Malaysia court allows Attorney-General's application to appeal in jailed ex-PM's legal case
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia's top court on Monday granted the Attorney-General's application to appeal a ruling giving jailed former Prime Minister Najib Razak access to a document he says allows him to serve his remaining prison sentence under house arrest.
Najib, imprisoned for his role in the multi-billion dollar 1MDB scandal, is pursuing a legal bid to compel authorities to confirm the existence of and execute a royal order that he said was issued last year as part of a pardon by the then king, entitling him to serve the remainder of his sentence at home.
In a unanimous decision, a three-member Federal Court bench ruled that the Attorney-General could appeal a lower court's January ruling in favour of Najib's attempt to access the alleged document, with the case to be heard on Jul 1 and 2.
The former premier had his 12-year sentence halved last year in a pardon by then-King Al-Sultan Abdullah Ahmad Shah. Najib said an "addendum order" to the pardon that granted him home detention was ignored by authorities.
The former king's palace has issued a letter saying the document does exist, but Malaysia's law ministry said it has no record of it, its home minister has denied knowledge and Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has said "we did not hide anything".
Najib was found guilty in 2020 of criminal breach of trust and abuse of power for illegally receiving funds misappropriated from a unit of state investor 1Malaysia Development Berhad. He is on trial for corruption in several other 1MDB-linked cases and denies wrongdoing.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
a day ago
- Straits Times
Malaysian political cartoonist's travel ban stirs anger, but police call it a mistake
– The Malaysian government faced accusations of stifling dissent after a June 7 Facebook post by popular local political cartoonist Fahmi Reza Mohd Zarin, saying he had been banned from leaving the country. Backbench MPs, analysts and the public said the ban was unwarranted. But on June 8, the police claimed it was a mistake, caused by 'procedural confusion' in placing him on an observation list. Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim ordered the police to provide an explanation, stating that the government 'respects personal freedom, provided it does not compromise national security or violate any existing laws'. In his Facebook post, Mr Fahmi said he was stopped at immigration at Kuala Lumpur International Airport while on his way to Singapore to see his favourite punk rock band. He claimed an immigration officer told him that Bukit Aman – the Malaysian police headquarters – had prohibited him from travelling abroad. 'I asked, 'Why?'' Mr Fahmi wrote on Facebook. 'The immigration officer replied, 'You need to ask Bukit Aman'. 'What's my offence? 'Only the Bukit Aman police and the Malaysian government can answer'.' His post garnered more than 19,000 reactions, 6,400 comments and 3,300 shares on June 8. Malaysia's police chief Razarudin Husain said Mr Fahmi was not subject to a travel ban, but he is under surveillance as part of an ongoing investigation. No details on the investigation were given. 'There was a confusion during the checkpoint verification process on June 7, which led to the erroneous issuance of a travel ban. The situation is currently under review and appropriate measures will be taken to update the relevant procedures,' Tan Sri Razarudin said in a statement . Mr Fahmi was dissatisfied with the police statement and said he will initiate legal action against the government. 'I did not see any officials dare to be responsible for their error to block my personal freedom of movement... Now it's time for the people to drag the authority into the court,' the activist said. In 2016, Mr Fahmi rose to prominence after caricaturing then Prime Minister Najib Razak as a 'sinister clown' in connection with the multi-billion-dollar 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB) scandal. He was charged with the improper use of network facilities with the intent to offend and annoy others. In July 2019, he was fined RM10,000 (S$3,030). In December 2024, Mr Fahmi was arrested and probed for ridiculing incoming Sabah governor Musa Aman as ' No 1 Corrupter' in a n artwork that depicted him with a RM100 note in place of his tongue. Tun Musa was accused of being involved in a US$63 million (S$81 million) timber kickback scheme during his tenure as Sabah chief minister from 2003 to 2018. But the charges against him were withdrawn in June 2020, causing widespread criticism. On May 29, 2025, the Sabah state government, which has the immigration autonomy , denied Mr Fahmi entry into the state – without giving an explanation. On Mr Fahmi's Facebook post about being denied freedom of travel, Asian Studies professor James Chin of Tasmania University described the Malaysian government's move as authoritarian. 'Silencing dissent and cracking down on political satire is not a national security matter – it's an excuse. Blocking someone from travelling over criticism is authoritarian, plain and simple. 'People are starting to see no real difference between Madani and Barisan Nasional (BN), and it's becoming clearer by the day,' Dr Chin penned in a Facebook post on June 7. Madani refers to Datuk Seri Anwar's slogan for civilised society under his administration. Before coming to federal power in May 2018, the Anwar-led Pakatan Harapan criticised the then-BN government for imposing travel bans on dissidents – most notably political cartoonist Zulkifli Anwar Ulhaque, who goes by the pen name Zunar; then-MP Tony Pua and Miss Maria Chin Abdullah, then chairwoman of the Bersih electoral reform group. Democratic Action Party (DAP) MP Syahredzan Johan stated that a travel ban cannot be imposed without strong justification. Mr Syahredzan, a lawyer who represented Mr Fahmi in the Najib caricature case, noted that the cartoonist had been allowed to travel abroad during the legal proceedings and had always cooperated with the authorities when required. 'If the travel ban is due to an ongoing investigation, such action is unnecessary, as Mr Fahmi is not a flight risk,' the DAP national vice-chairman said in a statement on June 8. Lu Wei Hoong is Malaysia correspondent at The Straits Times, specialising in transport and politics. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
5 days ago
- Straits Times
Six go on trial over London arson attack blamed on Russia's Wagner group
Six go on trial over London arson attack blamed on Russia's Wagner group LONDON - Six men went on trial on Wednesday over an arson attack which prosecutors say was carried out on behalf of Russia's Wagner mercenary group against a business in London that shipped goods to Ukraine. Four of the group are accused of aggravated arson on the Ukrainian-linked premises on an industrial estate in east London last March. Two others face charges of failing to disclose information about terrorist acts. They deny the charges. The goods the business shipped to Ukraine included satellite equipment from Elon Musk's Starlink. Prosecutor Duncan Penny told London's Old Bailey court the arson was "calculated criminality – but it was at the behest of foreign influence". He said that while those on trial may have been acting for "good old-fashioned greed", the men directing them were doing so on behalf of the Wagner group, banned by Britain as a terrorist organisation. Penny said the arson was organised by Dylan Earl, who had contacted Wagner on Telegram and last October admitted a charge of aggravated arson and being reckless as to whether lives would be endangered. Earl also became the first person to be convicted under the new National Security Act (NSA), brought to crack down on hostile activity by foreign states, when he admitted preparatory conduct to carry out acts which endangered life or created a serious risk to the safety of the public in the UK. Another man, Jake Reeves, 23, pleaded guilty in November to charges of aggravated arson and admitted a charge under the NSA of obtaining a material benefit from a foreign intelligence service, the prosecutor told the court. He said Earl and Reeves were also involved in a plot to carry out arson attacks on two other London businesses, a wine bar and a restaurant, and to kidnap the owner. The British authorities have accused Russia or its agents of being behind a number of spy plots and sabotage missions in Britain and across Europe, with the UK's domestic spy chief saying Russian operatives were trying to cause "mayhem". The Kremlin denies any such involvement and says London repeatedly blames it for anything "bad" that happens in Britain. Paul English, 61, Nii Kojo Mensah, 23, Jakeem Rose, 23, and Ugnius Asmena, 20, deny aggravated arson. Dmitrijus Paulauska, 23, and Ashton Evans, 20, deny knowing about terrorist acts but failing to disclose the information. The trial continues. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
5 days ago
- Straits Times
Anwar Ibrahim denied immunity as civil sexual assault suit set for June 16.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim says the lawsuit may be "politically motivated, or institutionally disruptive.' ST PHOTO: JASON QUAH KUALA LUMPUR - Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar on June 4 failed in his bid for immunity from liability while in office, paving the way for a civil lawsuit involving allegations of sexual assault against him to proceed on June 16. The High Court rejected Datuk Seri Anwar's application to refer eight constitutional questions to the Federal Court. High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain ruled that the questions did not warrant immediate constitutional referral and that the lawsuit could proceed through the regular civil process. 'From a judicial perspective, the proposed questions do not appear to meet the threshold of genuine constitutional controversy,' she said. There is 'no express constitutional or statutory immunity accorded to a sitting Prime Minister for private acts pre-office', she added. In response to the decision, Mr Anwar said in a statement: 'This matter has never been about seeking personal immunity or escaping legal scrutiny. It concerns the integrity of our constitutional system and the need to ensure that high public office is protected from litigation that may be strategically timed, politically motivated, or institutionally disruptive.' The lawsuit, brought by Mr Anwar's former research assistant Muhammed Yusoff Rawther, concerns an alleged incident that took place in 2018, before Mr Anwar's appointment as prime minister in November 2022. Mr Yusoff, now 31, claimed to have suffered serious physical, psychological and social trauma as a result of the incident. Mr Anwar, 77, has denied the claims, saying the charges had been fabricated to smear his political image. His lawyers argue that such civil suits against a sitting prime minister risk interfering with his constitutional duties and could undermine the executive's ability to function. They cite Articles 5, 8, 39, 40, and 43 of the Federal Constitution, which outline executive powers, to support the need for immunity. They say that the matter should be tested before the Federal Court before any trial proceeds. The Prime Minister had filed the application on May 23, seeking the High Court, which is hearing the suit, to refer the eight legal questions to the Federal Court. The court's ruling means the civil case is now back on track for a full hearing from June 16, 2025, placing renewed scrutiny on Mr Anwar's administration. Mr Anwar's legal team can still appeal the decision with the Court of Appeal within 30 days. Mr Yusoff's lawyer, Mr Muhammad Rafique Rashid Ali, welcomed the June 4 ruling. 'The importance of today's decision ensures that in Malaysia right now, we have a judiciary that has stamped very clearly that there is equality for everyone under the Constitution,' he told The Straits Times. 'When an executive or a person in power wants to shield himself with immunity as proposed by Anwar Ibrahim or anyone in power later on, the normal people are being shielded against that executive use of power by the courts.' The premier has had his own past battles with the legal system, having been convicted for committing sodomy and abuse of power, charges which he has always maintained are politically motivated. Mr Yusoff has been detained by the police since September 2024. He is currently on trial for charges of drug trafficking and possessing imitation firearms, and faces life imprisonment and caning if convicted. He has denied the allegations and claimed he was framed by people in power. Hazlin Hassan is Malaysia correspondent at The Straits Times. Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
