logo
700 Marines arrive in L.A. area amid ICE protests as Newsom files suit to block deployment

700 Marines arrive in L.A. area amid ICE protests as Newsom files suit to block deployment

CBS News2 days ago

Washington — About 700 active-duty Marines have arrived in the Los Angeles area to join National Guard troops who were sent to the city to respond to protests over federal immigration enforcement, a defense official said Tuesday morning, as California Gov. Gavin Newsom asked a federal court to block the deployment of troops onto city streets.
The Marines join approximately 2,100 members of the California National Guard who are now on location in the greater L.A. area, operating in Los Angeles, Paramount and Compton. A top Pentagon official testified to Congress that the estimated cost of deploying the National Guard and the Marines is roughly $134 million.
In a 28-page filing in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday afternoon, California Attorney General Rob Bonta asked a federal judge for a temporary restraining order to "prevent the use of federalized National Guard and active duty Marines for law enforcement purposes on the streets of a civilian city."
"Federal antagonization, through the presence of soldiers in the streets, has already caused real and irreparable damage to the City of Los Angeles, the people who live there, and the State of California," the filing said. "They must be stopped, immediately."
Notably, the filing says the state "does not seek to prevent any of those forces from protecting the safety of federal buildings or other real property owned or leased by the federal government, or federal personnel on such property," but instead "seeks narrow relief tailored to avoid irreparable harm to our communities and the rule of law that is likely to result" if Marines and the National Guard are used for immigration and law enforcement.
The U.S. Northern Command said in a statement Monday evening that Marines from 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine Division had been activated to prepare for the deployment. The Marines are based in Twentynine Palms, a city east of Los Angeles.
Northern Command said the Marines would "seamlessly integrate" with hundreds of members of the National Guard to protect "federal personnel and federal property." They have been trained in "de-escalation, crowd control and standing rules for the use of force," the military added.
A U.S. military official said the Marines are at a staging area in the greater L.A. area awaiting specific instructions. Appearing before the Armed Services Committee, Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Eric Smith referred specific questions to Northern Command but said the Marines who have been deployed have received crowd-control training and have equipment like shields and batons. He said the Marines "don't have arrest authority" and are there "to protect federal property and federal personnel."
Under federal law, active-duty military cannot be used for domestic law enforcement purposes without the president invoking what's known as the Insurrection Act, a step President Trump has not taken. Asked about whether he would invoke the law on Tuesday, Mr. Trump responded, "If there's an insurrection I would certainly invoke it. We'll see."
Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Monday that around 700 Marines "are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order." Hegseth said the Marines were being deployed from Camp Pendleton, south of Los Angeles.
The defense chief was appearing before lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, telling a House committee that "we believe ICE agents should be allowed to be safe in doing their operations and we have deployed National Guard and the Marines to protect them in the execution of their duties because we ought be able to enforce immigration law in this country."
Newsom suggested late Monday he would take legal action over the planned use of Marines, calling it illegal.
In a post on X, he wrote, "U.S. Marines serve a valuable purpose for this country — defending democracy. They are not political pawns. The Secretary of Defense is illegally deploying them onto American streets so Trump can have a talking point at his parade this weekend. It's a blatant abuse of power. We will sue to stop this. The Courts and Congress must act. Checks and balances are crumbling. This is a red line — and they're crossing it. WAKE UP!"
A demonstrator holds an upside-down U.S. flag as California National Guard members stand guard outside the Federal Building during a protest in response to federal immigration operations in Los Angeles, on June 9, 2025.
RONALDO SCHEMIDT/AFP via Getty Images
Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDowell said in a statement that the agency has decades of experience managing large-scale public demonstration and can handle the protests.
"The arrival of federal military forces in Los Angeles — absent clear coordination — presents a significant logistical and operational challenge for those of us charged with safeguarding this city," he said in response to the possible deployment of Marines, adding that there needs to be open communication between all agencies to prevent confusion and avoid escalation.
The military said Monday it was mobilizing another 2,000 members of the California National Guard to respond to the protests.
Mr. Trump deployed National Guard troops to downtown Los Angeles over the weekend to respond to tense protests over Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests. The Trump administration argues the deployment is necessary to protect federal property and ICE agents from violence. Mr. Trump has accused local leaders of not doing enough to deal with violent clashes at the protests.
Newsom opposed the deployment, and the state of California is already suing the Trump administration over what it argues is an illegal federalization of the National Guard. Some local officials have argued the deployment could aggravate an already caustic situation in downtown Los Angeles, and say state and local police agencies can handle the protests themselves.
"We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved," Newsom posted on X Monday.
contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Families arrested in LA Ice raids held in basements with little food or water, lawyers say
Families arrested in LA Ice raids held in basements with little food or water, lawyers say

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Families arrested in LA Ice raids held in basements with little food or water, lawyers say

As federal agents rushed to arrest immigrants across Los Angeles, they confined detainees – including families with small children – in a stuffy office basement for days without sufficient food and water, according to immigration lawyers. One family with three children were held inside a Los Angeles-area administrative building for 48 hours after being arrested on Thursday immediately after an immigration court hearing, according to lawyers from the Immigrant Defenders Law Center (ImmDef), which is providing non-profit legal services in the region. The children, the youngest of whom is three years old, were provided a bag of chips, a box of animal crackers and a mini carton of milk as their sole rations for a day. Agents told the family they did not have any water to provide during the family's first day in detention; on the second day, all five were given a single bottle to share. The one fan in the room was pointed directly towards a guard, rather than towards the families in confinement, they told lawyers. 'Because it was primarily men held in these facilities, they didn't have separate quarters for families or for women,' said Yliana Johansen-Méndez, chief program officer at ImmDef. Clients explained that 'eventually they set up a makeshift tent in an outside area to house the women and children. But clearly, there were no beds, no showers.' They have since been transferred to a 'family detention' center in Dilley, Texas, a large-scale holding facility retrofitted to hold children with their parents that was reopened under the Trump administration. Lawyers, who had been largely blocked from communicating with immigrants arrested amid the ramped-up raids in LA, said family members were able to recount the ordeal only after they were moved out of state. The harrowing details are the first to emerge about the conditions that people are being held in following the immigration raids targeting LA-area businesses and neighborhoods. To quell the widespread protests that followed, Donald Trump sent in military troops despite opposition from California leaders. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has said that it arrested 118 immigrants on Friday and over the weekend. Others were arrested at immigration offices and courthouses in the days prior. ImmDef and other local advocacy groups had compiled a separate list of more than 80 people who were apprehended – though many of them still do not appear in the agency's online databases of detainees. Many of the people arrested were jailed ad hoc, in LA-area courthouses and administrative offices. Over the past several days, attorneys have taken shifts waiting outside federal immigration offices, attempting to speak to the immigrants, but federal agents and national guard troops have largely blocked lawyers and family members from visiting with those who were arrested, citing safety concerns amid widespread protests in the city. On Tuesday, the immigration court in downtown Los Angles had been shut down – and blocked off. DHS did not immediately respond to multiple Guardian queries about where it was holding people arrested in LA, and whether local offices had been given instruction to prepare supplies and facilities to hold immigrants prior to the large-scale raids in the region. Legal aid groups were also largely denied access to immigrants who were transferred to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) processing center and detention center in Adelanto, in the high desert east of LA. 'Ice's excuse was, they're still processing all the new people,' said Johansen-Méndez. Over the weekend and on Monday, her colleagues were only permitted to visit with a handful of clients at the Adelanto detention center, even though they had called ahead to confirm that at least 40 people referred to the organization had been sent there. Several people have already been deported. Luis Angel Reyes Savalza, a deportation defense attorney supporting the affected families in LA, said at least one person who was bused to Mexico almost immediately after his arrest was not provided any paperwork or opportunity to contest his deportation. At least two others who were arrested at LA-area carwashes were deported to Tijuana, according to Flor Melendrez, executive director of the Clean Carwash Worker Center. Another person was told by agents to sign a paper if he wanted to visit an attorney, Johansen-Méndez said – but believes he was tricked into signing some sort of voluntary departure paperwork. 'Within hours, he was across the border to Mexico,' she said. Meanwhile, the family members of workers arrested at a clothing factory in downtown LA, in the parking lot at a Home Depot in the suburb of Paramount, and at a carwash in Culver City were desperately seeking answers about their loved ones' whereabouts. Landi, whose husband was arrested on Friday while he worked a shift at the Ambiance Apparel warehouse, said he had reported to work that day as normal. 'We never imagined he will be kidnapped by immigration,' she said at a news conference on Monday, outside the business's gates. The Guardian is not using her surname to protect her family's privacy and safety. 'The day he was kidnapped, my family went to request information about his abduction, but Ice told us he wasn't at the center,' she said. 'However, after much effort and struggle from our lawyer, Ice simply confirmed that he was there.' Families were not allowed to bring their loved ones jackets or medications, lawyers said. Those who were able to confer with attorneys reported that as holding facilities in the city became crowded with immigrants, families were rushed out to detention centers in California's high desert or in Texas. Agents confiscated belongings and provided little food or water, explaining to immigrants that the facilities had not prepared for the influx of detainees. Conditions in Adelanto were deteriorating as well, lawyers said. One of ImmDef's clients reported that meals were provided late, blankets and clothing were scarce, and some people were sleeping on the floor of a day-use recreational room as beds filled up. One client said he witnessed an older man's health dramatically decline after being denied medication for three days. On Sunday, Democratic US representatives Gilbert R Cisneros Jr, Judy Chu and Derek Tran said they were blocked from entering Adelanto. DHS did not respond to a query asking why lawyers and lawmakers have been denied access. With limited access to immigrants in detention, attorneys are also scrambling to understand the scope of the raids, and the extent to which the Department of Homeland Security has violated immigrants' rights. Related: US immigration officials raid California farms as Trump ramps up conflict One of the more unusual aspects of the large-scale militarized raids that began last week was that agents from Ice were joined by Customs and Border Protection officers, who are empowered to conduct warrantless stops – but only within 100 miles (160km) of the US border. Johansen-Méndez believes that the government has justified their presence in Los Angeles – which is more than 100 miles from the US-Mexico border – because the city touches the Pacific Ocean, which the administration could be considering as a 'border'. 'They're counting the entire coastline as a port of entry,' said Johansen-Méndez. 'It felt almost like an urban legend that it could be done. But at this point, it's just they're everywhere, literally.' Lawyers from ImmDef and other legal aid and advocacy groups have also been trying to piece together testimonies to better understand how and why immigration agents chose to sweep certain businesses and neighborhoods, and what justifications officers provided when stopping and apprehending people. 'How do they decide who they're going to ask for their papers and arrest, other than racially profiling?' Johansen-Méndez said. 'Did they just ask everyone in the room for their papers or just some people? Did they skip certain people that didn't fit the profile? We can't get that information because we can't talk to everyone.'

Major US climate website likely to be shut down after almost all staff fired
Major US climate website likely to be shut down after almost all staff fired

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Major US climate website likely to be shut down after almost all staff fired

A major US government website supporting public education on climate science looks likely to be shuttered after almost all of its staff were fired, the Guardian has learned. the gateway website for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (Noaa)'s Climate Program Office, will imminently no longer publish new content, according to multiple former staff responsible for the site's content whose contracts were recently terminated. 'The entire content production staff at (including me) were let go from our government contract on 31 May,' said a former government contractor who wished to remain anonymous for fear of retaliation. 'We were told that our positions within the contract were being eliminated.' Rebecca Lindsey, the website's former program manager, who was fired in February as part of the government's purge of probationary employees, described a months-long situation within Noaa where political appointees and career staff argued over the fate of the website. 'I had gotten a stellar performance review, gotten a bonus, gotten a raise. I was performing very well. And then I was part of that group who got the form letter saying, 'Your knowledge, skills, and abilities are no longer of use to Noaa' – or something to that effect.' Lindsey said she had been worried that might be a target of the new administration soon after the election, but when a large Noaa contract was up for renewal at the end of May, her former boss told her that a demand came 'from above' to rewrite parts of the contract to remove the team's funding. 'It was a very deliberate, targeted attack,' said Lindsey. Lindsey said the content for was created and maintained by a contracted staff of about 10, with additional contributions from Noaa scientists, and its editorial content was specifically designed to be politically neutral, and faithful to the current state of the sciences. All of those staff have now been dismissed, she said. 'We operated exactly how you would want an independent, non-partisan communications group to operate,' said Lindsey, and noted that is housed within the science division of Noaa, not its public affairs division. 'It does seem to be part of this sort of slow and quiet way of trying to keep science agencies from providing information to the American public about climate.' Noaa has been contacted for comment. It is unclear whether the website will remain visible to the public. The site was housed within the communication, education, and engagement division of Noaa, which describes itself as 'the largest team in the federal government dedicated to climate communication, education, and engagement'. The website receives hundreds of thousands of visits per month and is one of the most popular sources of information about climate science on the internet. The fired staff believe the changes to were targeted by political appointees within the Trump administration and specifically aimed at restricting public-facing climate information. 'It's targeted, I think it's clear,' said Tom Di Liberto, a former Noaa spokesperson who was also fired from his position earlier this year. 'They only fired a handful of people, and it just so happened to be the entire content team for I mean, that's a clear signal.' The purge spared two web developers, which Di Liberto says is a concerning sign. The contractor said: 'My bigger worry, long-term, is I would hate to see it turn into a propaganda website for this administration, because that's not at all what it was.' The contractor said that while there will still be some pre-written, scheduled content posted on the site this month, there are no plans for further new content: 'After that, we have no idea what will happen to the website.' The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand accounts from people in the know. If you have something to share on this subject you can contact us confidentially using the following methods. Secure Messaging in the Guardian app The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end to end encrypted and concealed within the routine activity that every Guardian mobile app performs. This prevents an observer from knowing that you are communicating with us at all, let alone what is being said. If you don't already have the Guardian app, download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select 'Secure Messaging'. SecureDrop, instant messengers, email, telephone and post See our guide at for alternative methods and the pros and cons of each. Lindsey said she also feared a 'sinister possibility' that the administration may co-opt to publish its own anti-science content. Lindsey said the administration could now 'provide a content team from the Heartland Institute, leveraging our audience, our brand, our millions of people that we reach on social media every month. That's the worst-case scenario.' ' is one heck of a URL. If you wanted to basically keep the website alive to do something with later, this is what you would do if you're the [Trump] administration,' said Di Liberto. 'It's clear that the administration does not accept climate science, so it's certainly concerning.' The cuts also mean that there is now also no one left to run social media accounts, which have hundreds of thousands of followers. Since staff in charge of did a lot of pushback on misinformation, their absence may help anti-science information flourish there more readily. 'We were an extremely well-trusted source for climate information, misinformation and disinformation because we actually, legitimately would answer misinformation questions,' said the contractor. 'We'd answer reader emails and try to combat disinformation on social media. Related: 'Flying blind': Florida weatherman tells viewers Trump cuts will harm forecasts 'We get attacked on social media by people who don't believe in climate change, and that's increased over the last six months or so as well.' The shutdown comes amid broader cuts to science funding across the government, including 'significant reductions to education, grants, research, and climate-related programs within Noaa', as stated in the 2026 'passback' budget Congress is currently deliberating. 'It seems like if they can't get rid of all the research, what they can do is make it impossible for anyone to know about it,' said Di Liberto. The contractor said they worry that what may have begun as a heavy-handed attempt by administration officials to limit public knowledge of human-caused climate change will have broader impacts on public education on the cyclical drivers of weather – as well as the results of publicly funded research conducted by Noaa scientists. 'To me, climate is more broad than just climate change. It's also climate patterns like El Niño and La Niña. Halting factual climate information is a disservice to the public. Hiding the impacts of climate change won't stop it from happening, it will just make us far less prepared when it does.'

Opinion of US has worsened in countries around world in last year, survey shows
Opinion of US has worsened in countries around world in last year, survey shows

Yahoo

time11 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion of US has worsened in countries around world in last year, survey shows

Barely one-third of people polled across 24 countries say they have confidence in Donald Trump as a world leader, with most describing the US president as 'arrogant' and 'dangerous', and relatively few as 'honest'. The survey of more than 28,000 people by the Pew Research Center also found that opinions of the US had worsened over the past year in more than half the countries polled – including falls of 20-plus points in Mexico, Sweden, Poland and Canada. In the UK, the figure had dropped from 54% to 50%. Asked how much confidence they had in Trump to 'do the right thing in world affairs', just 34% of respondents across the two dozen countries expressed some degree of confidence in him, with 62% saying they had little or no confidence. Only in five countries did a majority say they had 'some' or 'a lot' of confidence in Trump to do the right thing: Nigeria (79%), Kenya (74%), Israel (69%), Hungary (53%) and India (52%). In the other 19, opinions of the US president, who returned to the White House in January, were negative. In Mexico, 91% said they had 'not too much' or 'no confidence at all' in Trump, followed by Sweden (85%), Germany (81%), Spain (80%) and Turkey (80%). There, and in Australia, Canada, France and the Netherlands, 'none at all' was the majority view. In the UK, 47% said they had no confidence at all and another 15% not too much. Clear majorities across all countries also expressed little or no confidence in Trump's ability to handle specific issues: US immigration, the Russia-Ukraine war, US-China relations, the global economy, the Middle East and climate change. Across all issues, confidence was again particularly low in neighbouring Mexico (14%) and Canada (26%), but also in Turkey (16%), Australia (23%) and many EU member states including France (25%), Germany (25%), Spain (22%) and Sweden (22%). The figure for the UK was 34%. Across all countries, respondents were least confident about Trump's handling of the climate crisis (21%). US immigration policies were the area where they saw him doing best – though even there, only 36% expressed confidence. In nine of the 11 Nato members polled, six in 10 or more people did not trust Trump's handling of the Russia-Ukraine war, while similar shares in Japan and South Korea (and 77% in Australia) felt the same about Trump and US-China relations. Asked which personal characteristics described Trump, the most common choice (80%) was 'arrogant'. About two-thirds picked 'dangerous' and about 40% chose 'understands complex problems', 'diplomatic' and 'well-qualified to be president'. About two-thirds across all countries also said the word 'honest' did not describe Trump. But the same proportion said he was a 'strong leader', a share that has increased in countries where he is relatively popular, and in those where he is not. The survey, carried out between 8 January and 26 April, also found strong ideological and partisan divides in views of Trump, with right-leaning voters tending to view him much more favourably than those on the left – and also more than in his first term. In Israel, 93% of people who considered themselves right-leaning expressed confidence in Trump, against 21% of those on the left. Supporters of far-right and rightwing populist parties in Europe also tended to be markedly more positive in their verdict. In Hungary, 88% of those with a favourable view of the ruling Fidesz party had confidence in Trump, against 27% among those who viewed the party negatively. In Germany, 56% of AfD supporters approved of Trump, compared with just 8% of those who opposed the far-right party. The same was true in Poland of Law & Justice voters and in the UK of Reform voters (both 62%), but confidence in Trump was far lower among PVV voters in the Netherlands (43%), National Rally voters in France (39%) and Sweden Democrats voters (31%). The survey also found that confidence in Trump was significantly higher among men than among women in 17 of the 24 countries polled, ranging from a 19-point gap in Sweden (5% for women versus 24% for men) through 17 points in the UK (28% versus 45%), 12 points in France (16% versus 28%) to eight in Spain (15% versus 23%). Overall ratings of the US had declined in 15 countries since last spring, the survey found, and were broadly unchanged in six others. Only in Israel, Nigeria and Turkey were respondents more likely to give the US a more favourable rating than last year. Across the 24 countries, 49% of respondents had a favourable overall view of the US and an identical share had an unfavourable view. About 50% median said American democracy was working well, but 46% said it was working poorly. • The study polled people in Argentina, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kenya, Mexico, the Netherlands, Nigeria, Poland, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Turkey and the United Kingdom

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store