Pete Hegseth's news conference made one thing clear – but two questions still need answering
Pete Hegseth's angry news conference, where the US defence secretary roundly abused those media outlets and individuals who didn't agree with him, certainly told us one thing.
That when reliable information eventually emerges from the battle damage assessment of the US attack on Iran's Fordow nuclear plant, it won't be accepted by everyone.
The whole issue has suddenly become politically toxic in Washington and will doubtless be fed into the spin dryer of vitriolic commentary and assertion that has been the most stand-out feature of this second Trump administration.
But what we did find out from the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, General Dan Caine, was that the GBU-57 bunker buster bombs had been designed in some secrecy with exactly this sort of target in mind.
Trump-Iran live:
We also learned they all worked as per the test simulations, and that 12 were fired at six separate targets at Fordow and another two at a single target at the Natanz nuclear facility.
But over how to characterise the damage done in these attacks is really just a semantic spat. The two key questions are rather different.
Firstly, will the Iranians decide to give up their quest for a nuclear weapon as a result of this attack, as the Syrians did in 2007 when the Israelis destroyed their Al Kibar nuclear reactor?
Or else will they go hell for leather for a nuclear weapon, as Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein did after the Israelis destroyed his nuclear reactor in 1981?
Read more:
And secondly, if the Iranians decide to go again for a nuclear weapon, how long will it be before they are back at the nuclear threshold, where they were less than a month ago? Will it be within a year? Or five years? Or longer?
When we have an answer to those two questions, then we can put some real perspective on whether the US bombing has really been a success.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
14 minutes ago
- New York Times
Intelligence Agencies Race to Evaluate Iran's Nuclear Program
The Pentagon's top leaders held a news conference today to celebrate the U.S. bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities. The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen. Dan Caine, said it took 15 years of planning to execute the strikes, which were carried out by pilots in seven B-2 bombers that launched 30,000-pound weapons down Iran's ventilation shafts. When asked whether the military believed that the nuclear sites had been obliterated, as President Trump has repeatedly claimed, Caine said he would leave that to the intelligence community. Standing beside Caine, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth emphasized that the initial assessment from his department's intelligence agency, which suggested that Iran's program was set back only a few months, was a 'low confidence' report. Hegseth instead highlighted comments from the head of the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog, who said that the centrifuges at the Fordo uranium enrichment plant in Iran are 'no longer operational.' In a video message that appeared to be his first public statement since the strikes, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, congratulated Iranians for what he called a victory over Israel and the U.S. Khamenei, 86, had not been heard from publicly in a week, raising questions about his health and whereabouts. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trumps drop 'Made in the USA' label for new phone and a debate ensues: How to define 'made'?
NEW YORK (AP) — When the Trump family unveiled a new phone before a giant American flag at its headquarters earlier this month, the pitch was simple and succinct, packed with pure patriotism: 'Made in the U.S.A.' The Trumps are apparently having second thoughts. How about 'proudly American'? Those are the two words that have replaced the 'Made in the USA' pitch that just a few days ago appeared on the website where customers can pre-order the so-called T-1 gold-toned phones with an American flag etched on the back. Elsewhere on the site, other vague terms are now being used, describing the $499 phone as boasting an 'American-Proud Design' and 'brought to life right here in the U.S.A.' The Federal Trade Commission requires that items labeled 'Made in USA' be 'all or virtually all' produced in the U.S. and several firms have been sued over misusing the term. The Trump Organization has not explained the change and has not responded to a request for comment. Neither did an outside public relations firm handling the Trumps' mobile phone business, including a request to confirm a statement made to another media outlet. 'T1 phones are proudly being made in America,' said Trump Mobile spokesman Chris Walker, according to USA Today. 'Speculation to the contrary is simply inaccurate.' The language change on the website was first reported by the news site The Verge. An expert on cell phone technology, IDC analyst Francisco Jeronimo, said he's not surprised the Trump family has dropped the 'Made in the USA' label because it's nearly impossible to build one here given the higher cost and lack of infrastructure to do so. But, of course, you can claim to do it. 'Whether it is possible or not to build this phone in the US depends on what you consider 'build,'" Jeronimo said. 'If it's a question of assembling components and targeting small volumes, I suppose it's somehow possible. You can always get the components from China and assemble them by hand somewhere.' 'You're going to have phones that are made right here in the United States of America,' said Trump's son Eric to Fox News recently, adding, 'It's about time we bring products back to our great country.' The Trump family has flown the American flag before with Trump-branded products of suspicious origin, including its 'God Bless the USA' Bibles, which an Associated Press investigation last year showed were printed in China. The Trump phone is part of a bigger family mobile business plan designed to tap into MAGA enthusiasm for the president. The two sons running the business, Eric and Don Jr., announced earlier this month that they would offer mobile phone plans for $47.45 a month, a reference to their father's status as the 45th and 47th president. The call center, they said, will be in the U.S., too. 'You're not calling up call centers in Bangladesh,' Eric Trump said on Fox News. 'We're doing it out of St. Louis, Missouri.' The new service has been blasted by government ethics experts for a conflict of interest, given that President Donald Trump oversees the Federal Communications Commission that regulates the business and is investigating phone service companies that are now Trump Mobile rivals. Trump has also threatened to punish cell phone maker Apple, now a direct competitor, threatening to slap 25% tariffs on devices because of its plans to make most of its U.S. iPhones in India. ___
Los Angeles Times
15 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Mexico disputes U.S. money laundering charges against banks allegedly linked to fentanyl trafficking
MEXICO CITY — President Trump's vow to 'wage war' on drug cartels has resulted in bombshell accusations of money-laundering against three Mexican financial institutions — allegations that produced a defiant pushback from Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum. 'There's no proof, just words,' a clearly agitated Sheinbaum told reporters on Thursday. 'There has to be proof to know if there was money laundering or not. Therefore, we don't deny it or accept it.' A day earlier, the U.S. Department of the Treasury issued what it called 'historic' sanctions against CiBanco, Intercam Banco and Vector Casa de Bolsa. The department accused the three of laundering millions of dollars in narco-cash to facilitate the trafficking of fentanyl and other synthetic opioids into the United States. The orders 'affirm Treasury's commitment to using all tools at our disposal to counter the threat posed by criminal and terrorist organizations,' Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a news release. The Treasury Department move would largely prohibit U.S. financial institutions from dealing with the three sanctioned entities, effectively shutting them out from access to the world's largest market. The Treasury accused the three firms of laundering funds for various Mexican drug cartels and 'facilitating payments for the procurement of precursor chemicals needed to produce fentanyl.' U.S. authorities say Mexican cartels use chemicals imported from China to produce fentanyl in clandestine laboratories and then smuggle the potent opioid into the United States. Black-market fentanyl has led to tens of thousands of overdose deaths in the United States, officials say. Sheinbaum has been widely lauded for her non-confrontational, 'cool-headed' approach with the Trump administration, despite many disagreements — including on Trump's imposition of 25% tariffs on some Mexican imports, a levy meant to prompt Mexico to crack down further on fentanyl smuggling. But Sheinbaum signaled her clear displeasure with Treasury's punitive actions. 'Mexico is not subordinate to anyone,' Sheinbaum said. 'We coordinate, collaborate — we have said this many times — but we will not subordinate ourselves.' In Mexico, some analysts have called the Treasury moves a broadside against Mexico's economic well-being. U.S. authorities have frequently sanctioned Mexican companies and individuals for alleged links to drug smuggling, but experts say targeting of banks is much less frequent. 'The accusation is the gravest news for the Mexican financial system in decades and represents a point of no return for these three firms,' wrote columnist Carlos Mota of the El Heraldo de México newspaper. 'The entire Mexican financial system entered into shock.' But the Treasury said that 'any burden and disruption should be relatively minimal,' since none of the three firms is a dominant player in Mexico. All institutions — two banks and a brokerage house, all medium-sized firms — denied any wrongdoing. Vector Casa de Bolsa said it 'categorically rejected any imputation that compromises its institutional integrity.' Vector manages about $11 billion in total assets, according to U.S. officials. The case against Vector has drawn special scrutiny in Mexico because of the firm's ties to Alfonso Romo, a businessman who served for two years as chief of staff for former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, Sheinbaum's predecessor, mentor and the founder of Mexico's dominant Morena political bloc. After leaving the chief of staff position, Romo remained a top economic advisor to López Obrador. Mexican media accounts have described Romo as the honorary president and co-founder of Vector. Romo has not commented publicly. According to Mexican media reports, Mexico's current finance minister, Edgar Amador, is a former analyst with Vector. Among other allegations against Vector, the Treasury said that from 2013 to 2016 'a suspected Sinaloa cartel money mule' transferred more than $1.5 million to the brokerage firm. Vector was also allegedly linked to millions of dollars in Sinaloa cartel payouts to Genaro García Luna, Mexico's former top federal security official. García Luna was convicted in 2023 U.S. district court of colluding with the Sinaloa mob and receiving millions of dollars in graft. He is serving a 38-year prison sentence. The U.S. order against the three Mexican financial institutions is to take effect in 21 days. It is a civil action and does not involve criminal charges. Special correspondent Cecilia Sánchez Vidal contributed to this report.
