Premier pushes plan for mining exploration despite Bill 15 backlash
Premier David Eby has unveiled his plan to speed up mining development in northwestern B.C. to boost the provincial economy. But the announcement was overshadowed by growing opposition to a controversial law that will fast-track infrastructure and resource projects.
Eby says he has a plan to enable the province to fast-track mining development in northwestern BC, while respecting First Nations rights and conserving B.C.'s sensitive ecosystems.
"High environmental standards and partnerships with First Nations are not at odds with resource development," Eby said at a news conference overlooking the Port of Vancouver on Monday.
"Here in British Columbia, economic development, conservation of precious water and land and partnership with First Nations go together."
Eby says there's no reason it should take 12 to 15 years to approve a new mining project in B.C.
"The northwest is rich with critical minerals and metals that are the building blocks for much of the technology we rely on for our lives today, and they're also essential to new technology that will power our lives in the future. From electric cars and batteries to wind turbines and solar panels, we can't do it without these resources."
At stake, he says, is almost $50 billion in economic potential and tens of thousands of high-paying jobs.
Key to the government's economic growth plan is Bill 15. It's controversial proposed legislation that would give the cabinet the power to accelerate public infrastructure projects like schools and hospitals, and "provincially significant" private resource projects like critical mineral mines.
Indigenous leaders, environmental groups and the Union of BC Municipalities say the NDP government is giving itself unchecked power to push through resource projects with limited consultation or ecological safeguards.
Tsartlip First Nations Chief Don Tom called Eby a "snake oil salesman" whose pledge to First Nations that they will be consulted about major projects amounts to "trust us, bro."
"Trust has been broken between First Nations and the David Eby government," said Tom.
Hugh Braker, who sits on the First Nations Summit's political executive, said Indigenous leaders who voted for the NDP in the election feel betrayed.
"All the promises they made during the campaign last fall have gone out the window. They say damn the environment, full speed ahead."
Eby says the government's economic plans for mining are not connected to the proposed law.
"There's no connection between Bill 15 and today's announcement," he said.
That, despite mines being a key example cited at Eby's news conference on May 1, when he announced the bill.
Eby acknowledged that a mining project could be deemed "provincially significant" and therefore fast-tracked under that same bill.
"We do have theoretically — should the bill pass — opportunities under Bill 15," Eby said in response to a question from CBC News. "But even if Bill 15 didn't exist, we'd still be doing this announcement today."
The Association for Mineral Exploration said in a statement that in order for the province's proposed strategy for mining exploration to succeed, "it must be an open and transparent process that includes the mineral exploration sector at the table with government, First Nations and other partners."
Three First Nations leaders at Eby's event — Talhtan, Kaska͛ and Taku River Tlingit First Nations — backed the province's plan to fast-track mining development.
"We want to see our lives change for the better," said Beverly Slater, the president of the Talhtan Central Government.
In 2023, the Tahltan Central Government and the province reached a co-operation deal on the Red Chris gold and copper mine located in Tahltan Territory.
MLAs are set to vote on the final stage of the bill this week.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
26 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
For G7 leaders, immense global challenges weigh on agenda overshadowed by Trump
The last time Canada hosted a G7 summit, Tristen Naylor gained access as an unusual spectator. He was embedded as an academic observing the summit management office that oversaw the 2018 events at Charlevoix, Que. It was, he recalls, a marvel of organization, governed by a 132-page event 'bible.' 'It's page after page of minute-by-minute play-by-play on how the summit runs, with schematics and diagrams of every room setup, who stands where, how many cars you need,' said Mr. Naylor, the director of the Oxbridge Diplomatic Academy. But as Canada once again prepares for some of the world's most powerful leaders to meet at G7 meetings that begin this weekend, all of that meticulous planning – and any hopes for agreement or even basic comity – must reckon with a series of unknowns. There are new faces: Britain's Keir Starmer, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Japan's Shigeru Ishiba and the host himself, Prime Minister Mark Carney. There is a horizon clouded with haze, from the wildfires burning across this country, from the street fires lit in protests across the United States, from the conflagrations still raging in Ukraine and Gaza, from the trade wars that have drawn the U.S. into conflict with the other countries whose leaders will attend – and, perhaps more than anything, from Donald Trump, who has returned to power with a palpable disdain for the elite multilateralism that is the pillar on which the G7 has stood for a half-century. And there is history. Carney should ignore any antics from Trump at G7 and focus on business, Chrétien says Canada to seek agreements in global peace, energy security and new partnerships at G7, Carney says The Charlevoix summit ended with Mr. Trump calling then-prime minister Justin Trudeau 'very dishonest & weak,' and withdrawing by tweet from a joint statement. Seven years later, 'at the end of the weekend, if there is no big explosive Trump story, that alone will be a success,' Mr. Naylor said. 'The game is damage limitation.' The world leaders gathering this weekend in Kananaskis, Alta., are confronted with a scale of problems that the original Group of Six meeting in 1975 had determined to avoid (Canada did not join until the following year). That first summit, held in France, concluded with an agreement to pursue the 'maximum possible level of trade liberalization,' while striking a note of optimism. 'Our success will strengthen, indeed is essential to, democratic societies everywhere,' the leaders said in their closing communiqué. Ottawa under pressure to raise plight of Jimmy Lai at G7 summit Opinion: Massive fires burning across Alberta have helped put climate change back on the G7 agenda Fifty years later, the World Bank is forecasting the slowest decade of global growth since the 1960s – the result, in part, of rising tariff rates – while new levels of doubt have shrouded democratic governance. One third of the world's voters now live in countries where election quality has eroded, the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance has found. The immensity of those issues stands in contrast to the limited hopes for this G7 meeting, which are so dim that Canada is not planning for a joint communiqué at its conclusion, a senior official told reporters Thursday. Instead, the summit hosts are looking for short joint statements focused on concrete actions and agreements in certain areas. The Globe is not identifying the official, who was not authorized to speak publicly. Forgoing such a communiqué again this year could sidestep sparring over what language everyone, Mr. Trump included, would find acceptable. It would also reflect reality. This year's summit will draw together leaders as a group. But the greatest priority for most of those leaders is one man alone. Since he has returned to office, Mr. Trump has shattered expectations about how international trade should flow, how diplomacy should be done and even how secure other countries should feel within their own borders. If that means limited progress on matters of acute global concern, all may not be lost. The G7 has always been a place where personality matters, its annual gathering structured with extensive time for discussion outside the strictures of formal government business. Historically, leaders 'were supposed to develop a personal level of relationship and trust, so that at a point in which they might need one another, they knew and trusted one another,' said Douglas Rediker, a Washington-based political adviser who is a non-resident senior fellow at the Brookings Institution. That mandate, he said, matters more than ever. 'This becomes a meeting about taking the temperature of Donald Trump as a man, as a leader, as a policy-maker – as someone they can and cannot do business with, and can and cannot trust,' Mr. Rediker said. By the standard measure of things, this should be Mr. Carney's party. As host, he has power over the guest list and influence over the broad agenda for conversation. For Mr. Carney, a former central banker who has spent much of his life in elite company, the summit offers a venue to show action at a time when patience for political puffery has grown thin. 'The publics in the western world are just tired of leaders that spout rhetoric and then don't get anything done,' said Janice Stein, the founding director of the Munk School of Global Affairs. Mr. Carney, she said, has at the G7 a moment to pursue his ambition to remake Canada and its place in the world. The question is 'how much support can he build for his priorities, and how much traction will he get for them at the G7?' Elements of that strategy have come into view with those invited. With Mexico's Claudia Sheinbaum, Mr. Carney 'is rebalancing our relationships with other powers, but he is still renegotiating a security and economic relationship with the United States. Claudia Sheinbaum is a big piece of that,' Ms. Stein said. India's Narendra Modi represents an enormous economy that is for Canada a potential counterweight to China and the U.S. India, which like Canada has struggled to navigate Mr. Trump's tariffs, 'also needs to ramp up its trade policies,' Raja Mohan, a distinguished fellow with the Delhi-based Council for Strategic and Defense Research, said this week in remarks to the Asia Pacific Foundation of Canada. A meeting between Mr. Carney and Mr. Modi, he said, could deliver a fresh start to trade talks that have been stalled since 2023. 'So there is a moment, there, of economic reconstitution that is possible,' Mr. Mohan said. Elsewhere, though, foreign leaders are preparing for Kananaskis with questions about just how Mr. Carney intends to rebalance international relationships. Opinion: Mark Carney's go-it-alone approach is born of necessity Germany embraces militarism for the first time since the Second World War Take North American trade. The U.S. government has privately given some positive signals on the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement, a senior Mexican government official said. On one recent occasion, a top U.S. Trade Representative official said behind closed doors that the U.S. may choose to only 'review' USMCA rather than renegotiate it, the Mexican official said. The Trump administration is considering a timeline of July or September to get started, the source said, and Mexico would like to work more closely with Canada. The Globe is not identifying the official because they are not authorized to speak publicly. But there has, to date, been little co-ordination between the two countries, particularly at the political level, the official said. Other countries will arrive in Canada with eyes trained on Washington, not Ottawa. For Mr. Ishiba, one of the primary attractions of Kananaskis is the chance of a sideline meeting with Mr. Trump, where the Japanese Prime Minister has said he will press his country's case personally as tariff negotiations between the two countries drag on. In return for any tariff carve-outs, Japan is likely to promise to buy large amounts of U.S. energy and weapons. 'Japan's major priority will be twofold – ensuring the focus is on a rules-based international order and making progress on bilateral tariff negotiations when Ishiba and Trump meet,' said Rintaro Nishimura, a Tokyo-based associate with the Asia Group, a strategic advisory firm. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, meanwhile, will arrive in Kananaskis with hopes that other G7 leaders can together persuade Mr. Trump to take tough new measures against Russia. Response to Russia's actions in Ukraine, including massive air attacks over the past week, should be met not with 'silence from the world, but concrete action,' Mr. Zelensky wrote on social media this week. 'Action from America, which has the power to force Russia into peace. Action from Europe, which has no alternative but to be strong. Action from others around the world who called for diplomacy and an end to the war – and whom Russia has ignored.' Lisa Yasko, a member of the Ukrainian parliament's Foreign Affairs Committee, said her country was looking to the G7 to lead the way with a new round of sanctions to punish Russia for refusing to accept a ceasefire. The joint communiqué issued by G7 foreign ministers at the end of their March meeting in Charlevoix had threatened exactly that. But as foreign leaders arrive in Canada seeking time with Mr. Trump, they worry his focus is directed somewhere else. Ms. Yasko said there was concern that Mr. Trump was too preoccupied with domestic politics – his feud with Elon Musk, and the deployment of troops to California – to focus on helping Ukraine, which has a dwindling supply of U.S. weaponry sent by Mr. Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden. Mr. Trump has approved only a single arms sale to Ukraine – US$310-million in spare parts and other support for F-16 fighter jets – since taking office in January. 'It's not that easy for the average Ukrainian person to understand why the Americans are not doing certain things,' Ms. Yasko said in a telephone interview. 'It all looks as if all the attention is more focused on the internal agenda, rather than what happens in foreign affairs, where the actions of United States are very much needed.' The G7 concluded last year's summit in Apulia, Italy, with a 36-page statement that listed 11 main points of agreement, from standing in solidarity with Ukraine to a renewed commitment toward gender equality and taking concrete steps on reducing climate change. Few expect such language to emerge from Kananaskis. 'This is not going to be Trudeau and Macron smiling and chatting it out. That is a different world,' said Sumantra Maitra, a senior fellow at the Center for Renewing America, a MAGA think tank. Instead, in the areas where previous summits found common ground, Mr. Trump's arrival at the gathering may bring reason for dispute. Take Mr. Zelensky, who sparred with the U.S. leader in the White House. Having the Ukrainian President there 'is potentially far more destabilizing than anything,' said Mr. Maitra, who has advised Mr. Trump but does not speak for the administration. Then there is Mr. Trump's personal distaste for some leaders, such as France's Emmanuel Macron, and his distrust of multinational institutions. 'He's not looking for some kind of consensus-building, kumbayah exercise on the international stage. That's not his style and approach,' said Nile Gardiner, a specialist in foreign policy with the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. Across a series of issues at the G7, he said, 'one cannot rule out the strong potential for real conflict.' Mr. Trump, for example, has sought major spending increases among NATO allies, 'and I would expect that he will be raising that issue significantly, especially on Canadian soil, as Canada has been in President Trump's eyes one of the worst offenders on low defence spending,' Mr. Gardiner said. Mr. Carney has sought to blunt that blow, saying this week Canadian defence spending will soon reach two per cent of GDP. Mr. Trump is likely to seek more. Even so, against that set of low expectations, the G7 leaders may discover more areas of agreement than anticipated, said John Kirton, a political scientist at the University of Toronto who is director of the G7 Research Group. 'The secret to success is letting Donald Trump credibly claim that he led and won the G7 on some serious things. And there are standout candidates where it's relatively easy to do,' he said. Take a need for stimulus spending through tax cuts or defence spending. Or a commitment to fighting transnational crime and the drug trade. Or a pledge to make mandatory the removal of non-consensual sexual imagery, including pornographic deepfakes, from the internet – something the U.S. recently legislated. Or a common dedication to confronting China on security, trade and transnational repression. Or a pledge to act against crimes committed by undocumented migrants, a subject of nearly as much concern in Berlin as in Washington. Yet Mr. Trump could just as easily be provoked into anger by some perceived slight. Worse, he could back his hosts into a corner from which there is no polite exit. 'If he says something really outrageous about Canadian sovereignty or the 51st state that can't be characterized as a joke – the only precedent we have in this country for that kind of behaviour is 1967,' said Chris Alexander, a former cabinet minister under Stephen Harper, recalling Ottawa's bitter condemnation of Charles de Gaulle's 'Vive le Québec libre' refrain that preceded the French president cutting short his visit. Still, he said, diminished expectations for what this G7 will accomplish should not diminish its importance. Whatever it yields – be it insults or be it harmony – will offer insight into the direction of international affairs at a moment when Mr. Trump is far from the only leader questioning old assumptions. 'We are in something like a pivot away from globalization,' said Mr. Alexander. 'Does the summit amplify those trend lines? Or does it slow them down and moderate them? That is a question that I think is worth watching for.' With a report from Steven Chase
Globe and Mail
41 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Canada's financial regulators need to reduce money laundering. A task force review might speed that up
Canada's financial regulators are about to find themselves in the hot seat. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF), a global body that sets standards to combat money laundering and terrorist financing, is conducting a review of Canada's efforts to combat financial crime. One topic that will figure prominently in that evaluation is the effectiveness of regulators, including the Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada – the federal financial intelligence unit – and the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions – the country's top banking regulator. Both FinTRAC and OSFI, as they are known for short, are responsible for supervising the anti-money laundering compliance of banks. The FATF has cited issues with Canada's approach to regulation, supervision and monitoring in past reviews, but this year's evaluation comes in the wake of financial-crime scandals including one involving Toronto-Dominion Bank. 'Supervisors play a crucial role in preventing money laundering and terrorist financing,' states the FATF's guidance. 'Effective supervisors also ensure that these businesses comply with their anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing obligations and take appropriate action if they fail to do so.' The FATF's last review of Canada in 2016 recommended that FinTRAC and OSFI co-ordinate more effectively on the supervision of banks. Specifically, it said FinTRAC had increased its supervisory capacity but still had 'somewhat limited' expertise about banking, adding OSFI was conducting its supervision with limited resources. Ottawa to overhaul financial-crime laws in new border security bill Recent money laundering scandals, however, have caused both FinTRAC and OSFI to lose face. Last fall, TD became the first bank in the United States to plead guilty to conspiracy to commit money laundering and the largest bank in U.S. history to plead guilty to failing to maintain an anti-money laundering (AML) program that complies with federal regulations. American banking regulators and the U.S. Department of Justice imposed more than US$3-billion in fines and various non-monetary penalties. The Federal Reserve Board also required the Canadian bank to relocate to the United States the parts of its anti-money laundering compliance program that are responsible for complying with U.S. law. 'This program will be subject to oversight by U.S. regulators,' stated its release. Months before publicly announcing that requirement, U.S. regulators privately questioned their Canadian counterparts about why they previously failed to spot and remedy problems with TD's anti-money laundering risk controls, The Globe and Mail reported in May 2024. On Thursday, meanwhile, The Wall Street Journal reported that Norway's US$1.9-trillion sovereign wealth fund was placing TD 'under observation' for four years over financial-crime concerns. There have also been separate allegations of wrongdoing involving Wealth One Bank of Canada and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Canada). As a result, OSFI's stop-start approach to supervising financial-crime compliance in recent years will naturally be probed by the FATF. OSFI returned to AML oversight in 2024 after taking a three-year hiatus. In 2021, OSFI rescinded its guidance on deterring and detecting money laundering and terrorist financing, and handed over its regulatory responsibilities to FinTRAC. At the time, the objective was to make FinTRAC the exclusive overseer of banks' financial-crime compliance obligations. Task force to evaluate Canada's ability to fight money laundering and terrorist financing But OSFI did an about-face in 2024. Not only did it issue a new integrity and security guideline, but it stressed that it considers money laundering and the financing of terrorism third-party and foreign-interference risks that could harm the safety or soundness of banks. Trouble is, banks are once again confused about which federal regulator is in charge. They are also understandably frustrated that their massive spending on compliance programs has failed to yield successful convictions in court. Total financial-crime compliance costs for financial institutions hit US$2-billion in Canada, according to a 2023 study conducted by Forrester Consulting on behalf of LexisNexis Risk Solutions. Regulators, meanwhile, are also suffering from a breakdown in trust with the public because they operate behind a veil of secrecy. And, unlike their U.S. counterparts, they are barred from discussing problems at individual banks – even the widely publicized case involving TD. 'I would like to be forthcoming about our involvement in this case because I think that information would contribute to public confidence in the Canadian financial system,' OSFI Superintendent Peter Routledge told a Parliamentary committee in November. 'That said, Canadian law prohibits me or any OSFI official from disclosing confidential information obtained from federally regulated financial institutions in the course of OSFI's regulation and supervision activities.' Recent money laundering scandals have provided a withering assessment about the effectiveness of Canada's regulators. Maybe the FATF will finally persuade Ottawa to set them up for success.
Globe and Mail
41 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Inside job
Investigation When an account gets hacked, social media giant Meta offers little support, spawning a shadowy network of brokers and Meta employees who profit from helping them get back online Kathryn Blaze Baum Alexandra Posadzki Financial and cybercrime reporter The Globe and Mail Illustration by The Globe and Mail/istock to view this content.
