Norway's Wealth Fund to engage Rio Tinto, South32 over environmental concerns
May 12 (Reuters) - Norway's sovereign wealth fund, managed by Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM), has decided to actively engage with mining companies Rio Tinto (RIO.AX), opens new tab and South32 (S32.AX), opens new tab regarding their environmental practices, the fund operator said on Sunday.
The executive board of the largest sovereign wealth fund in the world said it arrived at this decision following a recommendation to sell its stake in the companies from the Council on Ethics, an independent adviser appointed by the government of Norway.
The fund owns an about 2.5% stake in Rio Tinto PLC (RIO.L), opens new tab, 0.13% stake in Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO.AX), opens new tab and a 2.6% stake in South32, according to LSEG data.
The council pointed to concerns over the companies' involvement in the Mineração Rio do Norte (MRN) joint venture, a significant bauxite mine in the Amazon rainforest.
The executive board of the wealth fund said in a statement it decided to engage with the companies on their work to reduce serious environmental damage over a period of five to 10 years.
The Mineração Rio do Norte is a joint venture between Glencore (GLEN.L), opens new tab which owns a 45% stake, Rio Tinto with a 22% stake and South32, which owns a 33% stake.
Seperately, the fund said it revoked the exclusion of German energy firm RWE AG (RWEG.DE), opens new tab, commending its shift towards renewable energy.
Meanwhile, it said decided to sell its shares in Mexican oil company Petroleos Mexicanos and Israeli firm Paz Retail and Energy (PAZ.TA), opens new tab, citing ethical concerns.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
16 minutes ago
- Reuters
Serbian farmers vow to oppose Rio Tinto lithium project even after EU labels it strategic
GORNJE NEDELJICE, Serbia, June 5 (Reuters) - Zlatko Kokanovic, a farmer from Serbia's Jadar region, is determined to stop development of a Rio Tinto (RIO.L), opens new tab lithium project, identified this week as strategic by the European Commission as it aims to cut dependency on China for mineral resources. Lithium is a key component in batteries for electric vehicles and mobile devices. The mine in the Jadar valley would eventually meet 90% of Europe's lithium needs should it go ahead. But like thousands of protesters, including many other farmers, who have sought to block development of the project in recent years, Kokanovic is worried about pollution of farmland in a region where a majority of people live off agriculture. "There are some things the money cannot buy," Kokanovic, a father of five children who is one of the largest milk producers in Gornje Nedeljice and a leading activist in the region, told Reuters. "I want to tell them (Rio Tinto) not to try to develop the mine or there will be unrest," he added. Rio Tinto has not given a start date for the project, which is expected to produce 58,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate annually, but has pledged to develop the mine cleanly. "The project will be delivered to the highest levels of transparency, to the highest levels of environmental protection and human rights standards," said Chad Blewitt, Rio Tinto's managing director for the Jadar project. "The European Union and European Commission never substitute, they never sacrifice those high standards." Blewitt had told Reuters on Wednesday that the company is revising the cost of the project. Rio Tinto's lithium project has been contested by green groups for years and sparked massive street protests in EU-candidate Serbia in 2022. In 2021 and 2022, Serbian environmentalists collected 30,000 signatures in a petition demanding that parliament enact legislation to halt lithium exploration in the country. The government revoked all Rio Tinto's exploration licences in 2022, before the Constitutional Court overturned the decision last year and reinstated them. Government officials say the mine will boost Serbia's economy. How protesters can stop a project that has domestic and international approval is unclear. But recent student protests in Serbia, where hundreds of thousands have taken to the streets and succeeded in collapsing the government, show the strength of civil society in the Balkan country. Kokanovic remains determined. 'My message to them is not to even try (to excavate lithium in Jadar), unless they want this government to be toppled fast."
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Norway to set up compensation scheme for 1980 oil rig disaster victims' families
Forty-five years after the Alexander L Kielland oil rig capsized in the North Sea, Norway's parliament has voted to set up a compensation scheme for relatives of the 123 men who died in the worst disaster in Norwegian waters since the second world war. 'This is a historic day, the end of more than four decades of fighting for justice,' said Mímir Kristjánsson, an MP from the leftwing Red party. The chair of the victims' committee, Anders Helliksen, said the state had 'finally accepted its responsibility'. The Kielland, a semi-submersible platform that at the time was housing 212 workers from the nearby Edda drilling rig, capsized when one of its five legs snapped in strong winds and high seas on 27 March 1980. Twenty-three Britons were among the dead. Several investigations have failed to assign responsibility, with the rig's French builders blamed for structural failings and its Norwegian and US owner and operator, Stavanger Drilling and Phillips Petroleum, for not maintaining or anchoring it properly. The disaster led to major changes in safety routines and regulations in the oil industry, but a report by experts at the University of Stavanger this year concluded the Norwegian authorities' actions before and after the collapse were seriously flawed. While the immediate cause was a welding defect, multiple mistakes contributed to the heavy loss of life: doors and hatches were left open, only five workers onboard had had safety training, and the platform was never approved for use as living quarters. 'This incident became a disaster because of a long chain of negligence, omissions and violations of rules designed precisely to prevent an accident becoming a disaster,' one of the report's authors, Eva Joly, said earlier this year. She told Norwegian media: 'The fatigue failure itself could also have been discovered if normal audit requirements had been met and exemptions had not been granted. This was the state's responsibility.' The 89 survivors and the bereaved families – between 300 and 400 children lost their fathers, according to campaigners – received some compensation from Phillips and Stavanger Drilling's insurers in the 80s, but no payout from the state. 'Many have had a very difficult time, with trauma, psychiatric issues, substance abuse and poor finances,' the Kielland Network said on its website. The state was also accused of failing to properly investigate the disaster or care properly for victims. Norway's parliament, the Storting, formally apologised for state authorities' shortcomings in 2022, a year after the national auditor general issued strongly worded criticism of the government for failing in its duty to victims. The parliamentary motion said: 'It is now time for the victims of the largest industrial accident in Norwegian history to receive compensation – making it also possible for survivors, bereaved families and society at large to put an end to this matter.' Passed by a narrow majority, it demanded the government set up a 'separate compensation scheme' for the Kielland victims, and that the auditor general 'clarify the state's responsibility' for the disaster and its lack of support for victims. 'The fact that this has taken so long shows that the state has never taken any responsibility for what happened in the North Sea,' said one survivor, Oddbjørn Lerbrekk. 'It's about time.' The amount of compensation has not yet been set.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Tech giants' indirect emissions rose 150% in three years as AI expands, UN agency says
GENEVA, June 5 (Reuters) - Indirect carbon emissions from the operations of four of the leading AI-focused tech companies, Amazon (AMZN.O), opens new tab, Microsoft (MSFT.O), opens new tab, Alphabet (GOOGL.O), opens new tab and Meta (META.O), opens new tab, rose on average by 150% from 2020-2023, as they had to use more power for energy-demanding data centres, a United Nations report said on Thursday. The use of artificial intelligence is driving up global indirect emissions because of the vast amounts of energy required to power data centres, the report by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU), the U.N. agency for digital technologies, said. Indirect emissions include those generated by purchased electricity, steam, heating and cooling consumed by a company. Amazon's operational carbon emissions grew the most at 182% in 2023 compared to three years before, followed by Microsoft at 155%, Meta at 145% and Alphabet at 138%, according to the report. The ITU tracked the greenhouse gas emissions of 200 leading digital companies between 2020 and 2023. Meta, which owns Facebook and WhatsApp, pointed Reuters to its sustainability report that said it is working to reduce emissions, energy and water used to power its data centres. The other companies did not respond immediately to requests for comment. As investment in AI increases, carbon emissions from the top-emitting AI systems are predicted to reach up to 102.6 million tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (tCO2) per year, the report stated. The data centres that are needed for AI development could also put pressure on existing energy infrastructure. "The rapid growth of artificial intelligence is driving a sharp rise in global electricity demand, with electricity use by data centres increasing four times faster than the overall rise in electricity consumption," the report found. It also highlighted that although a growing number of digital companies had set emissions targets, those ambitions had not yet fully translated into actual reductions of emissions.
