Surat banker dies in Pahalgam terror attack, three others injured
Rajkot/Surat/Gandhinagar: A day before he could celebrate his 44th birthday in scenic Kashmir, Surat resident
Shailesh Kalathiya
fell prey to the bullets of terrorists in Pahalgam, leaving his family completely shattered.
Alok Pandey, relief commissioner of Gujarat, confirmed Kalathiya's death. Kalathiya, who worked with a leading nationalised bank, went on a vacation to Kashmir with his wife Sheetal, daughter Niti, and son Naksh. He was currently posted in the insurance department of the bank's Kandivli branch in Mumbai for the last one year. Before being transferred to Mumbai, Kalathiya was posted in Jodhpur, Rajasthan.
Kalathiya was to celebrate his birthday on April 23, sources confirmed.
Three other tourists from Gujarat, 61-year-old Vinubhai Dabhi, a resident of Bhavnagar, Manika Patel, and Rinoo Pandey, were also injured in the attack. Pandey said their condition was stable.
Kalakhiya, who lived in Harikunj Society in the Chikoowadi locality of Katargam area, was originally from Drufaniya village of Amreli district and settled in Surat. His cousin brother lives in Mota Varaccha. The family members left for Kashmir to bring back his body.
Meanwhile, a father-son duo from Bhavnagar, Yatish Parmar and Smit, are incommunicado. Bhavnagar Range IG Gautam Parmar said the local authorities are in constant contact with J&K police and CRPF to trace their whereabouts.
Injured Vinubhai Dabhi's daughter, Sheetal, a constable with Bhavnagar police, told the media that a bullet grazed his arm, but the authorities assured the family that he is out of danger. Dabhi was part of a group of 20 relatives who travelled to Srinagar on April 16 to attend a spiritual gathering led by preacher Morari Bapu.
"I spoke to my parents around 2:30 pm, and they sounded cheerful, enjoying their time in mini Switzerland, Baisaran in Pahalgam. After hearing about the attack, I called my mother again at 5:30 pm. She told me my father was injured, but the wound was not serious," Sheetal said.
She added that a relative sitting next to her mother heard a loud blast, and moments later, gunfire erupted. "Everyone started running for cover," said Sheetal, who left for Pahalgam later in the night.
Dabhi's son Ashwin informed that the group travelled from Surendranagar to Katra aboard the Jammu-Tawi Express to attend the religious event. Their return journey was planned for April 30, with stops at Vaishnodevi, Punjab, and Rajasthan.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Indian Express
9 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Body of Haryana model Sheetal found in a canal near Sonipat
CHANDIGARH: The body of a 23-year-old Haryana-based model Sheetal was found in a canal in Sonipat with throat slit, two days after she was reported missing. Sources said that Sheetal alias Simmy Chaudhry was working as a model in the Haryanvi music industry, and before that, she was employed at a hotel in Karnal. She was living with her sister, Neha, in Panipat. On June 14, the model went for a shoot in the Ahar village. However, when she did not return home, her sister filed a missing persons complaint with the Panipat police. Her body, found in a canal close to Khanda village by the police has been sent for post-mortem. Sheetal had left two days ago in a car with a man identified as Sunil and the vehicle reportedly fell into the canal under suspicious circumstances.
Indian Express
10 hours ago
- Indian Express
A Delhi woman missing, two bodies, no answers: Inside a murder probe that unravelled
It was a cold winter evening five years ago when Ankit Bhati (27) arrived at the New Ashok Nagar police station in East Delhi. His wife, 23-year-old Sheetal, had been missing, he told the police. He suspected her parents, who had disapproved of their relationship from the start. Then, a highly decomposed body was discovered in a canal in Uttar Pradesh's Bulandshahr. Ankit was shown a photo, and he identified it as Sheetal. Based on his complaint and their investigation, police arrested the parents and four other relatives. The police case was that they strangled her, drove to the canal, and dumped her body. But in November 2023, the case took a dramatic turn — DNA tests came back negative. The body was not Sheetal's. And the police probe hit a wall. So, what happened? Sheetal and Ankit's courtship started around 2016, according to court documents. It was a classic meet-cute — they were supposed to find a match for a common friend, but they fell in love instead. They both lived in New Ashok Nagar, they were neighbours — Sheetal was staying with her parents, taking tuition classes, while Ankit was working at his uncle's dairy shop in the locality. The couple then decided to tell their parents about the relationship. Sheetal's parents did not take the news well. According to police, they allegedly beat her up and didn't allow her to leave the house for a while after she told them. On October 23, 2019, the couple secretly tied the knot at an Arya Samaj temple in Tis Hazari, according to court documents, and continued living at home. In January 2020, according to Ankit's police complaint, Sheetal said she would tell her parents about their marriage. Her uncle's son was getting married, and she would speak to her family about their own wedding 'at an appropriate time'. Ankit alleged that he regularly spoke with her over the phone. Their last conversation was on January 18, 2020. On February 6, 2020, Ankit approached the police, stating that his wife had been missing for a month. He had claimed Sheetal's parents were against their marriage as they belonged to the same gotra. In Hindu families, marriages within the same gotra are frowned upon since they are believed to be descended from the same lineage. In its FIR filed on February 16, 2020, the New Ashok Nagar Police alleged that Sheetal's parents didn't allow the two to meet and that they 'intentionally kidnapped her and hid her somewhere'. As police began investigating, they received information that a highly decomposed body had been fished out of a canal near Bulandshahr on January 30 that year. Police said their counterparts in Aligarh carried out the autopsy, and the body 'was missing skin due to extreme bloating in the water'. A photograph was shown to Ankit, along with a bundle of clothes — blue lowers and a light blue jersey — for identification. He 'confirmed' the body was Sheetal's — he claimed he had gifted the clothes to his wife. Another identifying factor was that the body had dental braces, just like Sheetal. Police thought they had an open-and-shut case of 'honour killing'. Over the next two days, Sheetal's father Ravinder Chaudhary (43), her mother Suman, her two uncles, a cousin and brother-in-law were arrested under sections 201 (disappearance of evidence), 120B (criminal conspiracy) and 302 (murder). According to a court order dated February 6, 2023, police alleged that Ravinder strangled Sheetal with a shawl 'in a fit of rage'. Then, two cars with the six accused drove to the canal. 'Her parents were in a WagonR with her body, which was kept upright in the rear seat, and the other car with the rest of the relatives followed,' an officer had said earlier. Police told the court that Ravinder admitted to disposing of his daughter's body in the lake. 'The prosecution has prima facie established the presence of the accused, Ravinder, near the lake on the intervening night of 18.01.2020-19.01.2020… from [his] call record details… Call record details of Sheetal's mobile phone also show her number was switched off on 18.01.2020 at 18:24:11, which corroborates the complainant's version,' said Additional Sessions Judge Swati Katiyar of Karkardooma Court while framing charges in this case on February 6, 2023. While the others were released on bail, Ravinder remained in jail. On November 18, 2023, the police case unraveled. As per procedure, DNA samples from the body and Ravinder were collected and sent to the Forensic Science Lab in Delhi's Rohini. The lab sent back the report in 2022, which said the samples did not match. Police then collected a sample of the mother's DNA — it was negative. This meant the body was not that of Sheetal's. Ravinder was granted bail by a Delhi court citing the DNA mismatch. The police were stumped. A scrutiny of court documents revealed that not one, but two bodies were recovered on the same day from the same canal. While they underwent autopsies, samples from only one body were preserved by doctors, documents added. Police and medical authorities never identified the second body. '… it came to light that the post-mortem of another female was conducted on the same day and at the same hospital [where] the post-mortem of the purported victim of the present offence was conducted. The possibility of switching biological samples between the two deceased females was raised by the prosecution. Since the viscera of the other deceased female was no longer preserved, the IO [Investigating Officer] repeated a DNA test… from a fresh blood sample of the wife of the present applicant… However, the same opinion was rendered by the CFSL, Lodhi Road. It again reiterated that the two DNA profiles did not match,' said then Additional Sessions Judge Vishal Gogne in his November 18, 2023, order. ASJ Gogne also stated that 'there is a strong likelihood' that the body recovered from the canal was not Sheetal's. There was no possibility to ascertain if the other body was Sheetal's — the Delhi Police said 'both bodies had been cremated'. Advocate Deepak Sharma, who represented the accused in court, argued that the Delhi Police had been negligent in their investigation. 'This is a botched-up investigation. Where is Sheetal? Who was the other woman whose body was found?' he said. On their part, the Delhi Police 'blamed' the UP police [in whose jurisdiction the body was found] for their alleged negligence. 'They (the UP Police) had photos of both bodies. Ankit identified his wife from the photo. We think they switched Sheetal's body with the other woman's since both were unidentified as far as they were concerned,' a Delhi Police officer earlier told The Indian Express. When contacted, the UP Police said they need to examine records, since it's an old case, before they can comment. Fresh avenues, denied Hoping to revive their case, the Delhi Police, on September 21 last year, moved court to conduct a lie detector test and a psychological assessment of Ravinder and his family. 'It is submitted that on 16.02.2020, the above case was registered on the complaint of Mr Ankit Bhati… During the investigation, it was revealed that the missing [woman], Sheetal Choudhary, was murdered and her body was dumped in Gang Nahar. Later on, an unknown body was recovered in Aligarh, and her post-mortem was conducted by the police officer concerned in Aligarh Hospital. During the post-mortem, exhibits, including teeth, of the deceased were seized, but the DNA of the same teeth [did] not match the DNA of her parents,' read the application. 'For further investigation, a polygraph test, layered voice stress analysis, and a psychological Assessment test of the six accused persons is required. Therefore, it is requested that the tests may be… conducted in FSL/Rohini…,' the application read. On May 29 this year, a Delhi court rejected the police's request. 'Since the accused persons have not consented… the court cannot force [them] to undergo the tests… Accordingly, the application is dismissed,' said Additional Sessions Judge Alok Shukla of Karkardooma Court in his order. 'It is settled law that compulsory or involuntary administration of polygraph tests on an accused violates the right against self-incrimination,' he added. As for the second body, Advocate Sharma had recently argued in court that an FIR should have been lodged in relation to it. The Delhi Police had replied that since the body was not Sheetal's and since it was found in UP, it was not in their domain. To this, Sharma replied that a zero FIR could have been lodged, which can be registered by any police station irrespective of jurisdiction, or the UP police could have been intimated about the events. Speaking to The Indian Express, Sharma alleged: 'It is crystal clear that from the beginning, no fair investigation was ever carried out by the investigating officer. The accused persons were arrested based on a false and concocted story… the investigating agency did not bother to conduct the lie detector tests at an initial stage of the probe.' To date, only a handful of witnesses have been examined, and the trial is unlikely to conclude any time soon. Meanwhile, Sheetal's whereabouts remain unknown. No body. No closure. Just a growing trail of questions — and two families still waiting for answers.
Hindustan Times
10 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Murdered Haryana model Sheetal Chaudhry's sister suspects Karnal hotel owner's role: ‘He pressured to marry'
The body of a 23-year-old model from Panipat was recovered from a canal in Khanda village of Sonepat's Kharkhauda area in Haryana, police said on Monday. The victim, identified as Sheetal also known as Simmy Chaudhry, was murdered, with her throat found slit, officials added. According to police, Sheetal had been working in the Haryana music industry for the past six months. Prior to that, she was reportedly employed at a hotel in Karnal. Sonepat ACP (Headquarters) Ajeet Singh confirmed the recovery of the body. 'Her sister had lodged a missing complaint in a police station in Panipat on Sunday. The victim's sister Neha said that Sheetal had left the house on June 14 and went for shooting at Ahar village in Panipat. We are probing this case from all angles. Her family suspected that she was murdered,' Singh said. Also read | Haryana model's body found in canal days after disappearance Neha, the victim's sister, alleged that Sheetal had called her on the night of June 14 to say that a former friend, identified as Sunil from Panipat, had arrived at the shooting location and beat her up. Neha further claimed that Sheetal had met Sunil while working at his hotel in Karnal. 'She also told me that Sunil was mounting pressure on her to go with him. Thereafter, her phone disconnected and she was unreachable," Sheetal Chaudhry's sister said. She added, 'On Sunday, Sunil's car slipped into a canal in Delhi and he was taken out by the passerby but my sister was not in the car. We suspect that Sunil killed my sister and he is concocting a false story. He is undergoing treatment in a hospital in Panipat.' Also read | Who was Sheetal? Haryana-based model found dead in Sonipat canal According to Neha, 'Sunil mounted pressure on her to get married". But Sheetal later came to know that Sunil was already 'married and father of two kids.' Soon after which, "Sheetal left the job but the hotel owner continued to chase her,' Haryana model's sister claimed. Meanwhile, Police is verifying the statements of victim's family members and a an investigation is ongoing.
