Russian warship spotted 'loitering' off Outer Hebrides coast
The Royal Navy deployed its HMS Dragon ship as Russian intelligence gathering vessel Yuri Ivanov "loitered" in the waters off the Outer Hebrides.
The UK ship was in the area following a major Nato exercise, dubbed "Formidable Shield", which took place between May 21 and 23.
READ MORE: Douglas Ross kicked out of Holyrood Chamber for breaking rules
The ship's Merlin helicopter was also launched to collect aerial information, before the Yuri Ivanov eventually left and headed north towards its base in the Arctic.
HMS Dragon was built by BAE Systems at Scotstoun on the Clyde and is based in Portsmouth.
At the same time the Yuri Ivanov was monitored off the Scottish coast, three Russian vessels, two cargo boats and a warship, RFN Stoikiy, were also shadowed by the Royal Navy after being spotted in the English Channel.
HMS Ledbury, HMS Hurworth and the 814 Naval Air Squadron monitored the warship as it sailed west through the Channel to meet two merchant vessels which were returning from the Mediterranean.
Lieutenant Commander James Bradshaw, commanding officer of minehunter ship HMS Hurworth, said: "Monitoring activity on the seas and seabed around the UK is one of the core roles of the Royal Navy's 2nd Mine-Countermeasures Squadron.
"This operation was all in a day's work for the ship's company who have shown great professionalism. We have kept a constant watch to ensure the security and integrity of the UK's critical sea-lanes."
READ MORE: Mountain climber airlifted from Munro after falling 50ft
Lieutenant Commander Craig Clark, commanding officer of HMS Ledbury, said: 'Escorting Russian vessels through UK waters is a vital demonstration of our unwavering commitment to national security.'
Lieutenant Patrick Bingham, gunnery officer from HMS Hurworth, added: 'As a former merchant navy officer, I know how important freedom of the seas is to the lifeline of goods and raw materials upon which our economy depends.
'The Royal Navy has been a guardian of the freedom of the seas for centuries and I am privileged to have contributed to this mission.'
It is the second time this month that Russian vessels in UK waters have been monitored by the Royal Navy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
19 minutes ago
- The Guardian
The Guardian view on Ukraine's spectacular attack: 21st-century tactics still require support from allies
Since Donald Trump scolded Volodymyr Zelenskyy with the words 'You don't have the cards right now,' Ukraine has been keener than ever to demonstrate that it has a few up its sleeve. On Sunday it showed its hand with an extraordinary, audacious drone attack on multiple bases deep inside Russia, which it says damaged 41 aircraft. Operation Spiderweb, which saw the smuggled drones released from their hiding places in wooden sheds and remotely piloted to their targets, was swiftly followed by another attack on Crimea's Kerch bridge using underwater explosives. Kyiv – often coy in such cases – was unusually swift to claim both incidents, but has not taken responsibility for two railway bridge attacks which Russia says led to the deaths of seven passengers at the weekend. There is obvious satisfaction in hitting Russian bombers and surveillance planes used against Ukrainian civilians, and Spiderweb's unexpected method will surely force Russia to think harder about defence. But the greater significance lies in its potential impact on domestic morale and international support. Ukraine has repeatedly surprised both its enemy and its allies throughout this war. Unexpected successes such as the Kursk incursion have changed the narrative at critical moments. Meticulously planned, and reportedly 18 months in the making, the latest operation must make Russia wonder what else may be on the way. It was also spectacular enough to make Mr Trump pay attention. The US president reportedly judged the attack to be 'badass'. But his cosy phone chats with Vladimir Putin appear to be locking in his tilt towards Moscow. On Wednesday he said that, in a 'good' conversation, Mr Putin had said he would have to respond. It did not appear to have occurred to the US president that discouraging retaliation might be desirable. He should be challenging Kremlin talking points instead of amplifying them. If Ukraine hoped to dispel the nuclear spectre which Russia has repeatedly summoned up, Mr Trump seems to be still in its thrall – with some of those around him talking up the threat again. The Center for Strategic and International Studies argued in a report this week that Russia's military performance has been notably poor in this war, with gains coming at a strikingly high cost in terms of both equipment and personnel – hitting an estimated million casualties this summer. But Russia still has many more cards. It continues to grind out its advance, and in late May it launched its largest drone and missile assault on Ukraine to date. Its war of attrition may look old-fashioned compared with Kyiv's innovations, but it still hurts. Meanwhile, talks in Istanbul have produced agreement on a prisoner exchange but no movement towards peace. There appears to be growing support in the US Senate for further sanctions on Russia, but Lindsey Graham is unlikely to move without Mr Trump's acquiescence, and there is little sign of progress in the House. Pete Hegseth did not attend the session on Ukraine at Thursday's gathering of defence ministers ahead of this month's Nato summit – a telling absence, though the Pentagon blamed scheduling issues. Kyiv needs and deserves increased support from Washington, but damage limitation looks like a more realistic aspiration. Ukraine continues to surprise, and to shift its approach as circumstances demand. Unfortunately, there is little sign of the US president, capricious as he is, changing course on this conflict.
Daily Mail
21 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Arson gang hired to burn down warehouse linked to Ukraine did not get paid by Russia as the attack was not up to Wagner Group's 'standards', court hears
Russia refused to pay arsonists who carried out a £1 million attack in the UK because the blaze wasn't up to the Wagner Group 's 'standards', a court has heard. The terrorist group conducting a sabotage campaign on behalf of Russian intelligence allegedly recruited a group of British men to set fire to a warehouse in Leyton, East London, destroying over £100,000 worth of equipment, including generators and vital satellite equipment destined for Ukraine. Today the Old Bailey heard that while the ringleader Dylan Earl, 20, had grand plans to do 'something big' for the Kremlin, boasting he could build 'a link' between the Wagner Group, IRA and notorious Kinahan crime cartel, his first mission failed to impress Russian handlers. Days before the blaze, a Wagner Group operative told Earl to watch a Cold War drama about KGB spies as a 'manual' for his mission, it was said. The Wagner contact known only by his Telegram handle 'Privet Bot' recommended watching the television series The Americans, about KGB agents undercover in the US, 'in order to understand work'. He allegedly told Earl: 'The idea is like that. You need to organise partisan cells in the country and in Europe and think of a name for your movement. We'll give you support... 'Watch this series. It will be your manual. You'll have a source of funding through organising arsons.' Privet Bot also messaged Earl asking: 'Hello friend, how are you, do you have any friends among hooligans or acquaintances in the IRA?' 'Do you have access to firearms?' Four men accused of carrying out the arson attack, Jakeem Rose, 23, Ugnius Asmena, 20, Nii Mensah, 23 and Paul English, 61, were told to live stream it to Earl so he could report back to the Russians on the success of the 'mission'. But unlike the KGB drama, in real life the arsonists made a series of errors, forgetting to film the attack and having to return to the scene where they were captured on CCTV and Rose dropped a knife with his DNA on it, jurors heard. One member of the gang, Jake Reeves, 23, from Croydon, South London, who has already admitted his part in the conspiracy, later complained they 'didn't do it to Wagner standards.' 'They were supposed to make it burn.. but they just ran in there,' he said. Two days after the attack, Earl admitted he was 'waiting on payment still, apparently it'll land today but it's nowhere near the amount because they didn't burn the whole thing.' Mensah allegedly complained about not being paid saying: 'Bro it's f****** burnt. We did some damage. U said u will pay on consider damage. Just be reasonable.' He added: 'Bro how u want us to do another job without getting paid. Just pay for the warehouse. Idk [I don't know] why ur stalling 1k.' The blaze at 11.40pm on March 20 last year started with a jerry can of petrol caused more than £1 million in damage to the premises, which was targeted because of its connection to Ukraine, with the warehouse being used to store StarLink satellite equipment and humanitarian aid bound for the war zone. The court heard that the 'architect' of the scheme, Earl had grand ambitions to 'build a link' between the IRA, Kinahans and Russia boasting: 'We have direct connection to the Kremlin, we can do something big.' Earl and Reeves have already admitted their involvement in the arson plot and a separate plan to set fire to businesses in Mayfair, west London, kidnapping the Russian dissident owner on behalf of the Wagner Group. Prosecutor Duncan Penny, KC, told jurors: 'This was deliberate and calculated criminality - at the behest of foreign influence. 'In the case of these defendants at the time of the fire they may have been ignorant of that influence and the motive may have been financial - good old-fashioned greed. 'For others, however, it appears to have been both political and ideological.' Rose, of Croydon, Asmena, of no fixed address, Mensah, of Thornton Heath and English, of Roehampton, all deny aggravated arson. The case continues.
South Wales Guardian
33 minutes ago
- South Wales Guardian
UK faces calls for 5% GDP defence spend, ahead of PM's meeting with Nato chief
Mark Rutte, the secretary general of the alliance, said on Thursday he is proposing Nato members spend 5% of gross domestic product (GDP) on defence. Mr Rutte, who will visit the UK next week to meet the Prime Minister, said members will be expected to spend 3.5% on the military, with a further 1.5% on defence-related measures. The commitment dwarfs Sir Keir's current defence plans, through which the UK would spend 2.5% of GDP by 2027, with an 'ambition' to raise this to 3% in the next parliament, a period which could stretch to 2034. Mr Rutte is said to be pushing for the target to be met by 2032, but speaking to reporters in Brussels, he suggested there was a need to 'consult' member countries on the details of a deadline. At a press conference, Mr Rutte said: 'I will propose an overall investment plan that will total 5% of GDP in defence investment and 3.5% of GDP for core defence spending.' He said this was to meet new 'capability targets' that ministers agreed on at a meeting earlier on Thursday, as well as 1.5% per year in 'defence and security-related investments like infrastructure and industry'. Asked if he could ensure countries would meet the commitment over time, Mr Rutte said he had a 'cunning plan' to hold political leaders to account, 'that nations will commit to yearly plans showing the increase each year to make sure that you come to the new target of 5%'. This would prevent a 'hockey stick' on a graph of spending over time, where it suddenly ramps up towards the end, he added. The US, which currently spends 3.4% of GDP on defence, is also being asked to meet the commitment, Mr Rutte said. 'The US is committed to increase defence spending to 5%,' he added. Asked about a timeline for the commitment, Mr Rutte said he did not want to 'go into more details', adding: 'Obviously, allies will have discussions amongst each other. 'We will consult with each other on some of these details. For example, what is the end date that you want to have reached it?' Amid pressure from Nato to ramp up spending beyond Sir Keir's current plans, US defence secretary Pete Hegseth has said he was sure the UK was 'going to get there'. 'We think everyone is going to get there, we really do. It's important they do. It's important that the UK gets there,' Mr Hegseth told reporters. We will continue to protect our people and our way of life. To do this, we must increase defence spending to make NATO a stronger, fairer, and more lethal Alliance #DefMin — NATO (@NATO) June 5, 2025 Elsewhere, Mr Hegseth declined to name countries not yet committed to the 5% pledge, but then proceeded to name those he claimed were committed, including France, Germany, the Baltic and Nordic countries, Poland, Greece and Hungary. Downing Street said it would not 'get ahead of' the Nato leaders' summit in the Hague later this month. A Number 10 spokesman said: 'The Prime Minister is clear that Europe must step up on defence and security, and we are proud to be leading the way with our Nato-first focused SDR, the commitment of our nuclear deterrent and nearly all of our armed forces to Nato and our historic uplift to defence spending. 'But I'm not going to get ahead of the summit in a couple of weeks time.' During his meeting with Mr Rutte on Monday, the Prime Minister is likely to raise the question of how 'we can ensure all allies meet their stated pledges in support of our collective defence', according to Downing Street. As well as his talks with Sir Keir, the former Dutch prime minister will visit Sheffield Forgemasters with Defence Secretary John Healey, and give a speech at Chatham House.
