Why were Waymo cars targeted during Los Angeles protests? What to know about them
Why were Waymo cars targeted during Los Angeles protests? What to know about them Waymo vehicles were set on fire during Los Angeles protests. Here's what to know about Waymo, its vehicles, and their vulnerability to fires.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
LA protesters ignite Waymo taxis, see the remains
Protesters vandalized and set Waymo autonomous taxis on fire amid anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles.
Several Waymo driverless vehicles were destroyed during anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles.
The flaming vehicles posed threats protestors may not have been fully aware of because of their unique design.
First responders and protestors were likely exposed to dangerous chemical compounds that could be fatal in high concentrations.
The image of burning Waymo driverless cars is becoming synonymous with the June 2025 Los Angeles protests. So, how did Waymo cars get to the scene of the protest in the first place and why were the vehicles being targeted?
A Waymo spokesperson confirmed to USA TODAY on June 9 that the company temporarily suspended its services in downtown Los Angeles "out of an abundance of caution." Here's how protestors used Waymo vehicles in the midst of a controversy over immigration enforcement that's left the country reeling.
What are Waymo cars?
Waymo is a company under the Alphabet (Google) umbrella that is developing driverless vehicle technology using cameras, radar and lidar sensors, and advanced computer systems. It launched a driverless ride-hailing service in several major cities.
A Waymo car is a vehicle owned by the company and equipped with technology that is capable of self-driving. Passengers can summon Waymo vehicles to their location and ride in the vehicles to their intended destination without interacting with a driver.
Where does Waymo operate?
Phoenix, Arizona
San Francisco, California
Los Angeles, California
Austin, Texas
The self-driving ride hailing service will soon be available in Atlanta, Georgia and Miami, Florida, as well, according to the company website. It has been tested in over 15 American states.
Waymo driverless cars targeted by protestors in downtown Los Angeles
A YouTube video by Wall Street Journal News shows protestors swarming a burning Waymo driverless car that is ablaze. The vehicle is covered in anti-ICE slogans. A masked person is seen smashing the vehicle with a hammer.
The vehicles were summoned to the scene, according to the Wall Street Journal News video above. Waymo disputes this, saying that the vehicles were present at the scene of the protests, not summoned with the intention of being set on fire. Their unique powertrain systems (motors and batteries) cause them to burn even hotter than internal combustion engine vehicles. Furthermore, EV batteries can easily overheat and ignite cars in extreme heat.
Electric vehicle fires can be more difficult to put out than internal combustion engine vehicle fires. Lithium-ion batteries experience "thermal runway, a chemical process that isn't as easily extinguished as a gasoline fire in part because it doesn't require oxygen" according to MotorTrend.
So, setting the Waymo driverless EVs on fire created an extremely burdensome situation for local authorities.
"I think protests need to be peaceful period, and anytime it deteriorates into violence that is a problem and it absolutely messes with the overall message," Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said during a press interview.
How many Waymo cars were burned in Los Angeles during protests?
At least five Waymo Jaguar I-Pace vehicles were destroyed during the Los Angeles protests. A new Jaguar I-Pace starts at a whopping $72,500. So, the total cost of the destroyed Waymo driverless vehicles could exceed $362,500 before accounting for the price of Waymo's autonomous driving technology like radar and lidar sensors.
Waymo's self-driving technology could add $100,000 to the cost of a Jaguar I-Pace due to the price of multiple sensors, cameras, and advanced autonomous driving systems, according to Slate Magazine. If this estimate is accurate, the total damages to the vehicles could be close to $862,500.
Why the Los Angeles Waymo car fires were so dangerous
Lithium-ion battery fires weren't the only risk to Americans during the Los Angeles protests of 2025. hydrogen fluoride, a toxic and corrosive chemical compound, was also expelled from the burning Waymo driverless cars, said Scientific American. This chemical compound could cause a person to cough up blood in mere minutes.
Inhaling high concentrations of hydrogen fluoride can be fatal, so the burning Waymo vehicles presented a deadly risk to those nearby. First responders to lithium-ion battery fires can develop breathing difficulties and throat burns while trying to extinguish the flames.
Ultimately, the events that took place on June 8 have sparked a nationwide conversation involving the current administration's immigration policies, the protests, and the federal government's reaction to the protests.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump wants to get rid of his red Tesla after feud with Musk
Tesla is no longer hot, the president says. After playing influencer-in-chief and hosting a car show in the South Lawn of the White House for the brand in March, Donald Trump is considering getting rid of his red Tesla, a day after his public spat with his close adviser and Tesla CEO Elon Musk. A White House official confirmed on background June 6 that Trump no longer wants the Tesla Model S he bought in March in a show of support for the company after incidents of vandalism at Tesla dealerships across the country. The electric car, worth about $80,000 new, still sits in the White House parking lot. Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk, who served as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency, a position from which Trump revealed Musk was asked to leave last month. 'Elon was wearing thin,' Trump posted on Truth Social, seemingly indicating that Musk had worn out his welcome. Musk lobbed a series of online jabs at Trump's signature tax and spending bill after he left the White House, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' and asking Americans to tell their representatives in Washington to "Kill the Bill." Trump said Musk was upset about electric vehicle subsidies from the bill that would have benefited Tesla. The Congressional Budget Office has said the bill would lead to an increase of $2.4 trillion in total deficits over the next 10 years, a figure Trump has disputed. The feud reached an apparent point of no return after Musk accused Trump of being named in classified files on financier and sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. A White House official told USA TODAY on background on June 6 that Trump had no plans to have any contact with Musk. Throughout his tenure as the cost-cutting czar, Musk has suffered ongoing losses for the car company. His deep cuts to federal staffing and programs spurred "Tesla Takedown" protests, with Tesla owners being harassed and multiple dealerships across the United States being vandalized. On March 11, Tesla's stock price plummeted 15%, the greatest one-day drop in five years. In the aftermath of the June 6 feud, Tesla's stock price fell 14% but showed signs of rebounding on Friday by 5%, trading at $300 on NASDAQ at 10:50 a.m. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump wants to dump his red Tesla
Politico
41 minutes ago
- Politico
Why tech is so quiet on the California protests
With help from Alfred Ng and Anthony Adragna The explosive immigration protests in California have become a national talking point, with politicians, celebrities and major interest groups all weighing in. Notably missing is California's wealthiest industry — one with its own big stake in the immigration debate. The biggest players in Silicon Valley have been sitting this one out, even as Waymo cars go up in flames in Los Angeles and protests spread to the Bay Area. Tech companies rely heavily on foreign-born workers, and on high-skilled immigration in particular. And the industry was vocal in the immigration debate just six months ago, rallying for the H-1B and student visa pipelines that have reliably attracted talent to their workforces. Tech figures even seemed cautiously optimistic that Donald Trump's administration might help them loosen some of the rules, with leaders like Elon Musk and Marc Andreessen trying to coax Trump into increasing visa numbers. The LA protests, however — and the militarized government response — have radically shifted the immigration conversation in ways that make even a powerful industry hesitant to try to tamp things down. Given the sharp divides in public opinion over the protests, and the deportations that sparked them, Big Tech is steering clear of a combustible situation. 'Anything that increases the tension around immigration will just make it harder for tech,' said Nu Wexler, a consultant who formerly worked in policy communications for Facebook and Google. 'In this culture of fear, I would be surprised if the large companies speak up,' he said. DFD called around to see where the biggest companies stood. Meta declined to comment on the protests, referring DFD to its November 2022 statement promising support for laid-off employees on work visas. Google and Amazon declined to comment on the record. Microsoft and Apple did not respond to DFD's inquiries. Trade associations restated their support for high-skilled immigration to DFD, while not directly touching on the clashes in LA. 'We need smart immigration policy,' said Gary Shapiro, CEO of the Consumer Technology Association. An analyst for the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation said that restricting high-skilled immigration 'would be a serious mistake.' In one sense, the protests don't immediately implicate Silicon Valley. The ICE raids that sparked the uproar were reportedly targeting subsistence workers at Home Depot parking lots and car washes, as well as a 9-year-old LA elementary school student, not immigrants who came for STEM jobs. But the industry has been dragged in anyway. Former Trump aide Steve Bannon explicitly called out Big Tech when lambasting the protests during his War Room podcast on Tuesday. 'You control who comes here as citizens,' he said. 'Silicon Valley doesn't want that … they're hiring everybody in the revolution of artificial intelligence, they're still bringing 135,000 H-1Bs because they detest American citizens.' Bannon also came out swinging six months ago, when Musk started pushing on the issue — calling the H1-B program a 'total scam,' and Musk a billionaire 'toddler' solely focused on his own wealth. As POLITICO reported, then-incoming deputy chief of staff for policy Stephen Miller was also working behind the scenes to slash visas for educated immigrants at the time. The tech companies aren't just trying to avoid being slammed again, though — they also have other business to worry about. As one observer put it, they don't want to alienate Republicans who can help pass favorable tax laws and ease up costly tariffs. 'High-skilled immigration never really ranks as a number one priority for any of them,' said an industry insider who asked not to be named due to consulting work with several major companies. 'It doesn't impact quarterly earnings, unlike the other issues.' They might not be able to sit it out forever, though. Rallies against ICE cropped up in San Francisco last weekend, with police arresting participants by Sunday. The nationwide No Kings protests against Trump set for the upcoming weekend are reportedly expected to attract thousands of people to the Bay Area. Wexler also thinks that certain developments in Washington could force big tech companies to get involved, noting that a policy change seriously impacting their workforces could 'push companies out of their comfort zone.' Macron's smartphone ban challenge French President Emanuel Macron is facing a host of legal, technical and lobbying challenges as he seeks to ban social media for children under 15, POLITICO's Eliza Gkritsi, Ellen O'Regan, Émile Marzolf and Klara Durand report. Macon is pushing for an EU-wide age verification law, but is threatening to go it alone if Brussels balks. 'I'm giving us a few months to achieve European mobilization. Otherwise, I will negotiate with the Europeans so that we can do it ourselves in France,' Macon said earlier this week. There's also the matter of who should verify the age of online users. Different wings of the tech industry — especially in the United States — have clashed over who should be responsible for checking the ages of internet users. Then there's the battle with the porn industry, which must verify users' ages under a new French law. That prompted the owner of Pornhub, Redtube and YouPorn to stop serving porn in France earlier in June. Trump's take on Obama 'Hope' poster The White House's Instagram account is making posters of alleged criminals that play off former President Barack Obama's iconic 'Hope' poster from his 2008 campaign. It has made five posts in this style since May, the first of which labeled Salvadoran native Kilmar Abrego Garcia as a member of the MS-13 gang, with an Obama logo on his shoulder. Its most recent post was a wanted poster for a man accused of assaulting federal officers in Los Angeles. The White House did not confirm or deny whether it is using AI to generate the images. The wanted posters aren't just needling Obama, perhaps Trump's greatest political foil — they're knocking off the aesthetic of artist Shepard Fairey, whose anti-authoritarian street-art roots gave the posters their cachet in the first place. Asked about the use of Obama's campaign imagery, Trump spokesperson Abigail Jackson said the posters were designed to associate Democrats with 'rioters and criminal illegal aliens.' 'The White House is always looking for creative, eye-catching ways to highlight the important work the Trump Administration is doing,' said Jackson. DFD also reached out to Fairey, who replied that the Trump administration's posts are the opposite of his original work's intent. 'Trump may be emulating my style, but we couldn't be more different on substance,' he said. post of the day THE FUTURE IN 5 LINKS Stay in touch with the whole team: Aaron Mak (amak@ Mohar Chatterjee (mchatterjee@ Steve Heuser (sheuser@ Nate Robson (nrobson@ and Daniella Cheslow (dcheslow@
Time Business News
44 minutes ago
- Time Business News
The Creator Commerce Evolution: Why Monetization Models Are Ripe for Reinvention in 2025
The digital creator economy has exploded into a $250B+ industry — but monetization for individual creators is still lagging behind in innovation. Traditional methods like one-off merch drops, YouTube ad revenue, or Patreon-style donations are no longer sufficient to build sustainable income. This is where new models like passes and subscription-based commerce are beginning to change the landscape for creators in 2025. In this blog, we dive deep into how the creator monetization ecosystem is evolving, why traditional storefronts are losing steam, and what forward-thinking tools are paving the way for scalable digital businesses. Whether you're a coach, influencer, educator, or creative entrepreneur, now is the time to take full control of your income by choosing the right model. For years, creators have operated under an algorithm-driven economy: 'Create more content, earn more money.' But that system is deeply flawed. It's inconsistent, platform-dependent, and usually favors large accounts. Even platforms that allow monetization, like YouTube or Instagram's Creator Marketplace, keep the bulk of the earnings. Creators typically see only a fraction of the revenue they help generate. And with platform policy shifts, bans, or algorithm changes, income can evaporate overnight. E-commerce platforms like Shopify are robust for traditional brands, but they're clunky for creators who sell digital content, coaching, or subscriptions. They require coding skills, payment integrations, and ongoing management — things most creators don't have time or energy to handle. This is why creator-first platforms like Popstore and Stan Store gained traction. They simplified selling for creators. But in 2025, simplicity alone isn't enough — scalability, engagement, and conversion-driven features are the new benchmarks. So, what does the new era of creator monetization look like? It's frictionless, platform-agnostic, and completely audience-centric. The best platforms today help creators build not just stores — but interactive business engines that drive sales on autopilot. Let's explore some critical shifts defining this transformation: Creators are now monetizing through low-ticket offers like mini-courses, templates, exclusive DMs, or PDF guides. Instead of waiting for large purchases, they turn small, high-volume transactions into consistent revenue. This is where passes come into play. Platforms like Popstore have introduced digital 'passes' that let creators offer temporary access to exclusive content, coaching calls, or digital events. It's like a ticket to a micro-experience — and it converts exceptionally well because it meets the audience's need for instant value. The era of 'link in bio' is still thriving — but now creators want more than just a menu of links. They want funnels that convert. A traditional link tree is no longer enough. Platforms like Popstore offer a 'link in bio' that acts as a mini-funnel, allowing you to sell, upsell, and capture leads within seconds. These optimized journeys are increasing conversion rates by up to 40%. Stan Store gained popularity for offering creators a quick storefront setup. But by 2025, many creators are finding its feature set limited when it comes to automation, scalability, and integrations. It focuses on simplicity — which is good — but lacks the dynamic monetization tools that are becoming standard today. For creators who want to sell beyond eBooks or coaching calls — such as gated content, digital experiences, or bundled offers — Stan Store may feel restrictive. Let's break down what top creators are now focusing on to future-proof their income: Membership-based models are exploding. Offering VIP community access, live sessions, or digital masterminds through subscriptions creates recurring income. Tools that support gated content, automated billing, and custom access (like Popstore's passes and products) are outperforming traditional stores. Audience segmentation and personalized offers drive higher conversion. Top platforms allow you to segment buyers based on behavior, product interests, or location — so you can serve tailored content or discounts automatically. Creators are shifting away from being dependent on platforms like TikTok or Instagram. Owning your email list, sales funnel, and customer data ensures long-term sustainability — even if a platform bans your account or changes its rules. Instead of piecing together tools (Stripe, Mailchimp, Notion, Google Docs, Zoom, Calendly), creators in 2025 are looking for one integrated platform that does it all. That's why hybrid tools like Popstore — which combine selling, messaging, and automation in one — are emerging as clear winners. With Popstore, creators can: Sell digital products, passes, subscriptions, or coaching Automate delivery and DMs on Instagram Capture leads via quizzes, forms, or comment triggers Create multiple pages and segment audiences Build a full funnel from one simple dashboard If you're looking for more flexibility than Stan Store offers — particularly if you're scaling your offers, audience, or revenue — you'll need a creator tool built for serious growth. Whether you're offering a $10 ebook or a $1000 cohort program, look for platforms that give you: Automated DMs to convert leads to convert leads Instagram comment triggers to drive traffic to drive traffic Audience segmentation for tailored messaging for tailored messaging Subscription + pass integration No-code design and editing Looking for a better option? Read our detailed review of the best stan store alternative for 2025. The shift is clear: creators are no longer just entertainers or influencers — they're entrepreneurs. The tools they use should reflect that. Gone are the days of relying on inconsistent ad revenue or algorithm luck. In 2025, successful creators are building intentional, data-driven, and scalable digital businesses. Whether you're experimenting with passes, exploring alternatives to stan store, or seeking a platform that grows with you, your monetization stack should be as powerful and creative as you are. The future of the creator economy isn't in static storefronts or one-size-fits-all solutions. It's in agile, intelligent systems that allow creators to sell smarter, not harder — and finally take ownership of their income. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
