Trump's hasty war on Iran risks dragging US into another endless conflict
Trump has fallen for Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just as hard as he fell for Russia's President Vladimir Putin and the die is cast.
This satellite picture taken on June 22, 2025, shows a close-up view of craters after US strikes on Iran's Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP), northeast of the city of Qom. Picture: Satellite image 2025 Maxar Technologies / AFP
He didn't take two weeks to make up his mind whether or not to bomb Iran, only two days. US President Donald Trump is not a patient man.
But he has just started another American 'forever war' in the Middle East, so he will have plenty of time to work on his self-control.
Let's start with the immediate issue. Assume for a moment that Iran was really working to build nuclear weapons, allegedly to destroy Israel.
Did the US bombing of the Fordow, Natanz and Esfahan nuclear enrichment sites really blast down through 90m of rock and permanently eliminate any skulduggery the Iranians were up to there?
Wrong question. If there really was a large stock of highly enriched uranium stored under all that rock, the Iranians have had a week to divide it up into dozens or hundreds of packets and hide it at safe sites all over the country.
What would you do if you knew somebody was coming to bomb you in a few days? Then there's this business about how highly enriched Iran's uranium is.
About 90% is weapons-grade and Iran had already enriched a lot of uranium to 60%, so the American B-2s have to start bombing right now.
ALSO READ: Oil prices plunge as Trump announces shaky ceasefire between Iran and Israel
No time to lose. No time even to think. Nonsense. The gun-type atomic bomb just fires one chunk of enriched uranium at another chunk and so long as the two chunks add up to a critical mass the bomb explodes.
That critical mass can be quite small if the uranium is highly enriched, but it will still work at 60% although the package will be heavier and bulkier. There was no deadline.
That type of nuclear weapon is so simple and fool-proof that there is no real need to 'test' it, but how was Iran going to deliver it?
A ballistic missile, presumably, because drones and cruise missiles can't handle the weight or the range, but few of Iran's ballistic missiles get through Israel's missile defences.
However, for the sake of argument, imagine that one of Iran's putative nine or 10 nuclear missiles does make it through and destroys an Israeli town or city.
We are piling improbable on top of implausible here, but what would Israel do then? Israel would probably respond by levelling Iran, which it is more than capable of doing.
It has the full triad of nuclear weapons, at least 100 of them but up to 400, of all sizes up to thermonuclear. Israel can sterilise the whole of Iran if it chooses.
None of these stories we are told makes much sense, so let's try a different approach. What did the 18 US intelligence agencies tell the director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, about Iran's nuclear weapons in March?
ALSO READ: Did the US strikes succeed, and how will Iran respond?
They told her Iran was not building nuclear weapons. Indeed, they explained Tehran only created a nuclear weapons programme after Saddam Hussein's Iraq invaded Iran with US help in the 1980s.
After Saddam was overthrown in 2003, it became clear that there had never been any Iraqi nuclear weapons, it was all a bluff.
Thereupon Iran closed its own nuclear weapons programme down and has never resumed it since. It's all just history now.
Trump has fallen for Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu just as hard as he fell for Russia's President Vladimir Putin and the die is cast.
It is likely to be a long, ugly war, conducted mostly by aircraft and missiles at first, but there will be boots on the ground if it goes on long enough.
An anti-clerical revolution in Iran could take the country down another road, but if the regime survives, the war could last for many years.
Persia was the rival superpower in Roman times and 1 000 years later it was the other superpower in Ottoman times. It's not a superpower any more, but then neither is the US.
NOW READ: Iran vs Israel: Principled peace is the only way forward
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
32 minutes ago
- IOL News
How US strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities changed the landscape of conflict
Experts say the US has been thrown into the conflict against Iran based on fake information about the latter's nuclear facilities. Image: Atta Kenare / AFP The recent US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have sparked intense debate, with the focus shifting from the act of aggression itself to the scale of destruction inflicted on Iran's nuclear program. US President Donald Trump initially claimed the damage was "monumental" and that the nuclear sites were "obliterated." However, the Pentagon's own report suggests that the damage was less severe, setting back Iran's nuclear program by only three months. The discrepancy between Trump's claims and the Pentagon's report has raised questions about the accuracy of the damage assessment. While Trump claimed to be happy about the damage, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, reportedly said that the US strikes inflicted "extremely severe damage and destruction" on Iran's nuclear facilities, but the extent of the damage is still being assessed. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ The US strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities have deepened the conflict in the Middle East, and the international community is waiting to see how the situation unfolds. Disagreement over the extent of the damage has raised questions about the effectiveness of the US strategy and the potential consequences for the region from experts. International relations expert Bruce Spector noted that there are "a couple of things that must be focused on, including the disagreement over the extent of the damage". "The Pentagon's intelligence agency's leaked report said the damage was rather less significant than a number of other organisations internationally had said," Spector said. "What we need to concentrate on is what happens going forward. Will the Iranians finally start rebuilding a nuclear program? And if they do, is it headed toward the creation of a bomb or a nuclear device?" Spector thinks the best way to evaluate the situation is to look at what happens next. "If Iran's program has been decimated or obliterated, then there isn't much point cooperating because there isn't much of a program to cooperate over," he said. "If that's a kind of a threat to allow the Iranians to begin to reconstitute their program, that's a whole different thing altogether." Spector noted that there are 18 different organisations in the US that focus on different aspects of information gathering, and they have yet to offer their analysis. "A lot of it will be second-hand intelligence…"It will be a while until we have a consensus on this,' Spector said. Meanwhile North Korea has since 'strongly' condemned the US strikes against Iranian nuclear facilities as a grave violation of a sovereign state's security interests and territorial rights, the North's state media reported. The US and Israel are the culprits of the current tensions in the Middle East born out of Jerusalem's "ceaseless war moves and territorial expansion" accepted and encouraged by the West," North Korea's foreign ministry said. "North Korea strongly denounces the attack on Iran by the US which ... violently trampled down the territorial integrity and security interests of a sovereign state. "The just international community should raise the voice of unanimous censure and rejection against the US and Israel's confrontational acts," the statement added.
IOL News
an hour ago
- IOL News
Afrikaner delegation returns from US with proposal to mend strained relations
Afrikaner refugees soon after landing in the USl. The American representatives reportedly expressed unease over the ongoing incidents of violence affecting farmers, which they see as a growing human rights and security issue. As a result, the delegation was told that stronger and more visible action to tackle farm attacks would be seen as a step towards improving bilateral ties. A delegation of Afrikaner leaders and interest groups has returned from a visit to Washington with a proposal aimed at restoring and improving relations between South Africa and the United States. The visit, which included representatives from the Freedom Front Plus, agricultural organisations and business groups, focused on addressing tensions that have developed in recent years over trade, security and governance issues. While the details of the talks remain partly confidential, members of the delegation have confirmed that several conditions were discussed as part of a proposed framework to rebuild trust and cooperation between the two nations. One of the key concerns raised by the US side, according to the delegation, is the current state of security in South Africa, particularly in rural areas. The American representatives reportedly expressed unease over the ongoing incidents of violence affecting farmers, which they see as a growing human rights and security issue. As a result, the delegation was told that stronger and more visible action to tackle farm attacks would be seen as a step towards improving bilateral ties. Freedom Front Plus leader Pieter Groenewald, who was part of the delegation, said the matter was raised in nearly every engagement. 'There is a perception abroad that rural communities in South Africa are not adequately protected. The US wants to see clear and decisive steps to address these attacks, which are affecting both local farmers and broader agricultural investment,' he said. In addition to the security concerns, the delegation said economic issues also featured prominently. Several US business representatives raised questions about South Africa's current empowerment policies, particularly Black Economic Empowerment requirements. According to the delegation, there was a request for exemptions or tailored solutions for foreign companies operating in the country, especially those in sectors deemed crucial for trade and investment. A senior business leader who took part in the talks said the proposal is not about undermining transformation but about finding ways to make the local environment more attractive for international investors. 'American firms want clarity, fairness and the ability to operate competitively. They are not asking for special treatment, but they want assurance that the rules do not place them at a disadvantage simply for being foreign entities,' he explained. The South African government has not yet officially responded to the proposals brought back by the delegation. However, political analysts believe the report could prompt discussions at the national level, particularly as concerns about foreign investment and international partnerships grow. The delegation described the tone of the meetings in Washington as constructive, though frank. 'There is goodwill, but also a sense of urgency,' Groenewald added. 'The Americans want to see evidence that South Africa remains a reliable and strategic partner on the continent.'
The Citizen
an hour ago
- The Citizen
29 high school pupils die in CAR exam day stampede
A power transformer explosion in Bangui caused mass panic during high school exams, leading to the deadly stampede. At least 29 pupils who were sitting their high school exams in the Central African Republic have been killed in a stampede after the explosion of a power transformer set off panic, the health ministry told AFP Thursday. Just over 5 300 students were sitting the second day of the baccalaureat exams when the explosion happened on Wednesday in the capital Bangui. In the panic, supervisors and students tried to flee, some jumping from the first floor of the school. The injured were transported by ambulance, on the back of pickup trucks or by motorbike taxi, AFP journalists saw. President expresses sorrow 'I would like to express my solidarity and compassion to the parents of the deceased candidates, to the educational staff, to the students,' President Faustin Archange Touadera said in a video published on his party's Facebook page. Touadera, who is attending a summit of the Gavi vaccine alliance in Brussels, also announced three days of national mourning. ALSO READ: South Africa calls for end to suffering in South Dafur Casualty toll confirmed as government and UN respond According to a document circulating on social media and authenticated by the health ministry, 29 deaths were registered by hospitals in the city. UN peacekeepers, police and other security were seen around the Barthelemy Boganda high school and hospitals. Education Minister Aurelien-Simplice Kongbelet-Zingas said in a statement Wednesday that 'measures will be taken quickly to shed light on the circumstances of this incident'. Civil unrest The CAR is among the poorest countries in the world and, since independence from France in 1960, has endured a succession of coups, authoritarian rulers and civil wars. The latest civil war started more than a decade ago. The government has secured the main cities and violence has subsided in recent years. But fighting occasionally erupts in remote regions between rebels and the national army, which is backed by Wagner mercenaries and Rwandan troops. NOW READ: West African leaders admit security woes mounting in region
