Trump swears he doesn't follow ‘fake news' – then goes on rant about CNN, MSNBC and ‘sleazebag journalists'
Donald Trump attacked the media on Wednesday in a Truth Social post, criticizing recent coverage of a clip of him that seized on an interaction where he thanked Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts and shook his hand during the president's joint address to Congress earlier this week.
'Like most people, I don't watch Fake News CNN or MSDNC, but I understand they are going 'crazy' asking what is it that I was thanking Justice Roberts for?' Trump wrote, using his pejorative nickname for MSNBC. 'They never called my office to ask, of course, but if they had I would have told these sleazebag 'journalists' that I thanked him for SWEARING ME IN ON INAUGURATION DAY, AND DOING A REALLY GOOD JOB IN SO DOING! The Fake News never quits!'
The moment at issue was relatively brief.
As Trump mingled with the crowd of dignitaries in the House who gathered Tuesday to watch the address, the president shook Roberts's hand and was recorded saying, 'Thank you again. [I] won't forget it.'
Some argued the exchange was emblematic of how the Supreme Court has enabled Trump in recent years.
'We can't know precisely what the president meant, but Trump does have a lot to thank Roberts for,' Adam Serwer writes in The Atlantic.
The Supreme Court delivered Trump multiple election-year victories, including a March 2024 decision blocking Colorado's move to strike Donald Trump from its presidential election ballot for his role in January 6, and a July ruling finding that former presidents have broad immunity from criminal prosecution for official actions, effectively ending a federal case against the Republican.
Given the administration's broad, hyper-speed attempts to cut federal spending and shutter agencies, which critics allege overstep executive authority, the high court may also be a rare roadblock against the Trump agenda, given that Republicans control both houses of Congress.
The day after Trump's much-discussed handshake with Roberts, the Supreme Court ruled that the administration must pay out nearly $2 billion in foreign aid to groups that work with the U.S. Agency for International Development, despite the White House's attempt to freeze funding and shutter the agency.
Trump has a long history of criticizing the media, and his frequent attacks on the 'fake news' beginning in his 2016 campaign helped the term enter the popular lexicon. Over time, the criticism has taken on a more barbed, violent edge, with Trump calling mainstream news channels the ' true enemy of the people.'
Some of this rhetoric has been strategic, Trump reportedly admitted.
''You know why I do it?'' 60 Minutes correspondent Lesley Stahl recalled Trump once telling her in 2016. ''I do it to discredit you all and demean you all so that when you write negative stories about me no one will believe you.''
The Republican's relationship with one news channel in particular, Fox News, has been a defining feature of his political life.
The network helped fuel Trump's political rise, and the Republican has staffed both of his administrations with numerous figures from the network. The current White House includes former Fox anchors and commentators as director of national intelligence and the secretaries of defense and transit.
During his first term, Trump was reported to have watched Fox for hours on end, sometimes live-tweeting his thoughts about various segments on favorite shows like Fox and Friends.
The relationship grew more fraught by 2020, when Fox News angered MAGAworld by accurately calling the Arizona presidential election results as a win for Joe Biden, despite reported attempts from Trump and his son-in-law Jared Kushner to lobby network leaders to revoke the call.
Fox's alignment with Trump proved problematic for the network in other ways, too, including having to pay $785 million to elections contractor Dominion Voting Systems to settle a defamation suit, stemming from repeated reporting agreeing with the Trump campaign's false claims of a rigged 2020 election.
The relationship got so tense that in 2023, network star Sean Hannity reportedly tried to appeal to Trump directly to stop attacking Fox and its owners, the Murdoch family, after Trump accused the network of 'collusion' to boost the political fortunes of his GOP primary rival, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis.
'Mr. President, I'm trying to help you out here with the Fox people here,' Hannity reportedly told Trump, according to Revenge: The Inside Story of Trump's Return to Power, a forthcoming book from Axios journalist Alex Isenstadt. 'But you're not making it easy for me by going after the Murdochs. You're not helping me. You're not helping yourself. If you can just lay off, we can start making some moves and getting back to normal.'
The attacks on the press have continued now that Trump is back in office, including blocking Associated Press reporters from covering official appearances because the wire service's influential style handbook has not adopted the administration's unilateral attempt to rename the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America.
The administration, frustrated with the pace of deportations, has also cracked down on leakers speaking to the media about impending removal operations against migrants.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
'Trump's ceasefire was a fragile fantasy from the world's loudest liability'
It was as fragile as his ego. Before the parties involved had a chance to speak, Donald Trump was doing a lap of honour around the world, hailing a ceasefire between Israel and Iran as a historic victory for his leadership. He posted slogans, shared self-congratulatory graphics - including one declaring 'TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING' - and praised himself as the man who had brought peace to a region at war. Within hours, as always, his work and his words had crumbled. The ceasefire disintegrated almost as soon as it was announced, exposed as yet another hollow stunt from a man obsessed with headlines over substance. What the US president trumpeted as a major diplomatic breakthrough has instead unravelled as yet another hollow promise, one forged not through serious negotiation or international consensus but through political theatre, self-promotion, and an alarming disregard for the complexity of the conflict he claimed to resolve. The ceasefire, announced to great fanfare, lasted only a few hours before violence resumed. Missiles were once again fired, tensions reignited, and hopes for calm were extinguished before they had the chance to take hold. Earlier, true to form, Trump had taken to his personal platform, Truth Social, not to urge restraint or focus on regional stability, but to praise himself. It was a moment of staggering hubris, and the statement was disproved almost immediately as the ceasefire disintegrated. This is the danger of a foreign policy built on self-image. Trump's actions have long been governed not by strategic logic or informed advice but by the pursuit of credit and headlines. In this latest episode, he sought to frame himself as a peacemaker (as he has Ukraine), a man capable of ending one of the world's most volatile standoffs. Once again, the reality has proven very different. Even Trump's sycophant supporters in the UK were quick to declare the ceasefire a world-changing achievement. One moronic troll even claimed: 'The Don might have just saved millions of lives around the world.' Such declarations have aged as poorly as many of Trump's ventures, from his failed university to his branded vodka. All quickly became busted flushes. This ceasefire was never built to last. There was no structure, no verifiable enforcement, no multilateral agreement underpinning it. The regional actors most affected by the fighting were not visibly aligned in purpose or commitment. The absence of diplomatic groundwork made the deal little more than a fragile illusion. Meanwhile, Trump's previous actions have made any genuine progress towards peace more difficult. He withdrew from the Iran nuclear deal while destabilising a framework that had placed significant checks on Tehran's nuclear programme. He has routinely backed Israeli military actions without serious scrutiny. And most recently, he ordered the bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities - an act which many experts agree pushed the region to the brink. His sudden pivot to peacemaker sits uncomfortably with the facts. And while his administration attempted to portray the ceasefire as evidence of strength and strategic foresight, the outcome speaks for itself: a few short hours of calm, followed by a renewed cycle of retaliation. There is a pattern here, and it is deeply troubling. Time and again, Trump has positioned himself as a dealmaker. But what follows is not peace, not resolution, but collapse. From North Korea to Afghanistan to the Middle East, his record is one of rushed announcements, minimal follow-through, and maximum personal glorification. The consequences are borne not by him, but by the people whose lives depend on stable diplomacy and coherent policy. It is not simply that this latest ceasefire failed. It is how it failed. In its haste. In its lack of credibility. And in its detachment from the on-the-ground realities that define one of the most entrenched geopolitical struggles in the world. There was no roadmap, no coalition of allies, and no clear terms of agreement. Instead, a message of 'mission accomplished' was presented before the mission had even begun. This is the style of governance that has come to define Trump's presidency: optics over outcomes, slogans over solutions. There is now serious damage to repair. The collapse of this ceasefire risks deepening mistrust among regional partners and complicating any future effort to secure a meaningful, durable peace. It undermines the credibility not just of the Trump administration, but of the United States as a reliable international actor. Leadership in moments of conflict requires more than proclamations and graphics on social media. It demands discipline, clarity, and the patience to build trust over time. Donald Trump has never demonstrated these qualities. The Middle East deserves more than theatrics. It deserves serious, sustained diplomacy. These 24 hours have once again shown that Donald Trump is not capable of delivering it. And the world, yet again, must deal with the fallout.
Leader Live
41 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Middle East ceasefire on the brink as Israel orders retaliation for Iran strike
Both Middle Eastern countries had agreed to lay down arms, following a proposal by US President Donald Trump. But on Tuesday morning, only hours after Israel agreed to the ceasefire, its defence minister Israel Katz claimed Iran had 'completely violated' the agreement by launching missile strikes after it came into effect. The defence minister instructed Israeli forces to resume targeting Iranian paramilitary and government targets. Iran's military however denied that it had fired missiles after the ceasefire, according to reports from Iranian state television. The UK had earlier welcomed the cessation in the fighting, but Cabinet Office minister Pat McFadden cautiously told BBC Breakfast it was 'good news, if the ceasefire holds'. He added: 'It's obviously a fragile situation in the Middle East. 'A number of people have been killed overnight in missile strikes, but I think the whole world will hope that the ceasefire will hold and that Iran will come forward with a credible plan that shows that it will not pursue the development of a nuclear weapon.' Israel had agreed to the ceasefire early on Tuesday morning, with the country's prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu reasoning it had achieved all its goals in its 12-day war against Iran, including removing the threat of its nuclear programme. 'Israel will respond forcefully to any violation of the ceasefire,' the Israeli prime minister warned. Iran's foreign minister Abbas Araghchi had earlier posted on social media site X there was 'NO 'agreement' on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations'. But he said Iran had 'no intention' of continuing attacks if Israel stopped its 'illegal aggression against the Iranian people' by 4am Tehran time (2am BST), around a quarter of an hour before his post. As Iran has repeatedly made clear: Israel launched war on Iran, not the other way around. As of now, there is NO "agreement" on any ceasefire or cessation of military operations. However, provided that the Israeli regime stops its illegal aggression against the Iranian people no… — Seyed Abbas Araghchi (@araghchi) June 24, 2025 Mr Trump first claimed an agreement had been reached overnight, but both Israel and Iran were initially silent. Writing on his social media site Truth Social, Mr Trump announced the 'complete and total ceasefire' to be brought in over 24 hours, saying the two countries had approached him 'almost simultaneously'. He said the ceasefire would be phased in, giving the two countries six hours to have 'wound down and completed their in progress, final missions'. It followed an onslaught of missiles targeting Israel early on Tuesday, which killed at least four people. Israel in turn launched a blitz of airstrikes targeting sites across Iran before dawn. Sir Keir Starmer will arrive at the Nato summit in the Netherlands on Tuesday, where the fragile situation in the Middle East is likely to dominate leaders' conversations. The UK started evacuating Britons from Israel on Monday, with the first group of 63 flown back via Cyprus. Downing Street said 'around 1,000' people had requested a seat on an evacuation flight – a quarter of the 4,000 who had registered their presence in Israel or Palestine with the Foreign Office. Shadow foreign secretary Dame Priti Patel told Sky News that the Conservatives felt America's intervention in the conflict was 'absolutely essential and necessary' to degrade Iran's nuclear capabilities. But the frontbench Tory hit out at the Government for a lack of clarity on its support for the US and Israel. She said: 'The Government has not been able to say – I was in Parliament yesterday – whether or not they supported this action or took a view on this action. 'I think the British people need clarity, they need to know whether or not their own government, the government of the day, backed the action.'
The Guardian
41 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump officials allowed by supreme court to resume deporting migrants to third countries
Update: Date: 2025-06-24T09:42:22.000Z Title: US supreme court allows Trump officials to deport migrants to countries other than their own Content: Hello and welcome to the US politics live blog. My name is Tom Ambrose and I'll be bringing you the latest news lines over the next few hours. We start with news that the US supreme court on Monday paved the way for the Trump administration to resume deporting migrants to countries they are not from, including to conflict-ridden places such as South Sudan. In a brief, unsigned order, the court's conservative supermajority paused the ruling by a Boston-based federal judge who said immigrants deserved a 'meaningful opportunity' to bring claims that they would face the risk of torture, persecution or even death if removed to certain countries that have agreed to take people deported from the US. As a result of Monday's ruling, the administration will now be allowed to swiftly deport immigrants to so-called 'third countries', including a group of men held at a US military base in Djibouti who the administration tried to send to South Sudan. The court offered no explanation for its decision and ordered the judge's ruling paused while the appeals process plays out. The three liberal justices issued a scathing dissent. The Department of Homeland Security hailed the decision as a 'victory for the safety and security of the American people'. 'DHS can now execute its lawful authority and remove illegal aliens to a country willing to accept them,' spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement. 'Fire up the deportation planes.' Read the full story here: In other developments: Donald Trump announced that Israel and Iran had reached a ceasefire in a post published on his social media platform. Iran and Israel had not immediately verified the deal. The news came just hours after Iran launched a retaliatory strike on a US military base in Qatar. CIA director John Ratcliffe and director of national intelligence Tulsi Gabbard will brief members of Congress today on US military action in Iran. Top Democrats began calling for a classified briefing after the United States launched military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities over the weekend. Democratic members of 'the Gang of Eight' say they have not been briefed on the situation yet, although Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson was briefed this morning. Health secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr met with major health insurers today, extracting pledges that they will take additional measures to simplify their requirements for prior approval on medicines and medical services. Kennedy, who is known for pushing anti-vaccine conspiracies, is set to speak this week at a fundraising event for Gavi, a public-private partnership which helps buy vaccines for the world's poorest children. Canada signed a defense pact with the European Union – the latest sign of the North American country's shift away reliance on the United States amid strained relations with Donald Trump. Trump is set to attend a two day Nato summit beginning tomorrow. The White House said that at the summit, Trump will push Nato members to increase defense spending.
