On Pak PM Shahbaz Sharif's call for peace talks, India says ‘only on process for Pakistan to vacate PoK'
Responding to Pakistan Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif's recent overture for 'peace talks' with India, including on counterterrorism, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) firmly reiterated India's longstanding position.
During a weekly press conference, MEA spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal underscored that New Delhi's approach towards Islamabad remains 'clear and consistent' – that terrorism and talks 'cannot go hand in hand'.
Randhir Jaiswal said, 'I would like to begin by stating that our bilateral approach towards Pakistan has been clear and consistent. We want to reiterate that terrorism and talks cannot go hand in hand.'
He emphasized that any conversation on terrorism must begin with Pakistan handing over terrorists from the list India had shared years ago. He said any bilateral talks will happen only on the timeline and process for Pakistan to vacate Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK).
'As far as terrorism is concerned, the discussion will be solely about Pakistan handing over to India the terrorists from the list provided to them several years ago. As for Jammu and Kashmir, any bilateral talks will only take place regarding the timeline and process for Pakistan to vacate PoK (Pakistan-occupied Kashmir),' he said.
Addressing a joint press conference in Tehran alongside Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, Pakistan PM Shahbaz Sharif said, 'We want to resolve all disputes, including the Kashmir issue and the water issue, through negotiations and are also ready to talk to our neighbour on trade and counter-terrorism.'
The Pakistan prime minister also underlined that the country will show they 'really want peace, seriously and sincerely' if his 'offer of peace' is accepted.
India has, firmly, maintained that 'terror and talks' cannot go together.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Is China arming Iran with missiles? Report says new order enough to make 800 ballistic weapons
At a time when the Trump administration is holding talks with Iran about its nuclear programme, Iran is procuring thousands of tons of missile fuel from China that could power up to 800 ballistic missiles, according to a report. read more A missile unveiled by Iran is launched in an unknown location in Iran in this picture received by Reuters on August 20, 2020. Iran is procuring thousands of tons of missile fuel from China that can power hundreds of ballistic missiles, according to a report. The development has come at a time when the United States and Iran and engaged in talks regarding the regime's nuclear programme. Iran has ruled out stopping nuclear fuel enrichment. Moreover, the report of missile fuel's purchase from China has now emerged for the second time this year. Iran has placed an order for thousands of tons of ammonium perchlorate to a Chinese entity based on Hong Kong, according to Wall Street Journal. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The newspaper said that the chemical ordered could power as much as 800 ballistic missiles. Previously, a report had said in January that said that Iran had bought the chemical from China to power ballistic missiles. However, that lot was later understood to have caught fire in the Iranian port of Bandar Abbas. The massive fire killed dozens and injured more than 1,000 people. Iran ramps up missile programme amid talks At a time when the United States is engaging in talks with Iran, the regime has sought to rebuild its missile programme. In clashes with Israel last year, Iran had suffered damages to its air defence systems to the extent that officials said it was left virtually naked. Israel had also struck a missile production site and a site related to the nuclear weapons programme. The Journal has reported that shipments of ammonium perchlorate are expected to arrive in Iran in the coming months from China. Sources told the newspaper that some of the chemical would be likely sent to Yemen-based Houthis. While Houthis have reached a ceasefire with the United States, they remain at conflict with Israel. The newspaper has reported that the chemical was ordered likely before the United States and Iran entered talks. In April, the United States sanctioned six persons and six entities in Iran and China for the trade of missile fuel, including sodium perchlorate, for Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
‘Reconsider Indus Waters Treaty Suspension': Pakistan Sent 4 Letters To India, 3 After Op Sindoor
Last Updated: In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had reiterated that 'trade and terror, water and blood, bullets and dialogue cannot go together' Pakistan has so far sent four letters expressing concerns over suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) and urging India to reconsider the decision. After the terrorist attack in Pahalgam on April 22, India's Secretary of the Ministry of Jal Shakti, Debashree Mukherjee, wrote to Pakistan's Water Ministry Secretary, Syed Ali Murtaza. The letter unequivocally stated that India remains a victim of cross-border terrorism emanating from Pakistan. India cited this context, alongside technical arguments, in communicating its decision to suspend its participation in the IWT. PAKISTAN'S LETTERS The first was dispatched in early May, before the launch of Operation Sindoor. Since then, three additional appeals have been sent by Murtaza. According to sources, all correspondence has been routed through the Ministry of Jal Shakti to the Ministry of External Affairs. In the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, Prime Minister Narendra Modi had reiterated that 'trade and terror, water and blood, bullets and dialogue cannot go together". HOW IWT SUSPENSION HELPED INDIA India has since accelerated work on strategic water infrastructure projects related to the Indus river system. A key initiative is a 130-kilometre canal designed to link the Beas River to the Ganga Canal, with a proposed extension to the Yamuna River. The nearly 200-kilometre project includes a 12-kilometre tunnel, potentially enabling Yamuna water to reach Gangasagar. States such as Delhi, Haryana, Punjab, and Rajasthan are projected to benefit from this initiative. The government has stated that the work is progressing rapidly and is expected to be completed within two to three years. A Detailed Project Report (DPR) is also being prepared. WHAT IT MEANS FOR PAKISTAN Sources suggest the suspension of the treaty could significantly affect Pakistan's Rabi crops, while the Kharif season will remain relatively unaffected. Beyond agriculture, the disruption could impact daily life, potentially leading to a water availability crisis. Pakistan has reportedly approached the World Bank to mediate. However, the World Bank has so far declined to intervene in India's internal decision to suspend its participation in the treaty. India has emphasized the need to revisit and renegotiate the treaty to reflect 21st-century realities. The original treaty, drafted in the 1950s and 1960s, is increasingly viewed as outdated due to changing hydrological patterns, glacial melt, population growth, and the need for sustainable energy and water management. Despite India's push for modernisation, Pakistan has resisted renegotiation. According to Indian officials, this stance itself contravenes the treaty's provisions. Following the Pahalgam terror attack, India has also announced a range of diplomatic and strategic responses, including the suspension of its participation in the IWT. Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! First Published:
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Iranians react to new Trump travel ban as tensions are high between nations
People walk past a state-sponsored anti-US mural painted on the wall of the former US Embassy in Tehran (Image credit: AP) Iranians again face a US travel ban imposed by President Donald Trump , with the decision drawing anger, frustration and some shrugs given the decades of tensions between the countries. Trump imposed a similar ban during his first term before withdrawing America unilaterally from Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, under which Iran drastically limited its program in exchange for the lifting of economic sanctions. But when he returned to the White House and began seeking a new deal with Iran, it saw the country's rial currency improve and stocks rise, but worries have grown as its government appears poised to reject an initial American proposal. The travel ban has further darkened that mood and led Iranians to fear Trump will lump the nations' 80 million people alongside of its theocratic government even after he's repeatedly praised them while seeking a deal. "Now I understand that Trump is against all Iranians, and his attitude is not limited to the government," said Asghar Nejati, a 31-year-old man working in a Tehran pharmacy. Even in the years after the 1979 Islamic Revolution and subsequent US Embassy hostage crisis, Iranian students traveled to the US to attend universities. Between 2018 to 2024, an average of around 10,000 Iranian students went to the US annually. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Perdagangkan CFD Emas dengan Broker Tepercaya IC Markets Mendaftar Undo Estimates suggest some 1 million Iranian-origin people live in the US today. Mehrnoush Alipour, a 37-year-old graphic designer, said the nations could have better relations if they could spoke to each other in softer tones. "This is another foolish decision. Trump cannot reach his goals by imposing pressures on ordinary Iranians," she said. "The two nations can have better relation through openings, not restrictions." Bank teller Mahdieh Naderi said Trump was lashing out over his frustrationed efforts to reach ceasefires in the Israel-Hamas war and the Russia-Ukraine war. "Trump just expressed his anger about his failed plans," Naderi said. "He is complaining about the Chinese and others who are living in the US, too." Some said interest in the US was already waning before the latest ban. "Over the past years, two of my grandchildren went to Canada to continue their education there," said Mohammad Ali Niaraki, 75. "Iranians are not limited in immigration and they are not as interested to go to the US as they were decades ago. Iranians prefer Canada, as well as neighbouring countries with flourishing economies like the (United Arab) Emirates." But others pointed out that high-ranking government officials have children living or working in the US, despite the tensions. "It's fine, but if he also kicks out the children of officials who live there it would be very nice," said a man who just gave his name as Mehdi. "We can't afford traveling to the US, almost 80 per cent of us can't. But if he kicks out those who are already there it would be much better." Tehran resident Mehri Soltani offered rare support for Trump's decision. "Those who have family members in the US, it's their right to go, but a bunch of bad people and terrorists and murderers want to go there as well," he said. "So his policy is correct. He's doing the right thing."
