Insolvency wave to batter Britain as tariffs and higher taxes hit firms
Updated: 12:10 BST, 26 April 2025
Britain could be 'hurtling towards a new wave of business insolvencies' as tariff turmoil and higher taxes batter firms.
Official figures yesterday showed the number of companies going bust rose by 9 per cent to nearly 2,000 last month.
And a report from restructuring firm Begbies Traynor suggested more will soon follow as the number of companies in 'critical' financial distress rose by 13 per cent in the first quarter.
Bars and restaurants, plus travel and tourism operators, were among the worst hit, the report said.
Fears over a downturn deepened too after survey figures this week suggesting the economy went into reverse in April.
John Cullen, business recovery partner at advisory Menzies, said: 'If recession is next in a line of challenges for British business, alongside a heavier tax burden and a decline in investor and lending confidence, we may be hurtling towards a new wave of business insolvencies.'
Increase: Official figures showed the number of companies going bust rose by 9 per cent to nearly 2,000 in March
Firms are being hammered by higher costs imposed by Labour, which has hiked employer National Insurance Contributions and the minimum wage and is introducing a wave of new workers' rights.
At the same time, they are fearful of the impact of Donald Trump's trade war both on exports to the US and in creating wider uncertainty that dampens business activity.
The Begbies Traynor report, published yesterday, said the number of firms in 'critical' distress climbed to 45,416 in the first quarter of this year, up by more than 5,000 on a year earlier though slightly lower than in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Julie Palmer, partner at Begbies Traynor, said: 'Optimism remains in short supply for UK businesses.'
She said that while recent official figures showed some positive signs – with data yesterday showing a 0.4 per cent increase in retail sales in March – businesses are worried about looming challenges.
Bars and restaurants have seen a 31 per cent year-on-year increase in firms in critical distress, while travel and tourism operators saw a 25 per cent rise.
'These sectors are bracing themselves for further economic fallout from both domestic tax increases and US tariffs,' said Palmer.
The Government's Insolvency Service yesterday said the number of company insolvencies in March rose by 9 per cent compared with the same month last year, to 1,992, though that was 2 per cent down from the level recorded in February.
Numbers over the past year have been slightly lower than in 2023, when they hit a record high.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
17 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Judge tosses Democratic committees' lawsuit over the Federal Election Commission's independence
WASHINGTON — A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to block President Donald Trump's administration from implementing an executive order that Democratic Party officials claim could undermine the independence of the Federal Election Commission. U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali in Washington ruled late Tuesday that there's insufficient evidence that the Republican administration intends to apply a key portion of Trump's executive order to the FEC or its commissioners.
Associated Press
20 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Judge tosses Democratic committees' lawsuit over the Federal Election Commission's independence
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to block President Donald Trump's administration from implementing an executive order that Democratic Party officials claim could undermine the independence of the Federal Election Commission. U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali in Washington ruled late Tuesday that there's insufficient evidence that the Republican administration intends to apply a key portion of Trump's executive order to the FEC or its commissioners. 'This Court's doors are open to the parties if changed circumstances show concrete action or impact on the FEC's or its Commissioners' independence,' the judge wrote. The Democratic Party's three national political committees sued after Trump signed the executive order in February. The order was intended to increase his control of the entire executive branch, including over agencies such as the FEC, a six-person bipartisan board created by Congress to independently enforce campaign finance law. The Feb. 18 order said the officials at those agencies 'must be supervised and controlled by the people's elected President' and demanded that no executive branch employee advance a legal view that contradicts the president or the attorney general. Trump issued the order after he abruptly got rid of FEC Chair Ellen Weintraub, a Democrat who said her ouster did not follow legal protocols. The FEC is just one of several independent agencies Trump has sought to control and targeted with firings. The plaintiffs — the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee — asked the judge to rule that a law insulating the FEC from partisan control is constitutional. They also asked for a preliminary injunction enjoining the Trump administration from applying part of the executive order to the FEC and its commissioners. 'Americans are legally guaranteed fair elections with impartial referees — not a system where Donald Trump can dictate campaign rules he wants from the White House,' the plaintiffs wrote in a statement. 'Democrats will use every tool at our disposal, including aggressively confronting Trump's illegal actions in the courts, to defend Americans' right to free and fair elections.' But government attorneys told the judge that the Trump administration has no plans to apply the executive order to the FEC. The judge said he can't conclude from the text of the executive order alone that Trump or Attorney General Pam Bondi are on the verge of taking such an 'extraordinary step.' The order doesn't single out the FEC and applies broadly to all executive branch employees, the judge concluded. 'The Court does not doubt that the committees would have cause for profound concern were the FEC's independence to be compromised,' he wrote. 'Given the FEC's central role in overseeing parties and campaigns, a compromise of its independence would pose an immense threat to our democratic elections, for all the reasons Congress established the FEC's independence in the first place.' The portion of the executive order challenged by the lawsuit has raised particular concern among campaign finance watchdogs, who call it a conflict of interest. Congress created the FEC in 1974 after the Watergate scandal with the goal of having it operate independently. 'This was not a hypothetical concern,' plaintiffs' attorney David Fox said during an April 9 hearing. 'And it's not a hypothetical concern today.' Justice Department attorney Jeremy Newman said the plaintiffs' concerns are based on mere speculation that the FEC may take a regulatory action that they oppose. 'There is no live controversy here,' Newman told the judge. 'The commission is conducting its business as it was two weeks ago, two months ago, two years ago,' FEC attorney James McGinley said during the hearing. Trevor Potter, a former Republican FEC commissioner and founder of the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center, said the FEC is responsible for enforcing the law against the president 'as both a candidate and as a holder of federal office.' 'It is crucial that the agency retain its independence from the White House, so it is able to hold the president — any president — and their political party accountable,' Potter said in a statement. ___ Swenson reported from New York.
Epoch Times
21 minutes ago
- Epoch Times
Trump's Megabill to Change Obamacare: What to Watch
A Republican megabill to enact President Donald Trump's agenda The ACA Marketplace, often referred to as Obamacare, allows low-income Americans to buy
