London police investigate "suspicious" Tesla fire in mall parking lot
A Tesla vehicle fire in a London, Ont., parking lot on Monday night is being investigated as suspicious, London police announced Wednesday afternoon.
Police say the fire happened at 11:30 p.m., on Mar. 17, and the vehicle was a 2025 4-door Tesla Model S. It was parked in the parking lot of CF Masonville Place, a mall in the city's north end.
There were no injuries reported in connection to the fire.
Tesla vehicle fire in north London parking lot deemed suspicious
30 minutes ago
Duration 0:11
The vehicle sustained significant damage, with police estimating a cost of $140,000.
Although the circumstances surrounding the fire are still unknown, Tesla vehicles and dealerships have been the target of increasing instances of vandalism, protest and destruction in recent weeks, both in Canada and the United States.
On Wednesday, a Montreal Tesla dealership was vandalized by activists who covered its front entrance in paint. One day prior, the Vancouver International Auto Show announced the removal of Tesla from the show, vaguely citing safety concerns as a reason.
Acts of vandalism against the electric vehicle manufacturer have multiplied since U.S. President Donald Trump took office and appointed Musk, considered the world's richest man, to oversee the U.S. Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), which has been slashing government spending and programs.
CBC News has reached out to Tesla for comment, but did not receive a response at the time of publication. Cadillac Fairview, the mall's owner, directed all questions to London police.
London police are asking the public for their help in the investigation, specifically through sharing dash-cam, residential or business surveillance camera footage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
30 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Judge tosses Democratic committees' lawsuit over the Federal Election Commission's independence
WASHINGTON (AP) — A federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit that sought to block President Donald Trump's administration from implementing an executive order that Democratic Party officials claim could undermine the independence of the Federal Election Commission. U.S. District Judge Amir H. Ali in Washington ruled late Tuesday that there's insufficient evidence that the Republican administration intends to apply a key portion of Trump's executive order to the FEC or its commissioners. 'This Court's doors are open to the parties if changed circumstances show concrete action or impact on the FEC's or its Commissioners' independence,' the judge wrote. The Democratic Party's three national political committees sued after Trump signed the executive order in February. The order was intended to increase his control of the entire executive branch, including over agencies such as the FEC, a six-person bipartisan board created by Congress to independently enforce campaign finance law. The Feb. 18 order said the officials at those agencies 'must be supervised and controlled by the people's elected President' and demanded that no executive branch employee advance a legal view that contradicts the president or the attorney general. Trump issued the order after he abruptly got rid of FEC Chair Ellen Weintraub, a Democrat who said her ouster did not follow legal protocols. The FEC is just one of several independent agencies Trump has sought to control and targeted with firings. The plaintiffs — the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee — asked the judge to rule that a law insulating the FEC from partisan control is constitutional. They also asked for a preliminary injunction enjoining the Trump administration from applying part of the executive order to the FEC and its commissioners. 'Americans are legally guaranteed fair elections with impartial referees — not a system where Donald Trump can dictate campaign rules he wants from the White House,' the plaintiffs wrote in a statement. 'Democrats will use every tool at our disposal, including aggressively confronting Trump's illegal actions in the courts, to defend Americans' right to free and fair elections.' But government attorneys told the judge that the Trump administration has no plans to apply the executive order to the FEC. The judge said he can't conclude from the text of the executive order alone that Trump or Attorney General Pam Bondi are on the verge of taking such an 'extraordinary step.' The order doesn't single out the FEC and applies broadly to all executive branch employees, the judge concluded. 'The Court does not doubt that the committees would have cause for profound concern were the FEC's independence to be compromised,' he wrote. 'Given the FEC's central role in overseeing parties and campaigns, a compromise of its independence would pose an immense threat to our democratic elections, for all the reasons Congress established the FEC's independence in the first place.' The portion of the executive order challenged by the lawsuit has raised particular concern among campaign finance watchdogs, who call it a conflict of interest. Congress created the FEC in 1974 after the Watergate scandal with the goal of having it operate independently. 'This was not a hypothetical concern,' plaintiffs' attorney David Fox said during an April 9 hearing. 'And it's not a hypothetical concern today.' Justice Department attorney Jeremy Newman said the plaintiffs' concerns are based on mere speculation that the FEC may take a regulatory action that they oppose. 'There is no live controversy here,' Newman told the judge. 'The commission is conducting its business as it was two weeks ago, two months ago, two years ago,' FEC attorney James McGinley said during the hearing. Trevor Potter, a former Republican FEC commissioner and founder of the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center, said the FEC is responsible for enforcing the law against the president 'as both a candidate and as a holder of federal office.' 'It is crucial that the agency retain its independence from the White House, so it is able to hold the president — any president — and their political party accountable,' Potter said in a statement. ___ Swenson reported from New York.
Global News
43 minutes ago
- Global News
Elon Musk calls Trump's ‘big, beautiful' tax bill a ‘disgusting abomination'
The chasm between Elon Musk and U.S. President Donald Trump appears to be widening, as the former lashed out at the latter's signature budget bill, calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' The billionaire, who just wrapped up a stint as a special government employee for the Trump administration, posted on his social media platform X Tuesday, calling Trump's bill a 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk wrote. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 3, 2025 Story continues below advertisement Musk, who had previously criticized the proposed legislation, quipping that it could be big or beautiful but not both, added on X: 'It will massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt.' He continued: 'Congress is making America bankrupt.' Get breaking National news For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen. Sign up for breaking National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Musk, who donated a quarter-billion dollars to help fund Trump's reelection campaign last year, left the White House last week, leaving behind his role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). His comments echo ones he made last week, days before departing his post, where he told CBS he was 'disappointed' by Trump's so-called 'big, beautiful' bill, saying it 'undermines' the work he put into helping cut government spending. He described the legislation, which includes a mix of tax cuts and enhanced immigration enforcement, as a 'massive spending bill' that will ultimately increase the federal deficit. 'I think a bill can be big or it could be beautiful,' Musk said. 'But I don't know if it could be both.' Story continues below advertisement The package, titled the 'One Big Beautiful Bill Act,' would cut taxes by US$3.75 trillion but also increase deficits by $2.4 trillion over the next decade, according to an analysis released Wednesday by the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO). The CBO also estimates an increase of 10.9 million people without health insurance under the bill by 2034, including 1.4 million who are in the country without legal status in state-funded programs. The package would reduce federal outlays, or spending, by nearly $1.3 trillion over that period, the budget office said. The legislation — which still needs to pass the Senate — would extend Trump's signature 2017 tax cuts, boost border security spending, impose work requirements on Medicaid and roll back clean energy tax credits. Story continues below advertisement 'Republicans cry crocodile tears over the debt when Democrats are in charge — but explode it when they're in power,' said Rep. Brendan Boyle of Pennsylvania, the top Democrat on the House Budget Committee. 'In the words of Elon Musk,' Boyle said, 'this bill is a 'disgusting abomination.'' According to Politico, Republican allies close to the White House are privately arguing that Musk's attacks on the megabill stem from the fact that it harms the tech billionaire's business interests, including his electric vehicle company, Tesla. 'The West Wing is perplexed, unenthused, and disappointed' with Musk, one anonymous White House staffer told the outlet. The legislation terminates multiple tax credits that Tesla — as one of the largest electric vehicle manufacturers in America — currently qualifies for, Politico notes, and the passing of the bill as it currently stands means Tesla's $11.4 billion in regulatory credits would expire at the end of this year. — With files from The Associated Press
Winnipeg Free Press
44 minutes ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
3 surprising market winners in 2025
Investors brave enough to peek at their account statements know that it's been a rocky 2025. Even before tariff-related volatility, DeepSeek AI's launch clouded the major technology theme that powered the market in 2023 and 2024, as AI stocks entered a bear market in March. But there have been equity gains to be had in 2025. When I look at year-to-date returns across indexes, I notice a few surprising stars: European stocks, Latin America, and real estate investment trusts. The common thread that connects the three? All had been underperformers in prior years. European stocks have been made great again Morningstar's European stock index is riding high this year, as the macroeconomic environment has been improving. The financial-services sector, in particular, is a key beneficiary. Then there's Germany's newfound interest in deficit spending and the continent's focus on military self-sufficiency, spurred by the Donald Trump administration. US tariff announcements caused sharp selloffs in Europe, but the recovery has been V-shaped. A weakening US dollar has magnified European equity gains for unhedged US investors. It doesn't hurt that the European Central Bank and the Bank of England have actually been cutting interest rates. My research and investment colleagues have called Europe 'the most attractive developed-markets region globally,' making European stocks worthy of inclusion in a diversified portfolio. Latin America: Can the revival last? South of the US border, stocks are rallying. Morningstar's Latin American equities index is up more than 22% so far in 2025, thanks to Brazil, Mexico, and the smaller markets of Colombia and Chile. Here, too, a weakening dollar has boosted equity returns for unhedged US investors. This marks quite a turnaround from losses of more than 25% in US dollar terms in 2024. Brazil, for its part, faces serious fiscal challenges. In Mexico, sentiment was dented by election results on both sides of the border. Coming into the year, my colleagues on Morningstar's research and investment team identified Brazil as the highest potential global equity market for the coming 10 years. Latin American stocks are volatile but could hold more upside. REITs, especially those outside the US, outperform Real estate investment trusts are also up double digits this year outside the US. Property sectors in many geographies are vibrant, bolstered by low or falling interest rates. What about the US? The Morningstar US REIT Index is well behind the Morningstar Global Markets ex-US REIT Index in 2025, but it's in positive territory, ahead of the broad US equity market. US interest rates that appear to be staying higher for longer are seen as a negative for real estate. That said, REIT yields are attractive, and property is a 'real asset' that can act as an inflation hedge. Diversification assures exposure to unloved asset classes US mega-cap technology-oriented stocks did so well for so long that many investors thought they were the only game in town. Coming into 2025, it was hard to envision how the Magnificent Seven could ever be knocked off their perch. The rise of artificial intelligence, widely viewed as 'bigger than the internet,' seemed inexorable. No one saw DeepSeek AI coming, and few predicted the degree to which tariffs would disrupt. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. Gravity is a powerful force in investing, too. US stocks, especially on the growth side of the market, posted returns in 2023 and 2024 that far exceeded their historical levels. Their losses in 2025 can be seen as a reversion to the mean, or a return to long-term averages. The surprising winners of 2025 show that investment performance is dynamic. Contrarian bets can be profitable, though they can also take time to pay off. Investors who diversify by geography, style, and market capitalization are also well placed to benefit from leadership change. ___ This article was provided to The Associated Press by Morningstar. For more markets content, go to Dan Lefkovitz is a strategist for Morningstar Indexes
