Concern over plans to remove Rayleigh football pitches
A plan to remove football pitches from leisure centres in south Essex has drawn complaints from families and club leaders.Rochford Council and its leisure centre operator, Everyone Active, was looking at replacing sports pitches with padel courts, with one councillor describing the move as "anti-football", The Local Democracy Reporting Service said. Padel has risen in popularity in recent times and described as a more accessible version of tennis which is played with stringless racquets on smaller courts.Everyone Active said the decision pre-dated its appointment as leisure centre operator. The council has been approached for comment.
Several local football clubs were working on a petition against the plans.Richard Southwood, who runs the Football Fun Factory in Rayleigh, Hockley and Southend said that parents were concerned about the impact of removing pitches."This would have a massive impact on the children," he said."If they remove the pitches there will be nowhere for these children to go and play football."Rayleigh Leisure Centre is the only place children and people can play in the area. We are trying to inspire the next generation of football players."Danielle Belton, the leader of the Conservative group on Rochford Council, said: "The football community in the area is huge. "It's not just about football. The parents get a lot out of it and can go shopping, to the gym or for a coffee. There is a feeling the council is anti-football".However, Lisa Newport, chair of the council's communities, wellbeing and housing committee said no decisions had been made about replacing the football pitches at Rayleigh Leisure Centre.An Everyone Active spokesperson said: "Plans for the padel courts were in the council's original management tender when selecting a new operator and was not an Everyone Active decision."
Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scotsman
27-05-2025
- Scotsman
Why today's culture warriors are marching to same beat as 1930s fascists
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... I'm probably the world's worst Aberdeen FC fan. When I lived in the city for five years, I didn't go to see them once and have been to perhaps half a dozen games in my lifetime, an average of one for every decade. When I belatedly remembered it was the Scottish Cup final on Saturday afternoon, I checked to see the score and watched the last 10 minutes of normal time. I was mildly pleased that the Dons won in the end. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However the thing that struck me most was something I didn't quite like: the 'togetherness' of the crowd, the sea of red in the Aberdeen end and of green and white in the Celtic one. It felt like they were surrendering their individuality a little too enthusiastically. Oswald Mosley, leader of the British Union of Fascists, inspects a parade of supporters before calling off a march through London's East End in 1936 (Picture: Becker/Fox Photos) | Getty Images A loss of confidence Now, I realise that social togetherness is often a good thing, but there's a nasty side to it too. And in politics and society in general, it feels like 'identitarian' ideas are on the rise, as if people have lost confidence in themselves as individuals and increasingly see life through a clannish, tribal lens. There's safety in numbers, or so they say. It can be seen in an appalling remark by a member of Northern Irish rap band Kneecap at a 2023 gig – 'The only good Tory is a dead Tory. Kill your local MP' – and in the social media call by Lucy Connolly, a Conservative councillor's wife, for 'mass deportations' and for people to 'set fire' to 'all the hotels' containing those she wanted to deport, following the murders of three young girls in Southport last year. Connolly recently lost her appeal against a 31-month prison sentence for inciting racial hatred and police are currently considering the Kneecap rapper's comment. The band later offered their 'heartfelt apologies' to the families of murdered MPs David Ames and Jo Cox, saying they rejected 'any suggestion that we would seek to incite violence against any MP or individual' and that 'an extract of footage, deliberately taken out of all context, is now being exploited and weaponised, as if it were a call to action'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Nothing to do with Southport murders However, in of themselves, the remarks strip members of a particular group – Conservatives or asylum seekers – of their right to be treated as an individual. In Connolly's mind, when she posted on social media on the day of the murders, the actions of a single person justified the collective punishment of countless others, from a number of different countries, who had nothing at all to do with the Southport murders. Whatever the moronic, metaphorical Kneecapper's intended meaning, the words 'the only good Tory is a dead Tory' paint Conservatives as so irredeemably evil that they deserve the ultimate punishment, rather than people who could be won over by reasoned argument. A cultural tsunami I disagreed with the late, great Scotsman journalist Bill Jamieson on a number of issues, but he was always thoughtful, often entertaining and both interesting and interested in other people's ideas. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad In 2018, in an article bemoaning the politicisation of gender, sexuality and identity, he wondered why his 'self-identification as 'Bill' is not sufficient declaration of 'who I am'' and, jokingly, whether LGBT would eventually become 'LGBTTTQQIAA'. 'To draw a line against this is nothing to do with a rejection of male or female homosexuality, but resistance to a politicisation that is deeply divisive and corrosive of individual privacy,' he wrote. '... with the cultural tsunami now breaking around us, who will stand in the way of it? And in this rush to self-identification with public labels and initials, how may we be more certain, or less, of who we really are within?' This 'cultural tsunami' is not just about gender, with concepts of race and nationality – which are not real things but ideas invented by humans – seemingly becoming more important to many people's sense of themselves and of others. The importance of 'I' To me, an excessive focus on shared identity, as opposed to individual identity, is almost bound to lead humanity in a dangerous direction. In Sarah Bakewell's excellent book, How to Live: A Life of Montaigne in One Question and Twenty Attempts at an Answer, she writes about how Leonard Woolf, husband of writer Virginia Woolf, was 'much affected' by the 16th-century French philosopher's essay, On Cruelty. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad After reading it, he remembered being asked as a young boy in the late 19th century to drown some day-old puppies. 'I put one of them in the bucket of water, and instantly an extraordinary, a terrible thing happened. This blind, amorphous thing began to fight desperately for its life... I suddenly saw that it was an individual, that like me it was an 'I', that in its bucket of water it was experiencing what I would experience and fighting death, as I would fight death if I were drowning...' Bakewell wrote that Woolf 'went on to apply the insight to politics, reflecting especially on his memory of the 1930s, when the world seemed about to sink into a barbarism that made no room for this small individual self... On a global scale, no single creature can be of much importance, he wrote, yet in another way these 'I's are the only things of importance. And only a politics that recognises them can offer hope for the future.' Today's culture warriors, on the right and the left, appear to be marching to a similar beat to those 1930s fascists. Their chosen collective identity is something sacred to them and anyone who criticises it or appears to be in opposition to it is considered an enemy.
Leader Live
12-05-2025
- Leader Live
Phil Parkinson could be set to receive Freedom of Wrexham
The Wrexham AFC manager could be granted freedom of the county borough, following the club's historic back-to-back-to-back promotions. Parkinson joined the club in 2021 and has overseen a meteoric rise from the National League to the Championship. At a meeting on Tuesday (May 13), the Executive Board will consider recommending to full Council that Parkinson is granted the honour, after steering the club to promotion over three successive seasons. If the board agrees, the recommendations will then be considered at a later meeting of full Council, which includes all 56 councillors from across the county borough. Parkinson would join Reds co-owners Rob McElhenney and Ryan Reynolds in having the Freedom of Wrexham, who were granted the privilege in 2022. MOST READ: Leader of the Council, Councillor Mark Pritchard, said: 'In 2022 the council granted freedom of the county borough to the club's owners, Rob McElhenney and Ryan Reynolds. 'It now seems fitting to have a similar discussion about granting the same honour to Phil Parkinson, as he's done an incredible job in taking the team from National League to Championship football over the past three seasons. 'What the club has achieved is phenomenal – not just in terms of success on the pitch, but also in terms of the knock-on effect for the city as a whole. It's given Wrexham renewed confidence.'
Daily Mail
05-05-2025
- Daily Mail
Membership fees to join the exclusive cricket club that owns Lord's could soar to £100,000 under plans to turn the 238-year-old club into a public limited company
It's famed for extremely pricey membership fees... and a long waiting list to match. Now new members of Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC) – the institution which owns the world famous Lord's ground – could find themselves paying £100,000 to join. Plans are under way to turn the 238-year-old club into a public limited company, in one of the most significant changes in its history. Under the proposals, which will be raised at the club's AGM on Wednesday, the existing 18,500 members would become shareholders of 'Lord's plc', with each share estimated to be worth between £50,000 and £100,000. Shares put up for sale would be offered to associate members and those on the waiting list, or could be left to a relative in a will. If nobody took up the offer, the share would then be made available to members of the public, according to the Sunday Times. All members would also be given a designated seat at the ground in north London – dubbed the home of English cricket – for the first time, a privilege currently reserved for those aged over 75 having had a membership for at least 30 years. But any decision would require the overwhelming majority of its members to agree in order to bring about the changes. Robert Griffiths KC, a former chairman of MCC's laws and development committees and an adviser for the group proposing the new scheme, said: 'MCC's official and constant refrain to its members has been that this is their club and their subscription gives them all the rights and privileges of ownership of the most prestigious cricket ground in the world. That is just marketing hype. It is a chimera, a fiction. 'As presently constituted, members have no proprietary or contractual rights in either the club or the ground. These ingenious proposals would change all that.' Next year the historic stadium will host its maiden women's test match, exactly 50 years since an England women's team first played on the ground. Members typically have to spend around 30 years on a waiting list before being able to join, paying an annual subscription of up to £700 depending on their age and where they live. Existing members include former Conservative prime ministers Sir John Major, David Cameron and Theresa May, as well as broadcaster Sir Stephen Fry and Rolling Stones frontman Sir Mick Jagger.
