, 2024 was the bloodiest year for Maoist casualties in over a decade, with 344 killed in security operations according to the South Asia Terrorism Portal. Last month, security officials cornered and killed one of India's most wanted Maoist leaders, Nambala Keshava Rao – who was almost in his 70s – along with 26 others alleged to be militants. Shah called it a 'landmark blow' to the Naxalite movement. N Venugopal, a newspaper editor who has spent years documenting the movement, claimed that of the roughly 500 people killed since the escalation of the counter-insurgency at the beginning of 2024, around half were non-combatant adivasis, including children. 'This is not an anti-Maoist operation, it is a killing spree,' he said. 'Security forces have become like bounty hunters, killing for rewards.' The claims of atrocities against adivasis in the name of anti-Naxalite operations go back years. Organisations such as Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch have documented over years how security forces have been implicated in extrajudicial killings – including allegations of what is referred to as 'encounter killings' in which police stage the deaths of civilians to look like the killing of Maoist fighters – and allegations of arbitrary detention, forced displacement and sexual violence. Bela Bhatia, a human rights lawyer in Chhattisgarh, alleged that forces in the area had always 'enjoyed impunity to carry out abuses and harassment and encounter killings, it's now just happening on a much bigger scale'. Bhatia was among several activists and lawyers in Chhattisgarh who said there was a newfound brutality to Operation Kagar, in which the focus was on 'neutralising' – meaning shooting to kill – any alleged Naxalite target, with police and paramilitary officers often incentivised with financial bonuses. 'Instead of prioritising arrests, the government has increasingly taken the path of elimination. Civilians are being lumped together with Maoists and killed,' said Malini Subramaniam, a human rights defender and journalist based in Bastar who has faced threats for her work. Subramaniam said entire adivasis villages in the Bastar area were being rounded up and coerced into surrendering, even if they had no involvement in the Naxalite uprising. 'The government has offered only two choices: either surrender or be killed,' she alleged. 'When we hear reports of people surrendering, it's often just ordinary villagers being forced to do so.' Sundarraj Pattilingam, Inspector Gen IG of Police Bastar Range leading the anti-Maoist operations, called the allegations 'completely baseless' and said the operations were all carried out 'as per the law'. He said: 'There is no intention to harm any civilians or to harm anyone who comes forward to surrender. The allegations are made up by the Maoists to put a question mark over the action of the security forces and boost up the morale of their cadres, who are already in a very bad shape.' Since the beginning of the year, leaders of the Naxalite movement, which operates as the Communist party of India (Maoist), have put out several statements calling for a ceasefire and expressed willingness to enter into peace negotiations with the government. However, the government has ignored calls for a political or rehabilitation process. That stance has reinforced a suspicion among activists and lawyers that the primary driver of the recent crackdown was not peace but instead corporate interests. The forests of Chhattisgarh and Jharkhand are rich with coal and minerals such as iron ore and some of India's biggest industrialists have set up mining operations there, with government-approved plans to expand. Soni Sori, a school teacher turned political leader fighting for adivasis rights in Chhattisgarh, claimed the targeting of adivasis was no accident. The tribal communities have blockaded and disrupted mining attempts in the forests as they fought back against their displacement and the destruction of the forests. 'This is a one-sided war— a war waged by the government against the people of this region, all to clear the way for industrialists desperate to seize the area's mineral wealth,' said Sori. The home ministry did not respond to request for comment. A home affairs statement in April said the government focused on 'security, development, and rights-based empowerment' in areas affected by the Naxal insurgency and said that 'the vision of a left wing extremism-free India is closer than ever'. Prakash Singh, the former commander of India's Border Security Force and author of a book on Naxalites, said he believed organisationally the Naxalites would ultimately be crushed and he called for a more 'humane' approach. 'Give them the opportunity to come out from the underground, lay down their arms and be given steps for rehabilitation,' he said. 'This way the government would achieve the same objective, without all this bloodshed.' Yet he also acknowledged that it was much harder to destroy the beliefs that have driven the insurgency. 'You can kill the cadre, you can liquidate the party,' said Singh. 'But as long as there is injustice, as long as there is exploitation or the displacement of the poor in any part of the country, the Naxal ideology is going to survive.'

Ukraine war briefing: severely wounded soldiers next in prisoner exchanges
Ukraine war briefing: severely wounded soldiers next in prisoner exchanges

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Ukraine war briefing: severely wounded soldiers next in prisoner exchanges

Russia and Ukraine are expected to exchange severely wounded soldiers on Thursday in the latest stage of a large-scale agreement to free more than 1,000 prisoners of war by each side. 'Tomorrow, we will begin urgent 'sanitary exchanges' of severely wounded prisoners,' Russia's top negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, posted. On Wednesday, a Ukrainian government agency announced that 'the bodies of 1,212 fallen defenders were returned to Ukraine'. Russia's top negotiator, Vladimir Medinsky, said Russia had 'received the remains of 27 Russian soldiers'. Ukraine did not say how many bodies it returned to Russia. Among the bodies returned on Wednesday were the remains of Ukrainian soldiers killed fighting in the Kharkiv, Lugansk, Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, Kyiv said, as well as those killed during Ukraine's incursion into Russia's Kursk region. Ukraine said its experts 'will identify the deceased as soon as possible'. The Ukrainian military said on Wednesday that it had struck a major Russian gunpowder plant in the western Tambov region, causing a fire. It characterised the plant as one of the main facilities in Russia's military industrial complex, making gunpowder for small arms, artillery and rocket systems. The Tambov regional governor, Yevgeny Pervyshov, confirmed an attack by drones and a fire. The Ukrainian military also said it recorded explosions at an ammunition depot in Russia's Kursk region and an airfield depot in Russia's Voronezh region. Volodymyr Zelenskyy said on Wednesday that Russia was determined to sow chaos in and destroy the south of his country as well as nearby Moldova and Romania, and called for increased pressure on Moscow to prevent further military threats. The Ukrainian president was addressing leaders of 12 south-east European leaders gathered in the Black Sea port of Odesa. 'Russian military plans are aimed at this region, and then at the borders with Moldova and Romania,' Zelenskyy said. 'We need protection now. But even more, we need long-term guarantees that this will never happen again.' Odesa, site of three ports, has been a frequent target of Russian air strikes and came under a massive drone attack on Monday that targeted an emergency medical building, a maternity ward and residential buildings. Much attention has focused on a possible Russian threat to Moldova, where the pro-European president, Maia Sandu, has accused Moscow of trying to destabilise her country and unseat her. Elections are being held in September. Sandu told the conference that Moldova 'knows just what hybrid war is and is prepared to share its experience. Moldova is facing one of its most important elections. Russia wants to see Moldova turn away from Ukraine. More to the point, it wants to use Moldova against Ukraine and the EU.' Serbia's Russia-friendly president, Aleksandar Vucic, attended the Odesa summit where he refused to sign a joint declaration calling for tougher sanctions against Moscow. It was Vucic's first visit to Ukraine since taking office over a decade ago. Vucic told Serbian media on Wednesday that the signing of the 'anti-Russian' declaration wasn't 'easy and simple for us', noting its mention of sanctions as one reason for abstaining. 'But I would like to once again express my full gratitude to President [Volodymyr] Zelenskyy for the exceptional hospitality here in Odessa,' Vucic said. Aircraft leasing companies have won a $4.7bn (£3.4bn) lawsuit against insurers over their planes stranded in Russia after the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Lisa O'Carroll reports that the high court in London ruled the planes had been 'lost' in March 2022 and the six aircraft leasing companies, including Ireland's AerCap and Dubai Aerospace Enterprise (DAE), could therefore recover losses from their 'war risks insurers' AIG, Lloyd's, Chubb and Swiss Re, as the cause of the loss was 'an act or order of the Russian government'. Restoration work started on Wednesday on Kyiv's Unesco-listed 11th-century Saint Sophia Cathedral – one of the main symbols of Ukraine – after it was damaged by Russian strikes a day earlier. Zelenskyy said part of the cathedral's facade collapsed. 'For all people who truly know history and who are no strangers to Christianity, any threat of damage or destruction to St Sophia is absolutely unacceptable, catastrophic.' Russia sent Tu-22M3 long-range bombers on a flight over the Baltic Sea on Wednesday, the defence ministry said, in the first such mission since Ukraine's stunning 1 June attack where bombers were destroyed or badly damaged by drones at air bases in Siberia and the far north.

New Russian ambassador tells Trump he will work to restore relations
New Russian ambassador tells Trump he will work to restore relations

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

New Russian ambassador tells Trump he will work to restore relations

June 11 (Reuters) - The new Russian ambassador to the United States, Alexander Darchiev, pledged to work to fully restore relations with Washington as he formally presented his credentials to President Donald Trump on Wednesday, Russian news agencies reported. "Russia and the United States are destined, as great powers, to have non-confrontational peaceful existence," the agencies quoted Darchiev as telling a reception at Russian embassy after returning from the White House. "It was a great honour for me, as Russian ambassador, to speak with President Trump and I assured him that I and this embassy under my direction will do everything to restore Russian-American relations and bring them back to normality and common sense." He said Trump had found time to receive him on the eve of the Russia Day holiday - which marks Russia's 1990 declaration of sovereignty, more than a year before the Soviet collapse. Darchiev has already completed two diplomatic stints in the United States and served as ambassador to Canada from 2014 to 2021. Like other senior Russian diplomats, he has in recent years issued strong public denunciations of the United States and the West. Washington's relations with Moscow plunged to their lowest in decades under Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, over the Kremlin's invasion of Ukraine. Ties have improved since Trump took office, with the two sides in contact to discuss a possible resolution to the conflict. "We have at last moved from monologues under the previous administration and a general absence of discussion to quite a pragmatic conversation, a complicated conversation," Darchiev was quoted as saying. The ambassador said his meeting with the U.S. president was a short one as dictated by protocol. "Nonetheless, our discussion was very constructive," the agencies quoted him as saying.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store