logo
Opinion - I am disabled but educated and ready to work — only Medicaid won't let me

Opinion - I am disabled but educated and ready to work — only Medicaid won't let me

Yahoo25-05-2025

I graduated this month with my master's degree in Education Policy and Leadership. I have published peer-reviewed research, co-created a survey instrument with a digital object identifier, served as a graduate task force co-chair, and was admitted to fully funded Ph.D. programs.
On paper, I represent the American dream's image of promise and success — driven, capable, and eager to contribute to the future of education reform in this country. But none of those credentials — not the degree, not the publication, not the leadership — have freed me from the grip of a system that punishes disabled people for trying to live.
I rely on Medicaid to cover a personal care attendant who helps me complete basic activities of daily living. There is no private insurance plan that will cover this need. Without this support, I cannot get out of bed, eat, or use the restroom safely. And yet, if I earn more than the narrow income limits set by Supplemental Security Income — which is often tied to Medicaid eligibility — I risk losing that care altogether.
In a cruel twist of policy, the moment I actually try to participate in society, the very tools I need to participate in society are stripped away.
The public debate around Medicaid work requirements ignores people like me. Politicians and pundits focus on 'able-bodied adults' and whether they're working hard enough — but no one talks about disabled adults who want to work, can contribute, and are forced into poverty by the very safety net that is supposed to support them.
Medicaid and SSI are deeply intertwined. In most states, including my home state of Florida, eligibility for Medicaid — which covers long-term services like personal care aides — is automatically granted to those who qualify for SSI. But SSI comes with harsh limits: just $943 in monthly income, and no more than $2,000 in assets.
A threshold limit is established under Section 1619(B) of the Social Security Act, placing a limit of $42,119 in earned income as a resident of Florida. This is equivalent to earning approximately $20 an hour, less than the average annualized earnings of students who graduated with a bachelor's degree from the state university system in the fall of 2022.
According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, nearly 8 million Americans rely on SSI, and about 60 percent of adult recipients have disabilities. Of those, many also depend on Medicaid for home-based and community-based services. Yet the income limits and asset tests have remained largely unchanged since the 1970s, adjusted only slightly for inflation.
This creates an impossible situation: I'm educated and ambitious and want to contribute to society. But I'm effectively forced to remain poor — not because I lack ability, but because working too much will leave me without the care I need to live. This is not independence — this is captivity.
Democrats often speak about equity, inclusion, and protecting marginalized communities. Republicans champion economic opportunity, self-sufficiency, and personal responsibility. But when it comes to people like me — disabled adults who want to live independently and escape the poverty trap — both parties have fallen short.
For Democrats, equity often stops at access. But real equity means creating a system where I can use my education without risking my care.
For Republicans, the rhetoric of independence rings hollow when working a full-time job disqualifies me from essential care.
The Medicaid work requirement debate misses the point entirely. The issue isn't whether people should work — it's whether the system allows disabled people to work without punishing them for it.
If policymakers are serious about promoting work, independence, and dignity, they should start by reforming rules that actively prevent such things. First, decouple Medicaid's long-term care supports from poverty requirements. Second, raise SSI's outdated asset limits. Then create tiered eligibility models that allow disabled adults to contribute while maintaining essential services.
We are not fringe cases. We are people trying to live, work, and thrive, but in a country that still hasn't figured out how to make freedom accessible.
Carlos Gamez has a master's degree in education policy and leadership from American University. He resides in Lakeland, Fla. and was recently appointed as a self-advocate member of the Florida Center for Inclusive Communities Advisory Committee.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

GOP tax and spending bill dings states that offer health care to some immigrants here legally
GOP tax and spending bill dings states that offer health care to some immigrants here legally

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

GOP tax and spending bill dings states that offer health care to some immigrants here legally

Demonstrators gather for a protest organized by the Minnesota Immigrant Rights Action Committee calling for the continuation of MinnesotaCare for undocumented adults outside of the Governor's Reception Room at the Minnesota State Capitol Tuesday, May 27, 2025. (Photo by Nicole Neri/Minnesota Reformer) The Republican budget bill the U.S. House approved last month includes a surprise for the 40 states that have expanded Medicaid: penalties for providing health care to some immigrants who are here legally. Along with punishing the 14 states that use their own funds to cover immigrants who are here illegally, analysts say last-minute changes to the bill would make it all but impossible for states to continue helping some immigrants who are in the country legally, on humanitarian parole. Under the bill, the federal government would slash funding to states that have expanded Medicaid and provide coverage to immigrants who are on humanitarian parole — immigrants who have received permission to temporarily enter the United States due to an emergency or urgent humanitarian reason. The federal government pays 90% of the cost of covering adults without children who are eligible under Medicaid expansion, but the bill would cut that to 80% for those states, doubling the state portion from 10% to 20%. That's the same penalty the bill proposes for states that use their own money to help immigrants who are here illegally. Ironically, states such as Florida that have extended Medicaid coverage to immigrants who are here on humanitarian parole but have not expanded Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act would not be harmed by the bill, said Leonardo Cuello, a Medicaid law and policy expert and research professor at the Center for Children and Families at Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy. It is 'wildly nonsensical and unfair' to penalize expansion states for covering a population that some non-expansion states, such as Florida, also cover, Cuello said. 'It would appear that the purpose is more to punish expansion states than address any genuine concern with immigrant coverage.' Republican tax bill could slash billions for Oregon Health Plan, state officials say West Virginia is one of the states where lawmakers are nervously watching U.S. Senate discussions on the proposed penalty. Republican state Rep. Matt Rohrbach, a deputy House speaker, said West Virginia legislators tabled a proposal that would have ended Medicaid expansion if the federal government reduced its share of the funding, because the state's congressional representatives assured them it wasn't going to happen. Now the future is murkier. Cuello called the proposed penalty 'basically a gun to the head of the states.' 'Congress is framing it as a choice, but the state is being coerced and really has no choice,' he said. There are about 1.3 million people in the United States on humanitarian parole, from Afghanistan, Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, Ukraine and Venezuela as well as some Central American children who have rejoined family here. The Trump administration is trying to end parole from some of those countries. A Supreme Court decision May 30 allows the administration to end humanitarian parole for about 500,000 people from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela. Not many of those parolees qualify for Medicaid, which requires a waiting period or special status, but the 40 states with expanded Medicaid could be penalized if immigrants qualify for the program, said Tanya Broder, senior counsel for health and economic justice policy at the National Immigration Law Center. It would appear that the purpose is more to punish expansion states than address any genuine concern with immigrant coverage. – Leonardo Cuello, Georgetown University research professor Meanwhile, an increasing number of states and the District of Columbia already are considering scaling back Medicaid coverage for immigrants because of the costs. The federal budget bill, named the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, is now being considered by the Senate, where changes are likely. The fact that so many states could be affected by the last-minute change could mean more scrutiny in that chamber, said Andrea Kovach, senior attorney for health care justice at the Shriver Center on Poverty Law in Chicago. By her count, at least 38 states and the District of Columbia would be affected by the new restrictions, since they accepted some options now offered by Medicaid to cover at least some humanitarian parolees without a five-year waiting period. 'They're all going to be penalized because they added in parolees,' Kovach said. 'So that's 38 times two senators who are going to be very interested in this provision to make sure their state doesn't get their reimbursement knocked down.' The change to exclude people with humanitarian parole was included in a May 21 amendment by U.S. Rep. Jodey Arrington, a Texas Republican who chairs the House budget committee. Arrington's office did not reply to a request for comment, though he has stressed the importance of withholding Medicaid from immigrants who are here illegally. '[Democrats] want to protect health care and welfare at any cost for illegal immigrants at the expense of hardworking taxpayers,' Arrington said in a May 22 floor speech urging passage of the bill. 'But by the results of this last election, it's abundantly clear: The people see through this too and they have totally rejected the Democrats' radical agenda.' Some states already are considering cutting Medicaid coverage for immigrants, though Democratic lawmakers and advocates are pushing back. Washington, D.C., Democratic Mayor Muriel Bowser has proposed phasing out a program that provides Medicaid coverage to adults regardless of their immigration status, a move she says would save the District of Columbia $457 million. Minnesota advocates protested a state budget deal reached last month with Democratic Gov. Tim Walz to phase out health care coverage for adults who are here illegally, a condition Republican lawmakers insisted on to avoid a shutdown. Similarly, Illinois advocates are protesting new state rules that will end a program that has provided Medicaid coverage to immigrants aged 42-64 regardless of their legal status. The program cost $1.6 billion over three years, according to a state audit. The state will continue a separate program that provides coverage for older adults. 'Our position is that decision-makers in Illinois shouldn't be doing Trump's work for him,' said Kovach, of the Shriver Center on Poverty Law. 'Let's preserve health coverage for immigrants and stand up for Illinois immigrant residents who have been paying taxes into this state for years and need this coverage.' Illinois state Sen. Graciela Guzmán, a Democrat whose parents are refugees from El Salvador, said many of her constituents in Chicago may be forced to cancel chemotherapy or lifesaving surgery because of the changes. 'It was a state budget, but I think the federal reconciliation bill really set the tone for it,' Guzmán said. 'In a tough fiscal environment, it was really hard to set up a defense for this program.' Oregon Democratic Gov. Tina Kotek is among the governors holding firm, saying that letting immigrants stay uninsured imposes costs on local hospitals and ends up raising prices for everyone. 'The costs will go somewhere. When everyone is insured it is much more helpful to keep costs down and reasonable for everyone. That's why we've taken this approach to give care to everyone,' Kotek said at a news conference last month. Medicaid does pay for emergency care for low-income patients, regardless of their immigration status, and that would not change under the federal budget bill. Franny White, a spokesperson for the Oregon Health Authority, said her state's Medicaid program covers about 105,000 immigrants, some of whom are here illegally. She said the policy, established by a 2021 state law, can save money in the long run. 'Uninsured people are less likely to receive preventive care due to cost and often wait until a condition worsens to the point that it requires more advanced, expensive care at an emergency department or hospital,' she said. California was among the first states, along with Oregon, to offer health insurance to immigrants of all ages regardless of their legal status. But it now is considering cutting back, looking to save $5 billion as it seeks to close a $12 billion budget deficit. In May, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom proposed freezing enrollment of immigrant adults who are here illegally, and charging them premiums to save money. 'It's possible that other states will decide to cut back these services because of budgetary concerns,' said Drishti Pillai, director of immigrant health policy at KFF, a health policy research organization. If the federal budget bill passes with the immigrant health care provision intact, states would have more than two years to adjust, since the changes would not take effect until October 2027. 'We have time to really understand what the landscape looks like and really create a legal argument to make sure folks are able to maintain their health care coverage,' said Enddy Almonord, director for Healthy Illinois, an advocacy group supporting universal health care coverage. Stateline, like the Capital Chronicle, is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Stateline maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Scott S. Greenberger for questions: info@

Ministers share 'same frustrations' over Gaza war as protesters, says Wes Streeting
Ministers share 'same frustrations' over Gaza war as protesters, says Wes Streeting

Yahoo

time22 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Ministers share 'same frustrations' over Gaza war as protesters, says Wes Streeting

Ministers share the "same frustrations" over the Gaza war as protesters, Wes Streeting has said. The health secretary said Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer and Foreign Secretary David Lammy are "working intensively" with international allies to try to bring the conflict to an end. This includes the return of Israeli hostages from Gaza and a ceasefire - "and crucially, the establishment of an independent Palestinian state", he said. Politics latest: Mr Streeting added: "Those of us who are in positions of power in government share all the same frustrations that the people who are marching on the streets because we want to see an end to this conflict, we want to see peace for Israelis and for Palestinians, and we want to see justice and statehood for the Palestinian people." He called the situation in the coastal territory "a horror show" and said the UK is working with international allies to try to get more aid into Gaza. But, he said international leaders have not "delivered the results that we want to see". On whether Israel is committing genocide, Mr Streeting said: "That's a question for international courts to weigh up. "Whether or not we use that term and whether or not the courts make that judgment doesn't alter the fact that we can see with our own eyes - that innocent children are dying in great numbers. "They are either starving or they are being bombed. And it's not just children, it's other innocent civilians, it's civilian infrastructure." Read more:Hundreds of thousands in Gaza 'catastrophically food insecure' A new was paused on Wednesday and part of Thursday after dozens of Palestinians were killed as they attempted to collect aid in southern Gaza on Tuesday. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation reopened two distribution sites on Thursday as the UN warned most of Gaza's 2.3m population is at risk of famine after the 11-week Israeli blockade. Data collected by the UN from humanitarian groups found the rate of young children suffering from acute malnutrition in Gaza has nearly tripled since a ceasefire earlier this year when aid flowed more freely than it is now. Around 5.8% out of nearly 50,000 children under five screened in the second half of May were diagnosed with acute malnutrition. This was up from 4.7% in early May and nearly three times the rate in February during a pause in fighting in the 20-month war between Israel and Hamas. Also on Thursday, Israel announced it had recovered the bodies of two dual-nationality Israeli-American hostages in their 70s, Gadi Hagi and his wife Judy Weinstein-Hagi, who were killed in Hamas' 7 October attack then taken to Gaza. At least 20 Palestinians were killed in Israeli strikes across Gaza on Thursday, including four journalists in a hospital, the Hamas-run local health authority said.

Texas Republican on deficit spending in GOP bill: ‘It's not a perfect world'
Texas Republican on deficit spending in GOP bill: ‘It's not a perfect world'

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Texas Republican on deficit spending in GOP bill: ‘It's not a perfect world'

Rep. Pete Sessions (R-Texas) lamented the deficit spending in the GOP's 'big, beautiful' spending package, but framed the issue as a necessary compromise to avoid having to negotiate with Democrats. 'I don't want to have any deficit spending. But what I'm trying to suggest to you is that we are stuck in a paradigm where we have to pass this ourselves,' Sessions told CNN's John Berman in an interview Thursday morning. The Texas Republican said he conceded on demands from a handful of Republicans representing blue-leaning states who pushed to raise the cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions, adding, 'It's a balance there.' 'What we're trying to do is balance out where the American people get jobs and job creation. We really don't want to see people just leave these blue states because of taxes that they can't afford their property,' Sessions said. 'So, it is not a perfect world, John.' He also pointed out that if the sprawling legislative agenda is not passed through the reconciliation process, then Republicans would have to turn to Democrats — which, Sessions argued, would not necessarily reduce deficit spending but would mean less of Trump's agenda could make it through Congress. 'The bottom line is, is that this has to come together as a piece of legislation. You see, John, if we do not pass our one big, beautiful bill, then we negotiate with Democrats, essentially nine Democrats, that simply raises spending to get us where we get the tax cuts that we save them, where they ought to be,' the GOP lawmaker said. 'So it is, no question about it, not a perfect battle for Republicans,' he added. The interview comes amid criticism from tech billionaire Elon Musk that has slowed momentum in the Senate on the bill. The Congressional Budget Office on Wednesday projected that the 1,116-page House passed bill would add $2.4 trillion to the deficit over the next decade.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store