Alaska Board of Game proposes new rules for bear-killing program intended to help caribou hunters
Two subadult brown bears walk along a beach in Katmai National Park and Preserve in June 2018. (Photo by R. Taylor/National Park Service)
After an Anchorage Superior Court judge struck down a state program that kills bears in order to help caribou hunters, the Alaska Board of Game is proposing a new version of the program.
According to a public notice published Friday, the board will meet in July in Anchorage to consider changing the state's predator control program to allow the killing of 'brown and black bears in addition to wolves to aid in the recovery of the Mulchatna caribou herd.'
Alaska's predator control program, implemented in various places across the state, involves killing predator animals in an attempt to boost prey populations for hunters.
The Mulchatna caribou herd's population has declined dramatically in recent decades, from about 200,000 in the 1990s to about 15,000 as of 2024, according to estimates published by the Alaska Department of Fish and Game.
Hunting from the herd has been banned since 2021, and the department believes that predation by bears is preventing the herd from expanding to a size that will support hunting.
Critics of the program have said the decline is more likely due to other reasons, including a rapidly changing habitat, disease and past overhunting. Climate change is leading to more woody plants growing on the tundra, affecting the caribou, which eat lichen.
The Alaska Wildlife Alliance filed suit against the state in 2023, arguing that ADF&G's implementation of the predator control program with regard to Mulchatna was unconstitutional.
In part, the alliance argued that the state failed to study the implications for the area's bear population, which includes animals that live part of the year in the Katmai National Park and Preserve.
That case resulted in a court order against the state, which attempted to continue the bear kills through an emergency regulation. Judge Christina Rankin found the state had acted 'in bad faith' when it kept killing bears despite a restraining order against ADF&G.
The court is now considering whether it should hold state officials in contempt.
Meanwhile, the new public notice shows the state is attempting to authorize the bear kills in a different way that could be effective ahead of next spring's caribou calving season.
'To correct the court-identified administrative issues, the Alaska Board of Game will hold a special meeting in July to discuss the restoration of the Intensive Management Program, as the administration is committed to protecting rural subsistence resources,' said Shannon Mason, a spokesperson for the ADF&G.
'Our predator control program, supported by local users, communities, advisory committees, and the Alaska Federation of Natives, had already shown success with improved calf survival and herd growth. As we have said before, halting the program now, in its third year, jeopardizes our progress. That's why we're pursuing our options to ensure the program can continue under Alaska's intensive management statute,' she said.
Alaska Gov. Mike Dunleavy ordered a freeze on new state regulations earlier this year, but Mason said by phone that the new predator control program is not subject to that freeze because the new regulations are an extension of an effort that was underway before the freeze took effect.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
National Parks Are Told to Delete Content That ‘Disparages Americans'
The Interior Department plans to remove or cover up all 'inappropriate content' at national parks and sites by Sept. 17 and is asking the park visitors to report any 'negative' information about past or living Americans, according to internal documents. It's a move that historians worry could lead to the erasure of history involving gay and transgender figures, civil rights struggles and other subjects deemed improper by the Trump administration. Staff at the National Park Service, which is part of the Interior Department, were instructed to post QR codes and signs at all 433 national parks, monuments and historic sites by Friday asking visitors to flag anything they think should be changed, from a plaque to a park ranger's tour to a film at a visitor's center. Leaders at the park service would then review concerns about anything that 'inappropriately disparages Americans past or living (including persons living in colonial times),' according to slides presented this week at a meeting with park superintendents. By Sept. 17, 'all inappropriate content' would be removed or covered, according to the presentation. The signs already are up at many national parks, including sites that commemorate difficult periods in American history like the Minidoka National Historic Site in Idaho, where more than 13,000 Japanese Americans were incarcerated after being forcibly removed from their homes without due process during World War II. 'Our history isn't always perfect,' said Theresa Pierno, the president of the National Parks Conservation Association, a nonprofit group that supports national parks and opposes the planned changes. 'How do you talk about Martin Luther King without talking about racism?' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


Bloomberg
7 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Big Take: Bloomberg's Keir Starmer Interview
Ahead of next week's G-7 Summit in Calgary, Canada, Bloomberg Weekend Editor-at-Large Mishal Husain sat down for an exclusive interview with British Prime Minister Kier Starmer. The wide-ranging conversation touched on Israel's ongoing strikes on Iran's Nuclear facilities, the US-UK trade agreement, defense spending and more.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's $1 Trillion Trade Shock: Is the U.S. About to Lose Its Edge?
Trump's tariff blitz is backlouder, costlier, and this time, with fewer friends. As he heads into the G-7 summit, his trade playbook is drawing sharper pushback from allies, courts, and economists. Bloomberg Economics estimates the global economy could be $1 trillion smaller by 2030 if the current tariff regime stays in place. The U.S. alone may shoulder more than a third of that painroughly 690,000 lost jobs and a shrinking slice of global trade. Meanwhile, countries like Canada, Japan, and Mexico are leaning harder into the CPTPP, hedging against what they now see as a less dependable U.S. trade partner. The economic trade-off Trump's banking on? More factories, fewer services. Bloomberg's model suggests tariffs could deliver 1.2 million new manufacturing jobsbut potentially erase 1.6 million in the service sector. That imbalance is already showing up in slower growth forecasts. The OECD now expects just 1.6% U.S. growth in 2025, down from 2.8% in 2024. And as prices tick up and global supply chains recalibrate, major U.S. trading partnersfrom Germany to Japanare preparing for impact. While the Trump team frames this as a strategic reset, even close allies are starting to build trade routes that bypass Washington. For investors, this shift could be a game-changer. Companies with cross-border exposureespecially automakers like Ford (NYSE:F) and Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA)may see higher input costs and pressure on margins if tariffs escalate. On the flip side, CPTPP economies like Vietnam and Mexico are gaining ground, drawing new investment and export orders that once flowed to the U.S. The bigger picture? America's withdrawal from TPP could end up as one of the most expensive political decisions in modern trade historynot just economically, but strategically. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data