
Canada rotates, offers little in Ivory Coast draw in last Gold Cup tuneup
After a declarative win over Ukraine that featured many of Canada's expected World Cup starters, head coach Jesse Marsch made 10 total changes to his team from three days earlier in Tuesday night's bout vs. the Ivory Coast. The outcome in Toronto was as expected: a largely ugly and overtly physical 0-0 draw, followed by a 5-4 Ivory Coast triumph in penalties, which were played as part of the Canadian Shield set of friendlies leading into the Concacaf Gold Cup.
Advertisement
Not only was there little entertainment value in Canada's draw, Marsch likely struggled to learn much in a game that stopped as much as it flowed. This was as disjointed a performance from Canada under Marsch since a 4-0 loss to the Netherlands in his first match as head coach.
There were some takeaways to glean, though, before Canada begins its run at the Gold Cup in Vancouver on June 17:
This is what happens when you make nearly a complete line change from one game to the next.
In stark contrast to Saturday's win, Canada was disjointed in possession. Without a clear understanding of teammates' movements, Canada could not execute Marsch's pressing demands consistently. And while the manager was inherently looking at this match as something of an audition for bench players to help stake their claim, multiple players appeared to treat it as such. It was easy to spot moments when players were trying to do too much individually and act outside of Marsch's system.
Defensively, Canada made efforts to close things down near goal. But Ivory Coast still cut through the middle of the park in transition too easily at times, which led to the better of the attacking chances. The visitors got them largely by matching a work rate that Canada has made its calling card under Marsch.
The game lost its flow midway through the second half and gave way to a boxing match. Yellow cards added up. So it felt like there was little to learn from a game that offered little of the back and forth that a competitive match might.
Joel Waterman looked like a rock around the goal. Sam Adekugbe had moments when his pace and know-how helped Canada be responsible in defending before he exited with an injury. But these were still just brief moments of positivity that Canada offered.
Advertisement
Jayden Nelson showed interest in breaking the game open early on but also looked like a player trying to do too much. Jonathan Osorio hardly impacted the game.
Ismaël Koné played like a man who wants to reclaim his position in the middle of the park for good. He pressed effectively, moved the ball with equal parts smarts and creativity and looked, with every step, like a player who had confidence in his arsenal. That confidence wasn't always evident in Copa América. That said, later in the game, his passing looked sloppy. Marsch will need a possible starter to be locked in for longer stretches.
Still, if we put aside individual mistakes, can players really be blamed all that much? They were puzzle pieces trying to be assembled on the fly – without any real photo on the box to use as a guide.
On a night when Marsch wanted to learn more about his team, he may not have received many sufficient answers.
One of the few starting spots in 2026 open is up top.
Jonathan David is one of a handful of guaranteed starters. After that, things get murky. The testy draw vs. Ivory Coast and lack of purpose in attack reinforced just how muddled things truly are for Canada's forward group right now.
Promise David showed (sorry) promise against Ukraine, but fitness concerns kept him out Tuesday. Canada's new forward duo, featuring Daniel Jebbison and Cyle Larin, didn't do much with their opportunity.
Positionally, Jebbison drifted too often. He wasn't nearly clean enough on the ball. Canada never appeared dangerous when he was contributing to the buildup.
You can understand why Marsch fought to recruit the dual-national: there is potential in Jebbison if he finally starts to log regular first-team minutes with his club. But right now, he does not look like he is ready to start for Canada in meaningful games.
Advertisement
As for Larin, Marsch recognizes one of Canada's longstanding veterans has the kind of experience and sway within the squad that few others do. But he must also be reminded of Larin's lack of foot speed and lack of decisive finishing ability at this stage.
It feels like the immediate answer will come by Marsch testing different forwards with Jonathan David. Of course, different options will bring different skill sets against different types of opponents. Tani Oluwaseyi might not offer the power in possession that Promise David would, but he can certainly sprint more when Canada needs to play in transition.
But for an incredibly intelligent player like Jonathan David, chemistry matters. The Gold Cup could end up seeing more rotation up front as Marsch determines who can actually be dynamic enough in attack alongside one of the world's better emerging forwards.
It was the kind of match where a takeaway emerges from a player spending a little over 10 minutes on the field.
But those 13 minutes or so did reveal plenty into Marsch's mindset moving forward: He's clearly a big believer in 19-year-old Luc De Fougerolles – and for good reason.
From the minute he stepped on the field, De Fougerolles brought fans out of their seats with a well-timed, crunching tackle. He stepped forward to play the ball with confidence. He showed his football IQ with smart passing, too.
His age did show itself when his weak penalty effort was saved, however.
Still, Marsch has plenty of reason to believe in De Fougerolles as a possible starter for the future. At 19, he is impressionable enough to adjust quickly to what Marsch wants. There is an aggressiveness in his approach that Marsch doesn't just appreciate: it could change the course of games for Canada.
'In training I always hear (Marsch) in my ear when I'm not tight enough to a striker, not jumping on the midfield or when I should,' De Fougerolles said. 'He's always letting me know and obviously when I am in camp, then I feel like I have to do that and I do feel like winning more duels as well when I go for it and I'm not worried about what's behind me, just going and pressing people and I feel that when I get back to Fulham, it puts me in a good place. Because a lot of the players are not really expecting it.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
USMNT 2026 World Cup squad projection: Pochettino's depth chart by position
The central focus coming out of the U.S. men's national team's embarrassing 4-0 loss to Switzerland on Tuesday in Nashville was, understandably, on the depth of the team's player pool. For years now we have heard about the potential of a 'golden generation' of American soccer players. Top young players were succeeding overseas with bigger clubs and at younger ages than any American men's national team before them. Advertisement But as some of those stars plateaued or fell off, and with need to fortify the squad in the absence of those regular starters, the lack of reliable options behind the starting group has started to show. One year out from the 2026 World Cup, it's an appropriate landmark to assess and project what the World Cup team could look like when the U.S. walks out of the SoFi Stadium tunnel for its tournament opener. The thought exercise showed that there are plenty of jobs still to be won, with plenty of depth spots — and a few starting jobs, too — up for grabs. It's a perilous ask to make predictions even a year out. Consider that only 14 of the USMNT's 23-man roster at the 2021 Concacaf Nations League finals were on the 26-man roster for Qatar. Among those who went from off-the-team to starting games at the last World Cup were Matt Turner, Cameron Carter-Vickers, Walker Zimmerman, Jesus Ferreira and Haji Wright. In other words, no matter how things look now, they will change. That being said, with one year to go, here is our projection for the USMNT squad if the 2026 World Cup started today, with another eye cast on the depth – or lack thereof – at each position. We went with a more traditional 23-man team but included a bonus trio if FIFA opts for 26-man squads again this time around. Formerly the undeniable strong suit of this program for decades, this position has become an open competition following the 2022 World Cup. Turner's dream move to Europe has become a stale nightmare, with the 30-year-old struggling to consistently get meaningful games since joining Arsenal in 2022. He's joining Lyon and could immediately be in another competition for time should incumbent starter Lucas Perri remain. Steffen and Schulte start regularly in MLS, but Steffen's shot-stopping has often been suspect in recent years, and he was forced to leave camp with a knee injury. Schulte, meanwhile, missed a chance to cement his standing at the Gold Cup with an injury (oblique) of his own. Advertisement Such is the dire state of the position that anyone able to play regularly at a high enough level will likely stay in the mix for call-ups between now and next summer. Matt Freese (NYCFC), Chris Brady (Chicago Fire) and Ethan Horvath (Cardiff City) have benefitted from their clubs' trust, while younger prospects Diego Kochen (Barcelona) and Gabriel Slonina (Chelsea) could rapidly rise if their development is far enough along. Absence makes the heart grow fonder, right? Dest, for all of his trickery and occasional attacking endeavors that leave the U.S. open in transition, is far and away the best right back in the pool. Missing him for the past year has emphasized just how much Dest adds to what the rest of the team does, and the imbalance in the team when he's not starting. Freeman, the 20-year-old from Orlando City, has a legitimate shot to break into the national team, in part because Scally just doesn't add anything going forward. Replacing Dest with Scally highlights how important it is to have the fullbacks providing width and, occasionally, verticality. Freeman could be the answer for that. The weakness of the fullback depth chart, though, and Scally's ability to play on both the right and left side – and his relative defensive steadiness – secures him a spot on this roster. If you need to dig into the depth chart at the World Cup, you have to pick players who can handle the world-class wingers you'll face. Scally, a regular Bundesliga starter, checks that box. Much like the last World Cup cycle, the current center back hierarchy is largely unsettled. Richards finally earned regular starts in the role with Crystal Palace last year, and he may need to assume a role as this team's defensive anchor. McKenzie had a steady debut season at Toulouse, while Zimmerman and Miles Robinson (FC Cincinnati) remain in contention as leading defenders in MLS. Advertisement Ream made just one qualifying window last cycle but has arguably been the USMNT's most consistent center back since the start of the 2022 World Cup. Although he'll be 38 next summer, he may again be needed to steady the backline. Auston Trusty and Cameron Carter-Vickers start alongside each other at Celtic but haven't looked the part with the national team. George Campbell is the sole viable prospect, but the 23-year-old toils on rudderless CF Montréal. The Fulham left back has become arguably the most indispensable player in the squad. There simply isn't a like-for-like replacement on the team, and neither Max Arfsten (Columbus Crew) nor John Tolkin (Holstein Kiel) has yet proved capable of handling World Cup-level duties. If Robinson is out, Dest becomes the starting left back. If Dest goes down, Scally moves over to the left. That's where Freeman's emergence at right back becomes an important development during this summer's Gold Cup. One potential late-emerging player to keep an eye on: Peyton Miller. Could the New England Revolution teenager prove enough over the next year, and maybe with a January move to Europe, to fight his way into the picture? On paper, this may be the pool's strongest group. Adams raised AFC Bournemouth's level when he returned from his year of injuries. Cardoso started throughout Real Betis' run to the UEFA Europa Conference League final, while Tessmann made 25 league appearances in his first year with Lyon. Adams' considerable injury history always looms over projections like these, especially after Cardoso's all-timer of a blunder against Turkey last week. Despite his steady play in La Liga – and links to a lucrative Atlético Madrid transfer – the 23-year-old has been shaky with the USMNT, which could lead Tessmann to earn a greater role after captaining the Olympic team last summer. Otherwise, Tessmann can play in a more advanced role within the engine room. McKennie just capped possibly the finest season of his career to date, but he has made just four appearances under Pochettino. Given his versatility and his prominence within this team, he'll need to quickly study up on his role. Musah was a starter in Qatar, but his development has stagnated in two seasons with AC Milan. A reported move to Napoli could provide a chance to get back on track, although he may again be a rotational piece for the defending Serie A champion. Advertisement As for alternatives beyond the Italy-based duo, Luca de la Torre has impressed on a loan with San Diego FC and is a 2022 World Cup veteran. Jack McGlynn has an important role with the Houston Dynamo and has shown flashes under Pochettino, scoring a pair of great goals, while Aidan Morris had a fine first season with Middlesbrough. Another area with a concerning lack of depth. Unlike other spots, however, there are clear starters of undeniable international caliber. The lack of evolution across the squad means that Pulisic and Weah's form will have an outsized impact on the USMNT's hopes of advancing to the knockout stage. The wing duo scored the team's only two goals in the last World Cup group stage. All eyes will be on how Weah handles his first tournament action after his inexplicable red card against Panama that doomed the team's Copa América hopes. Alejandro Zendejas has not been involved with the USMNT since November, but his form for Club América warrants a re-examination of his fit under Pochettino. If we made a list of players for whom the Gold Cup is most important, Tillman might top it. Here's the reality: Gio Reyna has played a total of 1,929 league minutes since his age 17 season in 2020-21. The idea that he can be counted on to be at the World Cup is just people clinging on to the hope of what a teenaged prospect could become. That makes Tillman's emergence all the more important. He has 21 goals and 12 assists across the last two Eredivisie seasons with PSV. He had three goals and two assists in Champions League play. That club form hasn't yet carried over to the national team, but the U.S. needs Tillman to become a key figure for this team. Right now, it feels like it's the mental and emotional side of the international game that he's missing the most — maybe he can tap a bit into his time in Scotland to add more urgency and physicality to the finesse of his game. Luna, meanwhile, has become the emotional example that Pochettino holds up for the rest of the group. His willingness to stay in a friendly with a broken nose — and then assist a goal — stuck with the coach. Right now, the U.S. needs more of Luna's mentality and desire in the group. It's tough to see a World Cup squad without Luna in it for that reason only. The door isn't closed on Reyna, by the way. If he makes a club move from Dortmund, plays consistently and produces, he'll be on the squad. Advertisement This, along with goalkeeper, feels like the most wide-open race on the World Cup squad. Balogun has hardly been available for Pochettino, but has the best skill set of any of the strikers in the pool. He can run in behind, is dangerous in the box and has been a consistent goal-scoring threat when on the field for the U.S. Pepi was in blazing-hot form for PSV this season before a knee injury ended his year. How he returns from that injury will go a long way in determining his place. Pepi was probably the biggest snub on the 2022 roster, an absence that felt significant when Josh Sargent (Norwich City) went down with an injury at the end of the group stage. Could next summer be his redemption? Haji Wright was a shock pick for the 2022 World Cup team, but Gregg Berhalter clearly wanted a different profile of striker to pair with Jesus Ferreira and Sargent. Wright ended up scoring a fluky goal vs. the Netherlands in the last 16, but it's his ability to provide depth up top and on the wings that earns him a spot on the roster. There are plenty of other candidates who could fight their way into the team, though. Sargent started in the last tournament and was arguably the best forward in the English Championship this season. That form just hasn't translated to the U.S. team; he, incredibly, hasn't scored internationally since 2019. Pochettino seems to really like Agyemang (Charlotte FC) and his profile, but could someone like Damion Downs (Köln) or even the injury-plagued Daryl Dike (West Brom) get hot at the club level and surge to a spot? Agyemang, Downs and Brian White (Vancouver Whitecaps) will get a chance to make their arguments this summer. GOALKEEPER (3): Schulte, Steffen, Turner DEFENDERS (8): Dest, Freeman, Scally; McKenzie, T. Ream, Richards, W. Zimmerman; A. Robinson MIDFIELDERS (7): Adams, Cardoso; McKennie, Musah, Tessmann; Luna, Tillman FORWARDS (5): Balogun, Pepi, Pulisic, Weah, Wright TENORIO: Miles Robinson, Josh Sargent, Alejandro Zendejas Advertisement If I get three extra players, I'm definitely adding center back depth, and Miles Robinson sneaks onto the team. I initially had him in my 23, so this is a good way to get him back in the mix. Despite not scoring, Sargent showed his quality in big games at Qatar 2022. He's probably my favorite forward of the bunch – just not sure Pochettino sees it that way. Lastly, winger depth on the team is atrocious, and Zendejas gives that a boost. RUETER: Aidan Morris, Patrick Agyemang, Alejandro Zendejas With a paucity of viable alternatives in defense — four center backs is fine by me given Pochettino's team shape — this trio brings greater versatility in midfield and the attack. Morris is a tidy passer with defensive chops, logging an impressive 64.7% 'true' tackle win-rate across 2,920 minutes. The 23-year-old also displayed strong ball progression — leading all qualified Championship midfielders with 74.6% passing accuracy for attempts traveling 35 yards or further — and savvy tactical fouling. He can fill any role in an engine room. Agyemang is a great reader of space with blistering pace, a skill set that allows him to shake up a game from the bench. With Agyemang as the third striker, Wright can primarily factor as the backup left winger with Zendejas deputizing on the right.


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
What is the trade value of Vancouver's 2025 first-round NHL Draft pick?
The Vancouver Canucks intend to swing the bat this offseason. The roster needs a significant freshening up after a dismal, drama-plagued campaign saw the club miss the Stanley Cup playoffs and trade their top centre in-season. The franchise sits at a major fork in the road with an underachieving core group that will enter next season with a lot to prove, and surrounded by a ton of uncertainty about its future. Advertisement Fireworks shouldn't just be expected to pop off above Griffiths Way this summer; they're almost certainly required if this hockey club is going to protect its future and salvage an era of Canucks hockey that once seemed so promising. In considering Vancouver's options this offseason, one asset looms especially large as potential trade asset weaponry: the club's 2025 first-round pick, which sits at No. 15 in the draft order. Given the club's short-term priorities and their Les Snead-like organizational track record, the No. 15 pick feels like a gimme to be dealt before Vancouver makes a selection at the decentralized 2025 NHL Entry Draft, to be held in Los Angeles June 27-28. That is why, in a recent The Athletic staff mock draft, we just projected a trade rather than have Vancouver make a draft selection. Given the widespread expectation — held both by us and the industry at large — that Vancouver is more likely than not to utilize the pick to bolster their roster, we figured we'd best give the buying power of this central asset more thought and attention. We built a data set, based on 10 years' worth of draft trades, to try and enhance our understanding of how valuable a middle-of-the-order first-round pick on the trade market has been, historically. So what should Vancouver be able to acquire with their first-round pick? First-round picks move relatively frequently on the NHL trade market. They're a standard form of currency, the de facto coin of the realm, utilized as a major or major secondary asset in all sorts of trades. For our purposes, we want to set up parameters in parsing the history of NHL trades that are roughly analogous to the Canucks' situation while also having a big enough data set to create some meaningful takeaways from this exercise. In order to try and get some sense of what the No. 15 pick should be worth on the trade market, we've decided to look at NHL trades over the past 10 years that prominently featured first-round picks between 11th and 20th. We wanted to cast something of a wider net downstream of the 15th selection while keeping the parameter really tight as the draft order inches closer to the top 10. Advertisement This is because expected draft value typically falls very quickly at the outset of the NHL Entry Draft and then flattens out somewhat. As a result, the value of the 10th pick tells us marginally less about what we can expect the value of the 15th than the value of the 20th pick, given expected draft pick value. We also wanted to exclude certain types of transactions for the sake of simplicity, and to keep this exercise as straightforward and true to life as possible to the situation that Vancouver finds itself in ahead of the 2025 NHL Entry Draft. For example, if Vancouver moves their pick, it's going to be to acquire win-now help. As such, we're not quite as interested in the exchange value of the No. 15 pick from the perspective of trading down at the NHL Entry Draft, to maximize aggregate draft capital. Trades that don't feature an active NHL-level player (or promising prospect) won't be included in our data set as a result. There are a couple of other sorts of deals that we're going to exclude here. Somewhat frequently, picks in this range of the first round are moved as part of deals at the trade deadline that fall into a classic 'buyers chasing playoff success' pattern that we often see from NHL teams. If Vancouver moves their pick, it won't be in this type of deal. And anyway, the trade value of win-now players at the NHL trade deadline is usually inflated, and considering them here doesn't really help us understand what teams would part with in the weeks leading up to the draft to acquire the 15th selection. Deals of this sort, or deals where the pick was acquired 12 months (or more) ahead of time, have been excluded from this sample. There is one more somewhat common variety of trade that pops up when you analyze the recent history of mid-first-round draft picks: the in-season trade that doesn't really fall into the classic trade deadline buy/sell bucket. Advertisement Usually, these sorts of deals occur in midseason and involve a player who either has term remaining on their deal, or are otherwise viewed by the team acquiring them as 'long-term fits.' The 2023 No. 17 pick that moved twice, for example, from the New York Islanders to the Canucks and then from Vancouver to Detroit while as the principal asset that sent Bo Horvat to Long Island and Filip Hronek to Vancouver, are two examples of this sort of trade. For now, we'll also exclude this variety of deal from our analysis. In-season trades necessarily are governed by different dynamics, given the relative dearth of teams with cap space during the campaign, and we're really focused on trying to get a better feel for the purchasing power of Vancouver's 2025 pick in the period leading up to and during the NHL Entry Draft itself. With those qualifiers out of the way, we're left with nine examples of pre-draft trades that included mid-first-round picks based on our definition and returned active players ahead of or during the NHL Entry Draft: Now that we've laid out our data set, let's go over some key takeaways to be aware of in evaluating the exchange value of picks like Vancouver's 2025 first-rounder. The first thing that jumps off the page when we consider these nine trades and the patterns that exist within this data set is that in every single relevant, comparable deal the team acquiring the more established, proven player had to include additional assets beyond the mid-first-round pick in the trade. A pick in the middle of the first-round draft order can serve as the centrepiece asset of a trade for a good young player and often has over the past decade, but over the past 10 years, we haven't seen a pick within range of Vancouver's No. 15 selection be utilized straight up to acquire a proven commodity NHL-level talent. While there isn't much in the way of a clear positional trend that we can pick out of this data set — there are several prime aged forwards, and several good young defenders that were acquired for packages built largely around mid first-round picks in our sample of trades — it seems notable that the only nominal centre in our dataset is Kirby Dach. And at the time of the trade, Dach had just completed his age-21 campaign and had yet to hit more than 10 goals or 30 points in a single season. Advertisement Across the past decade of NHL trade activity, there isn't really an example of a team trading an asset like Vancouver's 2025 pick and returning an established centre in the transaction. Given that a 'top two-line centre' is the Canucks' greatest need this offseason, that isn't an especially promising historical truth. In all likelihood, if history is any guide, the No. 15 pick won't be sufficient to land the centre ice help that Vancouver craves this summer. Across our data set, there are two primary profiles that the primary targets acquired by teams hawking mid-first-round picks on the trade market fit into. The first profile is the young up-and-coming player who has usually played through their entry-level contract. This is a label that rather neatly matches nearly half of the main target players in our dataset (Reinhart, Dach, Romanov, Hamilton). The second profile that pops up in these deals is the more obviously established, about-to-be-extension-eligible player in their mid-20s. This label applies neatly to the four remaining names in our data set (Lucic, Trouba, Ristolainen and Fiala). In all of these cases, it had become apparent that the team in question would have difficulty retaining the player for personal reasons or cap/financial ones, necessitating something of a hard pivot by their current team. With both profiles, it seems, cap and financial dynamics — and the pressure point of either negotiating a second contract, or buying unrestricted free agent years when a player is about to become eligible to hit the open market — rather clearly seem to shape which players tend to move in these sorts of trades. There's a lesson in that, perhaps, in that it might help us understand which sorts of players might be available to Vancouver in a trade involving the Canucks' 2025 first-round pick in the weeks ahead. A player like Minnesota Wild centre Marco Rossi, for example, would fit into the category of a player coming off his entry-level deal and in need of a significant raise. A player like Anaheim Ducks forward Trevor Zegras or Dallas Stars winger Jason Robertson, on the other hand, would fit in the latter category of a player approaching extension eligibility and the age at which NHL players become eligible for unrestricted free agency. Finally, we have one last player profile that doesn't fit neatly into the other obvious categories, the sore thumb trade in our sample: the Kasperi Kapanen deal. Kapanen was 23 years old at the time of this trade and one full season into a second contract bridge deal when the Pittsburgh Penguins reacquired him from the Toronto Maple Leafs in late August of 2020. The date there tells the entire story: Kapanen's bridge deal was signed in a world where the Maple Leafs and general manager Kyle Dubas would've reasonably expected the salary cap to rise on an annual basis, and the trade occurred just a few months after the imposition of the NHL's flat cap era, when it was clear that salary cap austerity would shape the league for the next several seasons. Advertisement The Kapanen deal is, in some ways, a relic of a moment and time. A trade shaped by factors that we aren't likely to see repeated this summer, given the historic cap growth that the NHL is projecting for next season (and for two seasons beyond that). It is nonetheless a trade that sticks out in this data set as especially instructive from a Canucks perspective. The deal was completed, after all, on the Pittsburgh Penguins side by current Canucks president Jim Rutherford during his time as Pittsburgh's general manager. (Top photo of Canucks general manager Patrik Allvin: Bruce Bennett / Getty Images)


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
What's going on with USMNT? Plus: Players to watch at Club World Cup
The Athletic FC ⚽ is The Athletic's daily football (or soccer, if you prefer) newsletter. Sign up to receive it directly to your inbox. Hello! Mauricio Pochettino was sold the American dream. His USMNT are having a nightmare. We're trying to get our heads around it. 🥵 Poch feels the heat 🏀 NBA, NFL bids for EPL club 📡 The Club World Cup Radar 👀 Totti's long-range belter 'I'm the guilty one here,' said Mauricio Pochettino, which made a change from apportioning blame to the players around him. Nothing has epitomised the awkward coupling between the USMNT and their new head coach quite like him digging out his squad at regular intervals. But Pochettino's mea culpa after Tuesday's 4-0 mauling by Switzerland was a variation on a recurring theme: that his collaboration with the U.S. has started badly, or taken longer than it should have done to take off. Don't forget, this was supposed to be U.S. Soccer getting serious and making the national team all they could be at the 2026 World Cup. It paid big to pluck Poch from the uppermost club coaching bracket. Advertisement So what's going on? Some mitigation before anything else. Pochettino's pool of players for the past week of friendlies has been weaker than normal. Certain mainstays such as Christian Pulisic and Sergino Dest are resting, and fringe names were rotated in on Tuesday. The fitness of his squad has been so temperamental he must think a clean bill of health is something that only happens for other coaches. His record over 10 games, though, is concerning: five wins and five defeats, with four of those losses in his past four matches. He fumbled the fixtures which really mattered, at the Concacaf Nations League, and he'll be bailing water if the confederation's Gold Cup — starting this Sunday — goes wrong, too. It took a mere six months for USMNT godfather Bruce Arena to imply that the Argentine was a poor choice. The Athletic's Paul Tenorio made me chuckle when he wrote in yesterday's TAFC: 'The honeymoon is over and a marriage counsellor is on retainer.' The trouble is that when you watch Poch's side, it's not easy to spot a fluent style forming, or dependable patterns of play. To wit: they Americans are no more potent than they were on the day Gregg Berhalter was fired last July. Just to branch off on a tangent for a second: across international football as a whole, we might be seeing evidence that switching from club jobs to a national team's technical area is trickier than it sounds. The crossover is in vogue, but how wise a ploy is it? England are furrowing Thomas Tuchel's brow. Germany have been ordinary under Julian Nagelsmann. Carlo Ancelotti isn't a sure-fire cure for Brazil's mediocrity. In reality, international coaching offers little scope to implement a detailed, tactical plan over a finite period. Training sessions are too few. Perhaps that's why associations went through a phase of banking on pragmatic types already working for them in another position, often coaching an age-group team; England did it with Gareth Southgate, Spain with Luis de la Fuente and Argentina with Lionel Scaloni. Advertisement There's an added complication for Pochettino, and one which is largely out of his control. The USMNT is not awash with world-class talent. Pulisic is as close as it gets but it surely says something that the cream of the crop in European club football aren't spending to sign him. It's concerning — if not surprising — that fatigue will see him sit out the Gold Cup entirely. The U.S. roster has its limits. That much is obvious. As Paul writes, the requisite depth is not there. But they should be, and have to be, better than this. 'If you want to criticise me, go ahead,' Pochettino said on Tuesday, and that grumbling could mount internally as well as externally at this rate. Because the World Cup is huge, it's predominantly on home soil next time, it's arriving soon and it will be many, many years before it comes around again. Somewhere in the not-so-distant future, FIFA will announce ticket prices for next year's World Cup finals. A handful are up for grabs already — corporate bargains at $73,500 a head, for example — but general-sale costs are still being finalised. The World Cup is a far bigger event than FIFA's Club World Cup (CWC), the revamped version of which starts in the U.S. on Saturday. But in Adam Crafton's overview of all of the things which need sorting for summer 2026, ticket sales are as intriguing as anything — because the CWC is failing to capture the imagination. The world governing body is offering students five tickets for $20 for the first game in Miami this weekend (down from $349 shortly after the group-stage draw in December). Realistically, it wouldn't be doing that if a) punters were queuing up to be there and b) it wasn't concerned about television cameras showing stacks of empty seats. Broadcast rights to this event set DAZN back $1bn after all. Advertisement On TV, the equivalent of two thirds of the globe's population will watch the 2026 World Cup. That audience is assured. But on the ground? It will sell better, sure, but were common sense to prevail, the take-up for the CWC should have some influence on FIFA's plans for next year. Don't hold your breath. One of the highlights of The Athletic's coverage of any tournament is always The Radar. Published before the games begin, it's our tactical, who's-who bible. You'll find Lionel Messi, Kylian Mbappe et all in today's Club World Cup breakdown but the real treats are the lesser-known profiles, like that of Auckland City's Dylan Manickum. He's a 32-year-old whose working life combines semi-pro football and, incredibly, full-time employment as an engineer. Beyond him, look out for River Plate's 17-year-old Franco Mastantuono. The precocious midfielder broke Lionel Messi's record as the youngest debutant in a competitive match for Argentina, and he's most likely off to Real Madrid soon. Also, a shout out to Mamelodi Sundowns goalkeeper Ronwen Williams. Last year, he was the first Africa-based 'keeper to be shortlisted for the Yashin Trophy, awarded annually to the world's best. Williams has the knack of reading penalties (below) and if Sundowns make any sort of splash, they'll likely be indebted to their main man. It's been one of those weeks for Italy's national team; one of those weeks they have from time to time. Who can rescue them from the hole they have dug for themselves? What about Francesco Totti, the drop-dead-gorgeous 2006 World Cup winner? He's 48 years old now but the force remains strong, as shown by him casually finishing from halfway in an old-boys' game over the weekend. In October, he talked (semi-seriously) about coming out of retirement. Let's get it on.