Regulator investigates Thames Water over delayed environmental schemes
Thames Water is being investigated by the water regulator for England and Wales, Ofwat, after it delayed environmental improvement schemes.
The investigation comes after the Guardian revealed that the UK's largest water company intentionally diverted millions of pounds pledged for environmental clean-ups towards other costs, including bonuses and dividends.
Ofwat has opened an enforcement case into the company to decide whether it has breached its obligations in failing to deliver 100 out of 812 schemes it was supposed to put in place between 2020 and 2025.
These environmental measures are part of the Water Industry National Environmental Programme (WINEP) and they include protecting and enhancing rivers, upgrading sewage systems to reduce spills, reducing the amount of water abstracted from rivers and improving the safety and quality of designated bathing sites.
Water companies have to deliver these on time as part of their statutory requirements with the regulator; failing to do so means enforcement action can be taken including fines. The WINEP deal is a condition for water companies being able to increase bills.
Lynn Parker, the senior director for enforcement at Ofwat, said: 'Customers have paid for Thames Water to carry out these essential environmental schemes. We take any indication that water companies are not meeting their legal obligations very seriously. Therefore, we have launched an investigation to understand whether the delayed delivery of environmental schemes means that Thames Water has breached its obligations. If we find reason to act, we will use our full range of powers to hold Thames to account for any failures and will require them to put things right.'
Consumer groups are concerned the failure to deliver environmental schemes, which are supposed to be paid for with funds from water bills, means that people in the Thames area will have to pay twice.
Thames has been mired in problems for months. The company faces serious financial issues and is heavily indebted, with speculation rife over whether it can survive in its current form or whether it may eventually have to be renationalised.
Matthew Topham, the lead campaigner at We Own It, said: 'To protect the interests of shareholder and creditors, the board have put the safety of Londoners and Thames Valley residents, and our environment, at risk. It's official privatised water can only continue to function by cheating the public.
'We should not have to pay again for infrastructure we have already paid for. Ofwat must cancel its bill rise at Thames and ask ministers to bring the firm into public ownership so it works for people, not profit.'
Sign up to Business Today
Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning
after newsletter promotion
Thames Water denied anyone will have to pay twice and said that the company remains committed to its environmental pledges. In its response to the Guardian's report in December, Thames said sharp increases in its costs such as energy and chemicals – which it claims went beyond standard measures of inflation – lay behind its decisions to delay the works.
A Thames Water spokesperson said: 'We note Ofwat's decision to open an enforcement case into the delayed delivery of WINEP7 and will cooperate fully. Customers will not pay twice for investment that has already been funded through customer bills. We've been very open about the challenges of delivering all the elements of our WINEP 7 programme, which has been impacted by cost increases that are higher than the inflation index applied to our allowances. We informed Ofwat of this in August 2023. We remain committed to delivering all our WINEP commitments.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
10 hours ago
- Daily Mail
KKR threat to NHS landlord: Don't give the barbarians a foothold in a sacred public service, says ALEX BRUMMER
Freed from the proposed £4billion rescue of Thames Water, private equity barons KKR have come fizzing back with an upgraded offer for NHS and private healthcare landlords Assura. KKR's latest and final bid of £1.7billion is only marginally better than that from listed rival Primary Health Properties (PHP) but is being recommended by Assura's board. The battle isn't necessarily over, with PHP still looking at options and claiming Chancellor Rachel Reeves's bonanza spending on the NHS as an ally. As has become customary when listed companies seek to vanish from the London stock market, there is extensive waffle from Assura about careful evaluation and fiduciary duty. The latter is investment banker-speak for running up the white flag. In cash terms, the KKR offer, at 52.1p a share, is barely better than the 51.7p bid from PHP. A 39 per cent premium may seem wonderful but given the depressed state of share valuations in London and a recent tech offer with a 96 per cent premium, the KKR deal is hardly effervescent. There is no obligation for Assura to accept either deal. A braver board would have told the private equity plunderers to get lost. Instead, it chose to disparage the alternative 'merger' with PHP, claiming financial and execution risk. The board also argues that the PHP offer would diminish Assura's efforts to support investment in the NHS estate. Who is Assura kidding? KKR fears too much exposure to regulated British assets and the political risk which comes with it as we learned when it pulled out of the near-complete Thames Water deal. Assura also needs to remind itself of how private equity works. Load up target companies with debt, squeeze costs, do some clever financial engineering with the leverage, raise prices or rents and head for the hills. A Government which better understood how highly indebted deals work might be cautious. A reading of the Competition & Markets Authority's work on veterinary services, revealing how the cost to pet owners and farmers has escalated, illustrates the dangers. More market-based private medicine in the UK eases pressure on the NHS. But allowing the barbarians a foothold in a sacred service is unacceptable even if it's wrapped up with tinsel and a bow. Sign of the Zodiac This week's pandemic of bids for Britain's tech crown jewels and skin care specialists rightly has been accompanied by much handwringing. How is it that companies born and bred in UK science and tech struggle to develop into national champions? After all, the City is second only to New York as a financial centre and is home to one of the world's biggest collection of banks and a strong venture capital industry. There ought to be no bars to start-ups or smaller listed firms accessing capital. Freeing up pension funds, allowing them to be more adventurous, ought to help. But swift market access to funding and liquidity is the key. That is why the launch of Pisces, the London Stock Exchange's platform for 'intermittent' capital, a place to come to raise funding and then vanish behind a privacy wall, is an important innovation. Stock exchange group boss David Schwimmer has been promoting the concept for years but freeing it from the weeds of regulatory bureaucracy is not easy. The insistence on broad-based disclosure rules threatened to sideline it. So it is good to learn that the Financial Conduct Authority, in keeping with the growth agenda, has dropped onerous transparency requirements on the environment, shareholder transactions and director pay. These threatened to strangle Pisces at birth. Let the fundraising begin before the rush to the door of UK tech and AI becomes a stampede. Peer pressure It has become something of a thing for Chancellors to name-check colleagues when delivering grand financial statements to the Commons. Rachel Reeves set a record with her pledges to spend, spend, spend in Labour constituencies in the North, Midlands, Scotland and Wales. Lonely Weymouth was the only southern town to receive much of a mention. Unlike Southport, it already has a serviceable pier.
North Wales Chronicle
12 hours ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Sadiq Khan criticises ‘disappointing' spending review
The mayor of London pledged to 'continue to fight for the investment we need' as he said there must never be an attempt to 'level down London'. Sir Sadiq is frustrated that Chancellor Rachel Reeves did not use her spending review to support proposed projects such as the extension to the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) and the Bakerloo Tube line. He did welcome the decision to provide Transport for London (TfL) with a long-term funding settlement, which it has sought for a number of years. This set out £2.2 billion in capital funding over four years. Sir Sadiq said: 'It's … disappointing that there is no commitment today from the Treasury to invest in the new infrastructure London needs. 'Projects such as extending the Docklands Light Railway not only deliver economic growth across the country, but also tens of thousands of new affordable homes and jobs for Londoners. 'Unless the Government invests in infrastructure like this in our capital, we will not be able to build the numbers of new affordable homes Londoners need. My response to the government's Spending Review ⬇️ — Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) June 11, 2025 'As mayor, I'll continue to make the case to the Government that we must work together for the benefit of our capital and the whole country. 'The way to level up other regions will never be to level down London. 'I'll continue to fight for the investment we need so that we can continue building a fairer, safer and greener London for everyone.' Andy Lord, London's transport commissioner, said the funding settlement means TfL can complete the introduction of new trains on the Piccadilly Tube line and DLR, and new signalling on 40% of the Tube network. He said it will also be able to obtain a new tram fleet, make progress in discussions on new Bakerloo line trains, and renew 'critical' roads, tunnels and flyovers.
Rhyl Journal
13 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Sadiq Khan criticises ‘disappointing' spending review
The mayor of London pledged to 'continue to fight for the investment we need' as he said there must never be an attempt to 'level down London'. Sir Sadiq is frustrated that Chancellor Rachel Reeves did not use her spending review to support proposed projects such as the extension to the Docklands Light Railway (DLR) and the Bakerloo Tube line. He did welcome the decision to provide Transport for London (TfL) with a long-term funding settlement, which it has sought for a number of years. This set out £2.2 billion in capital funding over four years. Sir Sadiq said: 'It's … disappointing that there is no commitment today from the Treasury to invest in the new infrastructure London needs. 'Projects such as extending the Docklands Light Railway not only deliver economic growth across the country, but also tens of thousands of new affordable homes and jobs for Londoners. 'Unless the Government invests in infrastructure like this in our capital, we will not be able to build the numbers of new affordable homes Londoners need. My response to the government's Spending Review ⬇️ — Sadiq Khan (@SadiqKhan) June 11, 2025 'As mayor, I'll continue to make the case to the Government that we must work together for the benefit of our capital and the whole country. 'The way to level up other regions will never be to level down London. 'I'll continue to fight for the investment we need so that we can continue building a fairer, safer and greener London for everyone.' Andy Lord, London's transport commissioner, said the funding settlement means TfL can complete the introduction of new trains on the Piccadilly Tube line and DLR, and new signalling on 40% of the Tube network. He said it will also be able to obtain a new tram fleet, make progress in discussions on new Bakerloo line trains, and renew 'critical' roads, tunnels and flyovers.
