Undocumented immigrants ask for temporary halt of Alien Enemies Act in Colorado
DENVER (KDVR) — Attorneys for two groups filed a request in federal court on Monday for a temporary restraining order on the Alien Enemies Act.
The organizations told FOX31 it is trying to prevent undocumented immigrants wrongfully accused of crimes from being illegally deported to a notorious prison in El Salvador. Nearly a dozen undocumented immigrants from Colorado have been sent to CECOT in El Salvador, according to the Rocky Mountain Immigration Action Network.
Location unknown: 18th District Attorney, ICE spar over undocumented suspect
The 25- and 32-year-old men are being held at the contract Immigration and Customs Enforcement Detention Facility in Aurora.
'They have been working, living with their families and doing all the right things. All of a sudden, because they have a tattoo, or because they were hanging out with friends at a certain apartment complex, the government is now alleging that they are members of a gang,' said Rocky Mountain Immigration Action Network Director of Advocacy Laura Lunn.
Attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union and the Rocky Mountain Immigration Action Network are representing the two men named in the suit. The organizations say more immigrants from Colorado are falsely being accused of being Tren de Aragua gang members.
The advocacy network says it believes at least 11 undocumented immigrants were flown to prisons in El Salvador in March. The ACLU says it's hoping the temporary restraining order will stop that from happening again.
'So, what we are trying to do is make sure that the federal government follows the constitution, follows the law and doesn't deprive people of their liberty or perhaps their life without an opportunity to challenge the allegations,' said ACLU Legal Director Tim Macdonald.
ICE says driver sentenced in deadly 2024 US 285 crash has been deported
FOX31 has asked ICE Denver if any undocumented immigrants have been deported using the Alien Enemies Act. We have not received an answer.
The ACLU says that while two men are named in the suit, the judge's order would have an impact on any other similar cases here in Colorado. A decision is expected Tuesday morning.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
33 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
What to Know About the ‘No Kings Day' Movement
The No Kings events are intended to present a peaceful but patriotic 'split screen' to the Trump administration's military parade and reject what they call the president's overreach. Groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, American Federation of Teachers, Planned Parenthood and Sen. Bernie Sanders's campaign office are coordinating protests. Walmart heiress Christy Walton has also supported the protests. Organizers hope that millions show up to march in what could be the largest demonstration against the administration since President Trump's second term began. More than 3.5 million people turned out for April's 'Hands Off' protests.
Fox News
2 hours ago
- Fox News
What to know about today's ‘No Kings' anti-Trump rallies across the US
Thousands of people are expected to rally in hundreds of cities across America on Saturday to protest the Trump administration and counter the president's military parade in Washington, D.C. to mark the Army's 250th birthday. Today is also Flag Day, which commemorates the adoption of the U.S. flag on June 14, 1777. The counter-protesters are framing their demonstrations under the slogan "No Kings," describing it as a "day of defiance" against Trump and his allies while other have been calling for the president to be "dethroned." They say they are defending democracy and are opposed to what they see as Trump's authoritarian rule. One of their key issues is Trump's mass deportation programs, which they oppose. Last week, protests against Trump's immigration crackdown turned violent in Los Angeles, with Trump calling in the National Guard to quell the chaos. Trump will be in the nation's capital to watch the parade, which will feature around 6,600 troops and 150 military vehicles, along with historical reenactments and performances by military bands. Trump wants the parade to demonstrate American military strength and patriotism. Several overlapping organizations are organizing the rallies, including Indivisible, a progressive group formed in 2016 I the wake of Trump's first election win, the American Civil Liberties Union, and 50501, a group formed earlier this year in response to President Trump's second administration. The name 50501 stands for 50 states, 50 protests, one movement. 505051 has organized several protests this year, including the April 5 "Hands Off" protests, encapsulated a broad range of grievances against the Trump administration, including healthcare and civil liberties concerns. Demonstrators are trying to portray President Trump as a king who rules with unchecked power and bypasses laws and court rulings. "They've defied our courts, deported Americans, disappeared people off the streets, attacked our civil rights, and slashed our services," the 50501 site reads. "The corruption has gone too. far. No thrones. No crowns. No kings." The flagship march and rally will be taking place in Philadelphia, where the phrase "No Kings But Us" is a common phrase seen on flags and pennants outside of homes. Previously, it was a non-political, revolutionary symbol of anti-monarchy and American pride. Recently, it's been adopted by the anti-Trump organization 50501. Trump on Thursday brushed off the protests' central theme that he is a king. "I don't feel like a king, I have to go through hell to get stuff approved," Trump said. "We're not a king at all, thank you very much," he added. Trump said that any demonstrators who turn up to protest the military parade will be met by a "very big force." "[These] people that hate our country, but they will be met with very heavy force." Protesters see the military parade as an extension of Trump's authoritarian rule and seek to counter it. They say it's a politicized use of military symbolism and a visual display of power reminiscent of autocratic regimes. They want to contrast it with their image of a grassroots movement and draw a sharp line between democratic values and authoritarian aesthetics. Protests are set to take place in over 2,000 cities across all 50 U.S. states, as well as in several international locations. The protest in Philadelphia is the flagship event, given its historical significance in the War of Independence against the British Empire and King George III. New York City, Los Angeles, Chicago, Seattle, Austin and Houston will host rallies as well as Dallas, Fort Worth, Miami, Orlando, Fort Lauderdale, Kissimmee and Apopka. According to the 50501 website demonstrators are taking to the streets to fight what they say is an authoritarian Trump regime.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Federal prosecutors now charging immigrants who don't submit fingerprints under dormant 1940s law
Federal officials have begun carrying out President Donald Trump's orders to enforce a World War II-era criminal law that requires virtually all non-citizens in the country to register with and submit fingerprints to the government. Since April, law enforcement in Louisiana, Arizona, Montana, Alabama, Texas and Washington, D.C., have charged people with willful 'failure to register' under the Alien Registration Act, an offense most career federal public defenders have never encountered before. Many of those charged were already in jail and in ongoing deportation proceedings when prosecutors presented judges with the new charges against them. The registration provision in the law, which was passed in 1940 amid widespread public fear about immigrants' loyalty to the U.S., had been dormant for 75 years, but it is still on the books. Failure to register is considered a 'petty offense' — a misdemeanor with maximum penalties of six months imprisonment or a $1,000 fine. In reviving the law, the Trump administration may put undocumented immigrants in a catch-22. If they register, they must hand over detailed, incriminating information to the federal government — including how and when they entered the country. But knowingly refusing to register is also a crime, punishable by arrest or prosecution, on top of the ever-present threat of deportation. 'The sort of obvious reason to bring back registration in the first place is the hope that people will register, and therefore give themselves up effectively to the government because they already confessed illegal entry,' said Jonathan Weinberg, a Wayne State University law professor who has studied the registration law. But the Trump administration also has another goal. It says one purpose of the registration regime is to provoke undocumented immigrants to choose a third option: leave the country voluntarily, or, in the words of the Department of Homeland Security, compulsory 'mass self-deportation.' Those efforts, alongside the administration's invocation of the Alien Enemies Act and a more aggressive approach to immigration raids, are meant to achieve a broader, overarching campaign promise: the largest deportation program in the history of America. 'For decades, this law has been ignored — not anymore,' the department said in a February announcement that it would enforce the law. The department called 'mass self-deportation' a 'safer path for aliens and law enforcement,' and said it saves U.S. taxpayer dollars. The Department of Homeland Security did not answer questions about its enforcement policies. The Alien Registration Act was passed in 1940, amid fears about immigrants' loyalties. A separate provision of the statute criminalizes advocacy for overthrowing the government. For about two decades, that provision was used to prosecute people who were accused of being either pro-fascist or pro-Communist. The registration provision, though, remained largely dormant, and had not been enforced in 75 years. It applies to non-citizens, regardless of legal status, who are in the U.S. for 30 days or longer. Certain categories of legal immigrants have already met the requirement. Immigrants who have filed applications to become permanent residents are considered registered by DHS, for example. And even some undocumented U.S. residents are already registered: U.S. residents who have received 'parole' — a form of humanitarian protection from deportation — are also considered registered. Still, DHS estimates that up to 3.2 million immigrants are currently unregistered and are affected by the new enforcement regime. The administration has created a new seven-page form that non-citizens must use. The form requires people, under penalty of perjury, to provide biographical details, contact information, details about any criminal history and the circumstances of how they entered the U.S. After DHS issued regulations to enforce the registration requirement in April, the administration announced that 47,000 undocumented immigrants had registered using the new form. The Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights and other advocacy groups filed a lawsuit challenging Trump's move to revive the registration requirement in March. U.S. District Judge Trevor McFadden, a Trump appointee, initially expressed skepticism toward the administration, saying in a recent hearing that officials had pulled a 'big switcheroo' on undocumented immigrants. But McFadden in April refused the plaintiffs' request to temporarily block the policy, saying the Coalition likely lacks the legal standing to sue because it has not shown that it would be harmed by the policy. The group has appealed McFadden's decision. In the meantime, the administration has begun to prosecute people for failure to register for the first time in seven decades. The prosecutions so far have stumbled. On May 19, a federal magistrate judge in Louisiana consolidated and dismissed five of the criminal cases, saying prosecutors had no probable cause to believe the defendants had intentionally refused to register. Judge Michael North wrote that the Alien Registration Act requires 'some level of subjective knowledge or bad intent' behind the choice not to register. The prosecutions, the judge wrote, are impermissible because most people are simply unaware of the law, and the government 'did not provide these Defendants — as well as millions of similarly situated individuals here without government permission — with a way to register' since 1950. But North also pointed out that the government may have an easier path to proving probable cause in the future, given that DHS created a new registration form in April. And government attorneys have appealed the five dismissed cases. The Justice Department and the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of Louisiana declined to comment on recent charges filed under the law. A spokesperson for the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia said the office 'is aggressively pursuing criminals in the district and will use all criminal justice resources available to make D.C. safe and to carry out President Trump's and Attorney General Bondi's direction to support immigration enforcement." The other federal district attorneys whose offices filed charges did not respond to a request for comment. Michelle LaPointe, legal director at the American Immigration Council, an immigrants' rights advocacy group, said these initial cases are the 'tip of the iceberg.' LaPointe is among the attorneys representing the Coalition in its lawsuit against the administration. 'I don't expect them to abate just because there were some dismissals,' LaPointe said, pointing to North's statements about future charges. 'They have already stated that they intend to make prosecution of the few immigration-related criminal statutes a priority for DOJ, and it's very easy for them to at least charge, even if they're not always gonna be able to sustain their burden to secure a conviction.' Weinberg, the Wayne State law professor, agreed that the administration will likely continue attempting broad enforcement. 'If they bring a whole lot of prosecutions and end up losing all, they may step back,' Weinberg said. 'If they bring a whole lot and win a few, they'll say, 'Well, that's the basis on which we can move further'' and appeal — potentially all the way to the Supreme Court, he noted.
