Baroness Casey's findings on grooming gangs set to be announced
Update:
Date: 08:10 BST
Title: Shadow home secretary says authorities 'covered up' grooming gangs
Content: Shadow Home Secretary Chris Philp says it is "critical" to get to the truth about police forces and local authorities' involvement in grooming gangs.
"They deliberately covered up these appalling crimes, the rape of young girls, predominantly those from vulnerable backgrounds," he tells BBC Breakfast.
He adds that authorities covered up these crimes because they were "more interested in race relations, than they were in protecting young girls".
Philip says Prime Minister Keir Starmer only announced the national inquiry into grooming gangs because the government had been "forced" to due to the Casey report being published.
Starmer told reporters at the weekend: "I've never said we should not look again at any issue." He added that Baroness Casey had originally thought a new inquiry was not necessary, but she had changed her mind having looked into it in recent months.
Update:
Date: 07:55 BST
Title: How did Elon Musk get involved?
Content: At the start of this year, the issue of grooming gangs was amplified by tech billionaire Elon Musk, who has millions of social media followers.
Musk made a number of attacks on X including accusing Sir Keir Starmer of being "complicit in the rape of Britain" during his time as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) between 2008 and 2013.
Speaking in January, Starmer said his record was there for all to see. While he was DPP he introduced a special prosecutor for child abuse and sexual exploitation.
Starmer also attacked those who were "spreading lies and misinformation".
The row was reignited after it was reported that the government had rejected Oldham Council's request for a government-led inquiry into historical child sexual exploitation in the town, in favour of a locally-led investigation.
Update:
Date: 07:46 BST
Title: Previous Inquiry chair highlighted abuse 'epidemic'
Content: In October 2022, child protection expert Prof Alexis Jay finished a seven-year inquiry into the countless ways children had been sexually abused in England and Wales.
The independent inquiry carried out 15 investigations, including into grooming gangs and abuse in schools and church settings.
She warned there was an "epidemic that left thousands of victims in its poisonous wake". She also made 20 recommendations to reduce child suffering.
These included setting up a national child protection authority, implementing tighter controls on who can work with vulnerable children and making not reporting abuse a criminal offence.
Professor Jay was also behind a 2014 report which found 1,400 underage girls, some as young as 11, had been abused between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham.
Update:
Date: 07:43 BST
Title: PM says it's 'right' to hold national inquiry
Content: Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said on Saturday there would be a full national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs in England and Wales.
The move was announced ahead of the publication of Baroness Louise Casey's report into the data and evidence on the nature and scale of group-based child sexual abuse.
"She's come to the view there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she's seen," Sir Keir told reporters over the weekend.
"I've read every single word of her report, and I'm going to accept her recommendation," he added.
Earlier this year, the government dismissed calls for a national inquiry on the basis the issue had already been examined during a lengthy inquiry led by Professor Alexis Jay in 2022.
Update:
Date: 07:36 BST
Title: Baroness Casey's findings on grooming gangs set to be announced
Content: Baroness Louise Casey's findings on grooming gangs are set to be published, after the prime minister announced a new national inquiry.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is expected to give a statement to the Commons over the report this afternoon.
Meanwhile, the National Crime Agency said it would carry out a nationwide operation to target and jail predators who have sexually exploited children as part of a grooming gang, the Home Office says.
Sir Keir Starmer announced on Saturday there would be a full national statutory inquiry into grooming gangs covering England and Wales.
Stay with us for live updates ahead of the report being published.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
33 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Carer's allowance: woman who won case against DWP calls for end to ‘sickening harassment'
The mother of a teenager with cerebral palsy has demanded an end to the 'sickening harassment' of unpaid carers after a significant legal victory against the government. Nicola Green, 42, was pursued by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) for more than a year after she was accused of fraudulently claiming nearly £3,000 in carer's allowance. When Green insisted she was innocent, the DWP wrote to her employer without her knowledge to try to recoup the sum from her pay. The part-time college worker, whose 17-year-old son has a number of health conditions, appealed against the fine before a tribunal judge, who quashed it in barely 30 minutes last month. Speaking after her legal victory, Green said she had been treated 'like a criminal' by the DWP over the £2,823.75 sum. 'I can't believe what they're putting people through,' she said. '[I'm] just a law-abiding person, who has never broken the law in my life. I've always tried to do things by the book … It feels like harassment.' The DWP wrote to Green on 27 May to say it was considering appealing against the tribunal ruling and that it would not cancel the debt until then. However, the department wrote to her again on Monday, days after being contacted the Guardian, to say it had cancelled the overpayment and that she would be offered advice about claiming compensation. A DWP spokesperson said: 'Ms Green's overpayment has been cancelled. We are committed to supporting carers across the UK. Tribunals offer customers an opportunity to provide any additional information which may be relevant to their case, and we regularly gather feedback and learn from them.' Green's case is the latest in the Guardian's award-winning investigation into the DWP's pursuit of unpaid carers despite official errors that have plunged tens of thousands of vulnerable people into hardship. The latest figures show that the government is clawing back at least £357m in carer's allowance paid out in error over the last six years, leaving hundreds of people with criminal records and some with debts of more than £20,000. The DWP has faced widespread criticism over its 'cruel and nonsensical' punishment of family carers who unwittingly earned slightly more than the weekly limit to qualify for carer's allowance, which rose to £196 a week in April. The department is alerted whenever a carer oversteps the weekly limit but until recently only checked half of these alerts – and as few as 12% for a long time – meaning tens of thousands of people were unknowingly building up debt for years. The controversial 'cliff-edge' rule means that a carer who earns £1 more than the weekly threshold must repay the whole of that week's carer's allowance, currently £83.30 a week. That means someone who earns £1 a week over the limit for a year must repay not £52 but £4,331.60. A Guardian analysis has found a sharp increase in the number of cases being quashed by judges in recent years as concern over the DWP's actions have grown. In the year to April 2025, tribunal judges struck out 42% of carer's allowance fines, compared with 29% in 2019 and 15% in 2014. In total, the DWP has lost 898 cases at tribunal in the last six years. Green, who works less than 14 hours a week at Bolton college, said she was reduced to tears by the DWP's pursuit. She juggles her term time-only job with caring for her teenage son, whom she did not wish to be named publicly. He has cerebral palsy, is deaf and has short bowel syndrome owing to complications arising from being born extremely premature, meaning he was hospitalised for six months from birth. 'They don't care about you. They don't care about your personal situation. They don't care what you've been through and they don't care how much you're saving the system,' she said. 'It's so unjust and it's the injustice that's driven me to challenge it. It's sickening actually. The tone of the letters – they're insinuating I'm a criminal. And going through the process you do feel like you've defrauded the system, however innocent it has been.' The DWP claimed Green had breached the earnings rules on seven occasions between December 2018 and April 2024. Five of these related to a one-off Christmas holiday bonus from her employer. One was due to unexpectedly receiving sick pay. The final overpayment related to a pay increase awarded to all Bolton college employees. However, tribunal judge Dianne Oliver ruled last month that Green had not in fact breached the rules because her average weekly pay was below the earnings limit. The DWP did not attend the 30-minute hearing in Bolton. The judgment follows a similar legal victory by another unpaid carer, Andrea Tucker, who defeated the government in February. The rulings are significant because the DWP routinely pursues carers on the basis of individual weekly earnings, rather than averaging them over a year. If the government took the latter approach, far fewer carers would end up with huge debts.
BBC News
34 minutes ago
- BBC News
Fresh appeal as arrest made in 1990 Mansfield Woodhouse murder probe
Police have issued a fresh appeal for information 35 years on from the murder of a man who was attacked in his Childerley and his wife Denise were asleep at their home in Sherwood Street, Mansfield Woodhouse, when they were attacked during the early hours of 19 February 1990, while their two children were also in the house died at the scene in Nottinghamshire, but despite being seriously hurt and requiring 160 stitches, Denise survived with lifelong the end of April a 62-year-old woman was arrested on suspicion of perverting the course of justice in connection with the incident, following developments in the case. Nottinghamshire Police said she was interviewed by detectives and bailed pending further force said officers had also recently visited Mansfield to speak to potential witnesses as they continue to investigate the death of the former miner. Kevin and Denise's daughter Emma was five and asleep in bed nearby during the previously told the BBC the pain of that night had never left her and appealed for witnesses to come said: "I just plead and urge people who know something to come forward, even if it is the smallest piece of information, please let the police know." Nottinghamshire Police described the attack as "savage" and said it had "robbed Kevin's children of a lifetime of memories".Det Ch Insp Ruby Burrow said: "We know the answer to Kevin's murder lies within the community and we also believe allegiances and loyalties will have changed after the passing of more than three decades."I'd continue to encourage anyone with any information, no matter how small, to please continue to get in touch with our officers or anonymously through Crimestoppers."
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Creator of Tattle Life finally unmasked: Founder of the 'most toxic place on the internet' is revealed as a male vegan influencer - as he's sued over posts on gossip forum where stars and 'normal mums' were 'relentlessly harassed'
The anonymous blogger who made money running a gossip site dubbed a 'trolls' paradise' has been revealed to be a male vegan food influencer - after a two-year legal battle saw an Irish couple successfully get £300,000 in damages after suing the publisher. A 41-year-old English man called Sebastian Bond is now confirmed to be behind Tattle Life, a forum which became synonymous with venomous posts about influencers, A-listers and anyone in the public eye; spurred on by countless of accounts sporting vague, untraceable usernames. Users dissect and annihilate, every minute detail of their targets' posts, from cleaning guru Mrs Hinch 's perceived struggle to fasten the poppers on her son's outfit (sample quote: 'like she'd never even seen a baby let alone dressed one before') to presenter Stacey Solomon 's toenails ('they could snatch salmon out of the river they are that long'). But now, a court has promised that a 'day of reckoning' it coming both for the cogs running the platform as well as those who used it to spit vitriol. For nearly a decade, since the site was set up in 2017, no one knew who ran Tattle Life. But many may be surprised to hear that he is a businessman 'going under a number of aliases' - and is reportedly known online as the author and foodie behind plant-based recipe Instagram page Nest and Glow (boasting 135,000 followers), according to the plaintiffs' legal team. Sebastian's identity can be revealed after the High Court of Justice in Northern Ireland last week granted an application to lift reporting restrictions, The Journal reports. Couple Neil and Donna Sands pursued legal action after facing 'defamation and harassment' on Tattle Life 'threads'. Donna, who runs Sylkie along with other brands, and Neil, an AI founder, said they found a 45-page thread of which they were subject to. This was deleted in May of this year. As per the outlet, Neil first reached out to the site operators in 2021 and asked them to take down the commentary about himself and Donna 'or face legal action'. In 2023, they initiated the process. Neil and Donna got £150,000 each in damages, and the Court granted an injunctive relief to prevent Tattle Life from posting about the couple again. It was also ordered that the Sands' legal costs be paid, with 'further costs and third-party compliance expenses' amounting to £1.8 million. The defendants' cessation figure - the amount which is payable to lift freezing orders against them - is currently at £1,077,173.00. The judge hit out at Tattle Life, stating there was 'clearly a case of peddling untruths for profit'. 'It is the exercise of extreme cynicism - the calculated exercise of extreme cynicism,' they continued. 'Which in reality constitutes behaviour solely aimed at making profit out of people's misery. 'People facilitating this are making money out of it… protecting their income streams by protecting the identity of the individual posters.' It is also understood that Sebastian uses different names online - one of them being Bastian Durward - and owns a number of businesses across the world. Two of them, Mr Justice Colton confirmed, include UK-registered Yuzu Zest Limited and Hong Kong-registered Kumquat Tree Limited. According to Companies House information, the former is currently in liquidation but alleged to offer 'media representation services'. At a hearing last Thursday, the court saw a letter from Sebastian's legal team, sent to one of the plaintiffs, claiming he was the Tattle Life founder but was 'unaware of any legal proceedings against him'. The Sands legal representatives disputed that he was unaware. An initial glimpse at Nest and Glow doesn't won't rouse suspicions that its founder is running a social media platform that has become known for its 'cruel' remarks. Aesthetic photos of mango chia seed pots and sweet potato snacks dominate the feed, along with instructions for recipes. An Amazon author page for his cookbook - being flogged for £20 online - claims that 'Bastian' has a 'passion for sharing healthy recipes to inspire everyone to eat natural food full of nutrients and vitamins' 'I've been vegan for over 30 years and on a nutrient-dense plant-based healthy diet for 15 of those,' he added. 'In 2015 I decided to leave my office job in order to follow my passions. This resulted in setting up the site Nest and Glow where I share healthy recipes and other natural lifestyle content.' However, the Irish couple who unmasked him as Tattle Life, have shared the names of his alises on their social media - stating that he was masking under the false name as a site moderator, Helen McDougal. 'Dear Friends,' Neil and Donna shared in an Instagram statement this weekend. 'As a couple we never wanted or expected to undertake this work, however when we discovered the hate site we were forced to take action. 'We are very grateful for your support, and hope that this serves as a reminder to those who want to attack others from behind a screen - that the internet is not an anonymous place. 'We will share more soon, but for today, we hope that this news will provide some peace to those affected by online hate and harassment, and that the internet can be a safer space for us all. Onward.' Tattle Life states on its site that it has a 'zero-tolerance policy to any content that is abusive, hateful, harmful and a team of moderators online 24/7 to remove any content that breaks our strict rules - often in minutes'. However, it adds that 'influencer marketing is insidious' and 'revolves around people that occupy the space between celebrity and friend to stealthy sell when in reality it's a parasocial relationship. 'It's an important part of a healthy, free and fair society for members of the public to have an opinion on those in a position of power and influence; that is why tattle exists. 'We allow people to express their views on businesses away from an influencers feed on a site where they would have to go out of their way to read, this is not trolling.' As reported per The Journal, Neil Sands also said: 'We undertook this case not just for ourselves but for the many people who have suffered serious personal and professional harm through anonymous online attacks on this and other websites. 'We believe in free speech, but not consequence-free speech – particularly where it is intended to, and succeeds in, causing real-world damage to people's lives, livelihoods and mental health. We were in the fortunate position to be able to take the fight to these faceless operators, and it took a lot of time, effort and expense.' Countless celebrities have been subject to vitriol at the hands of vicious comment threads - as well as those with smaller online presences. One tribe seems to draw particular malice: so-called mumfluencers, Instagram influencers who make their trade in sharing the exploits of themselves and their children online. In 2023, former mummy blogger Clemmie Hooper was handed a caution order for a period of one-year following a midwifery misconduct hearing - four years after she engaged in trolling other influencers on a gossip forum. The mother-of-four from Kent, once boasted 700,000 followers on Instagram and had partnered with brands such as Mothercare and Boden on sponsored posts. But in 2019, Clemmie - who worked part-time as a midwife - came off social media after her account on Tattle Life, a website devoted to discussing influencers, was exposed. Among the posts made under the Alice in Wanderlust psuedonym, was one accusing Black mummy blogger Candice Brathwaite of social climbing, being 'aggressive' and using her 'race as a weapon'. Just two months before, Clemmie had invited Candice onto her podcast to discuss her traumatic birth experience and how she developed life-threatening sepsis following an emergency C-section. Following the Fitness To Practise Committee Substantive Hearing with the Nursing and Midwifery Council, which started on February 28, of that year the panel's decision was announced on March 7. Earlier in the hearing, Clemmie had admitted to three of the charges facing her - that she made the comments in question, and that they had been intended to 'undermine or humiliate' their target. She also accepted that elements of the posts were 'racially offensive and/or discriminatory', but maintains that she was unaware of this offence at the time. The panel took into account some mitigating factors, including Clemmie's health at the time of making the posts, which was said to have clouded her objectivity. It also considered positive testimonials with regards to her midwifery practice, her public apology, her reflection and insight into her conduct, and her 'evident remorse', as well as how she had been affected by reading a very large volume of negative comments about herself online. Her self-removal from social media, and what the panel considered to be her negligible risk of repetition, were also considered mitigating factors. In addition, the panel said it accepts that Clemmie was unaware that describing a Black woman as aggressive was a racial trope when writing the posts, and that she has since engaged in self-directed training and reading around equality and diversity. Speaking to Grazia in 2021, Candice Brathwaite, said it had been 'painful' reading the posts on Tattle.
