Joshlin Smith accused elect not to take stand, state their case
Jacquen Appollis, Steveno van Rhyn and Kelly Smith face charges of human trafficking and kidnapping.
Image: Robin-Lee Francke/IOL
AS the State closed its case in the Joshlin Smith matter on Wednesday, accused Jacquen 'Boeta' Appollis and Steveno van Rhyn both elected to not give evidence or call witnesses.
Earlier, the State called Colonel Riaan Morris from the provincial Commercial Crimes Unit, who played six videos for the court.
The videos include Kelly Smith being filmed on Sunday, March 3, 2024, at an open prayer service being held for Joshlin.
The other videos also show Smith having a meeting at the Spur with now Minister Gayton McKenzie.
A few videos of the meeting with McKenzie are shown.
He was also provided with two links, which led to two videos of McKenzie, seated in the back of a vehicle, where he questions Van Rhyn about his whereabouts and what happened to Joshlin.
As the State closed its case, Judge Nathan Erasmus was told that the defence counsel would bring forth Section 174 applications.
A Section 174 application, under South Africa's Criminal Procedure Act, allows an accused person to be discharged if the court believes there is no evidence to support a conviction at the close of the State's case.
Fanie Harmse, the legal representative for Appollis, chose not to bring forth an application.
Van Rhyn's lawyer, Nobuhle Mkabayi, brought an application.
'The defence will argue accused two has no case to answer. All state witnesses who testified didn't bring any evidence that this court can come to the conclusion that accused two has committed an offence. It will be unfair if the accused is only brought into the dock to supplement the State's case,' she submitted.
When Judge Erasmus mentioned that State witness Laurentia Lombaard implicated van Rhyn, Mkabayi shot back, stating she was 'not credible'.
'Your client made a statement which I found admissible, that he admitted to being with when Joshlin was taken away, and he had gone back to find out what his cut was,' Judge Erasmus said.
'I strongly submit there is no evidence,' Mkabayi submitted.
Smith's lawyer, Rinesh Sivnarain, also brought forth an application to have charges discharged against his client, submitting the case had not brought enough prima facie evidence against his client.
'In regards to human trafficking, (there was) only one witness, Laurentia Lombaard, and I submit that her evidence was of such poor quality that it should be rejected in its entirety,' he submitted.
Sivnarain cited previous cases where credibility is questioned, arguing for the court to consider credibility.
'I am of the view that there is no evidence because of the inconsistencies and that her evidence should be rejected.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Friends and family desperately search for missing Comrades Marathon runner, Moira Harding
A search is under way for Moira Harding, a female runner who vanished after completing the Comrades Marathon, in Durban on Sunday. Harding is believed to have completed the race just before 5pm and has not been seen since. A family friend confirmed to IOL that Harding is from Kommetjie in Cape Town.
IOL News
7 hours ago
- IOL News
Prosecutors remain hopeful in Joshlin Smith case despite life sentences for kidnappers
Just over a week ago, Kelly Smith, Jacquen Appollis, and Steveno Van Rhyn were sentenced to life imprisonment by the Western Cape High Court for their roles in the abduction and trafficking of Joshlin, who was reported missing on February 19, 2024. State prosecutors in the high-profile kidnapping and trafficking case of six-year-old Joshlin Smith say they remain hopeful the child will still be found, despite the conviction and sentencing of the three individuals held responsible for her disappearance. Just over a week ago, Kelly Smith, Jacquen Appollis, and Steveno Van Rhyn were sentenced to life imprisonment by the Western Cape High Court for their roles in the abduction and trafficking of Joshlin, who was reported missing on February 19, 2024. The little girl has not been seen since that day, and her disappearance continues to haunt both investigators and the wider South African public. Prosecutors Advocate Zelda Swanepoel and Advocate Aradhana Heeramun led the state's case in the matter. Speaking to the media following the sentencing, both prosecutors described the outcome as bittersweet, saying justice had been served in part, but that the fight was far from over. 'We are still hopeful that something will break and we can solve this case by finding Joshlin,' said Heeramun. 'Every single lead is followed up. At no stage did we say this is a cold case. It is still a very active and live investigation.' Despite the court's decision bringing a degree of legal closure to a year-long investigation, Swanepoel emphasised that the most important part of the case remains unresolved: finding Joshlin.
eNCA
a day ago
- eNCA
Prosecutors' pyrrhic victory with Joshlin still missing
CAPE TOWN - It's been just over a week since Kelly Smith, Jacquen Appollis and Steveno Van Rhyn were sentenced to life behind bars for the kidnapping and trafficking of Joshlin Smith. The little girl was reported missing on 19 February last year. She has still not been found. This marked a test case in South Africa as the state had no victim to present to court. eNCA reporter Ayesha Ismail sat down with the two prosecutors who secured the three convictions. This as lawyers for some of those convicted, indicate they'll be appealing the sentence. Different criteria are used when deciding on allocating a specific case to a prosecutor. As the National Prosecuting Authorities head for trafficking in persons in the Western Cape, Advocate Zelda Swanepoel was the obvious choice for the Joshlin Smith case. Swanepoel needed a strong team to help her crack this case and included Advocate Heeramun during the trial. Swanepoel said, "H ow Advocate Heeramun became involved because at the time I was her advisor we are in the organised component of the DPPs office and it was the logical choice to include her as part of the team she has dealt with high profile cases in the past and I believed we could make a good team and we brought different virtues and capabilities to the team.' The two prosecutors understood the challenges of not having a victim to testify. Swanepoel explained, "It was the first time that we used trafficking in persons, where a child was sold and had not yet been recovered. There were three other previous reported cases, two in the High Court in Pretoria and one in Pietermartizburg.' Those three cases involved traps or undercover operations. Police were notified of a transaction taking place. A police agent negotiated the sale and the accused were arrested the minute the child was handed over. This was the first case where there was no victim or body to present to court. The focus had to be on the sale of the child. Heermun said, 'We then had to decide on the credibility, on the admissibility, and how to best present it in court." "You have to anticipate every possible angle the defence might come at your case and prepare in fact and in law for those arguments.' Balancing the evidence and the emotions wasn't always easy. VIZ@ the two prosecutors in court Swanepoel says trafficking in persons is the most challenging case to prove in court due to the vulnerability of the victims. She says prosecutors have to be strong for their victims. So, was Joshlin sold to a sangoma by her mother for R20,000 or was she taken to a woman called Ma Kalima by Jacquen Appolis and Steveno Van Rhyn on Kelly Smith's instructions? Swanepoel said, "Our argument is it's irrelevant to whom Joshlin was delivered because that is in fact the only contentious part in the evidence." "It was however, and this is the evidence that the court accepted, that there was an agreement, there was a plan to sell Joshlin, there was an agreement to sell Joshlin, there was even an agreement on the price. All four of the parties, and I include Miss Lombaard, all four of the parties agreed to the selling of Joshlin. All agreed to the benefit they were going to get and the roles they were going to play and that is what the court found .'
