&w=3840&q=100)
Is Pakistan behind kidnapping of three Indians in Iran?
India is probing the involvement of Pakistan and its ISI in the abduction of three Indians in Iran after the families of the victims received ransom calls from Pakistani phone number read more
India is investigating the role of Pakistan and its spy agency Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) in the abduction of three Indians in Iran. According to a report by The Economic Times, the probe began after the families of the Indian nationals received calls from a Pakistani phone number.
The three Indians who have been abducted in Iran are from Punjab's Sangrur, Hoshiarpur and SBS Nagar. The sources close to the matter told ET that they went missing in Iran and the authorities are making efforts to trace them 'urgently'. The three abductees have been identified as Hushanpreet Singh (Sangrur), Jaspal Singh (SBS Nagar) and Amritpal Singh (Hoshiarpur).
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
The three Indian nationals went missing on May 1 after they landed in Tehran. Sources close to the matter told ET that ISI might be trying to prove that the Indians were involved in 'espionage' in Pakistan.
Indian embassy issued a statement
Meanwhile, the Indian embassy in Tehran also issued a statement on the matter. 'Family members of three Indian citizens have informed the Embassy of India that their relatives are missing after having travelled to Iran. The embassy has strongly taken up this matter with the Iranian authorities and requested that the missing Indians be urgently traced and their safety should be ensured,' the Indian embassy in Iran recently said in a statement.
The embassy noted that it is 'keeping the family members regularly updated' on the efforts being made by it in the case. Meanwhile, a report from The Financial Express noted that these three men had been lured by an agent in Punjab who promised to send them to Australia through a route that passed via Dubai and Iran. The agent was based in Hoshiarpur and is currently untraceable.
What is also concerning is the fact that this is the second case in the past year involving Indian nationals going missing in Iran. In the past, Iranian authorities have urged Indians to be cautious while travelling abroad and not fall prey to illegal agents and trafficking networks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
33 minutes ago
- Mint
India eyes retaliation as US rejects WTO notice
The US has rejected India's May 9 notice at the World Trade Organization that proposed retaliatory action against Washington imposing steep import tariffs on steel and aluminium and said its actions were not safeguard measures, which is why it would not hold any discussion with New Delhi on the matter, people in the know said on Sunday. Under the current circumstances, India may retaliate by proportionately suspending concessions given to American imports (for example almonds and walnuts) and levy higher customs duties on metals coming from the US, said the people cited above, requesting anonymity. The Indian notice was against the US's February 10 decision to impose 25% levies on all imports of steel and aluminium effective from March 12. Now, the matter has been aggravated further as the Trump administration on May 30 doubled tariffs on the metals to 50% effective from June 4, citing national security. Against the US measure to hike import duties on steel and aluminium to safeguard American metal industries, India on May 9 formally notified WTO that it could suspend 'concessions and other obligations' granted to the US 'after the expiration of 30 days from the date of this notification', which would be June 8. Reacting to India's notice, the United States on May 22 informed WTO that India's proposed retaliation was not consistent with the multilateral trade rules. Washington said the US tariffs on metals were 'not safeguard' measures. 'Accordingly, there is no basis for India's proposal to suspend concessions or other obligations under Article 8.2 of the Agreement on Safeguards with respect to these measures,' it said in its latest communication to WTO. On grounds that the tariffs are not safeguard measures, the US also declined to discuss and resolve the dispute with India, leaving the ball in New Delhi's court. 'The United States will not discuss the Section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as we do not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure,' the American communication to the multilateral body added. While India's commerce ministry did not respond to a query on this matter, people in the know said India may retaliate unless the US agrees to a preferential treatment for India on these metals under the ongoing talks for an early deal (first tranche) within the proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA). Both countries are making efforts to conclude an early harvest deal by this month and a negotiating team from the US is expected to visit India this week, they said. Experts said high tariffs on steel and aluminium by the US are of critical importance to India. 'For India, the consequences are direct. In FY25, India exported $4.56 billion worth of iron, steel, and aluminium products to the US, with key categories including $587.5 million in iron and steel, $3.1 billion in articles of iron or steel, and $860 million in aluminium and related articles. These exports are now exposed to sharply higher US tariffs, threatening the profitability of Indian producers and exporters,' said Global Trade Research Initiative (GTRI) founder and former Indian Trade Service officer Ajay Srivastava. 'India has already issued a formal notice at the WTO signalling its intention to impose retaliatory tariffs on US goods in response to the earlier steel tariffs. With (President Donald) Trump now doubling the tariffs, it remains to be seen whether India will carry out the retaliation, by increasing tariffs on certain US exports within a month,' he added. Hindustan Times reported on May 14 about India proposing to levy retaliatory import duties on American goods proportionately in response to the United States' imposing safeguard tariffs on Indian steel and aluminium. 'The safeguard measures would affect US$ 7.6 billion imports into the United States of the relevant products originating in India, on which the duty collection would be US$ 1.91 billion. Accordingly, India's proposed suspension of concessions would result in an equivalent amount of duty collected from products originating in the United States,' India's May 9 notice to WTO said. The US, however, maintained at WTO that its tariffs on steel and aluminium are based on national security considerations and not 'safeguard measures' as claimed by India. 'Such disputes at WTO are common and routine. Without an effective appellate body at the multilateral forum, disputes have no real significance,' one of the persons mentioned above said. The second person said this is a vexed issue. The previous Joe Biden administration in 2018 had imposed a 25% tariff on certain steel and a 10% levy on aluminium items on grounds of national security. That was retaliated to by India in June 2019 when it imposed customs duties on 28 US products such as almonds and walnuts, besides filing a complaint at WTO. Later, the two sides, however, decided to resolve the dispute amicably through mutually agreed solutions (MAS). Under the agreement in June 2023, the US agreed to grant market access to steel and aluminium products under the exclusion process of Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act 1962 and India agreed to remove the additional duty (retaliatory tariffs) on certain American products. MAS is a mechanism under WTO where its members can resolve disputes amicably without going through the formal process of a settlement mechanism. (This article was first published in Hindustan Times)
Hindustan Times
34 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
India, Pakistan generals exchange warnings amid tensions at Shangri-La Dialogue as CDS Chauhan cites ‘red line'
Top military officials from India and Pakistan – Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan and chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Committee General Sahir Shamshad Mirza – exchanged warnings at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore amid heightened tensions between the two nations. Just as these nations are adjacent geographically, some of their top generals sat in neighbouring conference rooms inside the Shangri-La Singapore, taking part in simultaneous sessions late on Saturday afternoon on topics ranging from defence innovation solutions to regional crisis-management mechanisms, news agency PTI reported. Speaking at the event, CDS General Anil Chauhan, referring to Operation Sindoor against Pakistan, said, 'What India has done, politically, they have drawn a new red line of intolerance against terror.' "I hope this particular operation, it is basically lying in military domain, that should bring about some lessons for our adversary also, and hopefully they learn that this is a limit of India's tolerance," PTI quoted Anil Chauhan as saying. 'We have been subjected to this proxy war of terror for almost two decades and more, and we lost lot of want to put an end to it,' the CDS added. The ongoing tensions between the two neighbours drew attention at the gathering of the top global defence forum held from Friday to Sunday While New Delhi accused Pakistan-based terror groups of a deadly attack on tourists in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam in April in which 26 people were killed, Islamabad denies any involvement. In his address, Pakistan's General Sahir Shamshad Mirza stressed the need to move towards conflict resolution instead of management, warning that its absence could result in a destructive escalation, PTI reported, During a panel discussion, titled 'Regional Crisis-Management Mechanisms', Mirza said: 'It has become imperative to move beyond conflict management towards conflict resolution. This will ensure sustainable peace and assured crisis management.' He then stressed that an 'early resolution of Kashmir (issue) in line with the UN Security Council resolutions and as per the aspirations of the people is essential' for an enduring peace in South Asia. 'Given the Indian policies... the absence of a crisis management mechanism may not give enough time to the global powers to intervene and affect cessation of hostilities. They will probably be too late to avoid damage and destruction,' he said. Mirza also raked up the Kashmir issue. 'When there is no crisis, Kashmir is never discussed, and as we always say that it is the Kashmir dispute resolution in line with the aspirations of the people of Kashmir and in line with the UNSC resolutions that will address many issues. 'The core that resides between Pakistan and India is Kashmir,' he said. Mirza said unless countries did not 'enter conflict resolution' — which he said could initially be through conflict management and then lead to resolution — issues would 'always erupt'. The top general further said that following the military conflict, the 'threshold of an escalatory war has come dangerously low, implying greater risk on both sides, not just in the disputed territory but all of India and all of Pakistan'. 'Emboldening of India as a net security provider by the West and its ambition to become a regional hegemon is disincentivising it to engage in conflict management options,' Mirza asserted. Mirza also said that following the recent Pakistan-India military confrontation, the threshold of strategic stability had been lowered to 'dangerous levels'. He stated, 'The threshold of what we say conventional warfare has significantly degraded.' India launched Operation Sindoor on May 7 to destroy nine terror infrastructures in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) in retaliation against the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. All subsequent retaliations to Pakistani offensives were carried out under this operation. The four-day military conflict between India and Pakistan ended with an understanding on stopping the military actions on May 10. Mirza claimed that the US, the UK, Turkiye, China, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates as the 'interlocutors'. (With inputs from PTI)
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
Virat Kohli's One 8 Commune pub in Bengaluru lands in trouble, booked for absence of a designated smoking area
Virat Kohli's Bengaluru pub, One8 Commune, is facing legal issues after Cubbon Park Police filed a suo motu case for violating the COTPA Act due to the absence of a designated smoking area. This is the latest in a series of troubles for the establishment. Previously, the pub received a civic notice for alleged fire safety violations and lack of clearance, which went unaddressed. Disclaimer Statement: This content is authored by a 3rd party. The views expressed here are that of the respective authors/ entities and do not represent the views of Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for or endorse any of its contents nor is responsible for them in any manner whatsoever. Please take all steps necessary to ascertain that any information and content provided is correct, updated, and verified. ET hereby disclaims any and all warranties, express or implied, relating to the report and any content therein. More
