logo
Buying an electric car? Before spending big bucks, factor these hard facts

Buying an electric car? Before spending big bucks, factor these hard facts

Time of India28-04-2025

With the government proposing a complete ban on the import of
internal combustion engine
(ICE) vehicles by 2030, the push towards
electric vehicles
(EVs) is evident. The rationale is strong—EVs promise a cleaner environment and are positioned as a sustainable solution to India's pollution problem. The impact is already visible, with nearly two million EVs sold in 2024, reflecting rising consumer interest.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
India stares at a 'water bomb' threat as it freezes Indus Treaty
India readies short, mid & long-term Indus River plans
Shehbaz Sharif calls India's stand "worn-out narrative"
However, government policy is not the only reason for this rapid adoption. Lower running costs and the promise of long-term savings have also contributed to EVs becoming an attractive option for many buyers.
Yet, behind the optimism, a segment of consumers still remains hesitant to let go of their
ICE vehicles
, and for good reason. According to a 2024 Park+ survey, 51% of EV users considered switching back to ICE vehicles.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Moose Approaches Girl At Bus Stop In Jakarta Raya - Watch What Happens
Happy in Shape
Undo
While the EV ecosystem has seen notable improvements in recent years, several of the core challenges continue to exist. For prospective buyers, understanding these hidden costs is crucial to making an informed and regret-free purchase decision.
How usage impacts cost
Whether an electric vehicle will cost you less or more ultimately depends on how you use it. For individuals who primarily commute within the city, EVs can be highly cost effective.
Live Events
PADAM MITRA
PUNE
Profession:
Retired bank official
Cars:
Tata Tigor EV and Maruti Grand Vitara
Problem Faced: Charging issues outside city, requiring visits to Tata service centre. Avoids long drives; uses EV only for intra-city travel.
Take the case of Padam Mitra, who uses his EV exclusively for intra-city travel. 'I use it to travel within the city and, honestly, the experience has been great,' he says. However, he avoids long-distance drives due to range issues that he faced when he took it to Mumbai.
Electric cars
typically offer a shorter driving range than ICE vehicles; they cover lesser distance on a full charge compared to a full tank of fuel.
'The other problem I faced was charging my car outside home. If I charge it from a different charger, the plug gets stuck and I often need to go to the Tata service store for help,' he adds. He now makes sure to always charge his car at home. It has pushed the electricity bill by just Rs.1,000-2,000 a month, which is a reasonable amount. Mitra admits that he does not take his EV outside the city anymore.
He's not alone. Mumbai-based Ashish Dwivedi, an automobile engineer, has structured his
vehicle ownership
around the limitations of EVs. Aware of how EVs function, he has purchased electric scooters for city commutes and retained his XUV500 for inter-state travel. 'EV scooters and bikes offer great value for money compared to ICE if your daily commute is between 80 and 120 km. Beyond that, range anxiety becomes a real concern. When it comes to
electric car
s, the dynamics are different,' says Dwivedi.
ASHISH DWIVEDI
MUMBAI
Profession:
Automobile engineer
Vehicle(s):
Mahindra XUV 500 & Mercedes E350D; OLA S1 Pro Problem: EVs offer value only for daily city travel (80-120 km), he says. Also rues range anxiety and high upfront cost of electric cars.
Electric cars that offer a usable range closer to what's promised on paper typically come at a significant premium. For instance, the XUV 3XO (ICE variant) is priced between Rs.8 lakh and Rs.15.5 lakh, while the XUV 3XO EV with similar features and body design is priced between Rs.15 lakh and Rs.18 lakh. Buyers often end up paying considerably more simply because the vehicle is electric.
This premium pricing leads many buyers to assume that EV ownership will be hassle-free after purchase. However, reality kicks in when they drive for long hours only to find themselves stranded with a drained battery and no charging infrastructure in sight. Such moments reveal the gap between expectation and experience, particularly for long-distance travel.
Beware of these before buying an electric car
Understand usage patterns
EVs are cost-effective for city commute, but if you travel long distances, the range anxiety and charging issues can offset savings.
Factor in the hidden costs
Towing and battery replacement can burn a bigger hole in your pocket than expected. Battery replacement alone can cost up to 60% of the car's value.
Don't forget insurance and repair costs
EV insurance premiums are higher due to costly repairs, especially if battery or sensor damage is involved. Most owners add extra riders for battery protection.
Don't overlook charging infrastructure
Unlike petrol pumps, EV chargers aren't available everywhere, and even fast chargers can take hours. On road trips, poor infrastructure can derail your plans as well as budget.
Resale value can be low
Electric vehicles can depreciate a lot faster than ICE vehicles due to fast evolving technology and changing consumer preferences.
Not enough charging points
ARCHIT DHINGRA DELHI
Profession:
Marketing manager Car: Tata Tiago EV
Problem:
Car broke down during a trip from Delhi to Dehradun due to lack of nearby charging stations. Towing cost Rs.2,100. Frustrated by lack of infrastructure and his overall experience, he decided to sell the car, only to find that it had depreciated significantly.
That's exactly what happened with Delhi based Archit Dhingra. While driving his Tata Tiago EV from Delhi to Dehradun, the car broke down midway. 'I had to get my car towed because there was no charging station nearby. It cost me `2,100, excluding the charging cost,' says Dhingra. 'Towing an electric vehicle typically requires specialised equipment, which can be more expensive than towing an ICE vehicle,' explains Kunal Vora, Head of Products, Motor Insurance, Probus. Such instances highlight the hidden costs of EV ownership that most buyers overlook before making a purchase decision.
'Charging infrastructure challenges, coupled with high upfront costs and battery performance issues over a five-year period make electric cars an expensive affair,' says Dwivedi. He adds that these long-term concerns should not be taken lightly by prospective buyers. 'Replacing an EV battery can cost up to 60% of the car's value,' warns Himanshu Arora, Co-founder, GoMechanic. Just like a smartphone, an EV battery will gradually degrade over time, making a replacement almost inevitable down the line.
To address these concerns, brands like Morris Garage and Mahindra have introduced lifetime warranties on select electric models. However, there's a catch—this benefit is only applicable to the first owner. For second-hand buyers, the warranty doesn't carry over, which significantly pushes down the resale value of the vehicle, creating another hidden cost that often goes unnoticed.
Poor resale value
'After the Dehradun incident, I decided to sell my Tiago and switch back to an ICE vehicle. I had used it for nearly 2.5 years, but was shocked to find that I was getting only around 50% of what I had paid. That really frustrated me,' says Dhingra.
Unlike ICE vehicles, electric vehicles depreciate a lot faster due to rapid shifts in technology and evolving consumer preferences. This hits particularly hard for buyers who like to upgrade frequently or are concerned about long-term value. 'There's a common misconception that EVs are significantly more economical, but over 5-7 years, the total cost of ownership is quite similar, especially for those driving long distances frequently or at high speeds,' says a Gurugram-based mechanic who preferred to remain anonymous.
Higher premiums
Even if your EV doesn't break down or meet with an accident, you will still end up paying more in terms of insurance, which is non-negotiable. In the event of an accident, the repair bill can sometimes match the cost of a new vehicle. This is because EV repairs, especially those involving battery or sensor damage, are expensive. These high repair costs are one reason that insurance premiums for EVs are higher than those for ICE vehicles.
To mitigate risks, many EV owners also purchase additional riders that specifically cover electric vehicle vulnerabilities. 'EV owners often opt for add-ons that address EV-specific risks. Common choices include coverage for consequential battery damage and 24x7 roadside assistance for breakdowns or charging issues,' says Gaurav Arora, Chief, Reinsurance, Underwriting & Claims, Property & Casualty at ICICI Lombard
Should you buy?
There's no denying that EVs offer several benefits. The lower maintenance costs and fuel savings make them attractive for many urban users. If your travel is mostly within the city, they can be very cost-effective. Electricity use could be as low as Rs.1-3 per kilometre, compared to Rs.5-9 spent on fuel for ICE vehicles.
However, for frequent outstation travel, EVs still pose logistical hurdles. 'If you are a frequent traveller or a road- trip enthusiast, a petrol or diesel car makes more sense. Over time, the total cost may even out, but ICE vehicles still cause less hassle and are more long-lasting,' says the anonymous mechanic.
Arora of GoMechanic advocates hybrid vehicles. 'I'd definitely recommend either an ICE or a hybrid car. Hybrid is a smart, underrated technology that deserves more attention,' he adds. Hybrids offer the cost-saving benefits of EVs while addressing range anxiety. At lower speeds of 40-50 km per hour, the car runs on battery power. Once the speed crosses 60 km an hour, the engine takes over, as batteries tend to drain faster at higher speeds.
Meanwhile, the government is taking steps to improve the infrastructure. One promising initiative mandates that all petrol pumps include EV charging stations as well. However, while charging may not strain your wallet, the time it takes is a cost in itself. 'Charging an electric car to 100% can take 2-3 hours, compared to only 10-15 minutes required to refuel an ICE car. This time lag becomes a problem during long journeys,' says Arora. 'In the future, we might have faster chargers widely available, but for now, my vote still goes to ICE.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Viral Post Claims Mumbai Auto Driver Earns Rs 5-8 Lakh A Month Without Even Driving, Stuns Internet
Viral Post Claims Mumbai Auto Driver Earns Rs 5-8 Lakh A Month Without Even Driving, Stuns Internet

NDTV

time31 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Viral Post Claims Mumbai Auto Driver Earns Rs 5-8 Lakh A Month Without Even Driving, Stuns Internet

A Mumbai auto-rickshaw driver's extraordinary business venture has gone viral on LinkedIn, leaving many in awe. By leveraging his strategic location outside the US Consulate, he's reportedly earning Rs 5-8 lakh per month, outpacing many high-earning professionals like IT directors and chartered accountants, all without driving his auto. Rahul Rupani, a product leader at Lenskart, highlighted the story of the autorickshaw driver who's built a thriving business without driving his vehicle. Notably, hundreds of visa applicants visit the US Consulate daily, only to find out that bags aren't allowed inside. With no official storage options nearby, they often face uncertainty and anxiety about where to leave their belongings. Seizing this opportunity, the autorickshaw driver started a paid bag storage service. He caters to around 20-30 customers daily, earning Rs 20,000-30,000, which translates to a monthly income comparable to that of high-level corporate professionals. In a post on LinkedIn, Mr Rupai explained the auto driver's business model: "I was outside the US Consulate this week for my visa appointment, when security told me I couldn't carry my bag inside. No lockers. No suggestions. Just: "Figure it out." While I stood clueless on the footpath, an auto driver waved at me: "Sir, bag de do. Safe rakhunga, mera roz ka hai. ₹1,000 charge hai." I hesitated. Then gave in. And that's when I discovered this guy's brilliant business." See the post here: To accommodate the volume of bags, the autorickshaw driver has partnered with a local police officer who owns a nearby locker facility. The officer provides secure storage space, allowing the driver to safely store the bags, as his autorickshaw isn't equipped to hold them all. "And while most people are sweating over US visa interviews, this guy is running a zero-mile, hyper-profitable, bootstrapped operation. No MBA. No startup jargon. Just pure hustle and street-smart product-market fit," Mr Rupani wrote. He further called it "a masterclass in solving a hyper-specific pain point," admiring the driver's ability to build trust, ensure security, and charge a premium without relying on apps, funding, or formal business education. He praised the driver's resourcefulness, saying, "Real entrepreneurship doesn't always need a pitch deck. Sometimes it just needs a parking spot." NDTV is unable to confirm the authenticity of the post and the claims presented. While some users were impressed, others raised doubts and questions, seeking more information or clarification about the driver's business venture. One user wrote, "That's not his income alone. He has to share with multiple people, including the police. Otherwise, what stops other autowallahs from doing the same at a lower price? Also, I guess they don't know that there is s locker facility inside the consulate at a charge of 500."

Piyush Goyal calls Italian business enclaves in India to boost investment
Piyush Goyal calls Italian business enclaves in India to boost investment

Business Standard

time32 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Piyush Goyal calls Italian business enclaves in India to boost investment

Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal on Thursday proposed to develop an industrial conclave for Italian businesses in India to promote investments. Speaking here at India-Italy Business Forum meeting, he said Italian companies can consider setting up manufacturing units and offices in those enclaves. "I have a proposition for you. We can set up Italian enclaves where Italian businesses can set up shops... we can set up hotels, restaurants, healthcare for Italian people who would come to work there. It will be home away from home for them," Goyal said. These industrial parks can be set up in the proposed industrail corridors in different parts of the country. The minister is here on a two-day visit. He is meeting leaders and businesses to boost trade and investments between the two countries. India would invite Italian companies to certain locations in India such as Dighi near Mumbai and Sambhaji Nagar (Aurangabad) in Maharashtra to showcase potential locations for these enclaves. The government has announced to invest about Rs 28,000 crore to set up 12 industrial nodes, and build 100 industrial parks in the country. These industrial areas will be located at Khurpia in Uttarakhand, Rajpura-Patiala in Punjab, Dighi in Maharashtra, Palakkad in Kerala, Agra and Prayagraj in UP, Gaya in Bihar, Zaheerabad in Telangana, Orvakal and Kopparthy in Andhra Pradesh, and Jodhpur-Pali in Rajasthan.

Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use
Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use

Time of India

time40 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Google takes a gamble in class action jury trial over cell phone data use

HighlightsGoogle is facing an $800 million lawsuit in Santa Clara County, California, from Android smartphone users who claim the company misappropriates their cellphone data, affecting an estimated 14 million Californians. The plaintiffs allege that Google secretly transmits data over cellular networks even when devices are turned off, which they argue improperly consumes purchased data from mobile carriers without user consent. Despite Google's history of settling class actions, the company is opting for a trial, disputing the plaintiffs' claims that they have a property interest in cellular data allowances and arguing that no actual losses were incurred. Class actions rarely go to trial, which is why a case against Google is proving to be an outlier. The tech giant is defending itself before a jury in Santa Clara County, California, superior court in an $800 million lawsuit by Android smartphone users who say Google misappropriates their cellphone data. A jury of eight women and four men was seated on Tuesday in what lawyers say is expected to be a three-to-four-week trial, with opening statements kicking off on Wednesday. The stakes are high, but the class, which includes an estimated 14 million Californians whose mobile devices use Google's Android operating system, is in some ways just an appetizer. The same plaintiffs lawyers from Korein Tillery; Bartlit Beck and McManis Faulkner are litigating a parallel case in San Jose federal court covering Android users in the other 49 states, with billions of dollars in alleged damages. The plaintiffs in court papers say that even when their phones are turned off, Google causes Android devices to surreptitiously send information over cellular networks "for Google's own purposes," including targeted digital advertising. These transfers improperly eat up data that users purchase from their mobile carriers, the plaintiffs allege. Google spokesperson Jose Castaneda said the claims "mischaracterize standard industry practices that help protect users and make phones more reliable," he told me. "We look forward to making our case in court." A unit of Mountain View, California-based Alphabet, Google has a well-used playbook for settling class actions. Earlier this week, for example, the company agreed to pay $500 million to resolve shareholder litigation - a move that comes on the heels of a $50 million deal in May to resolve class-wide allegations of racial bias against Black employees and a $100 million payout in March to a proposed class of advertisers who claimed they were overcharged for clicks on ads. So why is Google taking this case to trial? In court papers, Google's outside counsel from Cooley argue that Android users incurred no actual losses, and that consumers consented to Google's so-called "passive" data transfers via terms of service agreements and device settings. The lawyers also dispute the fundamental premise of the case: that cellular data allowances can be considered "property" under California law and subject to conversion, a civil cause of action that involves taking a person's property without permission. When the "rhetoric and hyperbole are set aside, Plaintiffs' theory is revealed as little more than a (misguided) product design claim - not wrongful conversion," defense counsel wrote. The Cooley team, which includes Whitty Somvichian, Michael Attanasio, Max Bernstein and Carrie Lebel, declined comment. The plaintiffs sued Google in Santa Clara County Superior Court in 2019, asserting that they have a property interest in their cellular plans' data allowances, and that each quantum they pay for has a market value. They don't object to data transmissions when they're actively engaged with Google's apps and properties, like checking email or playing a game. But they say Google never told them it would avail itself of their cellular data when they weren't using their phones to send and receive a range of information on their usage. "The upshot is that these phone users unknowingly subsidize the same Google advertising business that earns over $200 billion a year," plaintiffs lawyer George Zelcs of Korein Tillery said via email. In addition to injunctive relief, the plaintiffs want Google to reimburse them for the value of the cellular data the company consumed. Per person, the amount is modest - 1 to 1.5 megabytes of data each day, the plaintiffs estimate. To put that in context, Americans used just over 100 trillion megabytes of wireless data in 2023, my Reuters colleagues reported. But with a class period dating back to 2016, the totals add up quickly. In court papers, Google lawyers sound almost incredulous at the amount of the claimed nationwide damages, which they say runs in the tens of billions - more than the $7.4 billion Perdue Pharma settlement for the opioid crisis, they note. "Plaintiffs cannot show remotely commensurate harm to the class," they wrote. In denying Google's motion for summary judgment in May, Judge Charles Adams allowed the plaintiffs' claim for conversion to go forward, ruling there are triable issues of material fact for jurors to decide. While Adams said no direct state law precedent exists as to whether cell phone data is property, he pointed to a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals last year in the parallel federal class action, Taylor v Google. In that case, U.S. Magistrate Judge Virginia DeMarchi in San Jose sided with Google and dismissed the complaint with prejudice in 2022, only to be reversed and remanded on appeal. The appellate panel in an unpublished decision ruled that the plaintiffs plausibly alleged they incurred damages when Google used their cellular data. Adams in a pre-trial order set some limits on what the lawyers will be allowed to argue to the jury. Plaintiffs may not suggest Google engages in "surveillance" of Android users, he wrote, or that the data transfers are a privacy violation. As for Google, Adams said, it "must not present evidence or argument suggesting that this case is 'lawyer driven' or was 'invented' by Plaintiffs' counsel."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store