Former Supreme Court judge Catherine McGuinness: ‘I would love to see a united Ireland before I die'
'It was really a feeling of the need for fairness, not to have a situation of one lot of people rolling in money and running everything, and other people crawling along and trying to manage the best they could.'
Catherine McGuinness is explaining a lifetime dedication to public service in Ireland, whether as a politician, judge, or holder of many roles including chair of the Forum for Peace and Reconciliation in
Northern Ireland
.
She is comfortable with being described as a patriot. 'Yes, of course I'm for Ireland. When your country asks you to do a job, the appropriate response is to have a go.'
And she enjoyed most of the jobs. 'I can't say that I was making enormous sacrifices. I put a lot of work into them, I felt it was worthwhile.'
READ MORE
Born in November 1934, McGuinness grew up in the Protestant, staunchly unionist, Dunmurry area of east
Belfast
, where her father, Robert Ellis, a native of Spanish Point in west
Clare
, was a Church of Ireland clergyman. He met her mother, Sylvia Craig, from Tullamore, Co
Offaly
, when both were students at
Trinity College Dublin
.
McGuinness and her two younger brothers lived with their parents on the then main Dublin-Belfast road, where the Orange Order paraded past their home every 12th of July.
The parish was a working-class one, her parents' church was not 'of the rich and grand', and she attended the local public elementary primary school. Their home was 'full of books' and her parents' influence made McGuinness aware there was 'something outside what I was learning in primary school, outside the kind of social and political outlooks of everyone else'.
[
NUI Galway honours Catherine McGuinness with new portrait
Opens in new window
]
Her mother, a clergyman's daughter, knew being a clergyman's wife 'was a job in itself', and was actively involved in parish work. 'She would not have been deliberately thinking she was as good as a man, she knew perfectly well she was.'
Her parents voted for the Northern Ireland Labour Party (NILP) but were not politically overt. Their decision to send her to boarding school in
Dublin
was largely because they found the girls' secondary schools in Belfast 'so very unionist'.
Catherine McGuinness during the finals of the A&L Goodbody Solicitors Mock Trial Competition in the Four Courts, 2000. Photograph: Frank Miller
McGuinness was aged 12 when she went to the clergy daughters' school (CDS) attached to Alexandra secondary school and college, then located at Earlsfort Terrace in Dublin. The CDS was 'deliberately designed to be reasonably cheap for the daughters of clergymen because they did not have much money'.
'In CDS, our view was, while we were poor, we were smarter,' she laughs.
She was particularly influenced by an 'excellent' teacher, Nora Golden, who taught Irish and French and 'was the person who interested me most in the Irish language'.
Having sat honours Irish in the
Leaving Cert
, McGuinness went to Trinity College Dublin in 1955 as a scholarship student to study Irish and French, where she met a young actor and broadcaster, Proinsias MacAonghusa. From the Connemara Gaeltacht and a 'very different' background to her own, he was not a student, but was involved with Trinity's cumann Gaelach.
Asked was it love at first sight, she smiles: 'More or less.' They married before she graduated, she was 21, he was 22, and were together for 48 years until his death in 2003.
The couple lived in south Dublin and also spent time in their holiday home near Rosmuc in Connemara, where her father-in-law taught in the nearby school.
It would be more wearisome to go on forever, you have got to lie down some time
—
Catherine McGuinness
Proinsias's parents separated before he met Catherine, who formed a strong bond with his 'wonderful' mother Maireád McGuinness. She had fought in the
1916 Rising
, took the anti-Treaty side during the
Civil War
and served time in prison before going to the
United States
, where she trained as a nurse.
On her return to Ireland, Maireád worked as a nurse, married, had four children, and then left her marriage, says McGuinness. 'She had the bravery to just up and leave when many people didn't. I wouldn't say she had given up being a Catholic, but she had a stand-off view of the Church as it was. She came to Dublin and managed to get herself a house from the Corporation and got her two daughters into school in Dublin.'
Maireád joined the 'left-wing and radical' Irish Housewives Association, and McGuinness accompanied her to its meetings. 'These were incredible women.'
McGuinness supported Maireád's unsuccessful candidacy as an independent for Dublin northeast in the 1957 general election, running on an IHA-backed platform that included promoting 'good housekeeping' in the nation's affairs.
[
Catherine McGuinness 'horrified' at idea to do away with Department of Children
Opens in new window
]
Proinsias was involved over decades in the Irish
Labour Party
and, in 1961, McGuinness left her teaching job at Alexandra College to work as the party's parliamentary officer, primarily as speechwriter for its leader Brendan Corish.
Her Labour Party involvement was grounded in a similar motivation to her parents' support for the NILP, she says. They were very much in favour of the
British Labour government
elected after the second World War and the introduction of the
National Health Service
. All of this contributed to her views about 'the need for fairness'.
Catherine McGuinness: 'When I was appointed, there were still some judges who really did not want to talk to you because they did not want women on the bench.' Photograph: Alan Betson
McGuinness quit as parliamentary officer after her husband, who was vice-chairman of the party for a time, fell out with some senior members and was expelled in 1967.
The couple then had two children, Caitríona, born in 1963, and Donal, born in 1965. Their third child, Diarmaid, was born in 1969, the same year that Proinsias ran unsuccessfully as an independent candidate in the
Dún Laoghaire
constituency.
McGuinness's Labour Party work had involved analysing different Bills and Acts. That experience of the interaction between law and politics, plus encouragement from her barrister uncle, Max Ellis, and from Kader Asmal - a law professor in Trinity, chair of the Irish Anti-Apartheid Movement and a close friend - led to her decision to pursue a law degree. 'I loved it, it all fitted in with what I had been doing in the Labour Party.'
She entered the Law Library in 1977, aged 42, where she devilled [was apprenticed to] Paul Carney, since deceased, who went on to become a judge of the
High Court
and
Court of Criminal Appeal
. 'He was quite a character and very, very good to work with – not the kind of person who kept an eye on you all the time. Sometimes I would say, 'I've never done that kind of case before' and he would say 'Go on, you're perfectly well able to do it'.'
More women were joining the Law Library in those years and some men would 'make remarks' about that, McGuinness recalls. One of the early entrants, Frances Elizabeth Moran, 'was supposed to have stood up and said 'Frances Elizabeth Moran, this is no place for you if this is the way people are going to behave''. The challenges for women at the Bar included simply getting work. 'Solicitors would be trying to get the best for their client and a lot would hesitate about putting a woman before their client or before judges.'
[
Catherine McGuinness: I could not resist a moment of triumph after 35 years
Opens in new window
]
Family law, then just developing, was one avenue of work for women. Many successful male barristers looked on it as 'awful messy stuff', and their approach was to 'let the women do that, we'll stick with men who fall off ladders or whatever'.
Family law 'was always about property', and some cases also involved cruelty or violence. 'Even if it was not about property like houses, it was about money, wages – people need money, even wives need money.'
McGuinness was elected senator for Trinity College in 1979 and was re-elected until 1987. She actively opposed the 1983 anti-abortion amendment to the Constitution and supported the 1986 referendum to end the divorce ban.
Her appointment to the Council of State from 1988 to 1990 by then president Patrick Hillery underlined the widespread respect in which she was held. She was appointed a second time to the council by President
Michael D Higgins
in 2012, serving until 2019.
Her appointment as the first woman Circuit Court judge in 1994 was an important milestone. 'When I was appointed, there were still some judges who really did not want to talk to you because they did not want women on the bench. They would not get away with it now.'
When asked to chair the Forum for Peace and Reconciliation, established in 1994, she was 'really pleased because of coming from the North and being a Northern Protestant'.
'It was hugely interesting and I really did feel we did achieve something, even if it was only to make these people sit down in one room and talk to each other.'
On the prospect of a united Ireland: 'I would love to see it before I die,' she says. The many changes in society North and South have, she believes, cast doubt on 'the old things we were fighting about'.
In 1996, she was promoted to the High Court bench. Four years later, she became the second woman to be appointed to the Supreme Court, where she served until she retired in 2006, aged 72. 'I really hated retiring.'
Catherine McGuinness: 'Don't lose courage, be prepared to work, and don't mind the people who are sort of pushing back.' Photograph: Alan Betson
Retirement turned out to be a loose concept. She was president of the Law Reform Commission until 2010 and, as chair of the Yes for Children campaign from 2011, led civil society organisations lobbying to insert a child rights amendment into the Constitution, the culmination of her decades of advocacy for children.
Her 1993 Kilkenny Incest Investigation report, as chair of the inquiry into failings over 15 years by various State agencies for an incest victim, had brought the child abuse issue into the public domain for the first time and led to changes in childcare law.
While welcoming the advances, McGuinness cautions there 'is always room for improvement', and is glad to see judges increasingly speaking out about children's rights.
At 90, it's fair to say, she has seen a lot of change over the decades.
[
Ireland 'needs to learn lessons' from France, Catherine McGuinness says
Opens in new window
]
Having more women involved in the law 'changes the agenda in a way, the family law issue practically did not exist before we all got involved'. Women deal with 'the basic issues', she says, including the idea of the family and the rights of children to education and to be properly looked after. 'All of those on-the-ground issues had not really featured much in the law at all except for very grand people.'
When McGuinness was in the Seanad, there were more women involved and she 'felt more listened to than in the past'.
As chairwoman of the national forum on the end of life, McGuinness urged an end to the 'taboo' around talk of death. She dislikes the widespread use of the expression 'passed away', rather than 'died'. 'It seems like crawling out of the room.'
She does not fear death. 'When you have got as old as I am, you think, well you can't go on forever. It would be more wearisome to go on forever, you have got to lie down some time.'
Her advice to others hoping to make a positive impact is to 'be brave'.
'Don't lose courage, be prepared to work, and don't mind the people who are sort of pushing back. Be brave, don't say 'I can't do this' or 'I can't do that'. Maybe you can, or at least you can try. Fight for what you want, if it's a good thing.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Corporate tax receipts drop 30% as Trump's tariffs bite
Corporate tax receipts fell by 30 per cent in May, amounting to a loss of over €1.1 billion when compared to the same month last year, amid signs US tariffs may be denting the profitability of multinationals in Ireland. The latest exchequer returns for May, published by the Department of Finance, indicated that the Government collected just under €2.5 billion in corporate taxes last month, compared to almost €3.6 billion in May last year. The department insisted, however, that 'once-off factors' had boosted receipts in May last year which distorted the year-on-year comparison. Nonetheless with most EU exports currently facing a 10 per cent levy in the US, possibly rising to 50 per cent if negotiations between Brussels and Washington fail, exporting companies here may be predicting lower earnings READ MORE [ Subscriber Only Opinion Ireland cannot base its economic strategy on the 'Taco' theory – Trump Always Chickens Out Opens in new window ] On a cumulative basis, receipts from the business tax were up by €1.1 billion at €7.4 billion but this reflects once-off revenues from the EU court ruling against Apple. When they are removed, corporate tax receipts to the end of May were down 9.4 per cent at €5.7 billion. Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe said: ' May is one of the more important months for tax revenues, and the steady growth in most tax headings points to an economy that is in a relatively good position." 'The most notable feature of the May exchequer returns was in respect of corporation tax, which saw a marked year-on-year drop,' he said. 'While this reflects once-off factors last year, it nonetheless highlights the degree of concentration in the corporate tax base, wherein a small number of multinational firms can significantly impact on the overall tax yield,' Mr Donohoe said. 'In a context of unprecedented uncertainty in the international economic landscape, this serves as a timely reminder of Ireland's exposure to changes in the global trading environment, and of the vital importance of adhering to a sensible and sustainable budgetary strategy,' he said. Overall the latest exchequer data show the Government collected €38.2 billion in tax revenue during the first five months of the year. This was up nearly €3 billion or 8.5 per cent on the same period last year aided by positive increases in income tax and VAT. Income tax receipts, the Government's largest tax channel, generated €14.5 billion, €630 million more than last year, reflecting the State's strong labour market. Separate figures, published on Thursday, put the headline rate of unemployment near a historic low of 4 per cent. VAT receipts for the year so far were also up by €600 million at €11.4 billion. The sales tax reflects consumer activity. On the spending side, total gross voted expenditure for the five-month period amounted to just under €42 billion, up by €3.1 billion (8.1 per cent) on last year and €37 million (0.1 per cent) behind profile. At a headline level, an exchequer surplus of €4 billion was recorded compared to a surplus of €0.8 billion last year, an improvement of €3.2 billion. Excluding the once-off receipts arising from the Apple tax case, the underlying surplus was €0.7 billion.


Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Suspended solicitor's appeal over professional misconduct finding to be heard in July
A date has been fixed next month for an appeal by suspended solicitor Declan O'Callaghan over findings of professional misconduct in connection with his handling of a land deal in Co Mayo. On Friday, the president of the High Court, Mr Justice David Barniville, set a provisional hearing date of July 23rd for the appeal. Barrister Michael Mullooly, for Mr O'Callaghan, said he expected it to run for two days and Mr O'Callaghan would be among his side's witnesses. Barrister Ruadhán Ó Ciaráin, for Nirvanna, the concrete products manufacturer that brought the complaint against Mr O'Callaghan over the 2007 land deal to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal, said it is expected to call two witnesses at most. READ MORE Last month, Mr Justice Barniville rejected a challenge by Mr O'Callaghan over the procedures adopted by the tribunal in reaching its findings last year of professional misconduct over the 2007 deal. On Friday, he made an order requiring Mr O'Callaghan to pay Nirvanna's costs in opposing that application. The rejection of Mr O'Callaghan's judicial review-type challenge cleared the way for the hearing of his full appeal. If he loses that appeal, the High Court will then consider whether or not to grant an application by the Law Society to strike him off. The society has agreed with the tribunal recommendation that Mr O'Callaghan be struck off, but the final decision on whether or not to grant a strike-off order must be made by the High Court president. The three-member tribunal last summer found Mr O'Callaghan guilty of four counts of professional misconduct over his handling of the 2007 land deal involving Nirvanna, a company of Co Mayo businessman Tom Fleming. [ Declan O'Callaghan: No end in sight as saga of suspended solicitor continues Opens in new window ] Now aged 80, Mr Fleming claimed Nirvanna never received €250,000 for selling the land to a now-deceased businessman. Mr O'Callaghan denied the sum was owed, and disputed the transaction was for 'sale' of the lands. The tribunal upheld the Nirvanna complaint, finding professional misconduct on grounds Mr O'Callaghan breached his duty of care to the company, provided inadequate professional services, and purported to act for vendor and purchaser in a transaction where there was 'a clear conflict of interest'. In recommending strike-off, it had regard to two findings of professional misconduct previously made by it in 1990 and 2019 against Mr O'Callaghan. He has been suspended as a solicitor since 2018 arising from a separate Law Society investigation into matters at his now-defunct practice Kilrane O'Callaghan & Co, which was based in Ballaghaderreen, Co Roscommon. The suspension was imposed pending a tribunal hearing of the society's application for an inquiry into matters arising from its investigation. Concerns raised in an independent solicitor's report for that investigation included that Mr O'Callaghan withdrew substantial fees from the estate of a bereaved child.

Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Windfarm must shut down three turbines and pay €360,000 damages to couple, High Court orders
A Co Wexford wind farm must fully shut down three of its six turbines and pay a total €360,000 damages, including €60,000 aggravated damages, to a couple over its adverse impact on them, a High Court judge has ordered. ABO Energy Ireland Ltd and ABO Energy O&M Ireland Ltd, operators of the wind farm at Gibbett Hill, near Bunclody, along with its owner, Wexwind Ltd, also face a potential legal costs bill of €2.3 million incurred by Raymond Byrne and Lorna Moorhead in their proceedings. Mr Justice Oisín Quinn refused to grant a stay, pending appeal, which would permit the three turbines closest to the couple's home to partially operate over certain fixed hours. The defendants failed to engage 'in any meaningful way' with the 'genuine and substantive' complaints made by the couple over 12 years since the turbines began operating in 2013, he said. READ MORE The defendants' 'seriously unimpressive' approach represented a threat to the goal of developing wind farms and wind energy here, he said. Addressing wind turbine noise in a substantial way was seen as 'critical' to the future success of wind as a major source of renewable energy. The trial had heard engineers and other experts are used to engaging with nearby residents and others and there are 'usually many solutions available', short of shutting down wind turbines, he noted. The defendants' approach merited aggravated damages, he said, but he would not award exemplary damages for reasons including the impact of the shut down order and positive behaviour of the defendants during the trial, including their admitting liability for nuisance on day 11 of the hearing. In their proceedings, the couple claimed the defendants wrongfully caused or permitted noise, vibration and shadow flicker to be emitted from the wind farm which caused, and continues to cause them, stress, anxiety and sleep disturbance, 'destroyed' the use and enjoyment of their property and devalued it. Represented by John Rogers SC, instructed by solicitor Joe Noonan, they initiated their action in 2018. The defendants had contested the claims but, last March, on the 11th day of the hearing of their full action, the defence admitted liability in relation to the claims of nuisance and they switched off the turbines from 10pm to 7am daily. At the end of the six week trial on April 4th, the defendants apologised for the nuisance and said they would also switch off the turbines from 7am to 11am at weekends and public holidays, pay damages for nuisance to date and into the future and address shadow flicker. In his 100 page judgment, Mr Justice Quinn said the plaintiffs' expert evidence was that the nuisance was 'one of the worst cases of wind farm noise impact' while the defence expert said it was 'an outlier'. He awarded annual damages of €10,000 and €15,000 respectively to Mr Byrne and Ms Moorhead for the 12 years of the nuisance from May 2013, meaning €120,000 and €180,000 general damages respectively. It was not appropriate to permit the defendants to pay additional damages rather than have the three turbines shut down, he held. The 'fair, just and appropriate' outcome was a permanent order directing their full shut down as that was the only order which would prevent what the defendants admitted was a serious nuisance. If an evidential basis for a solution, or combination of solutions, had been put forward by the defendants, that could have avoided the full shutdown of the turbines, he said. His conclusions, he stressed, were limited to the circumstances of this case, including the defendants decision to 'largely ignore' and then fail to engage in any meaningful way with a 'substantial and serious problem' they had belatedly admitted.