
Black female mayor unleashes on white voters after being booted from office
A Missouri mayor publicly criticized her white voters, accusing them of turning their backs on Black women in leadership after voting her out in favor of a new, white candidate.
Tishaura Jones, the former St. Louis mayor, suffered a staggering 28-point defeat to Mayor Cara Spencer last month, marking one of the worst losses for an existing mayor in the city's last 50 years, St. Louis Post-Dispatch reported.
However, the 53-year-old politician blamed her loss to racial bias amongst her voters, accusing them of booting her from office because she is Black.
'I think St. Louis needs to have a conversation with itself about why it no longer trusts Black women to lead,' Jones said in an interview with St. Louis Public Radio on Thursday.
'My dad always told me - and it's an old phrase - that Black women have to work twice as hard to get half as much,' she added.
'Well, I feel like we work five times as hard and get nothing in return.'
Just four years ago, voters from St. Louis's north side and its white progressive neighborhoods rallied behind Jones, propelling her into the mayor's office.
Fast forward to last month's re-election, and Jones' voter base had ultimately crumbled - white progressive neighborhoods that once championed her shifted their support to Spencer, the very candidate Jones defeated in 2021.
Explanations for the shift varied - disappointment in her activist base, missteps with grant programs, etc.
However, voters on both the north and south sides repeatedly voiced frustration with Jones' handling of basic city services - from trash pickup to pothole repairs - as well as her response to the massive snowstorm that hit the state in January.
What may have swayed voters was Spencer's straightforward yet resonant promise to St. Louis: a swift return 'back to basics', Post-Dispatch reported.
Yet Jones believes that even her Black voter base on the north side turned away from her, claiming they held unrealistic expectations during her four years in office.
In the radio interview published Thursday, Jones expressed frustration that voters overlooked a major achievement during her tenure - the city's homicide rate dropped by 40 percent from a record high in 2020 to a 10-year low last year.
'That's what the people wanted back in 2021,' Jones' said during the segment. 'And then they moved the goalposts to potholes and trash and snow removal.'
She also emphasized her efforts to begin revitalizing north St. Louis after decades of decline, but said she was never truly given the opportunity to deliver lasting change for city residents.
'There's no patience there,' Jones said. 'The expectations there are so high to deliver and deliver immediately to address the decades of neglect in four years, and that is impossible.'
In last month's re-election, Jones' voter base had ultimately crumbled - white progressive neighborhoods that once championed her shifted their support to Spencer, the very candidate Jones defeated in 2021
But for Jones, it wasn't just about the city's day-to-day issues. She believes her loss had far more to do with race - and the face that Spencer is a white woman - than with her record in office.
During the interview, Jones shared that when she campaigned in south city - a neighborhood that supported her in the previous election - no one could provide a clear reason for why they were voting her out of office.
'And if you can't give me a reason or something that I have particularly done, then the only default is race,' Jones said, according to the Post-Dispatch.
Jones' ousting follows the loss of three other Black female leaders from office, a point she highlighted during the interview.
Cori Bush, a former US Representative, was voted out of office in 2024. Darlene Green, the former Comptroller, also lost re-election last month. Kim Gardner, the former circuit attorney, resigned in 2023 in the midst of a controversy.
Jones asserted that not only do the residents of St. Louis need to reflect on their views of Black women in power, but the Democratic Party - especially the progressive Democrats - must also have that same conversation.
She said she wasn't sure about the future of the progressive movement she once led, adding that she didn't know anyone who could carry on the work she had already started.
According to her, others lack consistency and loyalty, according to the Post-Dispatch.
Despite her comments on the radio show, Jones revealed that she has mostly tuned out of politics since her defeat, Post-Dispatch reported. Although she teased a 'comeback' on social media, she never hinted at anything political.
Additionally, she shared that she's almost finished with a children's book she began writing while in office and is now exploring new career paths, including consulting, writing another book or starting a podcast.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
The reason why Americans like William and Kate more than Meghan and Harry
Americans like Prince William more than Prince Harry - and the Princess of Wales more than Meghan Markle - because the Sussexes' have chosen celebrity and self-martyrdom over royal duty, it was claimed today. A recent YouGov poll in the US revealed Prince William enjoys a 63 per cent favourability rating among Americans - comfortably above Harry's rating of 56 per cent. The Princess of Wales has a 49 per cent rating in the US compared to the only American on the list, Meghan Markle, who has a 41 per cent rating. Even worse for the Duchess of Sussex, 25 per cent of Americans view her unfavourably compared to six per cent for her British sister in law, best known as Kate Middleton across the Atlantic. UK-US politics expert and policy maker Lee Cohen has said that the polls show that Americans prefer the 'unshowy sense of duty' of the Wales' over the 'self-promoting' Sussexes. He believes that Meghan and Harry have come to 'personify grievance, vanity and betrayal'. 'Even in a land that rejected monarchy, public sentiment favours hands down the Prince and Princess of Wales over the rogue runaways who swapped Buckingham for Beverly Hills', he said. Mr Cohen is a trade expert and senior Fellow of the London Centre for Policy Research who worked in Congress. Having worked in both countries he has also become a commentator for issues on both sides of the Atlantic. Writing for The Spectator US, he said that Americans are tiring of Meghan and Harry, who is viewed negatively by one in five in the US - but is more popular than his wife. 'In an age of cultural decay and institutional collapse, Americans crave continuity. We are drawn to symbols of permanence and poise', he said. 'William and Kate, with their unshowy sense of duty, offer exactly that. The Sussexes, by contrast, offer only the fleeting buzz of celebrity – and worse, a corrosive kind of self-martyrdom disguised as liberation. Fame is not the same as honour. Accepting disingenuous awards, peddling lifestyle brands and monetizing private grievances may pay the bills, but it commands revulsion rather than respect. True nobility lies in service, not self-promotion'. He said that the Sussexes, in 'casting off' royal duties, have also lost their 'mystique' and Americans are 'running out of patience'. 'William and Kate, by simply showing up, remind us of a forgotten truth: that dignity, loyalty and service are not relics of the past but virtues still worth aspiring to. 'As Harry and Meghan sink into self-inflicted irrelevance, the Wales' soar – not because they bully nor shout the loudest, but because they understand Queen Elizabeth's example of the power of humble duty done well'. The most popular royal overall is William and Harry's late mother Princess Diana, who died in 1997, with a 79 per cent positive rating and 4 per cent negative. The late Queen Elizabeth II, who died in 2022, is in second place with a 73 per cent positive and 8 per cent negative ranking. William is in third overall and Harry fourth. The Prince of Wales has a 63 per cent positivity rating in America and 10 per cent negative, which puts him in first place among living royals. Some 56 per cent of US adults have a positive view of the Duke of Sussex while 21 per cent a negative opinion, according to the YouGov study for The Times. The Princess of Wales has a 49 per cent positive rating and 6 per cent negative All the senior royals are more popular than Meghan, the only US citizen on the list, whose ratings are 41 per cent positive and 25 per cent negative. The poll of 1,296 US adults was carried out between April 21 and 23, before Harry's bombshell BBC interview in which he called for 'reconciliation' with his family. Some 61 per cent have not changed their opinion on the couple since their move to the US, but 17 per cent said it was now worse and 10 per cent said it was now better. Yesterday it emerged that Prince Harry sought advice from Princess Diana 's brother about changing his family name to Spencer. Sources told the Mail on Sunday the Duke of Sussex actively explored ways to assume his mother's surname – a move that would have involved ditching Mountbatten-Windsor, used by his children, Prince Archie and Princess Lilibet. It is understood he discussed the issue with Earl Spencer – whose family seat is Althorp in Northamptonshire – during a rare visit to Britain, but was told that the legal hurdles were insurmountable. 'They had a very amicable conversation and Spencer advised him against taking such a step,' said a friend of Harry. Nevertheless, the fact that he consulted the Earl over the issue – a proposal that would dismay his brother and father – is a vivid expression of the toxic rift with his family. Mountbatten-Windsor is the surname available to descendants of the late Queen Elizabeth and Prince Philip. It combines the Royal Family 's name of Windsor and the Duke of Edinburgh 's adopted surname. On their birth certificates, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's children are Archie Harrison Mountbatten-Windsor and Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. Royal author Tom Bower has claimed that 'Meghan decided her real object in life was to be Diana'. If the name change had succeeded, Meghan's daughter, who is believed to have met the King only once, would have become Lilibet Diana Spencer, a more fulsome tribute to Harry's late mother. The move would be particularly hurtful to King Charles, who cherishes the Mountbatten name just as his father did. A mentor to Prince Philip, the 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma was also a strong influence on his great-nephew, the future King Charles. Philip adopted the Mountbatten name when he became a naturalised British subject and renounced his Greek and Danish royal title in 1947. The Queen and Philip decided in 1960 that they would like their own direct descendants to be known as Mountbatten-Windsor. According to the Government, you do not have to follow a legal process to start using a new name, but it suggests on its official website using a 'deed poll' to apply for or to change official documents such as a passport or driving licence. Names and titles are a highly sensitive subject for the Duke and Duchess of Sussex. They were given their Sussex titles by Queen Elizabeth on the day of their wedding in 2018. Meghan recently insisted her surname is Sussex, correcting a guest on her Netflix cookery and lifestyle programme. In episode two of With Love, Meghan, which was released in March, the 43-year-old former actress was joined by comedienne Mindy Kaling. Meghan told her: 'It's so funny you keep saying 'Meghan Markle' – you know I'm Sussex now.'


The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
China accuses US of ‘seriously violating' trade truce
China has accused the US of 'seriously violating' the fragile US-China detente that has been in place for less than a month since the two countries agreed to pause the trade war that risked upending the global economy. China and the US agreed on 12 May to pause for 90 days the skyrocketing 'reciprocal' tariffs that both countries had placed on the others goods in a frenzied trade war that started a few weeks earlier. Tariffs had reached 125% on each side, which officials feared amounted to virtual embargo on trade between the world's two biggest economies. Donald Trump had hailed the pause as a 'total reset' of US-China relations. But since then, trade negotiations have faltered, with the US complaining that China has not delivered on promises to roll back restrictions on the export of key critical minerals to the US. The US president said on Friday that China had 'totally violated' the agreement. The US Treasury secretary, Scott Bessent, said on Sunday: 'What China is doing is they are holding back products that are essential for the industrial supply chains of India, of Europe. And that is not what a reliable partner does.' During the period of aggressive retaliatory trade measures between the US and China in April, China had restricted the export of certain rare earth minerals and magnets, which are critical for US manufacturing. The restrictions were expected to be relaxed after the 12 May agreement but the process appears to have been patchy at best. Now, US companies, particularly car manufacturers, are reportedly running out of magnets. China hit back on Monday, accusing the US of violating and undermining the agreements reached in Geneva in May, and the consensus between Trump and Xi Jinping, China's president, on their 17 January phone call. China's commerce ministry said on Monday: 'The US has successively introduced a number of discriminatory restrictive measures against China, including issuing export control guidelines for AI chips, stopping the sale of chip design software to China, and announcing the revocation of Chinese student visas.' The ministry said China 'is determined to safeguard its rights and interests' and denied the accusation from the US that it had undermined the 12 May agreement. The US has indicated that another Xi-Trump call is expected soon. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion But outside the trade talks, US-China relations have soured in a number of areas. Last week, China condemned the announcement from the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, that the US would 'aggressively' revoke the visas of Chinese students in his country. And over the weekend, China and the US traded barbs over comments made by the US defence secretary, Pete Hegseth, at a conference in Singapore. Hegseth said that China was potentially an 'imminent' threat, while China's foreign ministry said that his comments were 'filled with provocations and intended to sow division'.


Sky News
42 minutes ago
- Sky News
Eight injured in petrol bomb and 'flamethrower' attack at rally for Hamas-held hostages in Colorado
Why you can trust Sky News Eight people have been injured at a US rally for Israeli hostages after they were attacked by a man with a makeshift flamethrower and petrol bombs. A group of people in Boulder, Colorado, were holding a regular demonstration to raise awareness of Hamas-held hostages in Gaza when they were allegedly targeted by a man who shouted "Free Palestine" on Sunday. The suspect was arrested at the scene. Four women and four men aged between 52 and 88 were injured and transported to hospitals, Boulder police said. Some of them were airlifted to hospital. Authorities had earlier put the count of the injured at six and said at least one of them was in a critical condition. The FBI says the attack was a targeted "act of terrorism" and named the suspect as 45-year-old Mohamed Soliman from El Paso County, Colorado. He was also taken to hospital after the alleged attack. Two senior law enforcement officials told Sky News' US partner network that Soliman is an Egyptian national who seemingly acted alone. They said he has no previous significant contact with law enforcement. The White House described the suspect as an "illegal alien" who had received a work permit under the Biden administration despite overstaying a tourist visa. A large part of downtown Boulder was cordoned off as sniffer dogs and the bomb squad searched for potential devices. However, police currently believe no one else was involved Police chief Steve Redfearn said the attack happened around 1.26pm on Sunday and that initial reports were that "people were being set on fire". He said injuries ranged from "very serious" to "more minor". "When we arrived we encountered multiple victims that were injured, with injuries consistent with burns," Mr Redfearn told the media. The police chief also said he did not believe anyone else was involved. "We're fairly confident we have the lone suspect in custody," he said. Boulder's police chief said the attack happened as a "group of pro- Israel people" were peacefully demonstrating. The walk is held regularly by a volunteer group called Run For Their Lives, which aims to raise awareness of the hostages who remain in Gaza. Video from the scene showed a bare-chested man shouting and clutching two bottles after the attack. Other footage showed him being held down and arrested by police as people doused one of the victims with water. Nearby there appears to be a large black burn mark on the ground. Brooke Coffman, a 19-year-old student, described seeing four women on the ground with burns on their legs. She said one appeared badly burned on most of her body and had been wrapped in a flag. She described seeing a man whom she presumed to be the attacker standing in the courtyard shirtless, holding a glass bottle of clear liquid and shouting. "Everybody is yelling, 'get water, get water,'" Ms Coffman said. Lady on fire 'from head to toe' Another eyewitness, who did not give his name, said he saw the suspect throw Molotov cocktails - an improvised bomb made from a bottle filled with petrol and stuffed with a piece of cloth to use as a fuse. He said: "It was very strange to just hear a crash on the ground of a bottle breaking and then it sounded like a boom and then people started yelling and screaming. "But I saw fire, I saw people screaming and crying and tripping and I saw the attacker - he had three Molotov cocktails. "One of them he threw inside a group and one lady lit on fire from head to toe and then the other four people were also injured in the fire, but not as bad as the first one." The eyewitness continued: "The attacker came out from the bushes and the trees... he threw another cocktail, and on the second one he lit himself on fire - I imagine accidentally. "He seemed to have a bullet proof vest on, or some kind of vest, and then a shirt underneath it. "And after he lit himself on fire he took off the vest and the shirt and he was shirtless. "But he still had his Molotov cocktails in his hands ready to use them... ready to throw them and explode them on people." Lynn Segal, another eyewitness, said: "These shoots of fire, linear, about 20 feet long, spears of fire, two of them at least, came across right into the group, about 15 feet from me." The 72-year-old said two neighbours of hers, a husband and wife in their 80s, were at the demonstration. She added that the wife was one of the victims and appeared to be the most seriously injured. "They're both elders in their 80s, and you can't take something like this assault to your body as easily as someone younger." Ms Segal, who was wearing a "Free Palestine" T-shirt, said she watches the demonstrations to "try and listen" to what the volunteers are "talking about" because she is concerned about the hostages. She added that she is concerned the attack will "divide this community". Another eyewitness told MSNBC that he saw the suspect "lighting people on fire while spraying gasoline on them". Brian, who is himself Jewish and asked that his last name not be made public, added that he saw victims "having their skin melt off their bodies". A statement from Boulder's Jewish community said "an incendiary device was thrown at walkers at the Run for Their Lives walk on Pearl Street as they were raising awareness for the hostages still held in Gaza". Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu later said in a statement this morning: "This attack was aimed against peaceful people who wished to express their solidarity with the hostages held by Hamas, simply because they were Jews. "I trust the United States authorities to prosecute the cold blood perpetrator to the fullest extent of the law and do everything possible to prevent future attacks against innocent civilians. "The antisemitic attacks around the world are a direct result of blood libels against the Jewish state and people, and this must be stopped." US Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, a prominent Jewish Democrat , said it was an antisemitic attack. "This is horrifying, and this cannot continue. We must stand up to antisemitism," he said on X. Boulder is a university city of about 105,000 people on the northwest edge of Denver, in the foothills of the Rocky Mountains. The attack follows the arrest of a Chicago-born man in the fatal shooting of two Israeli embassy employees in Washington DC two weeks ago. Tensions are simmering in the US over Israel's war in Gaza. There has been an increase in antisemitic hate crime, as well as moves by some supporters of Israel to brand pro-Palestinian protests as antisemitic. President Trump's administration has detained protesters without charge and pulled funding from elite universities that have permitted such demonstrations.