His and hers outfit ideas from £34 that take inspo from celeb couples
If you're looking for some fashion inspiration of how to match with your partner this summer, we've rounded up the best his and hers outfit ideas from £34
If you're searching for stylish summer pieces for both you and your other half, you're in the right place. From city breaks to seaside escapes, or even just dressing up for garden parties, these pieces find the perfect balance between comfort and versatility. Think easy layers, breathable fabrics, and outfits that look just as good together as they do on their own.
Whether it's a relaxed jumpsuit or a practical gilet, we've rounded up the very best his and hers finds to refresh your warm-weather wardrobe.
Shop our favorite matching-but-not-too-matchy looks from Columbia and FatFace starting from £34.
FATFACE
If you're looking for something that will make a statement, this his and her look will have you turning heads at every summer party. This men's swirl embroidered shirt, made from a breathable blend of cotton and linen, is a good way to add personality to your warm-weather wardrobe.
Pair it with cargo shorts for a practical edge, and finish the look with a pair of classic sunnies. For her, the teal blue jumpsuit is effortlessly eye-catching. Made from 100% viscose, it's lightweight, easy to wear, and the flattering silhouette makes it a go-to for everything from garden parties to beachside dinners.
If you're dressing up for a summer event, FatFace has you and your partner covered with looks that are the perfect balance between smart and seasonal. For him, this 100% cotton blazer is soft, breathable, and ideal for layering on warmer days. Pair it with the classic Oxford shirt that can be worn solo or under the blazer for a more refined finish.
For her, this striped midi dress, also 100% cotton, is perfect for golden-hour evenings. Add the shell earrings for a playful twist that still feels effortlessly chic.
COLUMBIA
When it comes to holiday dressing, practical doesn't mean it also has to be boring. This men's gilet has that balance; it is lightweight, functional, and stylish enough to throw over a simple white tee and trousers for an easy warm-weather look.
For her, the relaxed-fit beach windbreaker is a summer essential, especially for those breezy coastal walks or unpredictable weather days. Pair it with the Cove beach skirt for an effortlessly put-together outfit that's as chic as it is comfortable.
CREW CLOTHING
Channel your favourite celebrity couples like Victoria and David or Justin and Hailey by opting for similar but not matching looks. These linen shirts from Crew perfectly compliment each other without feeling like too much. Keep it simple and classy by teaming white chinos for him and a white cotton skirt for her.
JOULES
Polo shirts, patterned trousers and shift dresses are all over Joules' summer drop and we're loving it. Playing into that popular British countryside look but wiht a fun warm-weather twist, Joules has perfect outfits for both him and her.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
19 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Inside the trailer park house-flipping phenomenon that is earning Americans big bucks
Up to 21 million Americans live in manufactured homes, also known as mobile homes and trailers, and savvy buyers are cashing in on demand for these tiny homes to make big bucks. Byron Sellers, 39, of Tampa, said he has seen an increase in mobile home owners since he started flipping homes in 2018. 'It is cheaper,' he told 'Lots of people are being pushed out (of the main housing market).' Victoria, of New York City, who asked to go by her first name, agreed. She rents her Upstate New York and New Jersey mobile homes for $1,350 a month. That price, for a three bedroom, one bathroom home, is steeply cheaper than even studio rentals in the metropolitan area. 'Everybody wants a mobile home,' she told 'You can even move it.' Both Byron and Victoria got started in the industry after they realized how expensive flipping residential homes was and how much more cost effective trailers are. Byron started flipping homes near the Chicago area after he lost his job in 2016. He and his wife bought their first two mobile homes in March 2018 for a joint price of $4,300 in a trailer park. Within 45 days, their ready-to-live-in trailer sold for $9,500. After putting in $3,000 of renovations into the second one, it sold for $10,000, Byron told Some trailers, they've gotten even cheaper than that. 'I've gotten some for free,' Byron revealed. Since starting their business, they've made a low six figures from flipping homes alone, Byron said. Another $400,000 from mobile home parks and their equity in them. And another $40,000 teaching others how to do what they do. The reason Bryon and his wife, Sharnice, migrated into the mobile home market was because the former had wanted to get into real estate for a long time, but multi-family homes were largely outside his budget. He first heard of mobile home flipping while driving for a rideshare company and listening to a podcast to pass the time. He shared it with Sharnice and the rest is history. Victoria agreed that sometimes landlords are just want something to move fast, so they'll hand it off for free. So far, the New York mogul has gotten two mobile homes for free. Victoria has made around $80,000 doing the same, and put roughly $30,000 into the renovations of her seven homes - three of which she still owns and rents out. Victoria says she sees a lot of Latinos snapping up hers and they're mainly upper lower and middle class families. Meanwhile Byron and Sharnice have found that many of their buyers are usually within the $20,000 to $40,000 salary range, typically between the ages of 30 and 69 and are white or Hispanic. 'You have a bigger buyer pool of cash buyers,' Byron told But not every mobile home is a steal. Since moving to Tampa, Byron has seen some trailers for the prices of starter homes. And some parks even have pools, pickleball courts, and convenience stores. Those areas, however, are typically geared toward those in retirement and typically go more than $100,000. Even without those perks, living in a mobile home can be a cost-effective strategy for those pinching pennies but looking for an affordable home solution. Trailers typically run for $50,000 to $100,000 cheaper than a traditional home, Byron said, and there are no Homeowner Association fees to pay. After purchasing the home, if buyers live in a park, they will have to pay to lease the land. On top of that, mobile homes are classified as property, like cars are, so insurance prices and property taxes are much lower than standard homes. However, unlike homes, they don't retain their value. But for those willing to invest time and money into renovating them, they can make plenty of money doing it. They 'don't depreciate' as much as people might warn you, Victoria told Byron recently acquired a trailer for around $85,000, after fixing the septic tank and putting in $40,000 of work into it, he and his wife sold it for $212,000. Another one, which was move-in-ready, he spent $200 for a cleaning crew and turned the property around and sold it for $7,000. He got the trailer for free as someone was being evicted, he said. On average he puts anywhere between $3,000 to $20,000 into the renovation and hopes to sell it for three times the price he put into it. Since moving to Tampa, as it is a harder market, the couple hopes to net at least 50 percent more than what they paid. 'After the hurricanes, it's harder,' Byron told 'The market has slowed down.' However, people are 'still buying' and he doesn't foresee the market ever becoming obsolete. 'It's a niche market,' he admitted. 'I just see the future of them. People are going to need affordable housing.' The most Victoria has ever spent on a renovation was $6,000, spending less than that on average. When she redoes a home, she focuses on the bathroom and kitchen, as she says those are the most eye-catching to potential buyers.
Western Telegraph
34 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Minister says AI ‘does lie' but defends Government amid copyright row
Peter Kyle acknowledged the technology was 'not flawless' as he insisted the Government would 'never sell downstream' the rights of artists in the UK. He also said he had 'mistakenly' said his preferred option on AI and copyright was requiring rights-holders to 'opt out' of their material being used by tech companies, and had since 'gone back to the drawing board'. Ministers have faced a backlash from major figures in the creative industries over their approach to copyright, with Sir Elton John this week describing the situation as an 'existential issue.' The Government is locked in a standoff with the House of Lords, which has demanded artists to be offered immediate copyright protection as an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill. Peers have attempted to change the legislation by adding a commitment to introduce transparency requirements aimed at ensuring rights-holders are able to see when their work has been used and by whom. Asked about the risk of AI producing unreliable information, Mr Kyle said 'people need to understand that AI is not flawless, and that AI does lie because it's based on human characteristics'. 'Now it is getting more precise as we move forward. It's getting more powerful as we move forward,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips. 'But as with every single technology that comes into society, you can only safely use it and wisely use it by understanding how it works.' He added: 'We are going to legislate for AI going forward and we're going to balance it with the same legislation that we'll bring in to modernise the copyright legislation as well.' Hundreds of stars including Sir Elton John have urged the Government to strengthen protections for artists (PA) The Government has said it will address copyright issues as a whole after the more than 11,500 responses to its consultation on the impact of AI have been reviewed, rather than in what it has branded 'piecemeal' legislation. Among the proposals had been a suggestion that tech companies could be given free access to British music, films, books in order to train AI models without permission or payment, with artists required to 'opt-out' if they do not want their work to be used. Asked about the prospect of an opt-out clause, Mr Kyle told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'I always had on the table from the outset an opt-out clause. 'But I mistakenly said this was my preferred option that had more prominence than perhaps some of the creatives wanted it to have, and I've now sort of gone back to the drawing board on that, because I am listening to what people want.' Last month hundreds of stars including Sir Elton, Sir Paul McCartney and Kate Bush signed a joint letter to Sir Keir Starmer urging the Prime Minister to introduce safeguards against work being plundered for free.
South Wales Argus
35 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Minister says AI ‘does lie' but defends Government amid copyright row
Peter Kyle acknowledged the technology was 'not flawless' as he insisted the Government would 'never sell downstream' the rights of artists in the UK. He also said he had 'mistakenly' said his preferred option on AI and copyright was requiring rights-holders to 'opt out' of their material being used by tech companies, and had since 'gone back to the drawing board'. Ministers have faced a backlash from major figures in the creative industries over their approach to copyright, with Sir Elton John this week describing the situation as an 'existential issue.' The Government is locked in a standoff with the House of Lords, which has demanded artists to be offered immediate copyright protection as an amendment to the Data (Use and Access) Bill. Peers have attempted to change the legislation by adding a commitment to introduce transparency requirements aimed at ensuring rights-holders are able to see when their work has been used and by whom. Asked about the risk of AI producing unreliable information, Mr Kyle said 'people need to understand that AI is not flawless, and that AI does lie because it's based on human characteristics'. 'Now it is getting more precise as we move forward. It's getting more powerful as we move forward,' he told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips. 'But as with every single technology that comes into society, you can only safely use it and wisely use it by understanding how it works.' He added: 'We are going to legislate for AI going forward and we're going to balance it with the same legislation that we'll bring in to modernise the copyright legislation as well.' Hundreds of stars including Sir Elton John have urged the Government to strengthen protections for artists (PA) The Government has said it will address copyright issues as a whole after the more than 11,500 responses to its consultation on the impact of AI have been reviewed, rather than in what it has branded 'piecemeal' legislation. Among the proposals had been a suggestion that tech companies could be given free access to British music, films, books in order to train AI models without permission or payment, with artists required to 'opt-out' if they do not want their work to be used. Asked about the prospect of an opt-out clause, Mr Kyle told the BBC's Sunday With Laura Kuenssberg programme: 'I always had on the table from the outset an opt-out clause. 'But I mistakenly said this was my preferred option that had more prominence than perhaps some of the creatives wanted it to have, and I've now sort of gone back to the drawing board on that, because I am listening to what people want.' Last month hundreds of stars including Sir Elton, Sir Paul McCartney and Kate Bush signed a joint letter to Sir Keir Starmer urging the Prime Minister to introduce safeguards against work being plundered for free.
