Pōmare Power Fuels Stinging Health Blast
A century after he was Minister of Health Sir Māui Pōmare remained politically potent at Waitara's Ōwae marae on the weekend, inspiring outright rejection of Government policy on Māori health.
Standing for the Crown, New Plymouth MP David MacLeod bore the stinging criticism with obvious discomfort – like Pōmare he is a son of Ngāti Mutunga iwi.
Te Rā o Tā Māui Pōmare (Sir Māui Pōmare Day) each year celebrates the first Māori medical doctor and health minister, with kōrero about uplifting Māori health.
On Saturday Pōmare's great-granddaughter Miria gave the whānau address, condemning health policy changes for Māori.
'Hard-fought, hard-won gains for Māori health over the last 125 years have now been seriously undermined by the disestablishment of Te Aka Whai Ora, the Māori Health Authority – a move that has been severely criticized for discouraging Māori initiatives and disregarding the principle of tino rangatiratanga: self-determination.'
Her tupuna embraced scientific medical advances, but Miria Pōmare said he also pushed for a systematic Māori health focus.
Reforms were underpinned by Maori leadership, culturally-appropriate interventions, and commitment to self-determination: principles derived from Te Tiriti o Waitangi, she said.
'He knew the issues were not medical alone – they were political and economic and spiritual.'
As New Zealand's first statistics minister Tā Māui knew accurate data was crucial to win resources for Māori health equity.
Two weeks ago the Government canned the regular census and will instead collate data already gathered by state agencies.
'It appears to be a sinister reversion back to an assimilationist approach of former times,' said Miria Pōmare.
Her address drew vocal assent and applause.
In Te Ikaroa a Māui – the wharenui built and named to honour Tā Māui – Te Ātiawa and Taranaki leader Wharehoka Wano acknowledged David MacLeod's whakapapa with Pōmare.
But Wano told the National Party MP that tribal leaders on the paepae agreed with Miria Pōmare.
'Haere mai ki te Paremata o Tā Māui Pōmare (Welcome to Sir Maui Pōmare's Parliament).'
'And this is the opposition!'
'Forever!' someone called from the floor.
MacLeod stood in place of Māori-Crown relations minister Tama Potaka, who was at MP Takutai Moana Natasha Kemp's tangihanga.
'I'm here for the Crown. It's not David McLeod, it's not myself, but it is the Crown that I'm representing today.'
He delivered Potaka's message of hope: health spending rises, hospital upgrades including in New Plymouth, funding for Māori wardens, Kāinga Ora working with iwi housing providers, support for Kura Kaupapa Māori.
MacLeod said Pōmare worked with fellow Māori MPs from different parties.
'Today, we have Maori MPs in all political parties,' said MacLeod.
'We are mainly focused on common goals, just like Māui and Apirana [Ngata] back in the day.'
There was no applause.
Kaumātua Peter Moeahu was glad for the MP's clarity about representing the Crown.
'I don't think a helluva lot of the Crown at the moment, David.'
Moeahu said Māori were threatened 'every single day' by laws like the Treaty Principles Bill, the Regulatory Standards Bill and changes to resource management and local government.
'We know what you're doing, David,' said Moeahu
'But you are demonising us Māori as you do it, so that everybody's attention is focused on Māori … while you dismantle the environmental protections of this nation.'
Moeahu's son, New Plymouth District councillor Dinnie Moeahu, took his turn at MacLeod and his Government.
'Since you've been in office… I have been more frustrated, angry, mamae - in pain - than ever before,' he told MacLeod.
'You speak with a forked tongue. I don't believe everything that you said today and I don't even think you believe it.'
A dozen young Māori doctors at Ōwae to honour Tā Māui told the hui a wave of hundreds more was in the pipeline.
Acclaimed Te Ātiawa brain scientist Professor Sir Richard Faull said his childhood heroes were Pōmare and fellow Ngāti Mutunga doctor and MP Te Rangi Hīroa (Sir Peter Buck).
Faull said Te Tiriti set the gold standard for Māori health and wasn't about one partner being dominant.
'We have to have our Māori doctors to look after our Māori people and that is non-negotiable.
'Māui Pōmare knew that.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Fauono Ken Laban: First Pacific Candidate For Lower Hutt Mayoralty
Community leader Fauono Ken Laban has officially announced his candidacy for the Lower Hutt mayoralty, making him the first Pacific candidate to enter the race to replace outgoing Mayor Campbell Barry. He promises to unite the city and refocus the council on fundamental priorities. As the son of Sāmoan migrants who built their life in Wainuiomata, Fauono is a well-known broadcaster, community leader, and former police officer. He launched his campaign on Tuesday with the slogan 'Leadership That Unites, Priorities That Deliver.' Fauono's decision to run is rooted in the principles of service, teamwork, and practical focus. He says his experience in policing, sports, and community service has taught him that real progress comes from teamwork and putting people first. 'I've been a player, a captain, and a coach. I know what it takes to build a team that gets results,' he says. 'You need trust, shared goals, and the discipline to work together. Leading a city is no different. It's not about ego, it's about bringing everyone to the table to serve something bigger than ourselves.' 'I've spent my life bringing people together - on the field, in the community, and across the region. Real results come from teamwork. As Mayor, I'll unite people around clear priorities, listen to every voice, and lead a Council that truly works for our city.' Fauono's vision for Lower Hutt includes partnering with mana whenua, supporting the retention of Māori wards, and prioritising strong local connections to improve safety. 'Unity isn't a slogan, it's how I lead. It's about respecting people's voices, building trust, and getting the best out of everyone,' he says. 'When I was a community constable, I learned that real safety comes from strong relationships. It's not just about policing, it's about knowing your neighbours, having safe spaces for our young people, and ensuring support is there when families need it.' Fauono advocates for a return to basics, ensuring that council spending delivers value for money, supporting local businesses and workers, and relieving pressure on households. He envisions a council that truly puts people at the heart of its work - one that listens, follows through, and achieves tangible results for the community. 'Ratepayers deserve value for money. I'll make sure every dollar counts – focusing on the basics like water and roads, while creating opportunities for local businesses and workers. 'We can't keep putting all the pressure on households. It's time for smarter, more disciplined leadership. 'Because when we unite around shared values and clear priorities, there's nothing we can't achieve together.' In a statement to Local Democracy Reporting, Fuaono discussed the importance of Pacific representation, his decision to stand, and how he plans to engage with youth. 'My story is one of many Hutt Valley residents. The son of Sāmoan migrants who built their life here, raised to lead through acts of service. My decision to run for Mayor is grounded in that upbringing. I love my community so I have been called to serve them,' he says. 'I work with a number of young people, coaching multiple age grade rugby league teams here in the Hutt. They used to call me uncle but now with a few more grey hairs on my head, they call me Papa Ken instead. 'I will be bringing them on this campaign with me, getting their input on my decisions, knowing they can reach people in ways I can't.' Gabriel Tupou, Hutt City Councillor and the only Pasifika, told LDR that Fauono's candidacy could transform Pacific representation and increase voter turnout. 'This is very significant for our Pacific community because we haven't had a mayor of Pacific descent. Ken represents the best of us,' Tupou says. 'Ken's a local legend - well-known and respected, not just in Wainuiomata or Lower Hutt but across the Wellington region. 'His candidacy is a game changer, it will mobilise and motivate our people to vote. We've got a large Pacific community here, and I think that's what his campaign will do.' Tupou says Fauono's background and life experience allow him to connect with ordinary residents, especially Pacific families facing similar challenges. 'Ken comes from humble circumstances. He doesn't come from privilege. He understands the struggles our Pasifika families go through. He's a man of the people, so he knows what the issues are. With those insights, he brings strength, wisdom, leadership and humility.' He described Fauono as 'a local legend' and 'a statesman' with broad appeal and a legacy of mentoring young people, saying, 'Ken has a wide reach. He's down to earth and accessible to the community.' Fauono joins sitting councillors Brady Dyer and Karen Morgan, as well as community advocate Prabha Ravi, who have also confirmed their intention to contest the mayoral elections. More candidates are expected to announce before nominations close. Nominations for Lower Hutt's local elections open on Friday and close at noon on 1 August. Voting papers will go out from September, with the election day nationwide on 11 October.
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
Youth MPs Accuse Government Of 'Censoring' Them, Ministry Says Otherwise
The government is rejecting accusations it is censoring Youth MPs, saying the protocols followed are the same as 2022 and the young people get the final say on their speeches. However, the email sent to one Youth MP carries the subject line "changes required", and stated the ministry "have had to make some changes". Some of the Youth MPs involved say they will not be suppressed and the issue has fuelled the fire to make their voices heard. The Labour Party has criticised the approach taken after some Youth MPs were asked to remove parts of their speeches, because some of their speech lacked political neutrality by criticising "this government". Changes recommended included the removal of general mentions of the Treaty Principles Bill, funding for Māori and Pasifika, and Pay Equity. Speeches about "youth voice" and "freedom of speech" were also edited. In a written statement, Ministry of Youth Development general manager John Robertson said the same protocol had been followed as was used in 2022, and the feedback provided on the Youth MPs' speeches was "generally focused on supporting them to convey their arguments clearly and effectively, and in keeping with the non-partisan approach of Youth Parliament". "We also advised some Youth MPs that changes were required to their speeches to avoid putting themselves at risk. Youth MPs are not protected by parliamentary privilege. This means young people could be held liable if the contents of their speech raise concerns around defamation, copyright, privacy, contempt of court, or broadcasting standards. "However, as noted above, the final decision about what they say is made by the Youth MPs." Robertson said the ministry had in some cases told the Youth MPs "it is your decision around what your speech does and does not contain". "From here, it is your choice how you use [our] feedback. You are the one stepping up to speak and we fully respect your right to shape your speech in the way that feels right to you," it said. However, the email RNZ has seen did not include such a statement. The ministry confirmed it had provided feedback to "about half of the 80 young people who will deliver speeches", and that they were shifting from the approach used in 2019 and 2022 of livestreaming the speeches to instead sending the recordings to the participants after the event. This was "due to resourcing constraints... the participants are welcome to share this footage with others, and online", the ministry said. Minister for Youth James Meager said the speeches were not censored. "We do not censor the speeches of Youth MPs. We provide feedback, and in some cases suggest changes for them to consider, but we have been clear to all Youth MPs that they make the final decision about the content of their speech." He provided a written statement, much of which matched the ministry's statement word for word. However, the Youth MPs spoke to reporters at Parliament with one - Thomas Brocherie, a spokesperson for Make it 16, a group pushing for a voting age of 16 - saying the approach taken to the speeches was diluting the value of the Youth Parliament. "We have been told to not argue on either side of contentious issues such as the pay equity reforms or the Treaty Principles Bill for the excuse that they are current topics in the current Parliament. This is not just illogical, it is censorship," he said. "We cannot say we value democracy unless we actually show and prove we value democracy. Silencing the stakeholders of the future does not value democracy." Another Youth MP Nate Wilbourne, a spokesperson for Gen Z Aotearoa, said rangatahi were being silenced and censored. "We've been told to soften our language, to drop key parts of our speeches and to avoid criticizing certain ministers or policies. This isn't guidance. This is fear based control." Brocherie said the emails being titled "changes required" was "not at all a suggestion, that is blatant editing, they want us to change something to suit their purpose, to suit their agenda". Youth MP Lincoln Jones said they were provided with "a PDF of edited changes... delivered to our inbox, and that was the expected requirement, that we speak that speech". "It's honestly like they've gone through with it with a microscope to find any little thing that might be interpreted wrong against, I guess, the current government." Some of them sent responses to the ministry asking for clarification about the changes. "And what did we get? An automatic copy and pasted reply that is not at all in the principles of what Youth Parliament is," Jones said. "They claim to listen to us, they claim to want to uplift us, they send us an automatic copy and pasted response on the thing we have three minutes to speak about. That's not good enough." He said the experience had encouraged him even further to put himself forward to become an MP. "It honestly fuels that fire within me, and I think for all of us to put it out there and to make our voices heard."
Otago Daily Times
3 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Youth MPs accuse govt of 'censoring' them
By Russell Palmer and Giles Dexter of RNZ The protocols followed for this year's Youth Parliament are the same as previous years, the Ministry of Youth Development says, after accusations of censorship. However, the email sent to one Youth MP carries the subject line "changes required", and stated the ministry "have had to make some changes". Some of the Youth MPs involved say they will not be suppressed and the issue has fuelled the fire to make their voices heard. The Labour Party has criticised the approach taken after some Youth MPs were asked to remove parts of their speeches, because some of their speech lacked political neutrality by criticising "this government". Changes recommended included the removal of general mentions of the Treaty Principles Bill, funding for Māori and Pasifika, and Pay Equity. Speeches about "youth voice" and "freedom of speech" were also edited. In a written statement, Ministry of Youth Development general manager John Robertson said the same protocol had been followed as was used in 2022, and the feedback provided on the Youth MPs' speeches was "generally focused on supporting them to convey their arguments clearly and effectively, and in keeping with the non-partisan approach of Youth Parliament". "We also advised some Youth MPs that changes were required to their speeches to avoid putting themselves at risk. Youth MPs are not protected by parliamentary privilege. This means young people could be held liable if the contents of their speech raise concerns around defamation, copyright, privacy, contempt of court, or broadcasting standards. "However, as noted above, the final decision about what they say is made by the Youth MPs." Robertson said the ministry had in some cases told the Youth MPs "it is your decision around what your speech does and does not contain". "From here, it is your choice how you use [our] feedback. You are the one stepping up to speak and we fully respect your right to shape your speech in the way that feels right to you." However, the email RNZ has seen did not include such a statement. The ministry confirmed it had provided feedback to "about half of the 80 young people who will deliver speeches", and that they were shifting from the approach used in 2019 and 2022 of livestreaming the speeches to instead sending the recordings to the participants after the event. This was "due to resourcing constraints... the participants are welcome to share this footage with others, and online", the ministry said. Minister for Youth James Meager said the speeches were not censored. "We do not censor the speeches of Youth MPs. We provide feedback, and in some cases suggest changes for them to consider, but we have been clear to all Youth MPs that they make the final decision about the content of their speech." He provided a written statement, much of which matched the ministry's statement word for word. However, the Youth MPs spoke to reporters at Parliament with one - Thomas Brocherie, a spokesperson for Make it 16 (a group pushing for a voting age of 16) - said the approach taken to the speeches was diluting the value of the Youth Parliament. "We have been told to not argue on either side of contentious issues such as the pay equity reforms or the Treaty Principles Bill for the excuse that they are current topics in the current Parliament. This is not just illogical, it is censorship," he said. "We cannot say we value democracy unless we actually show and prove we value democracy. Silencing the stakeholders of the future does not value democracy." Another Youth MP Nate Wilbourne, a spokesperson for Gen Z Aotearoa, said rangatahi were being silenced and censored. "We've been told to soften our language, to drop key parts of our speeches and to avoid criticizing certain ministers or policies. This isn't guidance. This is fear-based control." Brocherie said the emails being titled "changes required" was "not at all a suggestion, that is blatant editing, they want us to change something to suit their purpose, to suit their agenda". Youth MP Lincoln Jones said they were provided with "a PDF of edited changes... delivered to our inbox, and that was the expected requirement, that we speak that speech". "It's honestly like they've gone through with it with a microscope to find any little thing that might be interpreted wrong against, I guess, the current government." Some of them sent responses to the ministry asking for clarification about the changes. "And what did we get? An automatic copy and pasted reply that is not at all in the principles of what Youth Parliament is," Jones said. "They claim to listen to us, they claim to want to uplift us, they send us an automatic copy and pasted response on the thing we have three minutes to speak about. That's not good enough." He said the experience had encouraged him even further to put himself forward to become an MP. "It honestly fuels that fire within me, and I think for all of us to put it out there and to make our voices heard."
