logo
Supreme Court Orders Maine House to Restore Voting Power to Censured Lawmaker, for Now

Supreme Court Orders Maine House to Restore Voting Power to Censured Lawmaker, for Now

New York Times20-05-2025

The Supreme Court on Tuesday ordered Maine legislators to temporarily restore the voting power of a state lawmaker after she had been censured for a social media post that criticized transgender athletes' participation in girls' sports.
The order was unsigned and did not provide the court's reasoning, as is typical in such emergency applications. No vote count was listed, but Justice Sonia Sotomayor noted she would have denied the application, and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote a dissent.
The court order provided no further explanation on next steps, but the legislator, State Representative Laurel Libby, had asked in her application to immediately be allowed to participate in the current legislative session, which ends in June.
Lawmakers had censured Ms. Libby, a Republican from Auburn, in February after she wrote a Facebook post criticizing the participation of a transgender athlete who had won a high school pole-vaulting competition. Ms. Libby included the name and photos of the student in the post, which went viral.
The formal reprimand of Ms. Libby prevented her from voting or speaking on the House floor until she apologized for the post. Lawmakers, in a party-line vote, had also found her in violation of the state's Legislative Code of Ethics, which includes a provision asserting that a legislator is 'entrusted with the security, safety, health, prosperity, respect and general well-being of those the legislator serves and with whom the legislator serves.'
Ms. Libby filed a lawsuit on March 11 in federal court in Maine, suing the House speaker, Ryan Fecteau, a Democrat. She claimed that her punishment violated the Constitution by stripping 'a duly elected Republican member' of the 'right to speak and vote on the House floor.'
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

This family-owned toy company is challenging Trump's tariffs before the Supreme Court
This family-owned toy company is challenging Trump's tariffs before the Supreme Court

Fast Company

time31 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

This family-owned toy company is challenging Trump's tariffs before the Supreme Court

An Illinois toy company challenged President Donald Trump's tariffs in front of the Supreme Court on Tuesday in a long shot bid to press the justices to quickly decide whether they are legal. Learning Resources Inc. filed an appeal asking the Supreme Court to take up the case soon rather than let it continue to play out in lower courts. The company argues the Republican president illegally imposed tariffs under an emergency powers law rather than getting approval from Congress. While the company won an early victory in a lower court, the order is on hold as an appeals court considers a similar ruling putting a broader block on Trump's tariffs. The appeals court has allowed Trump to continue collecting tariffs under the emergency powers law ahead of arguments set for late July. The company argued in court documents the case can't wait that long, 'in light of the tariffs' massive impact on virtually every business and consumer across the Nation, and the unremitting whiplash caused by the unfettered tariffing power the President claims.' The Supreme Court is typically reluctant to take up cases before appeals courts have decided them, lowering the odds that the justices will agree to hear it as quickly as the company is asking. Still, Learning Resources CEO Rick Woldenberg said tariffs and uncertainty are taking a major toll now. He's looking ahead to the back-to-school and holiday seasons, when the company usually makes most of its sales for the year. 'All the people that are raising their prices are doing it with a sense of dread,' Woldenberg told The Associated Press. But, 'we do not have a choice. We absolutely do not have a choice.' Attorneys for Learning Resources and sister company hand2mind, suggested the court could consider whether to take up the case before the end of the term in June and hear arguments when their next term begins in the fall, a relatively quick timetable. The Trump administration has defended the tariffs by arguing that the emergency powers law gives the president the authority to regulate imports during national emergencies and that the country's longtime trade deficit qualifies as a national emergency. Trump has framed tariffs as a tool to lure factories back to America, raise money for the Treasury Department and strike more favorable trade agreements with other countries. 'The Trump administration is legally using the powers granted to the executive branch by the Constitution and Congress to address our country's national emergencies of persistent goods trade deficits and drug trafficking. If the Supreme Court decides to hear this unfounded legal challenge, we look forward to ultimately prevailing,' said White House spokesperson Kush Desai. Woldenberg said he's putting 'enormous resources' into shifting his company's supply base but the process is time-consuming and uncertain. 'I think that our case raises uniquely important questions that this administration won't accept unless the Supreme Court rules on them,' he said. Based in Vernon Hills, Illinois, the family-owned company's products include the Pretend & Play Calculator Cash Register for $43.99 and Botley the Coding Robot for $57.99. __

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store