Britain's care system is collapsing – but Ed Davey has a plan
Bookshops receive their fair share of polemics from politicians seeking to enhance their own status, usually in the run-up to an election. Worthy (and often dull) subjects are tackled by this or that serving or aspiring party leader, in a bid to convince voters, even those who only spot the books from afar, that they're serious people with a serious agenda. Such is the cynicism of the age.
Why I Care by Ed Davey is not in that category. On first glance, the title might put off the curious reader; it reeks of Lib Dem virtue-signalling, proclaiming the moral superiority of a party from whom we're well used to hearing lectures about how to be better people.
But even in the first few pages, it becomes clear that the title has a literal meaning that transforms this book into a sincere, pragmatic and powerful analysis of one of the most urgent dilemmas facing our country today. For Davey himself is a carer, has been for most of his life and will be for the rest of it.
He lost his father when he was four years old and his mum, from cancer, when he was 15. He spent years as a teenager helping to care for her, aided by his two older brothers. His own son, John, has a neurological condition that has left him with severe learning and physical disabilities and the need for round-the-clock, lifelong care. And Davey's wife, Emily, has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis.
It is in this context that Davey attempts to tackle the realities and challenges – but also the joys and satisfaction – that come with the responsibilities of caring for a loved one. Why I Care is not an easy read; it is frequently uncomfortable, because it is so honest about the circumstances experienced by so many carers of all ages. Yet Davey's optimism and his pure love for his family, his obviously sincere concern for the plight of others in the same situation, shines from his writing.
This is, in part, an autobiography, and as with all political narratives, it relates the author's political career from non-committed student to full-time employee of the Liberal Democrats in Westminster and thence to a parliamentary seat himself. Political nerds might have preferred a more detailed – and indeed, a more strictly chronological – account of what, by any measure, has been an extraordinary political career.
Having entered the Commons in 1997, Davey rose to the Cabinet in 2012, in David Cameron and Nick Clegg's coalition government, serving as Secretary of State for Energy and Climate Change – a historically unusual achievement for a Lib Dem politician in itself. He lost his seat at the 2015 general election – the first serving cabinet minister to do so since Michael Portillo in 1997 – but regained it two years later, and then, after Jo Swinson's catastrophic defeat at the 2019 general election, became leader of his party.
That this rollercoaster ride was experienced even as Davey and his wife coped with their own domestic challenges says much about the man. And it becomes clear that writing about himself and his own career was never his priority for this book: his chief concern is helping the reader understand not just his own plight, but the challenges facing the millions of unpaid carers in the UK.
His authority comes partly as a result of his own experience and partly because of his work as MP for Kingston and Surbiton, in which he deals with constituents negotiating the maze put in carers' paths by local and national government. There are more than six million unpaid carers in the UK, a million of whom work more than 50 hours a week. As Davey points out, the continued operation of the NHS depends on the willingness of this army of volunteers to keep doing that work. Were they to down tools for any reason, the system would be unable to function.
And yet, despite how essential these workers are, the recognition, support and rewards are, at best, inconsistent. Davey eschews the temptation simply to berate successive governments for their failings, and tentatively explores policy solutions instead. Even so, those who expect a detailed template for a future system of support for carers will be disappointed. According to Davey, it is our politicians' tendency to opt for solutions first, and only subsequently to seek cross-party consensus on broad principles, that has led so often to failure. For instance, the current Government's decision to set up a further three-year review of care under Dame Louise Casey is a source of frustration to him: Davey believes that previous reviews, not least the review led by Andrew Dilnot and commissioned by the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition, have already covered much of the same ground.
Davey recommends what to most would seem a straightforward and common-sense innovation: allocating a named carer and social-worker to families, much as most people have a named GP. As you might expect from a Liberal Democrat, Davey is more sympathetic to a 'ground up' approach than a centralised one. 'The Casey Commission should look at this, rather than wasting time pondering a centralised, remote and bureaucratic system. I'm totally convinced good community models would enhance the efficiency of a named care worker approach.'
In explaining his motive for writing Why I Care, Davey writes: 'I hope I can promote a debate about how parents or unpaid family carers can be reassured that some alliance between family, community and state will ensure their loved ones will always get the care they need. And that the care will be safe and kind.' It is that last word that stands out. It is not a word you might expect to read in most books about policy but it permeates this one: Davey has spent his entire life being kind to those he loves and those he represents. He is not a man who dines out on his own moral superiority; he just gets on with it and hopes that the Government can too.
Why I Care is published by HarperNorth at £20. To order your copy, call 0330 173 5030 or visit Telegraph Books
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
The UK's 'most hazardous building' - the story of Sellafield's nuclear disaster
The UK's largest nuclear site – once dubbed the "most hazardous building in the country" – could continue leaking radioactive water into the ground until the 2050s. That's the damning verdict of a new MPs' report into the ongoing decommissioning of the Sellafield nuclear power plant in Cumbria, which, nearly 70 years ago, was the site of one of the world's worst ever nuclear accidents. In October 1957, uranium cells inside one of the site's two nuclear reactors caught fire, burning for three days solid. The fallout remains to this day and, on Wednesday, a report by the Commons public accounts committee criticised the speed of decommissioning the site, warning that officials are in danger of losing a race against time to complete the clean-up safely. Of particular concern is the Magnox Swarf Storage Silo (MSSS), which was built in the 1960s and consists of 22 vertical underwater compartments, storing around 10,000 tonnes of radioactive waste. Since 2018, the silo has been leaking enough radioactive water to fill an Olympic swimming pool every three years. The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) has described the situation as its "single biggest environmental issue". The site, initially known as Windscale, was initially built as a royal ordnance factory during the Second World War. After the war, it became the main site intended to produce plutonium for the UK's nuclear weapons programme and became home to Britain's first two nuclear reactors. During its construction, chief engineer John Cockcroft had insisted that filters were installed at the top of the chimney stacks on the two gas-cooled nuclear reactors, Windscale Pile 1 and 2. On the morning of 10 October 1957, a planned energy release procedure in Windscale Pile 1 did not go to plan, and unintentionally heated parts of the reactor. Scientists were expecting the reactor to eventually cool down but then spotted a fire in uranium fuel cells, producing a blaze reaching an estimated 1,300C (2,380F) – causing an incident so bad it was eventually ranked in severity at level 5 out of 7 on the International Nuclear Event Scale. The severity of events were minimised by the government and nuclear establishment of the time. When the incident started, men wearing radiation suits used scaffolding pipes to try and push the burning fuel rods out of the graphite reactor. High radiation levels meant they could only spend a few hours at the reactor, so they sought more volunteers from a nearby cinema. The blaze was eventually extinguished when air to the reactor room was restricted, but tons of radioactive materials had already escaped into the atmosphere. Indeed, it was Cockcroft's filter – the pair were collectively known as 'Cockcroft follies' – on Windscale Pile 1's chimney that stopped the disaster from becoming a catastrophe as it limited the amount of radiation released into the air. The ramifications of the accident were felt for years. It is estimated about 240 cases of cancer were caused by the radioactive leak and all milk produced within 310 square miles (800 square km) of the site was destroyed for a month after the fire. The disaster proved to be a wake-up call for the nuclear industry. Windscale Pile 1 was permanently shut down, and remains sealed and not yet fully decommissioned while Windscale Pile 2, which was undamaged, was also shut down shortly afterwards. It also to led to vast operational and technical improvements in nuclear reactor design, technology, licensing and regulation. Nowadays, Sellafield is one of the largest nuclear sites in Europe, with more than 10,000 people cleaning it behind miles of fencing. The size of a small town, it also has its own infrastructure with facilities including a postal service, an armed police force, shops, canteen and a medical team. The site's aging buildings plus the highly radioactive nuclear waste and unstable materials stored at the site mean it remains a significant hazard. Despite being non-operational since 2003, the site has many years of dismantling to go, up to 2125. Indeed, Sellafield still contains hundreds of thousands of tonnes of radioactive waste, including the largest stockpile of civilian plutonium in the world, in excess of 140 tonnes. Sellafield Ltd, the company clearing the site on behalf of the NDA, has been criticised in the report for missing 'most' of its annual targets, including those at the MSSS. 'The consequence of this underperformance is that the buildings are likely to remain extremely hazardous for longer", the MPs' report said. The challenge for Sellafield Ltd, and the NDA, is not only cleaning up the site but also maintaining the ageing buildings, which were never designed to be accessed again, and contain the unknown amount of radioactive waste inside. The site has several high-risk buildings including the Pile Fuel Storage Pond (PFSP), an open-air pond holding irradiated fuel and sludge that was built in the 1950s. The Pile Fuel Cladding Silo (PFCS) which contains fuel casings and other highly radioactive materials and the MSSS, which holds metallic cladding waste and removed from nuclear fuel rods. Despite an estimated decommissioning cost of £136bn, according to the report, the leakage on the MSSS is expected to persist until the oldest section of the structure is emptied in the 2050s. Public accounts committee chairman Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown said: 'The sheer scale of the hundred-year timeframe of the decommissioning project makes it hard to grasp the immediacy of safety hazards and cost overruns that delays can have. 'Every day at Sellafield is a race against time to complete works before buildings reach the end of their life. Our report contains too many signs that this is a race Sellafield risks losing.' The NDA acknowledged that the leak at the MSSS is its 'single biggest environmental issue', saying managing and retrieving waste from the silo was their 'highest priority'. They said: 'As the report says, the leak in the MSSS is contained and does not pose a risk to the public. Regulators accept that the current plan to tackle the leak is the most effective one.' The UK has a reported volume of approximately 4.58 million cubic metres of radioactive waste stored in various facilities across the country. Radioactive waste goes through stages of treatment, packaging, storage and disposal depending on its classification as high level waste (HLW), intermediate level waste (ILW) or low level waste (LLW). HLW is typically found in liquid form, and is often generated as a by-product during the reprocessing of fuel from nuclear reactors, with current practice to store for at least 50 years before disposal. ILW consists of mainly steels, graphite, concrete, cement, sand and sludges and is stored until a suitable disposal route becomes available, essentially an underground facility the UK government is planning on building. LLW is building rubble, soil and steel items that may have come into contact with radioactive material and can sometimes be incinerated or recycled. In the longer term, the UK government plans to create a geological disposal facility (GDF) to store nuclear waste underground for thousands of years. The NDA has identified two sites in Cumbria and plans to provide a decision to government on one site after community engagement. The current planning assumption is that a GDF will be available for intermediate level waste emplacement in the 2050s and high-level waste and spent fuel from 2075.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Watch live: Starmer faces Badenoch at PMQs after Reeves vows winter fuel U-turn
Watch live as Sir Keir Starmer faces Kemi Badenoch at PMQs on Wednesday (4 June), days after unveiling the UK's defence strategy for the next decade. On Monday (2 May), the prime minister announced his Strategic Defence Review with the aim to move the UK to 'warfighting readiness'. The government said that it will increase defence spending to 2.5% of gross domestic product from April 2027. Sir Keir also announced plans to build up to 12 new attack submarines which will replace the current fleet from the late 2030s onwards, and also confirmed that £15billion will be spent on its nuclear warhead programme. As the Labour government hikes up defence spending, opposition leaders will likely challenge the Prime Minister over what funding areas will have to be slashed in order to compensate. He will face questions in the Commons at noon, the majority from the Conservative leader who trivialised the plans as 'just an announcement' as 'a lot of the things they've announced in this strategic defence review require money'. Badenoch could also press the prime minister on the increasing numbers of small boat crossings. On Saturday (31 May), more than 1,100 migrants arrived in the UK, the highest number recorded on a single day so far in 2025.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Protect freedom to criticise Islam in law, MPs demand
The freedom to criticise Islam must be protected, Tory MPs have demanded amid a row over a man's conviction for burning a Koran. Following a trial at Westminster magistrates' court, Hamit Coskun, 50, was found guilty of committing a racially aggravated public order offence during a peaceful protest. Coskun set fire to a Koran outside the Turkish consulate in London earlier this year while declaring that Islam was a 'religion of terrorism'. Politicians and free speech campaigners claimed the 'grotesque' prosecution was an attempt to revive and expand long-abolished blasphemy laws. In an attempt to prevent future prosecutions, Nick Timothy, a Conservative MP, is proposing to put a Freedom of Expression (Religion) Bill before the Commons next Tuesday. The proposed Bill, which is co-signed by 11 other MPs, would extend section 29J of the Public Order Act, which protects the criticism of religions and religious beliefs so that it covers section 4A and section 5 of the Public Order Act, under which Coskun was charged. Mr Timothy argued that those parts of the Act are currently being used to prosecute legitimate criticism and protest regarding Islam. He said that while England and Wales abolished blasphemy laws in 2008, they were now effectively being revived through the use of the Public Order Act. The Bill, if enacted, would 'protect free speech and ensure no religion is above the law'. Section 29J of the Public Order Act provides protection to the right to criticise or express 'antipathy, dislike, ridicule, insult or abuse of particular religions or the beliefs or practices of their adherents'. Mr Timothy told The Telegraph: 'We now have a blasphemy law in this country. Parliament never voted for it, and the country doesn't want it. 'To use the Public Order Act in this way is completely unacceptable, and to argue the protester was shown to be guilty of disorderly conduct because he was attacked by others is grotesque. 'I will introduce a Bill to put a stop to all of this next week. I challenge the Government to support it.' Sir Gavin Williamson, who is among the MPs who signed the Bill, said: 'This Bill rightly draws a clear line in rejecting any attempt to introduce blasphemy laws through the back door. 'Britain abolished such laws to uphold open debate, critical thought, and the principle that no idea or belief is beyond scrutiny. That must not be undone.' At Westminster magistrates' court on Monday, Coskun was found guilty of a religiously aggravated public order offence of using disorderly conduct, which was motivated 'in part by hostility towards members of a religious group, namely followers of Islam'. Coskun, who is an atheist of Armenian-Kudish descent, attended the Turkish Consulate on Feb 13 while holding a burning copy of the Koran above his head and shouting 'F--- Islam' and 'Islam is religion of terrorism'. He was ordered to pay £240, but despite the conviction he has pledged to continue burning Korans and intends to go on a tour of the UK, visiting Birmingham, Liverpool and Glasgow where he will set fire to the holy book. It is unclear whether he will resist doing so until the case is heard at the Court of Appeal where it will be decided whether he is able to challenge Monday's verdict. During his protest, Coskun was attacked by a passer-by, who kicked and punched him and spat him while he lay on the ground. Although the man has admitted assaulting Coskun, he has denied using a knife in the attack. Passing sentence on Coskun on Monday, District Judge John McGarva dismissed the suggestion that the prosecution was an attempt to 'bring back and expand blasphemy law'. He said Coskun had a 'deep-seated hatred of Islam and its followers' and that what made his conduct disorderly was the timing and location of the protest and the fact it was accompanied by abusive language. He said the fact Coskun was attacked during the protest showed he posed a risk to public order. The judge concluded that Coskun's actions were 'highly provocative' and 'were motivated at least in part, by hatred of followers of the religion'. The Free Speech Union (FSU) paid for Coskun's legal fees alongside the National Secular Society, with both welcoming the Bill. Lord Young, the director and founder of the FSU, said: 'The Free Speech Union is helping Hamit Coskum appeal his conviction and we're optimistic it will be overturned, but that's a laborious, expensive process and it would be helpful if the law was clarified so the Crown Prosecution Service stops prosecuting people who protest against Islam or any other religion.' A spokesman for the National Secular Society said the conviction of Coskun was 'another damaging chip away at the fundamental right to free expression'. The spokesman added: 'Section 29J's robust free speech provisions explicitly protect expressions of antipathy, dislike, ridicule, and even abuse of beliefs, clearly signalling Parliament's intent to prevent the resurgence of blasphemy laws. 'With public order laws being used as a proxy for blasphemy codes to appease religious fundamentalists, the case for broadening freedom of expression protections is clear.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.