GM storing poor-selling Canadian-made electric vans on Michigan lot
GM storing poor-selling Canadian-made electric vans on Michigan lot
Show Caption
Hide Caption
General Motors: History, innovation, and legacy
Learn about the rich history and notable innovations of General Motors, from its founding in 1908 to its leadership in electric and autonomous vehicle technology.
GM has struggled to sell its electric commercial vehicles in the U.S.
CAMI Assembly took two weeks of previously planned downtime to align production schedules and balance inventor
Before incentives, Ford's electric van is more than $20,000 cheaper than GM's
General Motors is contending with a glut of slow-selling BrightDrop delivery vans, representing another flawed projection of EV sales and leaving hundreds of the vehicles parked on both sides of the U.S.-Canadian border, the Detroit Free Press has learned.
The Ingersoll, Ontario, plant that produces the all-electric vans just reopened after a two-week shutdown related to inventory. And GM is reportedly offering tens of thousands of dollars in rebates on the largest model.
The struggles come less than a year after GM folded the commercial vans into its Chevrolet brand in a bid to boost its performance as GM tries to gain ground against competitors, including Ford and Rivian, in the electric van space.
Sam Abuelsamid, vice president of market research at Telemetry Insights, said the extended range of BrightDrop vans far surpasses its market competitors — but so does its price tag. Before incentives, the vehicles cost about $74,000. Ford's E-Transit van with extended battery range, for example, is $51,600 — more than $20,000 cheaper — even before applying incentives.
'There is a market for electric vans,' Abuelsamid said. 'Just not at that price point.'
A Free Press photographer captured images last week of hundreds of vehicles lining a Flint, Michigan storage lot. Reuters published similar photos from CAMI Assembly plant in Ontario.
General Motors innovation: GM partners with Silicon Valley chipmaker Nvidia on AI, self-driving
The cause is low demand, according to a union official, as GM has struggled to sell its electric commercial vehicles in the U.S.
Chevrolet, the brand under which BrightDrop is now sold in the U.S., is reportedly offering rebates that add up to a 40% discount on the larger van.
GM produces BrightDrop vehicles at Canada's — and GM's — first full-scale all-electric vehicle manufacturing plant, which required massive investment to retool for EV production, including funding support from both governments.
Heavy rebates offered this year
CAMI Assembly closed during a scheduled two-week shutdown to 'align production schedules and balance inventory,' a GM spokesperson said in a statement. Production restarted last week.
Representatives at Unifor Local 88 said the BrightDrop vehicles in Flint had always been slated for the U.S. market and have nothing to do with President Donald Trump's tariff threats. Their rapid appearance is due to refining border-crossing transportation to include shipments by rail. If the vehicles remain in Flint, one union official said, it's likely because dealers aren't buying them.
BrightDrop's sales figures fall far short of its immediate competitors. GM sold 1,529 BrightDrop commercial electric vans in the U.S. last year, compared with Ford's 12,610 E-Transit vehicles and Rivian's 13,243 EDV. BrightDrop does, however, outsell Mercedes-Benz, which sold only 828 eSprinter vans in the U.S. last year.
According to a bulletin that CarsDirect said was sent to dealers, 2025 BrightDrop incentives surged on Feb.24,. Through June 30, the BrightDrop 400 and BrightDrop 600 are available with $25,500 purchase rebates throughout the country as part of the 2025MY BrightDrop Consumer Cash Program.
'Based on our analysis, these savings appear to be stackable, bringing up to $31,000 in potential savings,' CarsDirect reported.
General Motors said in a statement that it remains committed to the success of Chevrolet BrightDrop, 'and we remain optimistic about its future.'
'Customers continue to add BrightDrop products to their fleet thanks to its best-in-class available range and complete suite of driver safety solutions,' the statement said.
The company this week hired a new vice president to oversee GM Envolve, its fleet and commercial business software platform. Ian Hucker, who was previously with GM, most recently was chief commercial officer for Hyundai Capital Europe.
Since consolidating BrightDrop under the Chevrolet name, GM has more than 340 dealers selling the commercial vans, up from seven BrightDrop-specific dealers. Chevrolet BrightDrop has more than 250 unique commercial customers, the spokesperson also said, and 'we continue to earn new ones regularly.'
Long range means big expense
BrightDrop's superior range is what pushes prices above the others. Ford's vehicle has about 140 miles at full charge, and Rivian's is slightly higher. The BrightDrop van goes nearly double the distance, at 272 miles with maximum range battery pack and all-wheel drive.
But industry experts say long range isn't enough enticement for buyers to forget about added cost. Ford CEO Jim Farley told Wall Street last month retail customers already demonstrate they won't pay a premium for large EVs, making them 'a really tough business case given the expense of the batteries.'
Without naming names, Farley said some of Ford's competitors continue to bring expensive EVs to the market 'that are not going to work.'
Cost concerns hit fleet customers more than a traditional retail customer, and paying more for a bigger battery may not seem prudent as work and delivery vans tend to travel fewer than 70 miles a day, Abuelsamid said. About 60% of Ford's fleet customers return to corporate lots or garages at night where they can recharge for the next day's driving, he said, making larger batteries with long ranges less important.
Producing vans that can be configured to meet different customer needs is another driver of Ford's success. The E-Transit, for example, has 'more configurations than any other all-electric commercial van from a full-line automaker, offering two lengths, three roof heights, three body styles and up to 487 cubic feet of cargo volume,' according to the company's website.
GM launched BrightDrop in 2021 as a wholly owned subsidiary with expectations its revenue would top $10 billion by 2030 with low-20% profit margins. BrightDrop offers two commercial electric delivery vehicles: the Zevo 600, which resembles a UPS-style truck, and a smaller EV410 midsize truck.
The automaker made an $800 million investment to convert the CAMI Assembly to an EV factory to build the vans — a factory that previously made 300,000 Equinox vehicles per year, according to Sam Fiorani, vice president of global vehicle forecasting at Auto Forecast Solutions. Adding Chevrolet to the BrightDrop name hasn't improved sales, either.
Automotive industry: GM car buyers most loyal in 2024; Ford wins pickup and SUV categories
'BrightDrop has to establish itself as a brand and a source of these products. It's a whole new network that you have to build, where Chevrolet is established and knows the market,' Fiorani said.
Using electric vehicles for stop-and-go delivery usage is practical and amounts to significant cost savings from gas-powered vehicles. BrightDrop's EVs can save a fleet $10,000 to $12,000 per vehicle each year, the company said.
BrightDrop CEO Travis Katz said in 2022 that the company expected to be making 50,000 trucks a year starting in 2025 and bring in 'a lot of revenue.'
Katz left the company in late 2023 without specifying why as GM began reorganizing BrightDrop to function less independently and reduce costs.
'GM was going down the path that the corporation laid out for a market they anticipated to go heavily into electric vehicles. They are way ahead of the curve at the moment, and sales aren't meeting them there. Are GM executives anticipating 70,000 or 80,000 BrightDrop sales to break even, or can they work toward producing 10,000 a year?' Fiorani said. 'That's a much more practical number for this type of vehicle than the sales you see from the Express.'
CAMI's future
It's unclear what low BrightDrop sales in the U.S. could mean for the future of CAMI, a question complicated by possible loss of U.S. tax incentives and the potential for tariffs adding additional expense to these vehicles, Abuelsamid said.
If Trump successfully reverses aspects of the Inflation Reduction Act, which President Joe Biden signed into law on Aug. 16, 2022, to provide up to $7,500 in federal incentives for EVs through 2032, then costs for all EVs, not just fleet, will rise, and make importing these types of vehicles less enticing.
Meanwhile, community members in Ingersoll expressed concern over job stability in the current landscape, with the plant's 1,300 employees comprising a significant chunk of the area's roughly 11,000 residents.
'CAMI is the biggest employer in town and thousands of spinoff jobs across the region are attached to its future,' read a report from the London Free Press ahead of the planned shutdown. The paper also reported auto and auto parts plants could shut down within a week of U.S. tariffs being imposed.
Still, General Motors has deep ties to Canada that go back almost a century and would not move out of the country lightly. Dimitry Anastakis, the L.R. Wilson and R.J. Currie Chair in Canadian Business History at the University of Toronto, said that walking away from the major investments GM has made in the country just to start from scratch stateside would be lunacy.
'There was a feeling in the industry — and on Wall Street — that (Trump) wouldn't do this,' Anastakis said. 'No sane individual would bring down their own industry in this way. The uncertainty he is causing is going to impact Canada, but not in the way that he wants it. And it's going to hit Americans just as hard.'
Move to Michigan?
GM CFO Paul Jacobson hinted that the company's playbook to manage tariffs could entail moving production back to the U.S. in its earnings call and other recent public appearances.
'There's plays that we can do on that perspective to minimize the impact if there are tariffs either on Canada or Mexico,' Jacobson said. 'We're doing the planning and have several levers that we can pull.'
Those plans weren't meant to move forward, he said, until a permanent level of tariffs seemed unavoidable.
In total, Ingersoll-based companies in 2022 exported about $2.1 billion worth of goods. About $1.4 billion of that came from auto, food processing, defense, packaging and other advanced manufacturing, according to Lightcast, a labor market analytics company.
Retooling a plant for EV production is costly and time-consuming, yet it's not as though GM doesn't have another option — and in Michigan, no less.
'They could conceivably build these at Factory Zero,' Abuelsamid said.
Free Press staff writer Jamie LaReau contributed to this report.
Jackie Charniga covers General Motors for the Free Press. Reach her at jcharniga@freepress.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
5 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Nova Scotia's ambitious ‘Wind West' offshore energy plan wins support with conditions
HALIFAX - Two leading environmental groups are giving a thumbs up to Nova Scotia's ambitious plan to dramatically expand its fledgling offshore wind energy industry. But both groups were quick to add caveats. On Monday, Premier Tim Houston said the province's plan to license enough offshore wind farms to produce five megawatts of electricity would be increased eightfold to 40 megawatts, well beyond the 2.4 megawatts Nova Scotia needs. He called on Ottawa to help cover the costs of his new Wind West project, saying the excess electricity could be used to supply 27 per cent of Canada's total demand. 'Nova Scotia is on the edge of a clean energy breakthrough,' the Progressive Conservative premier said in an online video, adding the province is poised to become an 'energy superpower.' Gretchen Fitzgerald, executive director of Sierra Club Canada, said the premier's bold plan, which includes building transmission lines across the country, represents an exciting opportunity for the province. 'It could be a game-changer for the region and for Canada,' she said in an interview from Ottawa. 'But it needs to be done correctly and with consultations.' Fitzgerald said the Nova Scotia and Canadian governments must focus on securing long-term benefits from the nascent offshore wind industry because they did a poor job on that front when dealing with the offshore oil and gas sector. 'We have to make sure that we are not selling out what is a massive resource for less benefit than communities should have,' Fitzgerald said, adding that Nova Scotia continues to suffer from a high rate of energy poverty. In May of this year, utility affordability expert Roger Colton produced a report showing that 43 per cent of Nova Scotians were struggling to pay their energy bills — the highest proportion in Canada. While Fitzgerald applauded Houston's clean energy plan, she criticized what she described as the premier's populist penchant for taking decisive action before consulting with experts and the public. 'Moving from a couple hundred turbines to thousands in the next decade needs to be done in a staged way so we learn how to do this right,' she said, adding Houston appears to have adopted a ''move-fast-and-break-things mentality.' '(That) can lead to unacceptable harm to sensitive ocean life,' she said. 'From a community benefits and acceptance point of view, breaking trust can be the biggest barrier to getting to good climate solutions.' In October 2023, the Public Policy Forum released a study saying Sable Island Bank, an ocean area about 180 kilometres south of Nova Scotia, is among the world's best locations for wind energy generation. 'It and several other similarly endowed areas off the coast of Atlantic Canada hold the potential to place the region among the leading global hubs of offshore wind-powered energy development,' says the report from the independent non-profit think tank. It goes on to say that as the world shifts from a dependence on fossil fuels to forms of energy that do not emit climate-changing greenhouse gases, Atlantic Canada is facing 'a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity ... to recover an economic vitality comparable to the Age of Sail — fittingly built again on the power of wind at sea.' The report says the installation of 15 gigawatts of offshore wind generation would create about 30,000 direct jobs annually. Despite the hype, the industry must also earn acceptance from Nova Scotia's fishing industry, which in 2023 contributed $2.5 billion to the province's economy and employed 19,000 people. In Halifax, a spokesman for the Ecology Action Centre called on the provincial government to build public trust, especially with coastal communities. 'There really needs to be a priority on stakeholder engagement for all ocean users,' said senior energy co-ordinator Thomas Arnason McNeil. 'We're going to need to prioritize ecological safeguards and preserve the existing livelihoods that we have. That includes the fishing industry. That's half the economy in Nova Scotia.' Still, he said the province's big push for clean energy is on the right track, especially when it comes to building out its electricity grid to better connect with the rest of the country. If done right, the payoff would be enormous, Arnason McNeil said. 'We're talking serious job creation here and a lot of revenue potentially,' he said. 'The bottom line is that you have to do this right. (But) the prize at the end of the road is monumental in terms of the benefits.' A call for bids to build enough offshore turbines to generate five gigawatts of electricity is expected as early as this year. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025. Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .


Hamilton Spectator
6 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Global streamers fight CRTC's rule requiring them to fund Canadian content
OTTAWA - Some of the world's biggest streaming companies will argue in court on Monday that they shouldn't have to make CRTC-ordered financial contributions to Canadian content and news. The companies are fighting an order from the federal broadcast regulator that says they must pay five per cent of their annual Canadian revenues to funds devoted to producing Canadian content, including local TV news. The case, which consolidates several appeals by streamers, will be heard by the Federal Court of Appeal in Toronto. Apple, Amazon and Spotify are fighting the CRTC's 2024 order. Motion Picture Association-Canada, which represents such companies as Netflix and Paramount, is challenging a section of the CRTC's order requiring them to contribute to local news. In December, the court put a pause on the payments — estimated to be at least $1.25 million annually per company. Amazon, Apple and Spotify had argued that if they made the payments and then won the appeal and overturned the CRTC order, they wouldn't be able to recover the money. In court documents, the streamers put forward a long list of arguments on why they shouldn't have to pay, including technical points regarding the CRTC's powers under the Broadcasting Act. Spotify argued that the contribution requirement amounts to a tax, which the CRTC doesn't have the authority to impose. The music streamer also took issue with the CRTC requiring the payments without first deciding how it will define Canadian content. Amazon argued the federal cabinet specified the CRTC's requirements have to be 'equitable.' It said the contribution requirement is 'inequitable because it applies only to foreign online undertakings and only to such undertakings with more than $25 million in annual Canadian broadcasting revenues.' Apple also said the regulator 'acted prematurely' and argued the CRTC didn't consider whether the order was 'equitable.' It pointed out Apple is required to contribute five per cent, while radio stations must only pay 0.5 per cent — and streamers don't have the same access to the funds into which they pay. The CRTC imposes different rules on Canadian content contributions from traditional media players. It requires large English-language broadcasters to contribute 30 per cent of revenues to Canadian programming. Motion Picture Association—Canada is only challenging one aspect of the CRTC's order — the part requiring companies to contribute 1.5 per cent of revenues to a fund for local news on independent TV stations. It said in court documents that none of the streamers 'has any connection to news production' and argued the CRTC doesn't have the authority to require them to fund news. 'What the CRTC did, erroneously, is purport to justify the … contribution simply on the basis that local news is important and local news operations provided by independent television stations are short of money,' it said. 'That is a reason why news should be funded by someone, but is devoid of any analysis, legal or factual, as to why it is equitable for foreign online undertakings to fund Canadian news production.' In its response, the Canadian Association of Broadcasters said the CRTC has wide authority under the Broadcasting Act. It argued streamers have contributed to the funding crisis facing local news. 'While the industry was once dominated by traditional television and radio services, those services are now in decline, as Canadians increasingly turn to online streaming services,' the broadcasters said. 'For decades, traditional broadcasting undertakings have supported the production of Canadian content through a complex array of CRTC-directed measures … By contrast, online undertakings have not been required to provide any financial support to the Canadian broadcasting system, despite operating here for well over a decade.' A submission from the federal government in defence of the CRTC argued the regulator was within its rights to order the payments. 'The orders challenged in these proceedings … are a valid exercise of the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission's regulatory powers. These orders seek to remedy the inequity that has resulted from the ascendance of online streaming giants like the Appellants,' the office of the attorney general said. 'Online undertakings have greatly profited from their access to Canadian audiences, without any corresponding obligation to make meaningful contributions supporting Canadian programming and creators — an obligation that has long been imposed on traditional domestic broadcasters.' The government said that if the streamers get their way, that would preserve 'an inequitable circumstance in which domestic broadcasters — operating in an industry under economic strain — shoulder a disproportionate regulatory burden.' 'This result would be plainly out of step with the policy aims of Parliament' and cabinet, it added. The court hearing comes as trade tensions between the U.S. and Canada have cast a shadow over the CRTC's attempts to regulate online streamers. The regulator launched a suite of proceedings and hearings as part of its implementation of the Online Streaming Act, legislation that in 2023 updated the Broadcasting Act to set up the CRTC to regulate streaming companies. In January, as U.S. President Donald Trump was inaugurated for his second term, groups representing U.S. businesses and big tech companies warned the CRTC that its efforts to modernize Canadian content rules could worsen trade relations and lead to retaliation. Then, as the CRTC launched its hearing on modernizing the definition of Canadian content in May, Netflix, Paramount and Apple cancelled their individual appearances. While the companies didn't provide a reason, the move came shortly after Trump threatened to impose a tariff of up to 100 per cent on movies made outside the United States. Foreign streamers have long pointed to their existing spending in Canada in response to calls to bring them into the regulated system. This report by The Canadian Press was first published June 8, 2025.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 Hot Tech Stocks With More Potential Than Any Cryptocurrency
CoreWeave's AI cloud business is booming. D-Wave's practical applications for quantum computing are impressing investors. QuantumScape could reshape the EV market with its solid-state batteries. 10 stocks we like better than CoreWeave › Cryptocurrencies might be worthwhile plays for investors who have a high tolerance for risk. However, they're also notoriously volatile and difficult to value since they often trade on market hype or murky future expectations regrading their scarcity or utility. So instead of chasing the market's hottest cryptocurrencies right now, it might be smarter to invest in three speculative tech stocks: CoreWeave (NASDAQ: CRWV), D-Wave Quantum (NYSE: QBTS), and QuantumScape (NYSE: QS). These stocks are also undeniably risky, but they're built on firmer businesses with clearer roadmaps for the future. CoreWeave, which was once an Ethereum mining operation, abandoned the crypto market in 2018 and leveraged its big inventory of graphics processing units (GPUs) to build an artificial intelligence (AI)-oriented cloud-infrastructure business. After spending about $100 million on Nvidia's H100 data center GPUs in 2022, it carved out a niche with a dedicated AI platform which was about 35 times faster and 80% cheaper than bigger cloud-infrastructure platforms. It used its own GPUs as collateral to secure more financing, and it attracted some investments from big investors like Nvidia, Cisco, and PureStorage. Its total number of data centers rose from just three in 2022 to 33 at the end of its latest quarter. Its revenue soared from $16 million in 2022 to $1.92 billion in 2024, and it expects that figure to more than double to about $5 billion in 2025. It isn't cheap at 15 times that sales estimate, and its stock has already more than quadrupled since its initial public offering (IPO) just two months ago. But it could have plenty of room to grow as the AI market expands. CoreWeave's lack of profits, high debt, and plans to accelerate its spending on Nvidia's latest Blackwell GPUs could compress its near-term valuations and cool off its stock, but it could head a lot higher over the next few years if it successfully scales up its business and narrows its losses. D-Wave Computing develops quantum annealing tools which can help companies optimize their schedules, workflows, and supply chains. Through quantum computing, which stores zeros and ones simultaneously in qubits, it operates more efficiently than traditional computers which store that data in separate binary bits. D-Wave's core Leap platform, which can be integrated into bigger public cloud platforms, is essentially a quantum-powered efficiency expert. It runs an organization's processes through its systems in various ways, and it identifies the one which consumes the least power as the most efficient. As a quantum-powered platform, D-Wave can map out all of those potential outcomes at a much faster rate than traditional computers. More than 100 companies -- including Deloitte, Mastercard, Lockheed Martin, and Accenture -- already use its services. That makes it a more practical play on the nascent quantum-computing market than its other niche research-oriented peers. From 2024 to 2027, analysts expect D-Wave's revenue to surge from $9 million to $74 million. It's not expected to turn profitable anytime soon, and it might seem absurdly overvalued at 70 times its projected sales for 2027. But it could grow a lot bigger as the quantum-computing market expands over the next few decades. QuantumScape is another speculative stock which could skyrocket over the long run. It develops solid-state lithium metal batteries which have better thermal resistance, faster charging times, and last longer than traditional lithium ion batteries. That makes them well suited for electric vehicles (EV), but it hasn't commercialized any of its batteries yet. QuantumScape is backed by Volkswagen, and its first QSE-5 batteries will have a fast charging time of less than 15 minutes with an EV range of up to 500 miles. Most EVs currently have a range of roughly 300 miles with an average charging time of 30 minutes. It's only shipped a few low-volume samples so far, and it doesn't expect to mass produce any batteries or generate any revenue until 2026. But this year, the company is transitioning from its older Raptor separator process to its newer Cobra process. That long-awaited upgrade should boost its stability and yields to pave the way toward the mass production of its batteries. QuantumScape is worth $2.4 billion right now, but it's tough to value because it's unprofitable, isn't generating any revenue yet, and still faces competition from other battery makers and automakers. But if it successfully scales up its business, it might just attract a stampede of bulls and outperform any of the market's top cryptocurrencies. Before you buy stock in CoreWeave, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and CoreWeave wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $669,517!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $868,615!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 792% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Leo Sun has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Accenture Plc, Cisco Systems, Ethereum, Mastercard, Nvidia, and Pure Storage. The Motley Fool recommends Lockheed Martin and Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 3 Hot Tech Stocks With More Potential Than Any Cryptocurrency was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio