House staffers can't have WhatsApp on their devices
The House of Representatives has banned staff members from using WhatsApp on government devices, according to a report from Axios. In an email viewed by the outlet, the House's chief administrative officer (CAO) tells staffers that the Office of Cybersecurity 'has deemed WhatsApp a high-risk' because of a 'lack of transparency in how it protects user data, absence of stored data encryption, and potential security risks.'
The email says that congressional staff members can't download or use the mobile, desktop, or web browser version of WhatsApp on any government device. 'If you have a WhatsApp application on your House-managed device, you will be contacted to remove it,' the email reads.
Meta communications director Andy Stone pushed back against the decision in a post on X, saying the company disagrees with the CAO's characterization of WhatsApp 'in the strongest possible terms.' Stone adds that messages on WhatsApp are end-to-end encrypted by default, meaning third parties — not even Meta, which owns the platform — can read them. 'This is a higher level of security than most of the apps on the CAO's approved list that do not offer that protection,' Stone writes.
As noted by The Guardian, the CAO's message to staff recommended that they use other apps for communications instead, such as Microsoft Teams, Signal, iMessage, FaceTime, or the Amazon-owned messaging service Wickr. The CAO didn't immediately respond to The Verge's request for more information.
WhatsApp isn't the only app not allowed by the House. It has also banned TikTok on government devices and put restrictions on the use of the free version of ChatGPT.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
8 minutes ago
- Fox News
Charlamagne says Dems 'sound like hypocrites' for demanding congressional approval for strikes
Radio host Charlamagne tha God called out Democrats on Monday for their outrage about President Donald Trump launching strikes on Iran without congressional authority, saying they turned a blind eye when Democrats recently did the same. The U.S. launched a surprise strike using B-2 stealth bombers on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear facilities on Saturday. "All three sites sustained extremely severe damage and destruction," Joint Chiefs Chairman Air Force Gen. Dan Caine said during a briefing at the Pentagon on Sunday morning. Sen. Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., called out Trump for the strikes during a Sunday appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press," arguing the head of state should have begun the process by first "coming to Congress and asking for authorization to do this." He continued, "That's the constitutional approach to this. He could have talked to us about what the goal is and what the plan is ahead of time. And we could have had a discussion about it." Charlamagne agreed, but argued Democrats like Kelly should look in the mirror. "Morgyn, this is one of those times when politicians sound like hypocrites, because Mark Kelly is right, the president should get congressional approval," he said about the national war powers debate. "But there have been a bunch of presidents who have ordered strikes without congressional approval." "Barack Obama did it against Libya. Joe Biden ordered strikes in Iraq and Syria without congressional approval. Bill Clinton did it with - 'Kosovo' I think you pronounce it?" he recalled. "So presidents ordering military action without congressional approval has become pretty routine." Co-host Morgyn V. Wood noted that this issue is now being cited for possible impeachment. "So why didn't it lead to an impeachment for everybody else? Like, when Barack Obama did it, when Biden did it, when Clinton did it?" Charlamagne asked. Wood said that there have been calls for impeachment over presidents' military actions without congressional approval before, but Charlamagne was not persuaded. "I don't even remember hearing about it during the Joe Biden administration," Charlamagne said. "I guess that's just because of the way Trump has been moving," co-host DJ Envy said. "But we didn't hear about it when Obama did it. We didn't hear about it when Biden did it." "I do remember when Obama did it," Charlamagne said. "When Obama did it, I do remember, you know, people in Congress saying he needed congressional approval, and they were making it a thing. I don't remember the Biden thing at all. I don't remember that even making a headline." After Wood recalled the widespread outrage over Biden's botched withdrawal from Afghanistan, Charlamagne said he recalled Biden's lack of accountability for military missteps after an NBC News piece headlined, "Presidents' ordering military action without Congress' approval has become routine."
Wall Street Journal
13 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
TikTok and the Decline of Congress
President Trump last week granted TikTok a third reprieve from Congress's statutory ban on the popular Chinese-owned app. Talk about sending a bad signal to Beijing about the rule of law and national security. A large bipartisan majority of Congress last spring passed the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act after years of hearings about TikTok's national-security risks. The platform vacuums loads of data on Americans, and its algorithms promote content that spreads American division while downplaying news that offends the Chinese Communist Party.
Politico
18 minutes ago
- Politico
Senate war powers vote coming this week
President Donald Trump already had Republicans scrambling to get their 'big, beautiful bill' to his desk by next week. Now he's got Congress grappling with something even bigger: the aftermath of his airstrikes on Iran. The issue could come to a head with a vote as soon as this week. Sen. Tim Kaine's (D-Va.) resolution requiring congressional approval for military action in Iran ripens Friday but is expected to be on the floor sooner with the megabill set to eat up the back half of the week. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is pushing to move up the vote. He's urging his party to support the measure, but Democrats expect to lose the vote of Sen. John Fetterman (Pa.). On the GOP side, keep an eye on Sens. Rand Paul (Ky.) and Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), who said Sunday on X 'Congress alone' has the power to authorize war. Lawmakers in both chambers are set to receive briefings Tuesday on the situation in Iran; they were on the books before the strikes. In the House, Reps. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) and Ro Khanna's (D-Calif.) war powers resolution, which would block U.S. involvement in Iran, will not ripen until next week. But House GOP leadership is considering getting ahead of that: Speaker Mike Johnson could move this week to kill the effort with language getting rid of the privileged nature of the resolution, according to a person granted anonymity to relay the private discussions. Trump and GOP leaders are moving to unify the rank-and-file behind Trump's decision to strike, even as Trump openly muses about pursuing regime change in Iran. Take note of Trump's renewed attacks on Massie — a person familiar with the conversations who was granted anonymity to discuss them tells POLITICO it's part of an effort to keep members in line. Adding to the chaos for Republicans is Trump's Sunday evening musing about pursuing 'regime change' in Iran if its current leaders can't 'MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN.' 'This is not America First folks,' Massie said in response to Trump's Truth Social post. House Democrats are less unified. Most are questioning the constitutionality of the strike, but the party is split on where to go from there. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.) has brought up impeachment. Others, like Rep. Steny Hoyer (Md.), were more supportive of the strike. That could be a problem for Democrats trying to strengthen their opposition. The top Democrats on Foreign Affairs, Intelligence and Armed Services are drafting their own resolution in response to the strikes, according to a person granted anonymity to discuss the plan. There are likely a handful of pro-Israel Democrats who will vote against any war powers resolution. Even if the bill makes it to a House floor vote there likely won't be enough Republicans. What else we're watching: — Megabill's big week: Republicans will hold a closed-door meeting Monday night after votes for leadership to update members on the GOP megabill and its outstanding issues. Full bill text could land Monday, though it may also slip. While the 'big, beautiful bill' could hit the floor as soon as Wednesday, Thursday is looking more likely. — First Dem oversight vote: House Democrats' steering committee will vote this evening on who should be the party's leader on the Oversight Committee, followed by a full caucus vote Tuesday. California Rep. Robert Garcia, 47, is seen as the favorite in a field split along generational lines. He's running against Reps. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, 44; Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, 76; and Stephen Lynch of Massachusetts, 70. — Slashes to GAO funding: House Republican appropriators are proposing to cut funding for the Government Accountability Office by nearly half. It's the latest in a series of flash points between the GOP and the watchdog agency, which has been involved in clashes this year over DOGE, regulatory rollbacks and Trump's incursions into the power of the purse. Meredith Lee Hill, Jordain Carney, Nicholas Wu and Katherine Tully-McManus contributed to this report.
