Jailed M25 protesters gain support ahead of appeal
The great-granddaughter of leading suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst has said sentences given to several climate protesters were "heavy-handed and disproportionate" ahead of an appeal against their prison terms.
Sixteen activists jailed for as long as five years for their involvement in protests will challenge the length of their sentences at the Court of Appeal in London.
They were jailed for activities such as blocking the M25, throwing soup on to Vincent van Gogh's Sunflowers, and occupying tunnels dug under the road leading to the Navigator Oil Terminal in Thurrock, Essex.
Lending her support to their appeals, campaigner Helen Pankhurst compared their campaigns with that of the suffragettes.
"Environmental activists today stand in the same tradition," Ms Pankhurst said.
"I have no doubt future generations around the world will thank them for their campaigns."
Environmental campaign groups Friends of the Earth (FoE) and Greenpeace UK have been allowed to intervene in the case of five protesters, referred to by FoE as the "Whole Truth Five", who were jailed in July last year for disrupting traffic by having protesters climb onto gantries over the M25 for four successive days in November 2022.
Roger Hallam, co-founder of environmental campaign groups Just Stop Oil and Extinction Rebellion, was sentenced to five years in prison while Daniel Shaw, Louise Lancaster, Lucia Whittaker De Abreu and Cressida Gethin each received four-year jail terms.
All five protesters were convicted of conspiracy to intentionally cause a public nuisance, a law introduced in 2022 which outlaws direct action that causes "serious harm" to a section of the public. This can include property damage, injury, serious distress, annoyance or inconvenience.
During their trial, prosecution barristers told the court the protest had led to 50,000 hours of vehicle delays, an economic hit of at least £765,000, and cost the Metropolitan Police more than £1.1m.
During the trial last year, Judge Christopher Hehir said the five protestors had "crossed the line from concerned campaigner to fanatic".
He added Parliament had made clear it saw non-violent direct action against national infrastructure as serious and passed a law allowing him to hand down sentences of up to 10 years - more than for some violent offences.
Calling for the court to repeal the sentences, Ms Pankhurst said: "The heavy-handed and disproportionate custodial sentences given in the UK to peaceful environmental activists speaking truth to power is worrying in the extreme."
FoE and Greenpeace UK said their submissions supporting the five would also "assist those involved in the other linked appeals".
Among those due to appeal against their sentences are Phoebe Plummer and Anna Holland, who were jailed to two years and 20 months respectively for throwing soup on protective glass in front of the Sunflowers painting at London's National Gallery.
FoE said that its lawyers would argue that the sentences were "excessive" and breached human rights legislation, claiming they posed a "serious threat to our democracy".
Katie de Kauwe, senior lawyer at FoE, said: "Instead of further burdening our overcrowded prison system by criminalising those trying to push the climate and nature emergencies up the political agenda out of sheer desperation, the government should be accelerating efforts to deliver fair and meaningful action on the environment."
Ms Pankhurst's great-grandmother Emmeline Pankhurst founded the British suffragette movement in 1903 and helped women win the right to vote.
Helen Pankhurst, who was the University of Suffolk's vice chancellor from 2018 - 24, has continued her family's ongoing campaigns for gender equality.
Listen to the best of BBC Radio London on Sounds and follow BBC London on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to hello.bbclondon@bbc.co.uk
Climate groups to back M25 protesters' jail appeal
Activists throw soup on Van Gogh painting again
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Our two-tier justice system is turning Lucy Connolly into a martyr
Court of Appeal judges may believe that they were right to deny early release to Lucy Connolly, the 42-year-old Northamptonshire childminder who is serving 31 months in prison for an offensive tweet about asylum seekers. But even if they maintain that her sentence was just, I think they would have been wise to let her out anyway – for a simple and pragmatic reason. Keeping her locked up is eroding public faith in the justice system. Because, almost every single day now, we read of criminals being convicted of what seem like far worse crimes than hers – and yet somehow avoiding jail. Indeed, some of them manage to avoid it more than once. In 2022, a paedophile in South Shields admitted three charges of 'making indecent images of children' (as the law calls it), as well as one charge of possessing extreme pornography (which involved bestiality). As the judge at the time noted, however, 'You identify as transgender and that has caused issues for you and anxiety for you in how you would cope with that if you were sent immediately to prison.' Well, I suppose it would, although why we're meant to worry about prison being unpleasant for paedophiles, I'm not sure. But at any rate, he wasn't sent to prison. And nor was he sent there this week, when he was hauled back to court after breaching a sexual harm prevention order. On this occasion, the judge (a different one this time) said: 'You would undoubtedly be at risk of physical or sexual assault in custody because of your presentation in a male prison.' These words are of course wonderfully kind and compassionate. But, just for a moment, let's set aside questions of 'identity', and ask: which do we think is the worse crime? Writing something horrible on the internet about asylum hotels? Or downloading images of children being sexually abused – thus boosting the market for such images, and ensuring that more children will be sexually abused in future? Now, I haven't conducted a nationwide opinion poll on the above question. But I'm fairly confident that I can guess what the result would be. And I'm equally confident that I'm not alone in remembering the name 'Lucy Connolly' every time I read about some thug or pervert sauntering off with a suspended sentence. I don't for a moment deny that what Mrs Connolly wrote was awful. Nor do I deny that she broke the law. Yet our two-tier justice system is contriving to turn her into a martyr. So, even if the powers that be have no sympathy for her, they should at least look after their own interests. Which means letting her out. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
12 hours ago
- Yahoo
Heated exchange erupts over Andrew Cuomo's ‘Defund the Police' attacks in first NYC mayoral debate
Mayoral frontrunner Andrew Cuomo tried to make political bank during the heated Democratic mayoral primary Wednesday — by calling out his opponents' past support for the 'Defund the Police' movement. The former governor claimed the eight other candidates onstage during the highly-anticipated WNBC, WNJU and Politico New York debate had called for less money to flow to police. 'We wouldn't need more police if we didn't defund them in the first place,' Cuomo said. The attack prompted the Rev. Michael Blake – who emerged as the debate's breakout star in its first hour – to call out Cuomo for allegedly saying 'defund the police' when he served as governor. Blake pushed Cuomo to admit he used those three words. 'Are you saying you never said 'defund the police?'' he pressed. 'I used the words 'defund the police,'' Cuomo was forced to reply. 'I said I don't support 'defund the police.'' Cuomo gave the 'defund' movement legitimacy in 2021 while still in office when he said it was one of two schools of thought with the other option giving more money to law enforcement. The 'defund' attacks didn't just center around Cuomo. Queens Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani, who is gaining Cuomo in the polls, was criticized by longshot candidate Whitney Tilson for past X post that called the NYPD 'wicked & corrupt.' The resurfaced post from 2020 is still live on Mamdani's account. It responded to a ProPublica investigation about alleged abuses by the NYPD's vice squad. 'There is no negotiating with an institution this wicked & corrupt,' Mamdani had posted. 'Defund it. Dismantle it. End the cycle of violence.' Mamdani responded to the attacks by calling NYPD a critical part of public safety in the city and arguing rank-and-file cops don't want to be handling mental health calls that other professionals can better handle. The two top Democratic candidates — Cuomo and Mamdani — also battled over President Trump. 'I am the last person on this stage that Mr. Trump wants to see as mayor,' Cuomo said when asked how he will deal with the president. Trump would cut through Mamdani 'like a hot knife through butter' if the socialist is elected mayor, Cuomo argued. Moments later, Mamdani also sought to add that the Trump-foe feather to his cap. 'I am Donald Trump's worst nightmare, as a progressive Muslim immigrant who actually fights for the things that I believe in and the difference between myself and Andrew Cuomo,' he said.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Convicted nurse appeal 'straightforward', court told
The appeal of a former nurse who was convicted of murdering four elderly patients is a "straightforward" case, the Court of Appeal has heard. Colin Campbell, formerly known as Colin Norris, was found guilty in 2008 of killing four women by injecting them with insulin and was sentenced to life imprisonment. Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and Ethel Hall, 86, were inpatients on orthopaedic wards where Campbell worked in Leeds in 2002 and developed unexplained hypoglycaemia. However, the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which referred the case to the Court of Appeal four years ago, said prosecutors had relied on a "wholly circumstantial" case. Campbell, originally from Glasgow, was also found guilty of attempting to murder another inpatient, with his sentence carrying a minimum term of 30 years. On the 13th day of the appeal hearing in London, judges heard closing submissions from Campbell's barristers. In written submissions, Michael Mansfield KC said: "The appellant submits that this is a straightforward case in which this court must conclude that these convictions are unsafe." Campbell, who denied any wrongdoing and said he did nothing to cause hypoglycaemia, unsuccessfully appealed against his conviction in 2009 and applied to the CCRC in 2011. James Curtis KC, representing the Crown Prosecution Service, told the court there were "certain matters to which we take exception" from the defence's closing submissions. "There are a number of matters that I would seek to issue corrections on, things we firmly disagree with my learned friend on," he said. The appeal before Lady Justice Macur, Sir Stephen Irwin and Mr Justice Picken is due to conclude on Friday. Listen to highlights from West Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North. New evidence may prove nurse's conviction 'unsafe' HM Courts and Tribunals Service
