logo
Voters approve recreational marijuana, so why so many bans?

Voters approve recreational marijuana, so why so many bans?

Yahoo19-02-2025

Feb. 19—Nearly 60% of Ohio voters in November 2023 legalized adult-use, recreational marijuana and businesses that cultivate, process and sell it.
Yet, the majority of local communities have either banned or placed a moratorium on cannabis businesses. Also, Republican state lawmakers are proposing higher excise taxes and changes to the program.
The question of whether these measures undermine voters isn't exactly cut and dried.
Dexter Ridgway, research associate of the Drug Enforcement and Policy Center of the Moritz College of Law at Ohio State University, said it's difficult to know what people were voting for when they approved Issue 2.
"Are they voting for retailers or to legally consume and possess it?" he said.
In the Dayton region there are more than a dozen dispensaries licensed to sell recreational cannabis.
Under state law, customers 21 and older can buy up to 2.5 ounces of recreational cannabis at licensed dispensaries or home-grow up to six plants per person, with a maximum of 12 plants for a two-adult household for personal use. Any bans or moratoriums do not affect the ability of those of legal age to possess and use recreational cannabis, by smoking, vaping or edibles, or to grow the plants.
Issue 2 also included language specifying that cities, villages and townships are allowed to pass laws prohibiting or restricting adult-use cannabis businesses, which Ridgway said could have been a factor for some voters.
More and more communities in the Miami Valley are setting temporary and permanent bans, though this is bucking the trend in the rest of the state. Only 5% of Ohio's population is under an opt-out, Ridgway said.
Comparatively, 73% of municipalities in Michigan have opted out and 50% in New York have opted out in some way, whether it be medical only or a ban on medical and recreational, he said.
As of Feb. 4, 118 municipalities in Ohio have either permanently or temporarily banned the commercial cultivation, processing and dispensing of adult-use recreational cannabis, according to data from the Moritz College of Law. There had been 128 on the list, but 10 have since dropped a moratorium, Ridgway said.
However, that doesn't necessarily mean those communities will be future sites of recreational-use marijuana businesses.
"Some are allowing it but have a restrictive zoning code to the point where it is in effect a ban," he said.
Last month, the city of Kettering made its temporary freeze on adult-use recreational cannabis businesses permanent.
"We did not feel that the best use of our very limited land and real estate in the city was a dispensary," said Mayor Peggy Lehner, who noted there are dispensaries an easy drive away in Beavercreek and Dayton.
Riverside has two dispensaries operating in the city, but extended a moratorium through August. The moratorium affects 17 different types of businesses, such as self-storage facilities, gas stations and extended stay hotels.
"The extension really is because we are going through a new zoning code update and that will be closer to third or fourth quarter in 2025," said Katie Lewallen, Riverside's communications manager and clerk of council.
The city of Dayton has never had a moratorium on licensed cannabis businesses and has only restricted them based on appropriate zoning districts and building code regulations, the same as any other type of business, said Keith Klein, senior economic development specialist.
"From a development perspective, licensed marijuana businesses have been an economic success story. They have invested millions of dollars in revitalizing underutilized buildings and created approximately 250 new jobs in Dayton alone," he said.
The businesses also generate new tax revenue. Issue 2 included a 10% excise tax, which is in addition to local sales taxes. Of that excise tax, 36% goes to the municipalities and townships with an adult-use dispensary. Money collected also goes toward a social equity fund and substance abuse and addiction fund.
"Generally speaking, these businesses are safe and responsible neighbors in the community, in part because they are so heavily regulated by the state of Ohio," Klein said.
The city of Fairborn's moratorium expires March 31. City leaders invited residents to share their thoughts and ask questions during a Jan. 28 community forum at Fairborn High School.
"The bottom line is, is this something we want in Fairborn?" Mayor Dan Kirkpatrick said to the crowd of a few dozen residents, business owners and other community stakeholders.
City leaders said a dispensary could generate $400,000 in tax revenue.
Many in the audience had questions, such as whether it is legal to smoke marijuana in public, or in a designated outdoor drinking area during the warmer weather. Fairborn Police Chief Ben Roman said neither is allowed and that laws commonly applied to those abusing alcohol in public would apply to violators.
Roman also educated attendees on the state-imposed restrictions on where such businesses can be situated, which keeps them a certain distance from schools, child care centers, parks, public libraries and places of worship.
Mike Uecker of Bath Twp., a retired Air Force veteran and former Fairborn school board member, said "a medical-use facility would be all right" but that he is opposed to a recreational marijuana retailer.
Uecker said he has reservations about whether such an enterprise would be detrimental to existing businesses with military contracts requiring high-security clearances and the "opportunity cost" if cannabis retailers would make the city unattractive to military contract businesses that offer good, high-paying jobs.
"What do we risk?" he said.
Fairborn resident Beth Renken said she supports having an adult-use cannabis business with knowledgeable employees rather than people buying unregulated marijuana products.
"I rather it be in a controlled environment," she said.
The state is expected to start allocating additional licenses this summer, but it is not known how many will be released, Ridgway said.
Other unknowns include changes proposed in the Ohio General Assembly — including one sponsored by state Sen. Steve Huffman, R-Tipp City — that call for increasing the excise tax, possibly removing the share provided to local communities, capping the number of home-grow plants to six for each household and limiting the number of dispensaries.
Opponents say the tax incentive was a large part of why municipalities and townships allowed cannabis businesses. Also, they say the higher cost that would be passed on to consumers could drive many adult-use customers to states like Michigan with lower tax rates or to the illicit market.
Area communities have banned the sale of recreation marijuana
City Complete Other decision
Beavercreek No Ban on new businesses
Bellbrook No Moratorium through 5/20/25
Carlisle No Moratorium through 5/21/26
Centerville No Moratorium through 5/9/25
Clayton No Moratorium through 9/5/25
Clearcreek Twp. Yes
Dayton No
Englewood No Limit of one dispensary
Fairborn No Moratorium through 3/31/25
Fairfield No Limit of one dispensary
Franklin Yes
Hamilton Yes
Huber Heights Yes
Kettering Yes
Miami Twp. Yes
Miamisburg Yes
Middletown No Limit of three dispensaries
Monroe No Restrictions on where they can be located
Moraine Yes
Oakwood Yes
Oxford Yes
Riverside No Moratorium through 8/21/25 for new businesses
Springboro Yes
Springfield No
Tipp City No Moratorium through 12/15/25
Trotwood No Moratorium through 12/31/25
Troy Yes
Vandalia Yes
Washington Twp. No Moratorium through 5/13/25
West Chester Twp. No Moratorium through 6/30/25
Xenia Yes
Staff writers Sydney Dawes and Cornelius Frolik contributed to this report.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla Tumbles After Musk Escalates Attacks on Trump Tax Bill
Tesla Tumbles After Musk Escalates Attacks on Trump Tax Bill

Yahoo

time23 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Tesla Tumbles After Musk Escalates Attacks on Trump Tax Bill

(Bloomberg) -- Tesla Inc.'s shares sank as Elon Musk and President Donald Trump's simmering feud devolved into a public war of words between two of the world's most powerful people. ICE Moves to DNA-Test Families Targeted for Deportation with New Contract Next Stop: Rancho Cucamonga! US Housing Agency Vulnerable to Fraud After DOGE Cuts, Documents Warn The Global Struggle to Build Safer Cars Where Public Transit Systems Are Bouncing Back Around the World Trump on Thursday said he was 'very disappointed' by the Tesla chief executive officer's criticism of the president's signature tax policy bill. Musk fired back on social media, saying it was 'false' that the Tesla CEO knew the plan would unwind EV tax credits that benefit Tesla's business. Musk followed up with several more sharply worded posts, including saying Trump showed 'such ingratitude' for the help the billionaire entrepreneur has provided to Trump's administration. Tesla's shares fell as much 9.2% to an intraday low as the two traded barbs. The spat highlights how policies advanced by Trump and Republican lawmakers put billions of dollars at risk for Tesla. Trump's massive tax bill would largely eliminate a credit worth as much as $7,500 for buyers of some Tesla models and other electric vehicles by the end of this year, seven years ahead of schedule. That would translate to a roughly $1.2 billion hit to Tesla's full-year profit, according to JPMorgan analysts. After leaving his formal advisory role in the White House last week, Musk has been on a mission to block the president's signature tax bill that he described as a 'disgusting abomination.' The world's richest person has been lobbying Republican lawmakers — including making a direct appeal to House Speaker Mike Johnson — to preserve the valuable EV tax credits in the legislation. Separate legislation passed by the Senate attacking California's EV sales mandates poses another $2 billion headwind for Tesla's sales of regulatory credits, according to JPMorgan. Taken together, those measures threaten roughly half of the more than $6 billion in earnings before interest and taxes that Wall Street expects Tesla to post this year, analysts led by Ryan Brinkman said in a May 30 report. Tesla didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. The House-passed tax bill would aggressively phase-out tax credits for the production of clean electricity, and other sources years earlier than scheduled. It also includes stringent restrictions on the use of Chinese components and materials that analysts said would render the credits useless and limits the ability of company's to sell the tax credits to third parties. Tesla's division focused on solar systems and batteries separately criticized the Republican bill for gutting clean energy tax credits, saying that 'abruptly ending' the incentives would threaten US energy independence and the reliability of the power grid. The clean energy and EV policies under threat were largely enacted as part of former President Joe Biden's Inflation Reduction Act. The law was designed to encourage companies to build a domestic supply chain for clean energy and electric vehicles, giving companies more money if they produce more batteries and EVs in the US. Tesla has a broad domestic footprint, including car factories in Texas and California, a lithium refinery and battery plants. With those Biden-era policies in place, US EV sales rose 7.3% to a record 1.3 million vehicles last year, according to Cox Automotive data. --With assistance from Kara Carlson, Keith Laing, Josh Wingrove and Kate Sullivan. (Updates shares, adds Trump, Musk comments starting in the fourth paragraph.) Cavs Owner Dan Gilbert Wants to Donate His Billions—and Walk Again YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Is Elon Musk's Political Capital Spent? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P.

Tesla stock sinks as Musk and Trump's relationship blows up
Tesla stock sinks as Musk and Trump's relationship blows up

Axios

time26 minutes ago

  • Axios

Tesla stock sinks as Musk and Trump's relationship blows up

Tesla shares hit the skids Thursday as the relationship between Elon Musk and President Trump turned fully south. Why it matters: Musk and Trump were close political allies for a time, after the Tesla CEO poured hundreds of millions of dollars into Republican campaigns and led the budget-slashing Department of Government of Efficiency. The halo of that relationship was seen as a boon to Tesla's shares and the valuations of Musk's other companies like SpaceX. The big picture: Musk has repeatedly assailed Trump's "big, beautiful bill" in recent days, saying it'll unacceptably increase the national debt and wipe out DOGE's budget savings. On Thursday, Musk began reposting pre-presidency Trump tweets promoting a balanced budget and arguing against a debt ceiling increase. Trump responded in the Oval Office: " Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore." Between the lines: Tesla's stock was down more than 8% just after 1 p.m. ET Thursday. That decline would cost Musk nearly $11 billion personally. The downward trajectory suggests that investors are worried that a Musk-Trump breakup could hurt the empire of the world's richest person, which also includes xAI and Neuralink. Threat level: Tesla investors have been hoping for favorable policies from Washington, including for EVs and self-driving cars.

Trump and Musk's relationship flames out just as it started, intensely and publicly
Trump and Musk's relationship flames out just as it started, intensely and publicly

The Hill

time27 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump and Musk's relationship flames out just as it started, intensely and publicly

WASHINGTON (AP) — The breakup between the president of the United States and the world's richest man is unfurling much like their relationship started — rapidly, intensely and very publicly. As President Donald Trump sat in the Oval Office on Thursday with Germany's leader at his side, he lamented his soured relationship with Elon Musk, his adviser-turned-social media antagonist. Trump said he was 'very disappointed' with Musk after the billionaire former backer lambasted the president's signature bill of tax cuts and spending plans. Trump suggested Musk, who left the government last month after spearheading the tumultuous Department of Government Efficiency, misses being in the White House and has 'Trump derangement syndrome.' 'He hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that will be next,' Trump said. 'But I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Observers had long wondered if the friendship between the two brash billionaires known for lobbing insults online would flame out in spectacular fashion. It did, in less than a year. 'Look, Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will anymore,' Trump said. He said that he had helped Musk a lot and brushed aside the billionaire's efforts to get him elected last year, claiming that he would have won closely contested Pennsylvania even without Musk's help, which included spending at least $250 million supporting his campaign. The Republican president's comments came as Musk has continued a storm of social media posts attacking Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' and warning it will increase the federal deficit. Musk has called Trump's big tax break bill a 'disgusting abomination.' As Trump spoke to reporters at the White House on Thursday, Musk was watching. 'False,' he fired back on his social media platform as the president continued speaking. 'This bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Trump said Musk, the CEO and founder of Tesla, 'only developed a problem' with the bill because it rolls back tax credits for electric vehicles. 'Whatever,' Musk snapped back in a post on X responding to a video clip of the moment. He went on and said Trump could keep the cuts but should 'ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill.' The bill would unleash trillions of dollars in tax cuts and slash spending but also spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over a decade and leave some 10.9 million more people without health insurance, according to an analysis by the Congressional Budget Office, which for decades has served as the official scorekeeper of legislation in Congress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store